• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Immigration, Diversity, Human Capital and the Future Labor Force of Developed Countries: the European Model

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Immigration, Diversity, Human Capital and the Future Labor Force of Developed Countries: the European Model"

Copied!
20
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Immigration, Diversity, Human

Capital and the Future Labor Force of Developed Countries: the

European Model

Guillaume Marois

1

, Patrick Sabourin

1

, Alain Bélanger

1,2

and Wolfgang Lutz

1

1 World Population Program

International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis

2 Programme de démographie

Institut national de la recherche scientifique

6th World Congress of the International Microsimulation Association

June 21-23, 2017

Collegio Carlo Alberto, Moncalieri, Italy

(2)

Partnership between

IIASA

Joint Research Centre of the EC

Quantitative study of migration challenges arising from alternative scenarios in

1. the outmigration push factors in Africa and the Middle East,

2. the immigration pull factors in EU Member states and 3. the impact of the resulting migration streams into the

EU member states.

Center of Expertise in Population and

Migration (CEPAM)

(3)

CEPAM microsimulation model

• Core structure based on the LSD microsimulation model

– Microsimulation model for developed nations with similar purposes – Lead by Alain Bélanger and supported by the Social Sciences and

Humanities Research Council (Immigration, Education Ethnocultural Diversity and the Future of Labor Force Composition)

• Modgen language

– Statistics Canada’s programming language for microsimulation

• Dynamic / Continuous time / Case- and event-based / Open / Stochastic (Monte Carlo)

• Geography: 28 European Union member countries

• Time span: 2010 -

(4)

CEPAM microsimulation model

Variables:

• Demographic

– Age, Sex, Country of residence (28)

• Immigration and Ethnocultural variables

– Region of birth (Native + 11 regions) – Generation status (G1, G1.5, G2+) – Duration of residence (5)

– Religion (4)

– Language used at home (3)

• Socio-economic

– Education level + Education of the mother (3) – Labor force participation (2)

– Employment (2)

Data sources: European Social Survey, European Labor

Force Survey, Census 2011

(5)

CEPAM – Core Demographic Modules

• Mortality (Age, Sex, Education, Year)

• Fertility (Age, Sex, Education, Year)

• International migration (Composition, Size, Distribution)

• Internal Mobility (future)

(6)

Education module

Three-step modeling

Applied to individuals with incomplete education paths: newborns, immigrants arrived during childhood and members of the base population under 25 years old

1. Setting up an education level

When the individual is added to the population, the highest level of education that will be reached in his lifetime is set in a latent variable

– Probabilistically, according to individual characteristics

2. Schedule of education

Country-specific distribution by age from Eurostat (2013-2014)

3. Simulation of life course

If the individual survives until graduation age, the education state variable changes to reflect the appropriate educational attainment. A change in

education immediately affects other events (fertility, labor force participation, employment, mortality)

(7)

Education module

• Multinomial logit

Population (pooled data of ESS)

– Born before 1990

– Born in EU/Immigrated before age 25

– Stratified by gender and region (EU15/NMS13)

• Two purposes

1. To estimate differential for sociocultural variables in educational attainment

2. To estimate the net cohort/country-specific trend

• Assumptions on educational attainment of future cohorts

(8)

-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Effect of sociocultural variables on educational attainment (Low vs High), EU15

Male Female

Education of the mother is the main determinant

(9)

Most of the improvement in education for younger cohorts is explained by the education of the mother

<=1969 1970-1979 1980-1989

-1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5

Gross and net cohort trends for low education, Male

IT - Gross IT - Net HU - Gross HU - Net PT - Gross PT - Net

(10)

Labour Force Participation and Employment modules

Age 15-74?

Labor Force Participation

?

Employment

?

Employe d

Unemplo Non- yed

labor force labor Non-

force Yes

No

Yes

No

No Yes

Personal characteristics

Specific effect by country and gender

Age, education, age of youngest child, immigrant status, number of years since arrival, age at immigration

Interaction: age*education / education*immigrant

(11)

22 27 32 37 42 47 52 57 62 67 72 0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Labour force participation by age and education, Native females, EU

L M H

Presence of a child age 0-4

• Steeper gradient of education for females

• There is an interaction between LFP and fertility

T

(12)

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Labour force participation by immigrant status and education, Females, 30-34

100%

L M H

• Effect of duration of residence

• Having a High education level has less effect for international immigrants

• Education gradient stronger for females

(13)

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%Unemployment by immigrant status and education, Female age 30-34

L M H

• International migrants have lower LFP than natives and higher unemployment

– Threshold effect in duration of residence

– Threshold effect in education level for international immigrants

(14)

Some preliminary results

(15)

Modules Scenario 1

Reference Scenario 2

Immigration+ Scenario 3

Selection and integration

Labor force participation

Constant parameters Constant parameters Immigrants = Natives

Employment Constant parameters Constant parameters Immigrants = Natives

Immigration level

Wittgenstein

reference scenario

50% increase Wittgenstein

reference scenario

Immigration composition

Recent trends Recent trends More educated Shift 50% L→M Shift 50% M→H

• Same assumptions for fertility, mortality, education and internal

migration for all scenarios

(16)

For the next decades, better integration or increasing

immigration have similar effect on the number of workers

2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060

190000000 195000000 200000000 205000000 210000000 215000000 220000000 225000000 230000000

Projected size of employed population, EU, 2010-2060

Reference Immigrants+

Selection and integration

(17)

But in terms of total employment rate, increasing

immigration has no effect, while selection and integration may improve the situation

2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060 42%

44%

46%

48%

50%

52%

Projected employment rate (15+), EU, 2010-2060

Reference Immigrants+

Selection and integration

(18)

It is even more important to fully integrate immigrants with high education level

2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060 16%

17%

18%

19%

20%

21%

22%

23%

24%

Percent of population age 15 and over that are employed and have tertiary education, EU, 2010-2060

Reference Immigrants+

Selection and integration

(19)

Future Developments

• Complete the model

– Develop the internal migration module – Develop the ethnocultural modules

– Add differentials for most demographic and socio-economic events

– Implement other dimensions of economic indicators

• Analyse spatio-temporal trends and policies to

develop more analytical scenarios

(20)

Thank you

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

The EU’s mobility partnerships are a good start, but sender countries need economic incentives to cooperate in the management of irregular migration, including guarding their

DISCUSSION AND FURTHER RESULTS If stable theory is expanded to include immigration, we have shown that as long as fertility is below replacement, a sta- tionary

Its central finding is that, as long as fertility is below replacement, a constant number and age distribution of immigrants (with fixed fertility and mortality schedules) lead to

The GYA represents the expected number of years in the labor force in the absence of mortality, i.e., no deaths occur before or during the active ages and therefore, no working

One of the most obvious characteristics of a plot of age- specific migration rates is that there is a close correspondence between the rates for young children and the

Increasing immigration levels increases the size of the active population, but it also increases the inactive population at a similar pace because labor force participation rates

The last section compares outputs from different projection scenarios to demonstrate that incomplete economic integration of immigrants affects the results of labor force

In this section, we aggregate the projection results obtained for Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, Sudan, and Tunisia and compare them to the re- gional probabilistic projections