• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Prof. Dr. Otto May 6, 2011

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Prof. Dr. Otto May 6, 2011"

Copied!
5
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Linear Algebra II

Exercise Sheet no. 5

Summer term 2011

Prof. Dr. Otto May 6, 2011

Dr. Le Roux Dr. Linshaw

Exercise 1

(a) Consider2×2-matrices over the complex numbers. Why does their minimal polynomial determine their character- istic polynomial? Is the same true for3×3-matrices?

(b) Find two2×2-matrices that are not similar, but have the same characteristic polynomial.

(c) Show that any two2×2-matrices with the same minimal polynomial are similar inC(2,2). Is the same true inR(2,2)? (d) Discuss necessary and sufficient conditions (also in terms of the determinant, the trace, and the minimal and characteristic polynomial of a matrix) for the similarity of two matrices. Use these criteria to split the following9 matrices into equivalence classes w.r.t. similarity.

A1=

4 2 3

1 3 2

6 8 7

A2=

2 3 4

0 2 3

0 0 2

A3=

1 3 4

3 7 2

2 8 6

A4=

2 0 4

0 2 0

0 0 2

A5=

2 0 0

0 2 0

0 0 2

A6=

2 4 3

3 1 2

8 6 7

A7=

4 2 0

−2 0 0

2 2 2

A8=

2 5 7

0 1 8

0 0 3

, A9=

3 0 0

0 2 0

0 0 1

.

Solution:

a) If the minimal polynomial has degree 2, then it must be the characteristic polynomial. If it has degree 1, it must consist of one linear factor(X −λ), and the characteristic polynomial is (X−λ)2. (And if it is the polynomial p=0, then so is the characteristic polynomial.)

A3×3-matrix with minimal polynomial(X−2)(X−3)may have characteristic polynomial(X−2)2(X−3)or (X−2)(X−3)2. (Try to find an example of both!)

b) The following matrices have the same characteristic, but different minimal polynomials, and are therefore not similar:

A= 1 1

0 1

and B= 1 0

0 1

.

c) To prove that matrices inC(2,2) with the same minimal polynomial are similar, we find for each polynomialpof degree two a matrix to which all matrices withpas minimal polynomial are similar. So, if the minimal polynomial of a matrix is of the form(Xλ)(Xµ)withλ6=µ, then this also the characteristic polynomial, and the matrix is similar to

λ 0 0 µ

.

(2)

If the minimal polynomial is(X−λ), then the matrix is (similar to) λ 0

0 λ

,

and if the minimal polynomial is(X−λ)2, then it is similar to λ 1

0 λ

(This will later follow from the Jordan Normal Form Theorem).

InR(2,2)we have the additional possibility of a minimal polynomial of degree two that is irreducible overR. Over Cthe polynomial splits as(Xλ)(Xλ)withλ6=λ. Writingλ=r eiϕit follows from the previous exercise that the matrix is similar inR(2,2)to

r

cosϕ sinϕ

−sinϕ cosϕ

.

So we deduce that also inR(2,2)matrices with the same minimal polynomial are similar.

d) Similar matrices share the following features:

• They represent the same linear map with respect to different bases.

• They have the same eigenvalues with the same algebraic and geometric multiplicities.

• They have the same characteristic and minimal polynomial.

• They have the same determinant and trace.

• They have the same rank.

• One is invertible, diagonalisable, idempotent, nilpotent etc. iff the other is.

So these conditions are all necessary. We note that, if the matrices are diagonalisable, then having the same characteristic polynomial is also sufficient.

After comparing the traces and determinants it suffices to investigate the following classes for similarity:

{A1}, {A3}, {A6}, {A8,A9}, {A2,A4,A5,A7}.

SincepA8= (X−1)(X−2)(X−3) =pA9the matrixA8(andA9)is diagonalisable. It follows that the matricesA8 andA9are similar.

The characteristic polynomial ofA7is

(2−X)[(−X)(4−X) +4] = (2−X)(X2−4X+4) = (2−X)3.

The eigenspace corresponding to the eigenvalue 2 has dimension 1 forA2, dimension 2 forA4andA7, and dimen- sion 3 forA5. The matricesA4andA7are similar, since we haveA7=SA4S−1with

S=

−1 −1 −1

1 1 −1

−1 1 1

, S−1= 1 2

−1 0 −1

0 1 1

−1 −1 0

.

Exercise 2 (Endomorphisms and bases)

Letϕ∈Hom(R3,R3)be an endomorphism ofR3that, for someλ∈R, is represented by the matrix

Aλ:=

λ 1 0

0 λ 1

0 0 λ

(a) Check that the third basis vector in a basisBgiving rise toAλasAλ=¹ϕºBBmust be inker(ϕ−λid)3\ker(ϕ−λid)2. (b) Describe in words which properties of ϕ guarantee that¹ϕº

B

B =Aλ for some basisB (for instance, in terms of eigenvalues, eigenvectors, the minimal polynomial, or the characteristic polynomial).

