• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Supplementary material to: “The influence of tofogliflozin on treatment-related quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus”

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Supplementary material to: “The influence of tofogliflozin on treatment-related quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus”"

Copied!
15
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Supplementary material to:

“The influence of tofogliflozin on treatment-related quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus”

List of the institutional review boards (alphabetical order):

Research Ethics Committee of Ikeda Municipal Hospital (IRB11000019) Research Ethics Committee of Jiyugaoka Medical Clinic (IRB)

Research Ethics Committee of Juntendo Tokyo Koto Geriatric Medical Center (IRB11000134)

Research Ethics Committee of Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine (IRB 11000367)

Research Ethics Committee of Kansai Rosai Hospital (IRB11000182) Research Ethics Committee of Kawasaki Hospital

Research Ethics Committee of Kawasaki Medical School (IRB11000120) Research Ethics Committee of NakaKinen Clinic (IRB12000112)

Research Ethics Committee of National Hospital Organization Osaka (IRB11000763)

Research Ethics Committee of Nissay Hospital (IRB1800075)

Research Ethics Committee of Osaka General Medical Center (IRB11000754) Research Ethics Committee of Osaka Police Hospital (IRB14000008)

Research Ethics Committee of Osaka Rosai Hospital (IRB11000716)

Research Ethics Committee of Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine (IRB15000038)

Research Ethics Committee of University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan (IRB11000040)

(2)

Eligibility criteria of the study subjects Inclusion criteria:

1) Japanese with T2DM and inadequate glycemic control (HbA1c ≥ 6 % but < 9 %) but the inability to achieve the blood glucose level stated in the Diabetes Treatment Guideline of 2014-2015 despite being on drugs other than SGLT2 inhibitors with diet and physical therapy or on diet and physical therapy only for at least 12 weeks or patients who received treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors in the past but who have not used SGLT2 inhibitors for at least 12 weeks before signing their consent form.

2) No changes (including new prescriptions) in the patient’s antidiabetic, antithrombotic, antihypertensive medication or a therapeutic agent for dyslipidemia for at least 12 weeks before signing consent form.

3) Age 30–74 years at the time of giving consent.

4) Being able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria:

1) Type 1 or secondary diabetes.

2) Patients who are within the perioperative period or those with a serious infection or injury.

3) A history of myocardial infarction, angina, stroke, or cerebral infarction.

4) Severe renal dysfunction or end-stage renal failure (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2).

5) Serious liver functional impairment (aspartate aminotransferase ≥ 100 U/L).

6) Moderate-to-severe heart failure (class 3 or worse based on the New York Heart Association Functional Classification).

(3)

7) Urinary tract or genital infection.

8) Pregnant, possibly pregnant, nursing, or planning to conceive a child.

9) History of hypersensitivity to the study drug.

10) Present or past history of a malignant tumor (exceptions: patients not on medication for malignant tumor and no recurrence of the disease without recurrence risks during this study were allowed to participate).

11) Patients prohibited from using tofogliflozin.

12) Other ineligibility, as determined by an investigator.

(4)

Supplementary Table S1. Clinical characteristics of patients with and without DTR-QOL data

Parameters Patients with DTR-QOL data

(n = 252)

Patients without DTR-QOL data (n = 87)

p value

Sex (males) (%) 152 (60.3) 46 (52.9) 0.26

Age (years) 61.7 ± 9.5 59.3 ± 9.2 0.041

Current smoking 49 (19.4) 18 (20.9) 0.76

Body mass index (kg/m2) 26.8 ± 5.4 27.6 ± 4.6 0.25

Waist circumference (cm) 93.2 ± 12.6 (n = 236) 94.1 ± 10.7 (n = 67) 0.59

Duration of diabetes (years) 12.6 ± 8.6 11.5 ± 7.5 0.34

HbA1c (%) 7.3 ± 0.7 7.5 ± 0.8 0.12

Fasting blood glucose (mmol/L) 7.8 ± 1.8 7.8 ± 1.8 (n = 83) 0.95

C-peptide (ng/mL) 1.93 ± 1.14 2.12 ± 1.35 (n = 82) 0.21

Hypertension 140 (55.6) 53 (60.9) 0.45

Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 133.7 ± 16.2 (n = 247) 133.8 ± 15.4 (n = 83) 0.98

Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 78.0 ± 10.9 (n = 247) 79.5 ± 9.1 (n = 83) 0.28

Dyslipidemia 161 (63.9) 68 (78.2) 0.017

Total cholesterol (mmol/L) 5.01 ± 0.77 (n = 248) 4.75 ± 0.78 (n = 80) 0.010

LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) 2.95 ± 0.68 (n=250) 2.70 ± 0.63 0.002

HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) 1.39 ± 0.35 1.42 ± 0.30 0.45

Triglyceride (mmol/L) 1.38 (0.97, 1.91) 1.23 (0.98, 1.68) (n = 83) 0.35

Diabetic retinopathy 47 (18.8) (n = 250) 14 (16.3) (n = 86) 0.75

Diabetic nephropathy 79 (31.3) 22 (25.3) 0.34

Use of glucose-lowering agents 224 (88.9) 81 (93.1) 0.31

Metformin 132 (52.4) 59 (67.8) 0.013

Sulfonylurea 62 (24.6) 19 (21.8) 0.66

Glinides 16 (6.3) 4 (4.6) 0.79

Thiazolidinediones 34 (13.5) 7 (8.0) 0.25

α-Glucosidase inhibitor 33 (13.1) 16 (18.4) 0.22

DPP-4 inhibitors 133 (52.8) 37 (42.5) 0.11

(5)

GLP-1 R agonists 18 (7.1) 17 (19.5) 0.002

Insulin 58 (23.0) 14 (16.1) 0.22

Use of antihypertensive drugs 128 (50.8) 46 (52.9) 0.80

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors 5 (2.0) 3 (3.4) 0.34

Angiotensin II receptor blockers 110 (43.7) 36 (41.4) 0.80

Direct renin inhibitor 2 (0.8) 0 (0.0) 1.00

Calcium channel blocker 75 (29.8) 26 (29.9) 1.00

Diuretic drugs 16 (6.3) 6 (6.9) 0.81

α-Adrenergic receptor antagonist 1 (0.4) 1 (1.1) 0.45

β-Adrenergic receptor antagonist 5 (2.0) 1 (1.1) 1.00

Others 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)

Use of lipid-lowering agents 122 (48.4) 59 (67.8) 0.002

Statins 110 (43.7) 46 (52.9) 0.17

Ezetimibe 10 (4.0) 11 (12.6) 0.008

Resins 1 (0.4) 0 (0.0) 1.00

Fibrates 8 (3.2) 6 (6.9) 0.21

Use of antithrombotic agents 27 (10.7) 5 (5.7) 0.21

Antiplatelet agents 22 (8.7) 4 (4.6) 0.25

Anticoagulants 5 (2.0) 1 (1.1) 1.00

Others 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)

Data are presented as number (%) of patients or mean ± SD values. HbA1C: glycated hemoglobin; SD: standard deviation; LDL: low- density lipoprotein; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; DPP-4: dipeptidyl peptidase; GLP: glucagon-like peptide-1.

(6)

Supplementary Table S2.

