• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Periodontal Diseases and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Periodontal Diseases and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: "

Copied!
7
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Periodontal Diseases and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes:

Review of Two Decades of Clinical Research

Zocko Ange Désiré Pockpa

a

/ Assem Soueidan

b

/ Nadin Thérèse Koffi-Coulibaly

c

/ Alexandre Limam

d

/ Zahi Badran

e

/ Xavier Struillou

f

Purpose:The aim of this study was to review the literature and chart the clinical studies that have focused on peri- odontal diseases and adverse pregnancy outcomes since 1996.

Materials and Methods: Medline, Cinahl, and Cochrane databases were searched for original studies focused on pregnancy outcomes and periodontal status in humans. The most recent search was conducted on April 30, 2020.

Results:Of the 633 articles identified, 232 articles (n = 119,774 participants) were selected for analysis. The ma- jority of studies highlighted a statistically significant association between periodontal diseases and preterm birth (71 of 111 articles; 63.96%), low birth weight (46 of 64 articles; 71.87%), preterm low birth weight (29 of 49 arti- cles; 59.18%), preeclampsia (31 of 45 articles; 68.89%) and other pregnancy complications, such as preterm, prelabor rupture of membranes (17 of 26 articles; 65.38%). Geographical analysis revealed that clinical studies were conducted in 51 countries, primarily in the United States (42 studies, 18.10%), Brazil (33 studies, 14.22%) and India (25 studies, 10.78%). Irrespective of geographical location, analysis showed various degrees of evidence of a relationship between periodontal diseases and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Conclusion: The majority of the studies found a statistically significant link between periodontal diseases and some complications of pregnancy. The strength of such a link varies according to type of study, type of variable and outcome measure selected.

Key words: periodontal diseases, pregnancy, adverse pregnancy outcomes, mapping.

Oral Health Prev Dent 2021; 19: 77–84. Submitted for publication: 03.07.20; accepted for publication: 24.11.20 doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b898969

aAssistant, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Surgery, University of Felix Houphouët Boigny, Ivory Coast. Idea, methodological design, definition of search strategy, search and selection of articles, data extraction, wrote and approved the manuscript.

bProfessor, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Surgery, University of Nantes, France. Project supervisor, methodological design, definition of search strategy, synthesis of results, read and approved the manuscript.

cSenior Lecturer, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Surgery, Univer-rr sity of Felix Houphouët Boigny, Ivory Coast. Read and approved the manuscript.

dPostgraduate Student, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Sur-rr gery, University of Nantes, France. Data extraction, quality assessement of in- cluded studies, read and approved the manuscript.

eProfessor, Department of Periodontology, (CHU/Rmes Inserm U1229/UIC11), Faculty of Dental Surgery, University of Nantes, France; College of Dental Med- icine, University of Sharjah, Sharja, UAE; Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. Quality assessement of included studies, read and ap- proved the manuscript.

f Senior Lecturer, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Surgery, Uni-ii versity of Nantes, France. Project supervisor, methodological design, definition of search strategy, synthesis of results, read and approved the manuscript.

Correspondence:Xavier Struillou, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Surgery, University of Nantes, 1 place Alexis–Ricordeau, 44042 Nantes, France. Tel: +33-6-613-746-16; e-mail: xavier.struillou@univ-nantes.fr

P

eriodontal disease, such as gingivitis and periodontitis, is an immuno-inflammatory infection-induced condition affecting the tissues supporting the teeth (gingiva, peri- odontal ligaments, cementum, and alveolar bone).28 In susceptible patients, it results from a deficient host re- sponse following dysbiosis of the bacterial biofilm.13 If un- treated, permanent loss of teeth may result, entailing ad- verse repercussions in terms of the individual’s general state of health.19,46 Indeed, various studies have demon- strated a link between periodontitis and conditions such

as diabetes,31 rheumatoid arthritis,5 cardiovascular disor- ders,39 age-related macular degeneration,44 and erectile dysfunction.48

