• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Circular on foreign electronic confirmation of export

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Circular on foreign electronic confirmation of export"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

As per: July 14, 2015 | All contributions are made to the best of our knowledge | No liability is assumed for the content | © KÜFFNER MAUNZ LANGER ZUGMAIER

2.1 In General, the export declaration has to be lodged at the place where the goods are packed or loaded for expo rt shipment. If the taxable person packs or loads the goods for export shipment in Germany, the export declaration has to be lodged in Germany. The place of supply for the export supply of goods as regards VAT would also be in Germany.

If the goods are dispatched in Germany but packed or load- ed for export shipment in another EU member state, the place of supply for VAT purposes, (pursuant to sec. 3 pa- ra. 6 sentence 1 of the German VAT Act), is different to the place of packing or loading for export shipment. Of course, this only holds true if the customer outside the EU is a lready known at the time of dispatch and the goods are not pr o- cessed within the EU. Otherwise, there would be no export supply of goods taxable in Germany, rather only a self - supply from Germany to the EU member state in which the goods are processed.

Circular on foreign electronic confirmation of export

1. Current status

Exports with a value exceeding EUR 1,000 have to be declared electronically via web-portal (IAA-Plus) or via ATLAS. In such cases, sec. 10 para. 1 sentence 1 No. 1 of the German VAT Implementation Code stipulates that the electronic confirmation of export is the only acceptable proof of export for VAT purposes. Quite often, taxable pe r- sons perform export supplies of goods which are taxable in Germany, but which also require customs clearance for export in another EU member state. Until now, it has been unclear if and under which preconditions the German tax authorities would accept the confirmation of export issued by customs authorities of other EU member states.

2. Typical cases

In practice, the place of supply, as regards VAT, usually deviates from the place significant for customs purposes in the following cases:

Proper proof of export – acceptance of foreign electronic confirmation of export

Taxable persons are in need of a proper proof of export for zero-rated export supplies of goods. To date, the only admissible proof of export for export declarations filed electronically (via ATLAS), has been an electronic confir- mation of export. However, on 19 June 2015 the German Federal Ministry of Finance issued a circular, commenting on the preconditions on the basis of which the German tax authorities will accept, for VAT purposes, an electronic proof of export issued by customs authorities of another EU member state.

KMLZ VAT

NEWSLETTER

17 | 2015

(2)

As per: July 14, 2015 | All contributions are made to the best of our knowledge | No liability is assumed for the content | © KÜFFNER MAUNZ LANGER ZUGMAIER

with the reservation that complete documentation is avail a- ble evidencing that the goods have indeed been exported. In particular, these reservations are important in circumstances where the customs authorities of the other EU member state only issue an electronic message confirming the proper termination of the export procedure rather than also provid- ing a document of confirmation as a PDF file. In this case, the following additional preconditions have to be fulfilled:

 proof that the goods physically left the EU must be provided, as evidenced by the electronic message issued by the foreign customs authorities;

 documentary evidence must be made available by the taxable person of the receipt of the electronic message issued by the foreign customs authorities;

 documentary evidence of the link between the elec- tronic message issued by the foreign customs au- thorities and the relevant export declaration must be available; and

 there must be no doubt that the goods left the EU in the correct manner.

4. Practical impact

The clarification by the Federal Ministry of Finance and the acceptance of the confirmations of export issued by foreign customs authorities are very welcome developments. A f- fected taxable persons should immediately safeguard that all electronic messages received from foreign customs a u- thorities are being properly archived. For those not receiving confirmations as PDF files, steps should be taken to ensure that the additional preconditions are being fulfilled for the acceptance of such messages and that these doc uments are being meticulously archived.

For instance: A German taxable person supplies plant com- ponents to a customer in Brazil. For logistical reasons the plant components are packed in boxes for export by a su b- contractor at the port of Rotterdam.

2.2 If the value of the export does not exceed EUR 3,000, a simplified declaration procedure may be used. Using this simplified procedure means that no export declaration has to be lodged at the German customs authorities. It is sufficient to lodge an electronic declaration at the customs authorities of the EU member state where the goods will leave the customs territory of the EU. As regards VAT, the place of supply would be the place from which the goods are di s- patched, (sec. 3 para. 6 sentence 1 of the German VAT Act), whereas the consignment would be customs cleared for export in another EU member state.

2.3 In addition, under certain preconditions, Article 791 of the CCIC allows customs to clear goods for export at a customs office which is not competent for the place where the taxable person is established or where the goods are packed or loaded for export. This would be the case, for instance, if the destination of the goods was changed du ring transport and the new destination was outside the EU. In such a case, it would also be sufficient to lodge an export declaration directly at the customs office located on the border.

3. New provision

By issuing the new circular, the Federal Ministry of Finance has indicated its approval, in general, of electronic confi rma- tions of export issued by other EU member states as being acceptable for VAT purposes. Such proof is to be accepted

KÜFFNER MAUNZ LANGER ZUGMAIER Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH | Unterer Anger 3 | D -80331 Munich Tel.: +49 (0) 89 / 217 50 12 – 20 | Fax: +49 (0) 89 / 217 50 12 – 99 | www.kmlz.de | office@kmlz.de

Contact: Dr. Christian Salder Lawyer, Certified tax consultant Phone: +49 (0)89 / 217 50 12 - 85 christian.salder@kmlz.de

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

(2013) recently reported Gonatodes vitta- tus from Guyana, northern South America, on the basis of six museum specimens from two localities: Georgetown (capital city),

the active structural policy is based on a conception of growth oriented towards the world market and emphasizing new technology - a strategy which corresponds to

This article focuses on the institutional and political (re)actions of the EU to the Russian disinformation campaign against the European Union member states and Eastern

In a general equilibrium model with heterogeneous firms we show analytically that a fall in variable offshoring costs boosts trade in differentiated final goods through

This classification was based on previous jurisprudence of the Federal Fiscal Court, according to which the transfer of a co- ownership share was always to be

It may be advantageous to structure variable compensation in such a way that the 10% limit is not reached and the supervisory board member is therefore not a taxable person: In

If the procured service, which is deemed to have been carried out to the undisclosed agent, is VAT-exempt, the question arises as to the VAT liability of the undisclosed

According to the Federal Ministry of Finance Circular, the declaration has to be filed by the public body itself through a legal representative or by an authorized