(3)

(c) For fixedϕ(andλ), describe the set of all basesB= (b1,b2,b3)for which¹ϕº

B B=Aλ.

Hint.Useϕto expressb1in terms ofb2andb2in terms ofb3, and determine the possible choices forb3. (d) For λ = 0, what does the condition that ¹ϕº

B

B = A0, for some basis B, tell us about dimensions of and the relationship betweenIm(ϕ)andker(ϕ)? What are the invariant subspaces?

Solution:

a) Let B = (b1,b2,b3)be such a basis. pϕ(X) = (λ−X)3so (ϕ−λid)3= 0. Also, some calculation shows that (ϕ−λid)2(b3) =ϕ2(b3)−2λϕ(b3) +λ2b3=· · ·=b16=0.

b) We can find a basisB with¹ϕº

B

B =Aλ if, and only if,ϕ has only one eigenvalueλ, of geometric multiplicity1, and its minimal polynomial isqϕ= (Xλ)3.

c) IfBis a basis as above, then

b1=ϕ(b2)−λb2= (ϕ−λid)b2 and b2=ϕ(b3)−λb3= (ϕ−λid)b3. Hence, every choice ofb3uniquely determinesb1andb2.

For whichb3do we get a basis this way? Clearly, we must haveb16=0andb26=0. Hence, b2/ker(ϕ−λid) and b3/ker(ϕ−λid).

We can simplify these conditions to the single necessary condition b3/ker(ϕ−λid)2.

We claim that this condition is also sufficient, i.e., for everyb3∈R3\ker(ϕ−λid)2, the vectors(ϕ−λid)2b3, (ϕ−λid)b3,b3form a basis.

First, we show that b1 := (ϕ−λid)2b3 and b2 := (ϕ−λid)b3 are linearly independent. For a contradiction, suppose otherwise. Then, since both vectors are non-zero, there is a non-zero scalarαsuch that

(ϕ−λid)2b3=α(ϕλid)b3.

We can rewrite this equation to

ϕ(b2) = (α+λ)b2.

Hence,b2is an eigenvector ofϕwith eigenvalueα+λ. Sinceλis the only eigenvalue ofϕ, we obtainα=0. A contradiction.

Finally, we show that all three vectors b1,b2,b3 are linearly independent. Otherwise, we would have b3 ∈ span(b1,b2). Sinceb1,b2∈ker(ϕ−λid)2andker(ϕ−λid)2is a subspace, it follows that

b3∈span(b1,b2)⊆ker(ϕ−λid)2.

Again a contradiction.

d) LetB= (b1,b2,b3)be a basis such that¹ϕº=A0. Then

ker(ϕ) =span(b1) and Im(ϕ) =span(b1,b2).

Hence,

ker(ϕ)⊆Im(ϕ), dim(ker(ϕ)) =1 , dim(Im(ϕ)) =2 .

We claim that the only invariant subspaces are{0},ker(ϕ),Im(ϕ), andR3. LetU be an invariant subspace. If Ucontains some vectorv/ker(ϕ2), thenϕ(v)andϕ2(v)are also inUandv,ϕ(v),ϕ2(v)are linearly independent.

Hence,dim(U)≥3andU=R3.

Similarly, ifU⊆ker(ϕ2)but there is somevU\ker(ϕ), thenϕ(v)andvare linearly independent vectors inU. Hence,dim(U) =2andU=ker(ϕ2) =Im(ϕ).

Finally, ifU⊆ker(ϕ)thenU is either1-dimensional and, hence,U=ker(ϕ), orUis0-dimensional andU={0}.

(4)

Exercise 3 (Nilpotent endomorphisms)

Recall that an endomorphismϕ:VV isnilpotentif there is somek∈Nsuch thatϕk =0. The minimal suchkis called theindexofϕ.

(a) Suppose thatV isPoln(R)theR-vector space of all polynomial functions of degree up to n. Show that the usual differential operator :VV :f 7→ f0is nilpotent of indexn+1.

Suppose thatϕ:VV is nilpotent with indexk.

(b) Show thatqϕ=Xk.

(c) Show that, for everyvV,W:=span(v,ϕ(v), . . . ,ϕk−1(v))is an invariant subspace.

(d) LetW be the subspace from (iii) where we additionally assume thatϕk−1(v)6=0. Show that the restrictionϕ0of ϕtoW is nilpotent with indexk.

(e) Suppose thatV has dimensionk. Show that there is some basisBsuch that

¹ϕº

B B=

0 1 0 · · · 0 ... ... ... ...

