• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Black Holes II — Exercise sheet 5 (15.1)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Black Holes II — Exercise sheet 5 (15.1)"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Daniel Grumiller April 19th 2010

Black Holes II — Exercise sheet 5

(15.1) The ab-family of solutions Consider 2D dilaton gravity models

S2DG = 1 κ

Z

d2x√

−gh

XR−U(X)(∇X)2−2V(X)i with the following 2-parameter family of potentials:

U(X) =−a

X V(X) =−1 2Xa+b

Find all classical solutions of that theory in an Eddington–Finkelstein patch. Discuss what happens in the following three cases

(i) a= 1 +b (ii) a= 1−b (iii) b= 0

What is the corresponding ground state geometry in each of these three special cases?

(15.2) Jackiw–Teitelboim, Katanaev–Volovich, CGHS et al.

Consider 2D dilaton gravity (see above) with the following potentials (i) U = 0, V =−ΛX (Jackiw–Teitelboim)

(ii) U =α,V =βX2−λ (Katanaev–Volovich)

(iii) U = 0, V =−12 (Callan–Giddings–Harvey–Strominger) (iv) U =a, V =eαX (Liouville gravity)

(v) U = 0, V = 12X(c−X2) (Kaluza–Klein reduced Chern–Simons) Which of these models belong to theab-family of exercise (15.1)? Which of these models have constant dilaton vacua [see exercise (15.3)]? Which of these models have a Minkowski ground state? How many Killing horizons are there for each model?

(15.3) Constant dilaton vacua

Take the equations of motion of 2D dilaton gravity and find their most general solution for the metric g and constant dilaton X. You have to assume that V(X) = 0 has at least one real zero in the range of definition ofX. A suitable model for testing your results is the Kaluza–

Klein reduced gravitational Chern–Simons model with potentials U = 0 V = 1

2X(c−X2)

Discuss the geometries of all constant dilaton vacua of this specific model.

These exercises are due on April 26th 2010.

(2)

Hints:

• This exercise is analog to the calculations we performed during the lectures. You can choose convenient values for the two integration constants appearing in the definitions

Q(X) =Q0+ Z X

dy U(y) w(X) = w0−2 Z X

dy V(y)eQ(y) Recall our general solution for the metric in Eddington–Finkelstein coordinates

ds2 = 2 dudr−K(r) du2 K =eQw(1− 2m w ) and for the dilaton

rX =e−Q

The ground state solution arises if you set m = 0 (typically for the choice w0 = 0).

• You get the number of Killing horizons simply by counting the number of real zeros in the Killing norm (squared) K =eQw(1− 2mw ).

• Recall the equations of motion for 2D dilaton gravity from the lectures and exploit X = const. as early as possible. Exploit that the Ricci scalarR uniquely determines the Riemann tensor in 2D — if you know e.g. thatR is constant then spacetime can only be deSitter, Minkowski or Anti-deSitter, depending on the sign of R.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Presumably you also remember that a Killing horizon corresponds to a locus in spacetime where the norm of that Killing vector vanishes.. Now it is a matter of simple algebra

The Ricci scalar in 2d is something you can guess (there is only one possibility for a scalar constructed out of the first derivative of the connection, up to an overall factor,

• It is easiest if you use Gaussian normal coordinates to parametrize the cylinder, e.g. You can picture this by mentally cutting through Earth and throwing away they northern

Consider a piece of coal at zero temperature and a laser beam (a pure quantum state with some finite energy and entropy) in vacuum as initial state.. Provided the laser beam is

Finally, check which constraints have (weakly) vanishing Poisson brackets among themselves and with the Hamiltonian — these are then first class constraints, while all other

Note: I am not sure what is the most efficient way of doing this calcula- tion; I started with the variation δ(g µν ∇ µ n ν ) and proceeded from there, but there might be a

Use this ar- gument to find a representation of the full quantum gravity partition function that is as simple as possible.. These exercises are due on June 14

But conceptually this exercise may be non- trivial, so remember what is a thermal state in AdS 3 , look up the Brown–Henneaux result for the central charges and recall that the sum