Aarons, Debra. 1994. Aspects of the syntax of American Sign Language. Boston University dissertation.
Abels, Klaus & Peter Muriungi. 2005. The focus particle in Kîîtharaka. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 42. 219–239.
Abney, Steven Paul. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspects.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
Ackema, Peter & Ad Neeleman. 2002. Effects of short-term storage in processing rightward movement. In Sieb Nooteboom, Fred Weerman & Frank Wijnen (eds.), Storage and computation in the language faculty, 219–56. Dordrecht:
Kluwer.
Åfarli, Tor A. 1994. A promotion analysis of restrictive relative clauses. The Linguistic Review 11. 81–100.
Akmajian, Adrian. 1970. On deriving cleft sentences from pseudo-cleft sentences.
Linguistic Inquiry 1. 140–168.
Alba, Celia. 2010. Les oracions interrogatives parcials en LSC. Bases per a una anàlisi. Universitat de Barcelona dissertation.
Alexiadou, Artemis, Paul Law, André Meinunger & Chris Wilder (eds.). 2000. The syntax of relative clauses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Angelini, Natalia, Rossano Borgioli, Anna Folchi & Matteo Mastromatteo. 1991.
I primi 400 segni. Piccolo dizionario della lingua italiana dei segni per comunicare con i sordi. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
Bahan, Benjamin J. 1996. Non-manual realization of agreement in American Sign Language. Ann Arbor, Michigan: U.M.I. Boston University dissertation.
Bahan, Benjamin, Judy Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin & Carol Neidle. 1995. Convergent evidence for the structure of determiner phrases in American Sign Language.
In Leslie Gabriele, Debra Hardison & Robert Westmoreland (eds.), FLSM VI:
Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Mid-America, 1–12. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Baker, Charlotte. 1976. What’s not on the other hand in American Sign Language.
In Salikoko S. Mufwene, Carol A. Walker & Sanford B. Steever (eds.), Papers from the Twelfth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, 24–32.
Chicago: University of Chicago, Chicago Linguistics Society.
Baker-Shenk, Charlotte. 1983. A micro-analysis of the non-manual components of questions in American Sign Language. University of California, Berkeley dissertation.
Baker, Charlotte & Dennis Cokely. 1980. American Sign Language: A teacher’s resource text on grammar and culture. Silver Spring, MD: T.J. Publishers.
Barwise, Jon & Robin Cooper. 1981. Generalized quantifiers and natural language.
Linguistics and Philosophy 4. 159–219.
Basilico, David. 1996. Head position and internally headed relative clauses.
Language 72. 498–532.
Battye, Adrian C. 1989. Free relatives, pseudo-free relatives and the syntax of CP in Italian. Rivista di Linguistica 1. 219–250.
Beek van der, Leonoor. 2003. The Dutch it-cleft constructions. In Miriam Butt &
Tracy Holloway King (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG03 Conference, 22–42.
University at Albany, State University of New York CSLI Pubblications.
http://www.stanford.edu/group/cslipublications/cslipublications/LFG/8/
lfg03vdbeek.pdf (accessed 16 December 2013).
Belletti, Adriana. 2004. Aspects of the low IP area. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures (2), 16–51. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Belletti, Adriana. 2005. Extended doubling and the vP periphery. Probus 17(1). 1–35.
Belletti, Adriana. 2008. The CP of clefts. STiL-Studies in Linguistics CISCL Working Papers (2). 7–17.
http://www.ciscl.unisi.it/doc/doc_pub/belletti2008-The_CP_of_Clefts.pdf (accessed 16 December 2013)
Bellugi, Ursula, David Corina, Freda Norman, Edward S. Klima & Judy Reilly.
1989. Differential specialization for linguistics facial expression in left and right lesioned deaf signers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Aphasia, Santa Fe, NM.
Bertone, Carmela. 2007. La struttura del sintagma del determinante nella Lingua dei Segni Italiana (LIS). Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia dissertation.
Bertone, Carmela. 2008. Esiste un genere in LIS? Osservazioni sul tratto di forma.
In Caterina Bagnara, Serena Corazza, Sabina Fontana, Amir Zuccalà (eds.), I segni parlano. Prospettive di ricerca sulla Lingua dei Segni Italiana, 76–84.
Milano, Franco Angeli.
