• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Localized Multicasting

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Localized Multicasting"

Copied!
28
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Localized Multicasting

(2)

The Localized Multicasting Problem

Known information

Current node

Neighbors

Destinations

T1

T3

T2 S

B A

D C

(3)

The Localized Multicasting Problem

Known information

Current node

Neighbors

Destinations

Building blocks

Message split

T1

T3

T2 S

B A

D C

(4)

The Localized Multicasting Problem

Known information

Current node

Neighbors

Destinations

Building blocks

Message split

Next hop selection

T1

T3

T2 S

B A

D C

?

(5)

The Localized Multicasting Problem

Known information

Current node

Neighbors

Destinations

Building blocks

Message split

Next hop selection

Recovery

T1

T3

T2 S

B A

D C

?

?

(6)

The MSTEAM Algorithm

(7)

EMST Backbone Assisted Localized Routing

T9

T7

T6

T4

T1

T3 S

T8

T5

T2 T1,…,T9

Additional requirement:

Location information

(8)

EMST Backbone Assisted Localized Routing

T8 T9

T7

T6

T5

T4

T1

T2

T3 S

EMST(S,T1,…,T9)

(9)

EMST Backbone Assisted Localized Routing

T8 T9

T7

T6

T5

T4

T1

T2

T3

D1

D2 D3

S

(10)

EMST Backbone Assisted Localized Routing

T8 T9

T7

T6

T5

T4

T1

T2

T3 A

B

C

S

T7,T8,T9

T1,T2,T3 T4,T5,T6

(11)

EMST Backbone Assisted Localized Routing

T8 T9

T7

T6

T5

T4

T1

T2

T3 A

B

C

EMST(C,T7,T8,T9 )

EMST(B,T4,T5,T6 )

EMST(A,T1,T2,T3)

(12)

The Cost over Progress Framework

T3

T1

W V

T2 S

Which one is the better next hop node?

T1,T2,T3

(13)

The Cost over Progress Framework

Approximate expected number of hops H(S,V)

H(S,V)  (|EMST(S,T1,T2,T3)| - |EMST(V,T1,T2,T3)|) / |EMST(S,T1,T2,T3)|

Approximate expected cost C(S,V) = cost(S,V) * H(S,V)

Select node X which provides progress and minimizes C(S,X)

Example: cost(S,X) = b |SX| + c

T3

T1

W V

T2 S

(14)

Example: EMST(s,t0,…,t9)

s

t0

t1 t2

t3

t4

t5

t6 t7

t8

t9

(15)

Example: Final Multicasting Result MT(s,t0,…,t9)

s

t0

t1 t2

t3

t4

t5

t6 t7

t8

t9

(16)

MFACE: Traversal Start

S T6

T5

T4

T3

T1

T2

F1 F2

(17)

MFACE: Traversal Start

S T6

T5

T4

T3

T1

T2

F1 F2

(18)

MFACE: Traversal Continue

S

U

V W

F1 F2

F3

T1

T2 T3

(19)

MFACE: Traversal Continue

S

U

V W

F1 F2

F3

T1

T2 T3

(20)

MFACE: Traversal Continue

S

U

V W

F1 F2

F3

T1

T2 T3

(21)

MFACE: Traversal Continue

S

U

V W

F1 F2

F3

T1

T2 T3 p

(22)

MFACE: Traversal Continue

S

U

V W

F1 F2

F3

T1

T2

(23)

MFACE: Traversal Continue

S

U

V W

F1 F2

F3

T2

(24)

Other Geographic Routing

Approaches

(25)

Geocasting

Reach nodes in a certain area

Geocasting Components

Routing towards the area

Single-path, multi-path

Restricted directional flooding

Dissemination inside the area

Location-aware flooding

Reducing redundant transmissions

Geocast with guaranteed delivery?

(26)

Geographic Hash Table (GHT) (1)

Idea: hashing on geographical positions

Put() and Get() operations map to the same device near to the hashed location

Mapped device stores data

Use of planar graph routing to find the same device

Source F1 F2 F4 Sink

F5

F6 F3

(27)

Geographic Hash Table (GHT) (2)

Problem: changing network topology

Storing node might disappear

Put() and Get() may retrieve different storing nodes

Source F1 F2 F4 Sink

F5

F6 F3

(28)

Geographic Hash Table (GHT) (3)

Solution

Replication along the face perimeter

Periodic refresh messages traveling along the perimeter

New home node selected when

Refresh packet is missing for a certain timeout

Node closer to destination receives refresh packet

D

E

F

B C

A home

replica

D

E

F

B C

D

E

F

B C

(a) (b) (c)

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Both sets of spectra were fitted with the lineshape model using the SDF defined at 0 K (the SDF itself was different for chlorin and FMO). The modelling was performed as described

In the first multistable region (7.2 ≤ V ≤ 7.7), the localization pattern directly relates to the initial perturbances on each DOF: larger initial values on the first blade excite

Organisation Name:Nationalparkverwaltung Niedersächsisches Wattenmeer / Niedersächsischer Landesbetrieb für Wasserwirtschaft Küsten- und Naturschutz Voice:+49 (0) 4421

Organisation Name:Nationalparkverwaltung Niedersächsisches Wattenmeer / Niedersächsischer Landesbetrieb für Wasserwirtschaft Küsten- und Naturschutz Voice:+49 (0) 4421

Organisation Name:Landesamt für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein (LLUR). Voice:+49 4347 704-499 Facsimile:+49

Tr¨ oltzsch, Analytical, optimal, and sparse optimal control of traveling wave solutions to reaction–diffusion systems, in Control of Self-Organizing Nonlinear Systems, edited by

rticipants that can make mistakes and to different rates of memory rticipants that can make mistakes, and to different rates

Proposition 3.2 If the difference between the expected rates of exogenous technological progress of the two technologies is less than the expected rate of potential learning-by-doing