Between-group comparison of changes in clinical parameters during the treatment period

Parameters Tofogliflozin group Conventional group P value

Body mass index at baseline (kg/m2) 26.9 ± 62 (n = 127) 26.8 ± 4.6 (n = 125) 0.89 Week 26 (change from baseline) –0.7 ± 0.8 (n = 124)*** –0.1 ± 0.7 (n = 123) < 0.001 Week 52 (change from baseline) –0.8 ± 1.2 (n = 123)*** –0.1 ± 0.9 (n = 119) < 0.001 Week 78 (change from baseline) –0.9 ± 1.4 (n = 118)*** 0.0 ± 1.0 (n = 116) < 0.001 Week 104 (change from baseline) –1.0 ± 1.3 (n = 118)*** –0.3 ± 1.1 (n = 113) < 0.001 Waist circumference at baseline (cm) 91.2 ± 12.3 (n = 119) 91.7 ± 10.7 (n = 117) 0.86

Week 26 (change from baseline) –1.8 ± 6.2 (n = 104)* 1.2 ± 4.4 (n = 99)* <0.001

Week 52 (change from baseline) –0.5 ± 6.3 (n = 105) 1.8 ± 4.8 (n = 105)** 0.004

Week 78 (change from baseline) –0.8 ± 6.8 (n = 101) 1.7 ± 4.4 (n = 96)** 0.003

Week 104 (change from baseline) –1.0 ± 6.2 (n = 104) 1.8 ± 4.3 (n = 98)** <0.001

HbA1c at baseline (%) 7.4 ± 0.7 (n = 127) 7.3 ± 0.7 (n = 125) 0.45

HbA1c at baseline (mmol/mol) 57.0 ± 7.7 (n = 127) 56.2 ± 7.8 (n = 125) 0.45

Week 26 (change from baseline) –3.8 ± 6.3 (n = 125)*** 0.2 ± 5.7 (n = 123) < 0.001 Week 52 (change from baseline) –3.4 ± 7.1 (n = 123)*** 0.2 ± 5.4 (n = 120) <0.001 Week 78 (change from baseline) –3.4 ± 8.3 (n = 117)*** 0.6 ± 8.3 (n = 117) <0.001 Week 104 (change from baseline) –3.3 ± 8.0 (n = 111)*** 0.7 ± 7.4 (n = 111) <0.001 Fasting blood glucose at baseline (mmol/L) 7.8 ± 1.7 (n = 127) 7.9 ± 1.8 (n = 125) 0.55

Week 26 (change from baseline) –0.8 ± 1.7 (n = 121)*** 0.0 ± 2.1 (n = 115) < 0.001

Week 52 (change from baseline) –0.7 ± 1.6 (n = 115)*** 0.0 ± 1.8 (n = 115) 0.003

Week 78 (change from baseline) –0.5 ± 1.7 (n = 112)** 0.1 ± 2. (n = 106) 0.032

Week 104 (change from baseline) –0.7 ± 1.8 (n = 112)*** 0.2 ± 1.8 (n = 109) <0.001

C-peptide at baseline (ng/mL) 1.91 ± 1.24 (n = 127) 1.95 ± 1.04 (n = 125) 0.82

Week 52 (change from baseline) –0.22 ± 0.84 (n= 117)* –0.08 ± 0.87 (n = 116) 0.23

(7)

Week 104 (change from baseline) –0.17 ± 0.88 (n= 112)* –0.01 ± 0.88 (n = 108) 0.13 Total cholesterol at baseline (mmol/L) 5.03 ± 0.77 (n = 125) 4.98 ± 0.77 (n = 123) 0.65 Week 26 (change from baseline) 0.08 ± 0.56 (n = 118) –0.05 ± 0.52 (n = 112) 0.06

Week 52 (change from baseline) 0.07 ± 0.56 (n = 120) 0.02 ± 0.57 (n = 118) 0.20

Week 78 (change from baseline) 0.07 ± 0.53 (n = 112) –0.08 ± 0.63 (n = 106) 0.06 Week 104 (change from baseline) 0.07 ± 0.66 (n = 116) –0.04 ± 0.66 (n = 109) 0.20 LDL cholesterol at baseline (mmol/L) 2.96 ± 0.71 (n = 126) 2.95 ± 0.64 (n = 124) 0.96 Week 26 (change from baseline) 0.01 ± 0.54 (n = 122) –0.06 ± 0.49 (n = 120) 0.33 Week 52 (change from baseline) 0.00 ± 0.51 (n = 121) –0.03 ± 0.53 (n = 120) 0.68 Week 78 (change from baseline) 0.02 ± 0.48 (n = 116) –0.10 ± 0.56 (n = 116) 0.07 Week 104 (change from baseline) –0.02 ± 0.63 (n = 117) –0.10 ± 0.58 (n = 111) 0.28 HDL cholesterol at baseline (mmol/L) 1.41 ± 0.37 (n = 127) 1.37 ± 0.32 (n = 125) 0.35