In 1996, Offenbacher25 first documented that pregnant women with periodontitis were at a 7.5-times higher risk of delivering preterm low birth weight infants than women with healthy periodontal tissue. In the wake of this initial clinical study, a large body of research work has addressed the re- lationship between periodontal diseases and obstetrical outcomes.1,3,6,9,10,17,22-24,32,34,37,41

PERIODONTOLOGY

(2)

The aim of this study was to review the literature and chart the clinical studies that focused on periodontal dis- eases and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) over the two decades since Offenbacher’s publication.25

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Search Strategy

The following databases were searched electronically:

PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane (Fig 1). Published epide- miological and interventional studies suggesting a relation- ship between periodontal diseases and APOs were se- lected. The search was conducted using a combination of several key words. All of the references obtained were en- tered into Zotero 5.0 software (Center for History and New Media, George Mason University; Fairfax, VA, USA). The search targeted articles published in English or French, with the most recent search conducted on April 30, 2020.

Inclusion Criteria

To be included, articles were required to have the following characteristics:

y

based on original clinical studies (randomized controlled trial, not-randomized controlled trial, cohort study, case- controlled study, cross-sectional study);

y

a focus on periodontal diseases and preterm birth (PTB) and/or low birth weight (LBW) and/or preterm low birth weight (PLBW) and/or preeclampsia (PREEC) and/or other pregnancy complications (OPC);

y

published in English or French.

Exclusion Criteria

Articles were excluded if they were:

y

animal or in vitro studies;

y

beyond the scope of the research;

y

published in a language other than English or French;

y

opinion-based articles, literature reviews, systematic re- views, or meta-analyses.

Data Extraction

The following data were extracted from each article re- trieved: name of principal author, year of publication, coun- try of research, type of study, number of participants, type of obstetrical complication under investigation, assessment and diagnostic criteria for periodontal diseases, and main study findings and conclusions. The articles were then sorted into various groups according to the given obstetrical complication. If an article focused on several obstetrical complications, it was included in several groups.

Articles identified through database (PubMed, CINHAL, Cochrane)

(n = 633)

Selected articles after analysis of titles and abstracts

(n = 290)

Selected articles after full-text articles assessed

(n = 232)

Included articles (n = 232)

Articles excluded (n = 343)

Articles excluded (n = 58)

IncludedEligibilityScreeningIdentification

Fig 1 Flowchart of study selection.

(3)

RESULTS

A total of 633 potentially relevant articles were identified.

After eliminating those which failed to meet the inclusion criteria outlined, 232 articles (n=119,774 participants) were included for analysis (Fig 2). The sample included 193 epidemiological studies and 39 interventional studies.

About 10 articles were published each year on this topic in various journals (periodontology, gynecology, odontology, biology, etc).

The obstetrical complications investigated were: PTB (111 articles, 37.63%), LBW (64 articles, 21.69%), PLBW (49 ar-r ticles, 16.61%), PREEC (45 articles, 15.25%), and OPC (26 articles, 8.81%), such as preterm prelabor rupture of mem- branes, spontaneous abortion, fetal growth restriction, and stillbirth (Fig 3). The majority of studies highlighted a signifi- cant relationship between periodontal diseases and PTB (63.96%), LBW (71.87%), PLBW (59.18%), PREEC (68.89%), and OPC (65.38%) (Table 1).

A geographic analysis of the article search for this topic revealed that clinical studies were performed in 51 coun- tries, mainly in the United States (42 studies, 18.10%), Bra- zil (33 studies, 14.22%), and India (25 studies, 10.78%) (Fig 4). The majority of studies were conducted in Africa (70%), North and South America (69.14%), Asia (76.32%) and demonstrate a statistically significant link between peri- odontitis and APOs (Fig 5). However, those conducted in Europe (52.17%) and Oceania (50%) show mixed results.

DISCUSSION

The purpose of the present work was to provide a review of the literature and chart clinical studies investigating a rela- tionship between periodontal diseases and APO from 1996 onward. To the best of our knowledge, this review of the lit- erature is the first of its kind to provide a worldwide over- view of the clinical research work conducted on this topic during the last two decades. It also outlines how this re- search has evolved over time and documents findings from each continent.