Bertone, Carmela. 2009a. La grammatica dello spazio nella LIS. In Carmela Bertone
& Anna Cardinaletti (eds.), Alcuni capitoli della grammatica della LIS. Atti dell’Incontro di Studio “La grammatica della Lingua dei Segni Italiana”, 79–99. Venezia, Editrice Cafoscarina.
Bertone, Carmela. 2009b. The syntax of noun modification in Italian Sign Language (LIS). University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 19. 7–28.
Bertone, Carmela. 2011. Fondamenti di grammatica della Lingua dei Segni Italiana.
Franco Angeli, Milano.
Bertone, Carmela & Anna Cardinaletti. 2011. Il sistema pronominale della lingua dei segni italiana. In Anna Cardinaletti, Carlo Cecchetto & Caterina Donati (eds.), Grammatica, lessico e dimensioni di variazione nella LIS, 145–160. Milano, Franco Angeli.
Bhatt, Rajesh. 2003. Locality in correlatives. Natural Languages and Linguisitic Theory 21 (3). 485–541. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bhatt, Rajesh. 2005a. Three theories of relative clauses. The syntax and semantics of nominal modification. Manuscript.
http://people.umass.edu/bhatt/752-s05/752-s05-l1.pdf (accessed 16 December 2013).
Bhatt, Rajesh. 2005b. Correlative clauses. The syntax and semantics of nominal modification. Manuscript.
http://people.umass.edu/bhatt/752-s05/n44.pdf (accessed 16 December 2013).
Bianchi, Valentina. 1999. Consequences of antisymmetry: Headed relative clauses.
Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bianchi, Valentina. 2000. The raising analysis of relative clauses: A reply to Borsley.
Linguistic Inquiry 31. 123–140.
Bianchi, Valentina. 2002. Headed relative clauses in generative syntax – part I and II. Glot International 7(6). 197–204; Glot International 8(6). 1–13.
Bianchi, Valentina. 2004. Resumptive relatives and LF chains. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP, 76–114. New York/Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Bokamba, Eyamba Georges & Mallafe Dramé. 1976. Where do relative clauses come from in Mandingo? Chicago Linguistics Society 14. 28–43.
Bonneau, José. 1992. The Structure of internally headed relative clauses. Montreal:
McGill University dissertation.
Borer, Hagit. 1995. The ups and downs of Hebrew verb movement. [Special Hebrew Issue (Aug. 1995)]. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3(13). 527–606.
Springer.
Borsley, Robert D. 1997. Relative clauses and the theory of phrase structure.
Linguistic Inquiry 28. 629–647.
Borsley, Robert D. 2001. More on the raising analysis of relative clauses. Manuscript.
Essex: University of Essex.
Boyes-Braem, Penny, Elena Pizzuto & Virginia Volterra. 2002. The interpretation of signs by (hearing and deaf) members of different cultures. In Rolf Schulmeister
& Heimo Reinitzer (eds.), Progress in Sign Language Research In Honor of Siegmund Prillwitz. 187–219. Hamburg: Signum.
Brame, Michael. 1968. A new analysis of the relative clause: Evidence for an interpretive theory. Manuscript. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Branchini, Chiara. 2009. Relative libere e interrogative wh- in LIS. In Carmela Bertone & Anna Cardinaletti (eds.), Alcuni capitoli della grammatica della LIS, 101–115. Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina.
Branchini, Chiara, Caterina Donati, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach. 2007.
Relatively similar: relative clause typology and sign languages. Paper presentend at the 2nd Conference of the Association Francaise de Linguistique Cognitive (AFLiCo), Lille, May 10th, 2007.
Branchini, Chiara & Caterina Donati. 2009. Relatively different: Italian Sign Language relative clauses in a typological perspective. In Anikó Lipták (ed.) Correlatives Cross-linguistically, 157–191. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Branchini, Chiara & Carlo Geraci. 2011. L’ordine dei costituenti in LIS: Risultati preliminari. In Anna Cardinaletti, Carlo Cecchetto & Caterina Donati (eds.), Grammatica, lessico e dimensioni di variazione nella LIS, 113–126. Milano:
Franco Angeli.
Branchini, Chiara, Anna Cardinaletti, Carlo Cecchetto, Caterina Donati &
Carlo Geraci. 2013. Wh duplication in LIS. Sign Language & Linguistics 16(2). 157–188.
Bresnan, Joan. 1976. Evidence for a theory of unbounded transformations. Linguistic Analysis 2. 353–395.