Week 26 (change from baseline) 0.07 ± 0.18 (n = 123) 0.00 ± 0.19 (n = 120) 0.010

Week 52 (change from baseline) 0.06 ± 0.15 (n = 123)* 0.00 ± 0.18 (n = 120) 0.010 Week 78 (change from baseline) 0.06 ± 0.19 (n = 117)** 0.02 ± 0.22 (n = 117) 0.13 Week 104 (change from baseline) 0.06 ± 0.19 (n = 119)** 0.04 ± 0.20 (n = 112)* 0.38 Triglyceride at baseline (mmol/L) 0.22 (–0.08, 0.68) (n = 127) 0.38 (0.04, 0.63) (n = 125) 0.17 Week 26 (change from baseline) –0.04 (–0.26, 0.20) (n = 118) 0.00 (–0.21, 0.23) (n = 113) 0.59 Week 52 (change from baseline) –0.05 (–0.27, 0.16) (n = 114) –0.02 (–0.30, 0.16) (n = 115) 0.53 Week 78 (change from baseline) 0.00 (–0.27, 0.19) (n = 112) –0.04 (–0.26, 0.17) (n = 105) 0.68 Week 104 (change from baseline) –0.05 (–0.25, 0.18) (n = 111) –0.04 (–0.28, 0.22) (n = 108) 0.91

Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 133.2 ± 14.4 (n = 125) 134.3 ± 17.9 (n = 122) 0.62

Week 26 (change from baseline) –5.0 ± 14.0 (n = 123)* –0.3 ± 16.0 (n = 120) 0.017 Week 52 (change from baseline) –5.7 ± 13.0 (n = 121)*** –2.8 ± 18.2 (n = 117) 0.15 Week 78 (change from baseline) –5.9 ± 14.9 (n = 116)* –1.8 ± 19.6 (n = 112) 0.08 Week 104 (change from baseline) –5.1 ± 16.1 (n = 115)* 0.7 ± 19.2 (n = 110) 0.014

Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 77.3 ± 10.5 (n = 125) 78.8 ± 11.2 (n = 122) 0.28

(8)

Week 26 (change from baseline) –1.6 ± 8.9 (n = 123)** 0.0 ± 9.1 (n = 120) 0.19 Week 52 (change from baseline) –3.0 ± 10.0 (n = 121)*** –0.5 ± 10.4 (n = 117) 0.16 Week 78 (change from baseline) –2.8 ± 10.0 (n = 116)* –1.0 ± 10.1 (n = 112) 0.42 Week 104 (change from baseline) –3.5 ± 10.4 (n = 115)*** –1.7 ± 10.3 (n = 110) 0.11

eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) 81.8 ± 22.1 (n = 126) 82.1 ± 25.9 (n = 124) 0.92