Since 1996, 232 articles (about 10 articles/year) focus- ing on the relationship between periodontal diseases and APO have been published in PubMed, CINAHL, and Co- chrane. At the outset, the studies focused solely on PTB and LBW. Then, over time, other obstetrical complications such as PREEC and OPC came to the fore of research work10,34 (Fig 3).

The majority of non-interventional studies (130/193 arti- cles, 67.36%) have demonstrated a statistically significant link between periodontal diseases and APO (Table 1). This is consistent with the findings from several systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses previously conducted on this topic, demonstrating that 60% to 80% of the studies found a link between periodontal diseases and APO.8,12,14,15,42,43,45,47 In Fig 2 Distribution of trials

by year.

Fig 3 Obstetric complications investigated.

232 articles, 119774 participants

PD and OPC 8.81%

PD and PREEC 15.25%

PD and PLBW 16.61%

PD and LBW 21.69%

PD and PTB 37.63%

(4)

et al16 found insufficient evidence to conclude that peri- odontal treatment administered during pregnancy was in- strumental in reducing PTB rates (relative risk = 0.87; 95%

CI: 0.70–1.10). Nonetheless, given the timescale of recruit- ment and administration of periodontal treatment in these clinical trials (for the most part during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy), the possibility that earlier treat- ment (during the first trimester or even prior to conception) could have had a positive impact on the prevention of some types of obstetrical complications cannot be ruled out.16 All the data under discussion were collected from various countries throughout the world, encompassing diverse san- itary, cultural, and socioeconomic conditions. In the Ameri- cas and Asia, where the majority of the trials on this topic were undertaken (94 and 76 studies respectively), approxi- mately 3 of 4 studies found evidence of a statsitically sig-gg nificant link between periodontal diseases and APO. This rate is lower in Europe, where only 52.17% of the studies (1 in 2) made a significant connection between periodontal diseases and APO. In Oceania and Africa, little data are available in this regard. However, the majority of the studies substantiated a relationship between periodontal diseases and APO (Fig 5).

Differents definitions have been used to define the pres- ence of periodontitis. This observation has been made by several authors of similar studies who believe that this meth- odological heterogeneity constitutes a real obstacle for the comparison of studies between them and could influence the results obtained.12,15,16,38,43 The introduction by consensus reports of the new classification of periodontitis should allow a harmonization of the diagnostic and evaluation criteria of the periodontal status for future investigations.4,27

Unlike periodontitis, the studies found identical criteria for defining premature deliveries, low birth weight newborns and preeclampsia.

The abundance of findings from these past 20 years of research have led to a positive impact on the various health 2007, a systematic review by Xiong et al47 revealed that, in

29 of 44 (65.91%) studies published up to December 2006 (26 case-controlled studies, 13 cohort studies, and 5 con- trolled trials), a link was established between periodontal dis- ease and an increased risk of APO. In 2016, Corbella et al8 issued the findings of a meta-analysis based on 22 case- controlled studies and cohorts published between 1965 and 2015. According to these findings, periodontal disease is a statistically significant risk factor for PTB (Odds Ratio [OR]=1.61, CI [confidence interval] 95% 1.33–1.95), for LBW (OR=1.65; CI 95% 1.27–2.14), and for PLBW (OR=3.44, CI 95% 1.34–8.80). Similar findings were documented in a 2013 systematic review by Ide and Papapanou.15 That same year, a systematic review by Guirassy et al12 highlighted that 10 of 13 studies (76.92%) found a link between periodontal diseases and the incidence of PREEC. Similar conclusions were drawn in meta-analyses by Wei et al45 and Huang et al.14 In short, the majority of the non-intervention studies conducted over the two decades confirms a link (however weak or strong) between periodontal diseases and APO.