Bresnan, Joan & Joan Grimshaw. 1978. The syntax of free relatives in English.
Linguistic Inquiry 9. 331–391.
Broadwell, George A. 1986. A-bar anaphora and relative clauses. Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the Northeast Linguistic Society, 47–56. McGill University, 1985.
Brunelli, Michele. 2006. The grammar of Italian Sign Language with a study about its restrictive relative clauses. Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia MA thesis.
Brunelli, Michele. 2011. Antisymmetry and sign languages: A comparison between NGT and LIS. Utrecht, LOT dissertation.
Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Butler, Ruth. 1993. Rodin. The shape of genius. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
Caponigro, Ivano. 2002. Free relatives as DPs with a silent D and a CP complement.
In Vida Samiian (ed.), Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL 2000), 140–150. Fresno, CA: California State University.
Caponigro, Ivano & Kathryn Davidson. 2011. Ask, and tell as well: Question-answer clauses in American Sign Language. Natural Language Semantics 19. 323–
371.
Carbonieri, Giacomo. 1858. Osservazioni di Giacomo Carbonieri sordo-muto sopra l’opinione del signor Giovanni Gandolfi professore di medicina legale nella università di Modena intorno ai sordi-muti. Modena, tipografia di Carlo Vincenzi.
Cardinaletti, Anna, Carlo Cecchetto & Caterina Donati (eds.). 2011. Grammatica, lessico e dimensioni di variazione nella LIS. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Carlson, Greg N. 1977. Amount Relatives. Language 53. 520–542.
Caselli, Maria Cristina, Serena Corazza, Virginia Volterra. 1998. Linguaggio e sordità. Videolibro in lingua dei segni italiana. [VHS tapes]. Milano: Fabula- Il mondo dei segni.
Cecchetto, Carlo, Carlo Geraci & Sandro Zucchi. 2006. Strategies of relativization in Italian Sign Language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24. 945–975.
Cecchetto, Carlo, Carlo Geraci & Sandro Zucchi. 2008. Sentential complementation in Italian Sign Language. In Michael Grosvald & Dionne Soares (eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Western Conference on Linguistics, 46–58. Davis:
Department of Linguistics, University of California at Davis.
Cecchetto, Carlo, Carlo Geraci & Sandro Zucchi. 2009. Another way to mark syntactic dependencies. The case for right peripheral specifiers in sign languages. Language 85. 278–320.
Cecchetto, Carlo & Caterina Donati. 2010. On labeling: Principle C and head movement. Syntax 13(2). 241–278.
Cecchetto, Carlo & Caterina Donati. 2011. Relativization in Italian Sign Language (LIS): The missing link of relativization. Paper presented at the Symposium on Complex Sentences and Beyond in Sign and Spoken Languages, Georg- August Universität Göttingen, October 13th–14th.
Cheng, Lisa. 1991. On the typology of wh questions. Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On wh-movement. In Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow &
Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal Syntax, 71–132. New York: Academic Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In Ken Hale
& Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The View From Building 20. Cambridge, Massacusetts: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1998. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 15 (MITWPL). Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT Cambridge, MA.
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by Step. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2004. On phases. Manuscript. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Chomsky, Noam & Howard Lasnik. 1977. Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry VIII. 425–504.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1978. La sintassi dei pronomi relativi cui e quale nell’italiano moderno. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa I. 31–126.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1982. On the theory of relative clauses and markedness. The Linguistic Review 1. 247–294.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2005. The dual source of adjectives and phrasal movement in the romance DP. Manuscript. Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2008. Two types of non-restrictive relatives. In Olivier Bonami
& Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics 7, 99–137. Paris.
Cinque, Guglielmo & Luigi Rizzi. 2008. The cartography of syntactic structures. In Vincenzo Moscati (ed.), CISCL Working Papers on Language and Cognition 2, 43–59.
Citko, Barbara. 2001. Deletion under identity account of relative clauses. In Minjoo Kim & Uri Strauss (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st North East Linguistics Society (NELS), 131–145. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Cole, Peter. 1987. The structure of internally headed relative clauses. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5. 277–302.
Cole, Peter & Gabriella Hermon. 1994. Is there LF wh-movement? Linguistic Inquiry 25. 239–262.