Week 26 (change from baseline) –2.8 ± 9.8 (n = 121)** –3.2 ± 9.8 (n =120)** 0.77 Week 52 (change from baseline) –2.4 ± 10.0 (n = 121)** –2.5 ± 10.0 (n = 119)** 0.96 Week 78 (change from baseline) –3.6 ± 9.9 (n = 117)*** –3.8 ± 10.5 (n = 115)*** 0.88 Week 104 (change from baseline) –3.3 ± 12.8 (n = 118)** –4.8 ± 10.2 (n = 111)*** 0.33 UAE at baseline (mg/g/cre) 2.70(1.84, 3.66) (n = 122) 2.87 (1.67, 4.24) (n = 123) 0.58 Week 26 (change from baseline) –0.08 (–0.61, 0.47) (n = 112) –0.17 (–0.61, 0.37) (n = 107) 0.20 Week 52 (change from baseline) –0.11 (–0.66, 0.36) (n = 116)* 0.03 (–0.37, 0.52) (n = 115) 0.11 Week 78 (change from baseline) –0.05 (–0.53, 0.66) (n = 107) 0.14 (–0.32, 0.87) (n = 104) 0.31 Week 104 (change from baseline) –0.10 (–0.65, 0.34) (n = 114) 0.11 (–0.35, 0.60) (n = 108) 0.025 hsCRP at baseline (ng/mL) 602.0 (308.0, 1460.0) (n = 127) 587.0 (268.0, 1450.0) (n = 125) 0.93

Week 52 (change from baseline) –18.0 (–298.0, 203.0) (n = 119) 10.0 (–257.0, 305.0) (n = 117) 0.50 Week 104 (change from baseline) –41.5 (–428.0, 179.0) (n = 118) 28.5 (–177.0, 343.0) (n = 110) 0.16 Adiponectin at baseline (μg/mL) 7.50 (5.10, 10.30) (n = 127) 7.60 (5.60, 10.40) (n = 125) 0.63 Week 52 (change from baseline) 0.70 (0.10, 1.30) (n = 119)*** 0.30 (–0.30, 1.00) (n = 117)* 0.011 Week 104 (change from baseline) 0.70 (–0.10, 1.80) (n = 118)*** 0.25 (–0.30, 1.10) (n = 110) 0.016 NT-proBNP at baseline (pg/mL) 35.0 (17.0, 66.0) (n = 127) 32.0 (20.0, 62.0) (n = 125) 0.64

Week 52 (change from baseline) –1.0 (–14.0, 13.0) (n = 119) 3.0 (–14.0, 9.0) (n = 117) 0.57 Week 104 (change from baseline) 2.0 (10.0, 18.0) (n = 118) 1.5 (–9.0, 17.0) (n = 110) 0.94 Data are presented as the mean ± SD or median (25th and 75th percentiles) values. Differences in parameters between groups at baseline were analyzed using Student’s t-test or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Differences in parameters from baseline to weeks 26, 52, 78, and 104 within each group were analyzed using a one-sample t-test or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Differences in parameters from baseline to

(9)

weeks 26, 52, 78, and 104 between groups were analyzed using Student’s t-test or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P

< 0.001.

eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; SD: standard deviation; UAE: urinary albumin excretion; hs-CRP: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; NT-proBNP: N-terminal–pro-brain natriuretic peptide; HbA1C:glycated hemoglobin; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; HDL: high- density lipoprotein.

(10)