However, the results of interventional studies have shown to a lesser degree that periodontal treatment admin- istered to pregnant women effectively prevents APOs,2,11,17,

18,33,36 while others reach the opposite conclusion.21,26,29 In a total of 39 interventional studies, 24 (61.54%) identi- fied beneficial effects of periodontal treatment administered during pregnancy on APOs (Table 1). Condylis et al7 reported the same observation: 9 of 15 (60%) RCTs found a signifi- cant reduction in complications of pregnancy after periodon- tal treatment. However, a meta-analysis in 2010 by Uppal et al40 and another by Polyzos et al30 suggested that periodon- tal treatment had no effect on pregnancy outcomes. They indicated numerous sources of bias that may have affected the findings of those studies which concluded that periodon- tal treatment had a beneficial effect on APO. For instance, they underlined numerous disparities in the inclusion crite- ria. Similarly, the meta-analysis (15 RCT) by Iheozor-Ejiofor

Table 1 Results obtained by type of study and obstetrical outcomes

Cohort Case-control Cross-sectional Total

+ – +/– + – +/– + – +/– + – +/– + – +/–

PD and PTB 13 9 0 24 12 0 28 14 1 6 4 0 71 39 1

PD and LBW 5 5 0 17 5 0 18 6 1 6 1 0 46 17 1

PD and PLBW 5 6 0 8 4 0 12 8 0 4 1 1 29 19 1

PD and PREEC 0 3 0 9 3 0 21 6 1 1 0 1 29 11 2

PD and OPC 1 1 0 7 6 0 5 2 0 1 0 0 7 7 0

24 24 0 65 30 0 84 36 3 18 6 2 166 83 5

PD: periodontal diseases; PTB: preterm birth; LBW: low birth weight; PLBW: preterm low birth weight; PREEC: preeclampsia. OPC: other pregnancy outcomes;

+: link; -: no link; +/-: reserved opinion; RCT: randomized contolled trial.

(5)

policies of several countries, as prenatal consultation with an oral health specialist has become a standard part of healthcare for pregnant women.20,35 In Canada, for exam- ple, an initial appointment with a dental surgeon is recom- mended from the start of pregnancy for removal of plaque where required. A second appointment is then scheduled during the second trimester of pregnancy for implementa- tion of the treatment agreed upon at the first appoint- ment.35 In France, an oral-health prevention program for

pregnant women, implemented by the French national healthcare insurance provider (CPAM), has been operating since 2013.20 It comprises a free preventive oral-health checkup with a dental surgeon for all pregnant women in the fourth month of pregnancy. Its main purpose is to screen for periodontal diseases during pregnancy, with a particular focus on women at risk of PTB. This initiative is consistent with good practice guidelines and should be rec- ommended for all pregnant women.

1 1 1 2 5

33

3 6

2 6

3 2 2 2 9

42

1 2 1 6

1 6

25

1 6

1 1 2 5

9

3

1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 6

10

1

Albania yGermany Saudi Arabia Argentina Australia Brazil Canada Chile China Colombia South Korea Croatia Czech Republic Denmark Spain USA Fiji Finland France United Kingdom Holland yHungry India Indonesia Iran North Irland Iceland Israel Italia Japan Jordan Kosovo rMadagascar Malaysia Mexiko Nepal Nigeria Uganda Pakistan Poland Rwanda Senegal Serbia South Africa Sri-Lanka Switzerland Taiwan Tanzania Thailand yTurkey eeueaVenezuela

45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0

51 Countries, 119774 Participants

Fig 4 Distribution of trials by country.

70% 69.14%

76.32%

52.17% 50%

30% 30.86%

21.05%

45.65%

50%

2.63% 2.18%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

0%

Africa (10 studies) America (94 studies) Asia (76 studies) Europe (46 studies) Oceania (6 studies)

Link No Link Reseved Opinion

Fig 5 Distribution of trials results by continent.

(6)

CONCLUSION

Since 1996, periodontal disease has been considered a potential risk factor for the occurrence of APOs. Regardless of the continent, the majority of epidemiological studies un- dertaken have identified a significant yet tenuous link be- tween periodontal diseases and certain complications of pregnancy. The strength of such a link varies according to type of study, type of variable, and outcome measure se- lected. Whether periodontal treatment has a beneficial ef-ff fect on reducing the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, however, remains debatable.