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Corazza, Serena. 1990. The morphology of classifier handshapes in Italian Sign Language (LIS). In Ceil Lucas (ed.), Sign Language Research. Theoretical Issues, 71–82. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Corazza, Serena. 1993. Ambiguità nei verbi della 3.a classe. Paper Presented at the
“Terzo Seminario di Formazione LIS”. Roma: Istituto di Psicologia, C.N.R. – Gruppo S.I.L.I.S., February 12–14.
Corazza, Serena. 1995. Storia della lingua dei segni nell’educazione dei sordi italiani.
In Giulia Porcari Li Destri & VirginiaVolterra (eds.), Passato e Presente: uno sguardo sull’educazione dei sordi in Italia, 77–102. Napoli: Gnocchi.
Corazza, Serena, Maria Luisa Franchi & Virginia Volterra. 1984. Syntactic mechanisms in Italian Sign Language. Paper presented at the Bristol International Sign Language Workshop, Bristol, England, September.
Corazza, Serena & Virginia Volterra. 1988. La comprensione di lingue dei segni
“straniere”. In Tullio De Mauro, Stefano Gensini, Maria Emanuela Piemontese (eds.), Dalla parte del ricevente: percezione, comprensione, interpretazione.
Atti del XIX Congresso Internazionale S.L.I., 73–82. Roma: Bulzoni.
Corina, David. 1989. Recognition of affective and noncanonical linguistic facial expressions in hearing and deaf subjects. Brain and Cognition 9. 227–237.
Coulter, Geoffrey R. 1983. A conjoined analysis of American Sign Language relative clauses. Discourse Processes 6. 305–318.
Culy, Christopher. 1990. The syntax and semantics of internally headed relative clauses. Stanford: Stanford University dissertation.
Davidse, Kristin. 2000. A constructional approach to clefts. Linguistics 6(38). 1101–
1131.
Davidson, Kathryn, Ivano Caponigro & Rachel Mayberry. 2008a. The semantics and pragmatics of clausal question-answer pairs in ASL. In Tova Freidman &
Satoshi Ito (eds.), Semantics and Linguistic Theory XVIII, 212–229. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
http://elanguage.net/journals/salt/article/viewFile/18.212/1899 (accessed 16 December 2013).
Davidson, Kathryn, Ivano Caponigro & Rachel Mayberry. 2008b. Clausal question- answer pairs: Evidence from American Sign Language, Proceedings of West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 27, 108–115. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
http://www.lingref.com/cpp/wccfl/27/paper1822.pdf (accessed 16 December 2013).
Dayal, Veneeta Srivastav. 1988. Hindi relative clauses and learnability. Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 8. 133–160.
Dayal, Veneeta Srivastav. 1991. The syntax and semantics of correlatives. Natural Languages and Linguistic Theory 9. 637–686.
Dayal, Veneeta Srivastav. 1996. Locality in wh quantification: Questions and relative clauses in Hindi. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Delahunty, Gerald P. 1981. Topics in the syntax and semantics of English cleft sentences. Irvine, California, University of California dissertation.
Delahunty, Gerald P. 1982. Topics in the syntax and semantics of English cleft sentences. Bloomington, Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Del Gobbo, Francesca. 2001. Appositives schmappositives in Chinese. In Maki Irie
& Hajime Ono (eds.), UCI Working Papers in Linguistics 7, 1–25.
DeGraff, Michel Anne Frederic. 1992. Creole grammars and the acquisition of syntax: The case of Haitian. University of Pennsylvania dissertation.
Delin, Judy L. 1989. Cleft constructions in discourse. University of Edinburgh dissertation.
Déprez, Viviane. 2003. Haitian Creole se: A copula, a pronoun, both or neither? On the double life of a functional head. In Dany Adone (ed.), Recent development in creole studies, 135–173. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~deprez/Adone.pdf (accessed 16 December 2013) Déprez, Viviane. & Marie-Thérèse Vinet 1997. Predicative constructions and
functional categories in Haitian Creole. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 12 (2). 1–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
Dermidache, Hamida. 1991. Resumptive chains in restrictive relatives, appositives and dislocation structures. Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
De Vriendt, Sera & Max Rasquinet. 1989. The expression of genericity in sign language. In Siegmund Prillwitz & Tomas Vollhaber (eds.), Current Trends in the European Sign Language Research: Proceedings of the 3rd European Congress on Sign Language Research, 249–255. Hamburg: Signum-Verlag.
