• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

EU activities and plans to address plastics and microplastics in the aquatic environment

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "EU activities and plans to address plastics and microplastics in the aquatic environment"

Copied!
22
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

EU activities and plans to address plastics and microplastics

in the aquatic environment

Helen Clayton, ENV C1 Water European Commission

European Conference on

Plastics in Freshwater Environments

21-22 June 2016, Berlin

(2)

Contents

• Three policy milestones

• Circular Economy Package 2015

• Recent EU-funded studies and findings

• Plastics in the context of the Water Framework Directive

• Other developments

2

(3)

3

Marine Strategy Framework Directive 2008 Good Environmental Status (by 2020):

"the properties and quantities of marine litter do not cause harm to the coastal and marine environment"

(4)

Green Paper 2013

• First systematic approach to plastics in the environment at European Union level

• Made reference to the problem of microplastics and the issue of chemicals in and adsorbed to microplastics

• Cited UN statistic that 80% of marine plastics come from land-based sources

• Examined several policy options to improve the management of plastic waste in Europe

(5)

Green Paper 2013 policy options

Application of the waste hierarchy to plastic waste management

Achievement of targets, plastic recycling and voluntary initiatives

Targeting consumer behaviour

Towards more sustainable plastics

Durability of plastics and plastic products

Promotion of biodegradable plastics and bio-based plastics

EU initiatives dealing with marine litter including plastic waste

International action

5

(6)

Plastic Bags Directive 2015

• Public consultation in 2011

• Directive on single-use plastic bags adopted in 2015

• Implementation underway in Member States

• Very significant reductions in use

(7)

42%

2% 6%

4%

9%

36%

Deposit onto or into land

Land treatment and release into water bodies Incineration/disposal

Incineration/energy recovery Backfilling

Recycling

7

Low levels of recycling-high levels of

landfilling

Incineration of recyclable waste

No long-term targets

Source: Eurostat

(8)

From a linear …

To a circular economy

(9)

Circular Economy Package adopted by the Commission 2 December 2015

Action Plan

Communication List of Follow-up

Initiatives (Annex) 4 Legislative proposals on waste

9

(10)

Production

Waste Management

Consumption

Secondary raw materials

5 priority sectors

Plastics

Food Waste

Construction

& Demolition

Biomass &

Bio-based Products Critical Raw

Materials Food waste

(11)

50 actions between 2015 and 2018/2019 – involving several policy areas

Ecodesign to include reparability, durability, recyclability

• Actions on Green Public Procurement

Funding of €650 million for ‘Industry 2020 in the circular economy’

• Legislation on fertilisers

• Interface between chemicals, products and waste legislation

• Proposals on waste

• More prevention

• Long-term recycling & re-use targets

• Landfill restrictions

• Proposals on marine litter, water reuse

11

(12)

Aspirational target of 30% reduction in marine litter by 2020

Baseline needed – JRC working on

Programmes of measures under MSFD being assessed in 2016/2017

Strategy on plastics to be established by 2017

Major aim to reduce marine litter

Consideration of recyclability/biodegradability and bio-based plastics

Vision/actions on microplastics

Strategy for most-found items

In the waste proposal:

Higher recycling target for plastics (55% by 2025), to be defined for 2030

Litter to be included in waste management plans

Common rules on Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) 12

(13)

Recent studies

• Mudgal et al (2011) Plastic Waste in the Environment

• van der Wal et al (2015) Identification and

Assessment of Riverine Input of (Marine) Litter

• Sherrington et al (2016) Study to support the development of measures to combat a range of marine litter sources

• Oosterbaan et al (2016?) Riverine Litter

Monitoring – Options and Recommendations (JRC Technical Report)

13

(14)

Quantities

How much litter is in the sea?

How much plastic is added

annually?

How much of the annual incr. is micro-

plastics?

Over 150 million

tonnes 5 to 13 million tonnes (from Jambeck et al.)

No reliable estimates

2 to 5 million

tonnes 150,000 to 500,000 tonnes

(about 80% from land-based sources)

80,000 to 220,000 tonnes (primary

sources)

70,000 to 275,000 tonnes (secondary

(15)

0 10.000 20.000 30.000 40.000 50.000 60.000

Tyre dust Textiles Pellet Spills Building paints

Road paint Cosmetic Marine paints

Source: Sherrington et al (2016) Eunomia report for European Commission DG ENV

Lower Estimate Upper Estimate

Primary microplastics

to the marine environment

15

(16)
(17)

Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC Objectives: Good

ecological and good

chemical status by 2015 Assessment of 2nd RBMPs in 2016-17

Review of the Priority Substances List

Review of the

Groundwater Directive Review of the WFD by

2019 17

(18)

• Rivers = vectors

• In the context of the Water Framework Directive Member States must report on the presence of litter, if they are taking measures to address it

New studies in preparation (with JRC), addressing technical aspects of riverine litter monitoring, aiming at harmonised and regular monitoring, development of modelling tools (considering river flow, meteorological information, and population and other socio-economic data) and at an EU floating-litter observation network

Riverine litter

(19)

Microplastics in sediments

"Very recent research suggests that deep sea sediment could be a significant sink for marine litter. Even plastics which would normally be buoyant in sea water can sink if they are biofouled by microbial communities.

Sediment sampling tends to concentrate on microplastics;

their concentration in sediment has been found to be up to 30,000-130,000 times the level of concentration by particle count found in surface waters. However this was taking into account fibres of a size far below that considered in typical floating litter surveys."

Sherrington et al (2016) Eunomia report for European Commission DG ENV

19

(20)

The importance of links – and some other ongoing/forthcoming initiatives

• WFD-MSFD links (including in context of revision of the GES Decision)

• Review of the Drinking Water Directive

• Refit of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive

• Innovation Partnership on Water

• Fitness Check of Chemicals Legislation

• Community Strategy on Endocrine Disruptors

• Mixtures – follow-up of Council Conclusions

• Non-toxic environment strategy

• Information Platform on Chemical Monitoring (IPCheM)

• EFSA opinion on micro- and nano-plastics in seafood

20

(21)

Plastics in the environment - a shared footprint

• International (incl. UNEP)

• Regional

(e.g. HELCOM)

• “Domestic”

(European/

National/

Sub-National)

21

(22)

helen.clayton@ec.europa.eu

22

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

The murder of Jews was not directed against the Jews of Germany or the Jews of Poland or even the Jews of Europe, but against all the 17 million Jews scattered throughout the

Hence, implementing strategies such as creating an age- friendly work environment, offering ongoing training, exploiting task automation, using ergonomics to improve

In general, BEEPS indicates that borrowing from local private banks seems to be more important than borrowing from state-owned banks (including state development banks), which

A  public  competition  procedure  is  implemented  by  the  selection  board,  which  always  includes 

Eighteen Member States responding to this question (Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Malta,

– under Article 15 of the GDPR to request information from us about your personal data which we have processed. In particular you may request information about the purposes for

This is in contrast to the arguments given by the European Commission to support water pricing as the key policy instrument in the WFD (EC, 2000). The Commission argues that:

A European Green Deal requires a green EU budget and it is essential that we make use of the last windows of op- portunity to strengthen climate performance of the budget that