REFERENCES

1. Agueda A, Ramón JM, Manau C, Guerrero A, Echeverría JJ. Periodontal disease as a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes: a prospective cohort study. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:16–22.

2. Albert DA, Begg MD, Andrews HF, Williams SZ, Ward A, Conicella ML, Rauh V, Thomson JL, Papapanou PN. An examination of periodontal treat- ment, dental care, and pregnancy outcomes in an insured population in the United States. Am J Public Health 2011;101:151–156.

3. Boggess KA, Berggren EK, Koskenoja V, Urlaub D, Lorenz C. Severe pre- eclampsia and maternal self-report of oral health, hygiene, and dental care. J Periodontol 2013;84:143–151.

4. Chapple ILC, Mealey BL, Van Dyke TE, Bartold PM, Dommisch H, Eickholz P, Geisinger ML, Genco RJ, Glogauer M, Goldstein M, et al. Periodontal health and gingival diseases and conditions on an intact and a reduced periodontium: Consensus report of workgroup 1 of the 2017 World Work- shop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Periodontol 2018;89(suppl 1):S74–S84.

5. Cheng Z, Meade J, Mankia K, Emery P, Devine DA. Periodontal disease and periodontal bacteria as triggers for rheumatoid arthritis. Best Prac- tice & Research. Clin Rheumatol 2017;31:19–30.

6. Cisse D, Diouf M, Faye A, Diadhiou MF, Tal-Dia A. Periodontal Disease of Pregnant Women and Low Weight Newborn in Senegal: A Case-Control Study. Open J Epidemiol 2015;20:1.

7. Condylis B, Le Borgne H, Demoersman J, Campard G, Philippe H-J, Soueidan A. [Interest of periodontitis screening and treatment in preg- nancy: systematic review]. Journal De Gynecologie, Obstetrique Et Biolo- gie De La Reproduction 2013;42:511–517.

8. Corbella S, Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M, Francetti L, Weinstein R, Ferrazzi E.

Adverse pregnancy outcomes and periodontitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis exploring potential association. QI 2016;47:193–204.

9. Dasanayake AP, Gennaro S, Hendricks-Muñoz KD, Chhun N. Maternal peri- odontal disease, pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes. MCN. Am J Maternal Child Nurs 2008;33:45–49.

10. Farrell (née Moore) S, Ide M, Wilson RF. The relationship between mater-rr nal periodontitis, adverse pregnancy outcome and miscarriage in never smokers. J Clin Periodontol 2006;33:115–120.

11. Gomes-Filho IS, Cruz SS, Costa M da CN, Passos JS, Cerqueira EMM, Sampaio FP, Pereira EC, Miranda LF. Periodontal therapy and low birth weight: preliminary results from an alternative methodologic strategy. J Periodontol 2010;81:1725–1733.

12. Guirassy M. Relation entre maladie parodontale et risque de survenue d’une pré-éclampsie : revue systematique. Rev Col Odonto-Stomatol Afr Chir Maxillo-Fac 2016;23:25–31.

13. Hajishengallis G. Periodontitis: from microbial immune subversion to sys- temic inflammation. Nature Rev Immunol 2015;15:30–44.

14. Huang X, Wang J, Liu J, Hua L, Zhang D, Hu T, Ge Z-L. Maternal periodon- tal disease and risk of preeclampsia: a meta-analysis. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol Med Sci 2014;34:729–735.

15. Ide M, Papapanou PN. Epidemiology of association between maternal periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes – systematic re- view. J Periodontol 2013;84:S181–S194.

16. Iheozor-Ejiofor Z, Middleton P, Esposito M, Glenny A-M. Treating periodon- tal disease for preventing adverse birth outcomes in pregnant women.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;6:CD005297.

17. Jeffcoat M, Parry S, Gerlach RW, Doyle MJ. Use of alcohol-free antimicro- bial mouth rinse is associated with decreased incidence of preterm birth in a high-risk population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:382.e1-382.e6.