Di Renzo, Alessio, Luca Lamano, Tommaso Lucioli, Barbara Pennacchi & Luca Ponzo. 2006. Italian Sign Language (LIS): Can we write and transcribe it with SignWriting? In Chiara Vettori (ed.) W15 2nd Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Lexicographic Matters and Didactic Scenarios, 11–16. Genova: LREC, Genova 28 Maggio.
Donaldson, Susan K. 1971. Movement in restrictive relative clauses in Hindi, Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 1. 1–74.
Donati, Caterina. 1994. Il que relativo spagnolo. Lingua e Stile XXX. 565–595.
Donati, Caterina. 2000. La Sintassi della comparazione. Padova: Unipress.
Donati, Caterina. 2006. On wh-head-movement. In Lisa Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds.), Wh-movement moving, 21–46. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
http://www.uniurb.it/lingue/docenti/donati/pubblicazioni/On_Wh_Head_
Movement.pdf (accessed 16 December 2013).
Donati, Caterina & Carlo Cecchetto. 2011. Relabeling heads. A unified account for relativization structures. Linguistic Inquiry 42(4). - ISSN 0024-3892.
http://www.coris.uniroma1.it/news/files/LI2011.pdf (accessed 16 December 2013).
Downing, Bruce T. 1973. Correlative relative clauses in universal grammar.
Minnesota Working Papers in Linguistics and Philosophy of Language 2.
1–17.
Downing, Bruce T. 1978. Some universals of relative clause structure. In Joseph H.
Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Human Language. Volume IV: Syntax, 375–
418. Standford University Press.
Emonds, Joseph. 1976. A transformational approach to English syntax. New York:
Academic Press.
Emonds, Joseph. 1979. Appositive relatives have no properties. Linguistic Inquiry 10. 211–243.
Evans, Gareth. 1980. Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 11. 337–362.
Fabb, Nigel. 1990. The difference between English restrictive and non-restrictive relative clauses. Journal of Linguistics 26. 57–78.
Faltz, Leonard M. 1995. Toward a typology of natural logic. In Emmon Bach, Angelika Kratzer & Barbara H. Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages, 271–319. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Fontana, Josep M. 1990. Is ASL like Diegueño or Diegueño like ASL? A study of internally headed relative clauses in ASL. In Ceil Lucas (ed.), Sign Language Research. Theoretical Issues, 238–255. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Franchi, Maria Luisa. [1987] 2004. Componenti non manuali. In Virginia Volterra (ed.) La Lingua dei Segni Italiana, 159–177. Bologna: il Mulino.
Frascarelli, Mara. 2010. Narrow focus, clefting and predicate inversion. Lingua 120.
2121–2147.
Frascarelli, Mara & Francesca Ramaglia. 2013. (Pseudo)clefts at the syntax-prosody- discourse interface. In Hartmann, Katharina & Tonjes Veenstra (eds.), Cleft structures viii, 97–138. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Galloway, Teresa. 2012. Distinguishing correlatives from internally headed relative clauses in ASL. Paper presented at Semantics of Under-Represented Languages (SULA) 7, Cornell University, May 4th.
Geraci, Carlo. 2002. L’ordine delle parole nella LIS. Università degli Studi di Milano MA thesis.
Geraci, Carlo. 2006. LIS (Lingua dei Segni Italiana) tra ricerca e divulgazione.
Università di Milano-Bicocca dissertation.
Geraci, Carlo, Marta Gozzi, Constanza Papagno & Carlo Cecchetto. 2008. How grammar can cope with limited short-term memory: Simultaneity and seriality in sign languages. Cognition 106(2). 780–804.
Geraci, Carlo & Robert Bayley. 2011. Chi, cosa dove, perché, quando: la distribuzione dei segni wh- in LIS. In Anna Cardinaletti, Carlo Cecchetto & Caterina Donati (eds.), Grammatica, lessico e dimensioni di variazione nella LIS, 125–141.
Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia: Edizioni Cafoscarine.
Geraci, Carlo, Robert Bayley, Anna Cardinaletti, Carlo Cecchetto & Caterina Donati. (In preparation). Variation in Italian Sign Language (LIS): The case of wh-signs. Manuscript.
Giusti, Giuliana. 1993. La Sintassi dei determinanti. Padova: Unipress.
Gonda, Jan. 1954. The original character of the Indo-European relative pronoun io-.
Lingua 4. 1–41.