Supplementary Table S3. Changes in concomitantly used anti-diabetic agents

Parameters Tofogliflozin

treatment group

Conventional

treatment group P value Any concomitantly used anti-diabetic agent

Baseline 112 (88.2) 112 (89.6) 0.84

Week 26 109 (87.2) 115 (92.0) 0.30

Week 52 106 (86.2) 111 (91.7) 0.22

Week 78 103 (85.8) 110 (92.4) 0.14

Week 104 102 (85.7) 105 (92.1) 0.15

Metformin

Baseline 62 (48.8) 70 (56.0) 0.26

Week 26 62 (49.6) 76 (60.8) 0.10

Week 52 59 (48.0) 76 (62.8) 0.021

Week 78 56 (46.7) 75 (63.0) 0.014

Week 104 56 (47.1) 75 (65.8) 0.005

Sulfonylurea

Baseline 31 (24.4) 31 (24.8) 1.00

Week 26 27 (21.6) 31 (24.8) 0.65

Week 52 28 (22.8) 31 (25.6) 0.65

Week 78 27 (22.5) 28 (23.5) 0.88

Week 104 25 (21.0) 29 (25.4) 0.44

Glinides

Baseline 8 (6.3) 8 (6.4) 1.00

Week 26 7 (5.6) 8 (6.4) 1.00

Week 52 6 (4.9) 7 (5.8) 0.78

Week 78 7 (5.8) 8 (6.7) 0.80

Week 104 8 (6.7) 7 (6.1) 1.00

Thiazolidinediones

Baseline 15(11.8) 19 (15.2) 0.47

Week 26 14 (11.2) 19 (15.2) 0.46

Week 52 15 (12.2) 19 (15.7) 0.46

Week 78 14 (11.7) 17 (14.3) 0.57

Week 104 14 (11.8) 16 (14.0) 0.70

α-Glucosidase inhibitors

Baseline 17 (13.4) 16 (12.8) 1.00

Week 26 18 (14.4) 17 (13.6) 1.00

Week 52 18 (14.6) 16 (13.2) 0.85

Week 78 19 (15.8) 16 (13.4) 071

Week 104 18 (15.1) 16 (14.0) 0.85

DPP-4 inhibitors

Baseline 59 (46.5) 74 (59.2) 0.045

Week 26 57 (45.6) 76 (60.8) 0.022

Week 52 57 (46.3) 72 (59.5) 0.041

Week 78 56 (46.7) 71 (59.7) 0.05

Week 104 54 (45.4) 69 (60.5) 0.026

GLP-1 R agonists

Baseline 13 (10.2) 5 (4.0) 0.08

Week 26 13 (10.4) 6 (4.8) 0.15

Week 52 13 (10.6) 7 (5.8) 0.24

Week 78 12 (10.0) 6 (5.0) 0.22

(11)

Week 104 12 (10.1) 5 (4.4) 0.13 Insulins

Baseline 28 (22.0) 30 (24.0) 0.77

Week 26 27 (21.6) 30 (24.0) 0.76

Week 52 27 (22.0) 32 (26.4) 0.46

Week 78 25 (20.8) 30 (25.2) 0.45

Week 104 25 (21.0) 28 (24.6) 0.54

Data are presented as the number (%) of patients. The two treatment groups were compared using Fisher’s exact test. Administration of tofogliflozin in the tofogliflozin treatment group was not considered a concomitant anti-diabetic agent. DPP-4: dipeptidyl peptidase; GLP: glucagon-like peptide-1.

(12)

Supplementary Table S4. Changes in concomitantly used cardiovascular medications Tofogliflozin