18. Jeffcoat MK, Jeffcoat RL, Tanna N, Parry SH. Association of a common ge- netic factor, PTGER3, with outcome of periodontal therapy and preterm birth. J Periodontol 2014;85:446–454.

19. Kinane D, Bouchard P, Group E of European Workshop on Periodontology.

Periodontal diseases and health: Consensus Report of the Sixth Euro- pean Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:333–337.

20. Legifrance. Arrêté du 26 novembre 2013 portant approbation de l’avenant n° 3 à la convention nationale organisant les rapports entre les chirur-rr giens-dentistes et l’assurance maladie signé le 31 juillet 2013.

21. Macones GA, Parry S, Nelson DB, Strauss JF, Ludmir J, Cohen AW, Stam- ilio DM, Appleby D, Clothier B, Sammel MD, et al. Treatment of localized per not reduce the occurrence of preterm birth: results from the Peri- odontal Infections and Prematurity Study (PIPS). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:147.e1-147.e8.

22. Meqa K, Dragidella F, Disha M, Sllamniku-Dalipi Z. The association be- tween periodontal disease and preterm low birthweight in Kosovo. Acta Stomatolog Croat 2017;51:33–40.

23. Nabet C, Lelong N, Colombier M-L, Monsarrat P, Vergnes J-N, Sixou M, Musset A-M, Goffinet F, Kaminski M. Parodontite maternelle et causes d’accouchement prématuré - Étude cas-témoins EPIPAP. Actualités Odonto-Stomatologiques 2014;1:20–26.

24. Nabet C, Lelong N, Colombier M-L, Sixou M, Musset A-M, Goffinet F, Ka- minski M, for the Epipap Group. Maternal periodontitis and the causes of preterm birth: the case–control Epipap study. J Clin Periodontol 2010;37:

37–45.

25. Offenbacher S. Periodontal diseases: pathogenesis. Ann Periodontol 1996;

1:821–878.

26. Oliveira AMSD, Oliveira PAD de, Cota LOM, Magalhães CS, Moreira AN, Costa FO. Periodontal therapy and risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Clin Oral Investig 2011;15:609–615.

27. Papapanou PN, Sanz M, Buduneli N, Dietrich T, Feres M, Fine DH, Flem- mig TF, Garcia R, Giannobile WV, Graziani F, et al. Periodontitis: Consen- sus repor t of workgroup 2 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Periodontol 2018;89(suppl 1):S173–S182.

28. Pihlstrom BL, Michalowicz BS, Johnson NW. Periodontal diseases. Lancet 2005;(19)366:1809–1820.

29. Pirie M, Linden G, Irwin C. Intrapregnancy non-surgical periodontal treat- ment and pregnancy outcome: a randomized controlled trial. J Periodontol 2012;84:1391–1400.

30. Polyzos NP, Polyzos IP, Zavos A, Valachis A, Mauri D, Papanikolaou EG, Tzio- ras S, Weber D, Messinis IE. Obstetric outcomes after treatment of peri- odontal disease during pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMJ (Clinical research) 2010;341:c7017.

31. Preshaw PM, Alba AL, Herrera D, Jepsen S, Konstantinidis A, Makrilakis K, Taylor R. Periodontitis and diabetes: a two-way relationship. Diabetolog 2012;55:21–31.

32. Rakoto-Alson S, Tenenbaum H, Davideau J-L. Periodontal diseases, pre- term births, and low birth weight: findings from a homogeneous cohort of women in Madagascar. J Periodontol 2009;81:205–213.

33. Reddy BVR, Tanneeru S, Chava VK. The effect of phase-I periodontal therapy on pregnancy outcome in chronic periodontitis patients. J Obstet Gynaecol 2014;34:29–32.

