• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Advanced Automata Theory Exercise Sheet 3

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Aktie "Advanced Automata Theory Exercise Sheet 3"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Advanced Automata Theory Exercise Sheet 3

Prof. Roland Meyer TU Braunschweig

Dr. Prakash Saivasan Summer term 2017

Out: Apr 26 Due: May 2, 09:30

Exercise 1: Star-Free Languages

Prove or disprove whether the following languages over Σ ={a, b}are star-free:

a) (ab∪ba) b) (a∪bab)

c) Lodd ={w∈Σ | w has odd length}

Exercise 2: Star-Free ⇒ FO[<]-definable

a) Let w=a0. . . an ∈Σ be a word and let i, j ∈N such that 0≤i≤j ≤n. Show that for every closed FO[<]-formula ϕ and FO-variables x, y with I(x) = i,I(y) =j, there is a formulaψ(x, y) such that

S(w),I ψ if and only if S(ai. . . aj)ϕ.

b) Deduce from a) that FO[<]-definable languages are closed under concatenation.

c) Prove using structural induction that every star-free language is FO[<]-definable.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

b) B¨ uchi’s theorem (I) can be adapted to show that every NBA-definable language is S1S- definable. Illustrate the main ingredients needed to adapt B¨ uchi’s proof.. c) B¨

[r]

[r]

c) Prove using structural induction that every star-free language

Because of the holiday on Monday, you can bring your submissions to the exercise class

Adapting Parikh’s proof, show that reachability in counter machines with one unrestricted counter and n r-reversal bounded counters

The words in the language will however respect the actions on the unrestricted counter because they correspond to actual effects on the counter of M 00 , which can make sure we

The idea is to accept a run if the set of states that occur infinitely often matches one of the Q i