treatment group

Conventional

treatment group P-value Antihypertensive drugs

Any antihypertensive drugs

Baseline 56 (44.1) 72 (57.6) 0.033

Week 26 55 (44.0) 74 (59.2) 0.023

Week 52 55 (44.7) 73 (60.3) 0.015

Week 78 54 (45.0) 73 (61.3) 0.014

Week 104 54 (45.4) 69 (60.5) 0.026

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors

Baseline 1 (0.8) 4 (3.2) 0.21

Week 26 1 (0.8) 4 (3.2) 0.37

Week 52 1 (0.8) 4 (3.3) 0.21

Week 78 2 (1.7) 4 (3.4) 0.45

Week 104 2 (1.7) 4 (3.5) 0.44

Angiotensin II receptor blockers

Baseline 48 (37.8) 62 (49.6) 0.08

Week 26 47 (37.6) 64 (51.2) 0.041

Week 52 47 (38.2) 62 (51.2) 0.05

Week 78 45 (37.5) 63 (52.9) 0.019

Week 104 44 (37.0) 59 (51.8) 0.025

Calcium channel blockers

Baseline 35 (27.6) 40 (32.0) 0.49

Week 26 33 (26.4) 41 (32.8) 0.33

Week 52 33 (26.8) 43 (35.5) 0.17

Week 78 32 (26.7) 44 (37.0) 0.10

Week 104 33 (27.7) 42 (36.8) 0.16

Lipid-lowering agents Any lipid-lowering agent

Baseline 53 (41.7) 69 (55.2) 0.043

Week 26 52 (41.6) 69 (55.2) 0.043

Week 52 52 (42.3) 69 (57.0) 0.029

Week 78 55 (45.8) 70 (58.8) 0.09

Week 104 58 (48.7) 69 (60.5) 0.12

Statins

Baseline 48 (37.8) 62 (49.6) 0.08

Week 26 47 (37.6) 62 (49.6) 0.07

Week 52 47 (38.2) 62 (51.2) 0.05

Week 78 49 (40.8) 62 (52.1) 0.09

Week 104 52 (43.7) 62 (54.4) 0.12

Antithrombotic agents Any antithrombotic agent

Baseline 14 (11.0) 13 (10.4) 1.00

Week 26 14 (11.2) 14 (11.2) 1.00

Week 52 15 (12.2) 13 (10.7) 0.84

Week 78 15 (12.5) 14 (11.8) 1.00

Week 104 15 (12.6) 13 (11.4) 0.84

Antiplatelet drugs

Baseline 12 (9.4) 10 (8.0) 0.82

Week 26 12 (9.6) 11 (8.8) 1.00

Week 52 13 (10.6) 10 (8.3) 0.66

Week 78 13 (10.8) 10 (8.4) 0.66

Week 104 13 (10.9) 10 (8.8) 0.66

Anticoagulants

Baseline 2 (1.6) 3 (2.4) 0.68

Week 26 2 (1.6) 3 (2.4) 1.00

Week 52 2 (1.6) 3 (2.5) 0.68

(13)

Week 78 2 (1.7) 4 (3.4) 0.45

Week 104 2 (1.7) 3 (2.6) 0.68

Data are presented as number (%) or mean ± standard deviation (SD). The two treatment groups were compared using Fisher’s exact test. SD: standard deviation

(14)

Supplementary Table S5. Summary of serious adverse events and adverse events.

Parameters Tofogliflozin treatment

group (n=127) Conventional treatment group (n=125)

Any adverse events 57 (44.9) 67 (53.6)

Severe adverse events 17 (13.4) 22 (17.6)

Death 0 (0) 0 (0)

Worsening of glycemic control 3 (2.4) 10 (8.0)

Hypoglycemia 14 (11.0) 15 (12.0)

Myocardial infarction 1 (0.8) 0 (0)

Other coronary artery diseases 2 (1.6) 1 (0.8)

Stroke 0 (0) 3 (2.4)

Subarachnoid hemorrhage 0 (0) 1 (0.8)

Peripheral artery disease 1 (0.8) 0 (0)

Arrhythmia 2 (1.6) 0 (0)

Venous thrombosis 0 (0) 1 (0.8)

Volume depletion 1 (0.8) 0 (0)

Hepatic cancer 2 (1.6) 0 (0)

Prostate cancer 1 (0.8) 1 (0.8)

Brest cancer 1 (0.8) 2 (1.6)

Malignant lymphoma 1 (0.8) 1 (0.8)

Anemia 0 (0) 1 (0.8)

Vertigo 1 (0.8) 1 (0.8)

ophthalmic diseases 2 (1.6) 5 (4.0)

Otolaryngology disease 5 (3.9) 3 (2.4)

Dental diseases 1 (0.8) 0 (0)

Influenza, common cold 18 (14.2) 15 (12.0)

Pneumonia 0 (0) 2 (1.6)

Other respiratory disease 1 (0.8) 2 (1.6)

Epigastric discomfort 1 (0.8) 1 (0.8)

Digestive tract disease 14 (11.0) 9 (7.2)

Liver dysfunction 1 (0.8) 0 (0)

Renal dysfunction 0 (0) 2 (1.6)

Urinary lithiasis 1 (0.8) 1 (0.8)

Dyslipidemia 0 (0) 1 (0.8)

Thyroid disease 2 (1.6) 1 (0.8)

Urinary tract infection 2 (1.6) 6 (4.8)