Graffi, Giorgio. 1977. On Italian cleft sentences. In Maria-Elisabeth Conte, Anna Giacalone Ramat & Paolo Ramat (eds.), Wortstellung und Bedeutung. Akten des 12. Linguistischen Kolloquiums, 113–123. Pavia, Tübingen, Niemeyer.
Grimshaw, Jane B. 1975. Evidence for relativization by deletion in chaucerian Middle English. North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 5. 216–224.
Groenendijk, Jeroen & Martin Stokhof. 1982. Semantic analysis of wh-complements.
Linguistics and Philosophy 5. 175–223.
Grohmann, Kleanthes K. 2000. Prolific peripheries: A radical view from the left.
University of Maryland, College Park dissertation.
Grolla Elaine. 2004. Clausal equations in American Sign Language: A semantic analysis. Manuscript based on poster presented at Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research 8, University of Connecticut.
Groos, Aneeke & Henk van Riemsdjik. 1981. Matching effects in free relatives:
A parameter of core grammar. In Adriana Belletti, Luciana Brandi & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar, 171–197. Pisa:
Scuola Normale Superiore.
Grosu, Alexander. 1994. Three studies in locality and case. London & New York:
Routledge.
Grosu, Alexander. 1996. The proper analysis of ‘missing p’ free relative constructions.
Linguistic Inquiry 27. 257–293.
Grosu, Alexander. 2000. The semantic diversity of internally-headed relative clauses. In Chris Schaner-Wolles, John Rennison & Friedrich Neubarth (eds), Linguistic Studies in Honour of Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler Presented on His 60th Birthday, 337–346. Torino: Rosenberg & Seiler.
Grosu, Alexander. 2002. Strange relatives at the interface of two millennia. Glot Internaltional 6. 145–167.
Grosu, Alexander & Fred Landman. 1998. Strange relatives of the third kind. Natural Language Semantics 6. 125–170.
Gundel, Jeanette. 1977. Where do cleft sentences come from? Language 53. 543–
559.
Halliday, Michael. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English 2. Journal of Linguistics 3(2). 199–204.
Halliday, Michael. 1985. Introduction to functional grammar. London: Longman.
Han, Chung-hye & Nancy Hedberg, 2008. Syntax and semantics of it-clefts: A tree- adjoining grammar analysis. Journal of Semantics 25(4). 345–380.
Happ, Daniela & Marc O. Vorköper. 2006. Deutsche Gebärdensprache. Ein Lehr- und Arbeitsbuch. Frankfurt: Fachochschulverlag.
Harbert, Wayne. 1983. On the nature of the matching parameter. The Linguistic Review 2 (3). 237–284.
Haudry, Jean. 1973. Parataxe, hypotaxe et corrélation dans la phrase latine. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 68. 147–186.
Hedberg, Nancy. 2000. The referential status of clefts. Language 76 (4). 891–920.
Heggie, Lorie. 1988. The syntax of copular structures. Los Angeles, University of Southern California dissertation.
Heim, Irene. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. University of Massachusetts, Amherst dissertation.
Higgins, Francis Roger. 1973. The pseudo-cleft construction in English.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
Hirschbühler, Paul & María-Luisa Rivero. 1981. Catalan restrictive relatives: Core and periphery. Language 57(3). 591–625.
Hirschbüler, Paul & Maria-Luisa Riviero. 1983. Remarks on free relatives and matching phenomena. Linguistic Inquiry 14(3). 505–519.
Hock, Hans Heinrich. 1988. Relative clauses and rebracketing in Old English. In Elmer H. Antonsen & Hans Heinrich Hock (eds.), Germanic Linguistics II:
Papers from the IInd Symposium on Germanic Linguistics, 35–55 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: Indiana University Linguistic Club.
Hock, Hans Heinrich. 1989. Conjoined we stand: Theoretical implications of Sanskrit relative structures. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 19. 93–126.
Hoffmeister, Robert. 1977. The influential point. In William Stokoe (ed.), Proceedings of the National Symposium on Sign Language Research and Teaching, 177–
191. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of the Deaf.
Hoffmeister, Robert. 1982. The acquisition of language abilities by deaf children.
In Harry Hoemann & Ronnie Wilbur (eds.), Communication in Two Societies:
Monographs in Social Aspects of Deafness. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Hornstein, Norbert & Amy Weinberg. 1981. Case theory and preposition stranding.
Linguistic Inquiry XII(1). 55–91.