34. Riché EL. Periodontal disease increases the risk of preterm delivery among preeclamptic women [cited 2017 March 25]. Available at:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16013222

35. Ross L. La santé dentaire des femmes durant la grossesse - Api Laval.

apigroupe [Internet]. 2016 February 9 [cited 2018 March 17]. Available at: https://apigroupe.com/des-dents-en-sante-pendant-la-grossesse-5- choses-a-surveiller/

36. Sant’Ana ACP, Campos MR de, Passanezi SC, Rezende MLR de, Greghi SLA, Passanezi E. Periodontal treatment during pregnancy decreases the rate of adverse pregnancy outcome: a controlled clinical trial. J Appl Oral Sci 2011;19:130–136.

37. Soroye M, Ayanbadejo P, Savage K, Oluwole A. Association between peri- odontal disease and pregnancy outcomes. Odonto-Stomatologie Tropicale [Tropical Dent J] 2015;38:5–16.

38. Teshome A, Yitayeh A. Relationship between periodontal disease and pre- term low birth weight: systematic review. Pan African Med J 2016 July 12 [cited 2017 March 20];24. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/

articles/PMC5075444/

39. Tonetti MS, Van Dyke TE. Periodontitis and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: consensus report of the Joint EFP/AAP Workshop on Periodonti- tis and Systemic Diseases. J Periodontol 2013;84:S24–S29.

(7)

40. Uppal A, Uppal S, Pinto A, Dutta M, Shrivatsa S, Dandolu V, Mupparapu M. The effectiveness of periodontal disease treatment during pregnancy in reducing the risk of experiencing preterm birth and low birth weight: a meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:1423–1434.

41. Usin MM, Menso J, Rodríguez VI, González A, Tabares S, Parodi R, Sem- baj A. Association between maternal periodontitis and preterm and/or low birth weight infants in normal pregnancies. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med 2016;29:115–119.

42. Vergnes J-N, Sixou M. Preterm low birth weight and maternal periodontal status: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstetrics and Gynecology 2007;196:135.

e1–7.

43. Vettore MV, Lamarca G de A, Leão ATT, Thomaz FB, Sheiham A, Leal M do C. Periodontal infection and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Cadernos De Saude Publica 2006;

22:2041–2053.

44. Wagley S, Marra KV, Salhi RA, Gautam S, Campo R, Veale P, Veale J, Ar-r royo JG. Periodontal disease and age-related macular degeneration: Re- sults From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III.

Retina 2015;35:982–988.

45. Wei B-J, Chen Y-J, Yu L, Wu B. Periodontal disease and risk of preeclamp- sia: a meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS One 2013;8:e70901.

46. Wolf DL, Lamster IB. Contemporary concepts in the diagnosis of peri- odontal disease. Dent Clin North Am 2011;55:47–61.

47. Xiong X, Buekens P, Fraser WD, Beck J, Offenbacher S. Periodontal dis- ease and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review. BJOG 2006;

113:135–143.

48. Zuo Z, Jiang J, Jiang R, Chen F, Liu J, Yang H, Cheng Y. Effect of periodon- titis on erectile function and its possible mechanism. J Sex Med 2011;

8:2598–2605.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

In the relatively small Rate Control Efficacy in Permanent Atrial Fibrillation: a Comparison between Lenient versus Strict Rate Control II (RACE- II) trial, lenient rate control

► Women with Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) in pregnancy are more likely to experience adverse birth outcomes including preterm birth, premature rupture of membranes, low birth

The risk of severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with a recent maternal ZIKV infection among pregnant travellers was evaluated in a nested case control study comparing

Ø STENSEN 4 1 Research Laboratory and Academic Clinical Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, 2 Department of Biomedicine, Division

1950, after treating mice infected with virulent strains with Bayer 7602, observed that these animals were highly resistant to challenge with either homologous or heterologous

It has also been shown that at plasma vita- min C levels of 56.8 μmol/l, renal excretion of vitamin C starts to increase and that at values higher than 70 μmol/l renal vitamin

4, we characterise the joint distribution of adverse selection, the probability of trade, the efficiency contribution, the inside firm’s profit, and the worker’s wage.. The first

However, not all the drugs used in gout treatment improve CV outcomes; colchicine has shown improved CV outcomes in patients with recent myocardial infarction and stable