Genital infection 1 (0.8) 0 (0)

Genital pruritus 2 (1.6) 0 (0)

Dermatitis 2 (1.6) 0 (0)

Eruption 3 (2.4) 1 (0.8)

Muscle spasm 1 (0.8) 0 (0)

Bone fracture 3 (2.4) 2 (1.6)

Other orthopedic disease 3 (2.4) 9 (7.2)

Edema 0 (0) 1 (0.8)

General fatigue 0 (0) 1 (0.8)

Traumatic injury 0 (0) 3 (2.4)

Others 11 (8.7) 11 (8.8)

Data are presented as number (%) of patients.

(15)

Supplementary Table S6. The effect of each treatment on the total score of DTR-QOL7 in the subgroup divided by HbA1c values at Week 104

Total subjects Tofogliflozin

treatment group Conventional

treatment group P-value (inter- treatment

-group) Subjects with

HbA1c < 7 % 8.3 [0.0, 19.4]***

(n=84)

13.9 [0.0, 27.8]***

(n=50)

5.6 [-2.8, 11.1]

(n=34)

0.025 Subjects with

HbA1c with ≥ 7 % 2.8 [-8.3, 13.9]*

(n=115)

8.3 [4.2, 19.4]**

(n=52)

0.0 [-11.1, 8.3]

(n=63)

0.006 P-value

(< 7 % vs. ≥ 7 %)

0.007 0.11 0.09

Data are expressed as the medians [range: 25 % to 75 %]

Change from baseline is shown as the change in the actual value between the baseline and week 104.

Changes from baseline to week 104 were assessed using Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test within the group. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.

Differences in delta change in the total score of DTR-QOL7 from baseline to week 104 between the groups (treatment effect) were analyzed using Wilcoxon’s rank sum test.

Supplementary Table S7. Effect of each treatment on the total score of DTR-QOL7 in the subgroup divided by the occurrence of AE

Subjects without AE Subjects with AE

but without SAE Subjects with SAE P-value (inter- group) Tofogliflozin

treatment group

8.3 [0.0, 22.2] ***

(n=55)

13.9 [0.0, 22.2] ***

(n=35)

18.1 [0.0, 25.0]*

(n=12)

0.79

Conventional treatment

group

5.6 [2.8, 11.1]*

(n=44)

-2.8 [-13.9, 8.3]

(n=39)

0.0 [-13.9, 5.6]

(n=15)

0.15

Data are expressed as the medians [range: 25 % to 75 %]

Change from baseline is shown as the change in the actual value between the baseline and week 104.

Changes from baseline to week 104 were assessed using Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test within the group. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.

Differences in delta change in the total score of DTR-QOL7 from baseline to week 104 between the groups (treatment effect) were analyzed using Wilcoxon’s rank sum test.

AE: adverse event; SAE: serious adverse event

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

In detail, this included the assumptions that (i) respondents who report higher levels of experienced and perceived stigma would report lower self-esteem, higher levels of

4 the comparison of extension of HAZ and kerf width with rising feeding rate for laser beam cutting of a CFRP laminate by means of a Yb-doped fibre laser is shown.. Both HAZ and

Differences of clinical parameters between CYP1A1 rs1048943 risk allele carriers and non-carriers in GAgP patients were compared using an independent t test at baseline, 3 t

In the overview of the 14 formulated hypotheses the follow- ing pattern can be seen (Tab. 3): Consistent with the general presumptions of the quality-of-life

Despite these differences, the rela- tive risk of death from CHD was reduced to a similar extent in diabetic patients in Europe and the United States [7] with moderate

‡ Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status is scored on a scale from 0 to 5, with 0 indicating no symptoms and higher scores indicating increasing disability.. §

The purpose of the study was to assess the impact of frailty syndrome on quality of life and depression symptoms of patients with type 2

Nevertheless, pentosidine levels in the urine have also been associated with increased vertebral fracture prevalence in T2DM patients and lower trabecular bone score, but not