... ... ... 0 ... 1

0 · · · 0

 .

Solution:

a) Sincen+1(x 7→ xi) =0, for all in, the index of∂ is at mostn+1. On the other hand, i(x7→ xn)6=0, for in. Therefore, the index is exactlyn+1.

b) The minimal polynomialqϕ must divideXksinceϕk=0. By minimality ofk, we haveϕi6=0, fori<k. Hence, qϕ6=Xi, fori<k. Therefore,qϕ=Xk.

c) Letw∈span(v,ϕ(v), . . . ,ϕk−1(v)). Then

w=α0v+α1ϕ(v) +· · ·+αk−2ϕk−2(v) +αk−1ϕk−1(v), and

ϕ(w) =α0ϕ(v) +α1ϕ2(v) +· · ·+αk−2ϕk−1(v) +αk−1ϕk(v)

=α0ϕ(v) +α1ϕ2(v) +· · ·+αk−2ϕk−1(v)∈span(v,ϕ(v), . . . ,ϕk−1(v)).

Henceϕ(w)W, for everywW.

d) For everywV, we haveϕk(w) =0. This implies that ϕ0k(w) =0, for allwWV. Hence, the index is at mostk. It cannot be less thanksincevW andϕ0k−1(v) =ϕk−1(v)6=0.

e) Since the index ofϕisk, there is somevV such thatϕk−1(v)6=0. For the basisB= (ϕk−1(v), . . . ,ϕ(v),v), the matrix¹ϕº

B

Bhas the desired form.

Exercise 4 (Characteristic and minimal polynomial)

LetA∈F(n,n)have the characteristic polynomialpAand the minimal polynomialqA=Xr+Pr−1 i=0ciXi. (a) LetB0,B1, . . . ,Brbe defined as below.

B0 := En B1 := A+cr−1En

B2 := A2+cr−1A+cr−2En . . .

Br−1 := Ar−1+cr−1Ar−2+· · ·+c1En Br := Ar+cr−1Ar−1+· · ·+c0En

LetB(X):=Xr−1B0+Xr−2B1+· · ·+X Br−2+Br−1and show that(X EnA)B(X) =qA(X En).

(5)

(b) Use part (a) to show that pAdivides(qA)n.

(c) Use part (b) to show thatpAandqAhave the same irreducible factors.

Solution:

a) One sees that for the sequenceBiwe have:

B0 = En

B1AB0 = A+cr−1EnA

= cr−1En . . .

Br−1ABr−2 = c1En BrABr−1 = c0En AsBr=qA(A) =0we get

ABr−1=c0EnBr=c0En.

Using these observations we can determine(X EnA)B(X):

(X EnA)B(X) = (XrB0+Xr−1B1+· · ·+X2Br−2+X Br−1)

−(Xr−1AB0+Xr−2AB1+· · ·+X ABr2+ABr−1)

= XrB0+Xr−1(B1AB0) +· · ·+X Br−1ABr−2ABr−1

= XrEn+Xr−1c1En+Xr−2cr−2En+· · ·+X c1En+c0En

= qA(X En)

b) The determinant on both sides of the above equation gives|(X EnA)||B(X)|=|qA(X En)|= (qA(X))n. Since|B(X)|

is a polynomial,|X EnA|divides(qA)n; that is the characteristic polynomialpAofAdivides(qA)n.

c) Suppose f is an irreducible polynomial. If f dividesqAthen, sinceqAdividespA, f dividespA. On the other hand, iff dividesqA, then by part(a),f divides(qA)n. Butf is irreducible; hence f dividesqA. ThusqAandpAhave the same irreducible factors.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

meteorite contains C-rich material at some individual measurement po- sitions. The other points can be identi fi ed as a mixture of melilite and albite. 6d) show that the

By 9J ( we denote the set of all i-open polyhedra.. On the other hand we notice that there are rings 3 which admit no Euler characteristic, and others which admit more than one.

6.1 Materials supply: If the buyer supplies the seller with materials needed for contract per- formance, these shall remain the property of the buyer.. They have to be designated as

11.3 In case of defects in the goods delivered, the purchaser may, at its option, (i) require the tenderer to remedy the defects at no charge, (ii) reduce the price in proportion to

THE MINIMAL CONTROL FIELD PROBLEM FOR LINEAR

Comité organisateur : Juliette Brack (Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, HiCSA-CHAR), Julie Glodt (Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, HiCSA), Nicolas Sarzeaud (EHESS-CRH,

Pbtscher (1983) used simultaneous Lagrange multiplier statistics in order to test the parameters of ARMA models; he proved the strong consistency of his procedure

This problem was studied in Aubin-Clarke [2] when U is convex, and by many other authors. The abstract theorems of Section 3 can be applied as well to this new problem, but we