Huang, Cheng-Teh James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
Huang, Cheng-Teh James. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15(4). 531–74.
Huddleston, Rodney. 1984. Introduction to the grammar of English. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Iatridou, Sabine, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Roumyana Izvorski. 2001. Observations about the form and meaning of the perfect. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, 189–238. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Ito, Junko. 1986. Head-movement at LF and PF. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 11. 109–138.
Izvorsky, Roumyana. 1996. The syntax and semantics of correlative proforms. In Kiyomi Kusumoto (ed.), Proceedings of North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 26, 133–147. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Izvorski, Roumyana. 1997. Subject free relatives in null-subject languages: Evidence from Slavic. In Wayles Browne, Ewa Dornisch, Natasha Kondrashova & Draga Zec (eds.), Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Cornell Meeting, 267–288. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Izvorski, Roumyana. 2000. Free relatives and related matters. University of Pennsylvania dissertation.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1977. X-bar syntax: A study of phrase structure. Cambridge, MA:
The MIT Press.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1979. How to keep ninety from rising. Linguistic Inquiry 10(1).
172–176.
Jespersen, Otto. 1927. A modern english grammar III. London: George Allen &
Unwin.
Jespersen, Otto. 1928. A modern english grammar on historical principles.
Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
Jespersen, Otto. 1937. Analytic syntax. London: Allen & Unwin.
Kachru, Yamuna. 1973. Some aspects of pronominalization and relative clause construction in Hindi-Urdu. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 3. 87–103.
Kachru, Yamuna. 1978. On relative clause formation in Hindi-Urdu. Linguistics 207.
5–26.
Kadmon, Nirit. 1987. On unique and non-unique reference and asymmetric quantification. University of Massachusetts, Amherst dissertation. Published by Garland, New York.
Kalluli, Dalina. 2000. Restrictive relative clauses revisited. North-eastern Linguistic Society 30. 353–62.
Kayne, Richard. 1976. French relative que. In Frederick Hensey & Marta Lujàn (eds.), Current Studies in Romance Linguistics, 255–299. Washington D.C.:
Georgetown University Press.
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Keenan, Edward L. 1985. Relative clauses. In Timothy Shopen (ed.) Language Typology and Syntactic Description 2, 141–170. Cambridge University Press.
Keenan, Edward L. & Bernard Comrie. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8. 63–99.
Kegl, Judy. 1977. ASL syntax: Research in progress and proposed research.
Unpublished Manuscript, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Kegl, Judy, & Howard Poizner. 1991. The interplay between linguistic and spatial processing in a right lesioned signer. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 13. 38–39.
Kegl, Judy & Howard Poizner. 1997. Crosslinguistic/crossmodal syntactic consequences of left-hemisphfere damage: Evidence from an aphasic signer and his identical twin. Aphasiology 11. 1–37.
Kim, Jong-Bok. 2012. On the syntax of it-cleft constructions: A construction-based perspective. Linguistic Research 29(1). 45–68.
Kimmelman, Vadim. 2009. On the interpretation of èto in so-called èto-clefts. In Gerhild Zybatow, Denisa Lenertová, Uwe Junghanns & Petr Biskup (eds.), Studies in Formal Slavic Phonology, Morphology, Syntax, Semantics and Information Structure: Proceedings of FDSL 7, 319–329. Leipzig 2007.
Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
King, Tracy H. 1993. Configuring topic and focus in Russian. Stanford University dissertation.
Kiss, Katalin É. 1998. Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74(2). 245–273.
Kiss, Katalin É. 1999. The English cleft construction as a focus phrase. In Lunella Mereu (ed.), Boundaries of morphology and syntax, 217–229. Amsterdam:
John Benjamins.
Klima, Edward. & Ursula Bellugi. 1979. The Signs of language. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1984. Case marking, agreement and empty categories in Turkish.
Harvard University dissertation.
Koster, Jan. 2000. Extraposition as parallel construal. Manuscript, Groningen:
University of Groninger.
Kraak, Albert & Willem Gerrit Klooster. 1968. Syntaxis. Uitgeverij Stam-Kemperman N. V., Culemborg.
Kubuş, Okhan. 2010. Relative clause constructions in Turkish Sign Language. Poster presented at Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR). Indiana, USA: Purdue University, West Lafayette.
Kubuş, Okan. 2011a. Appositive vs. restrictive relative clause constructions. Paper presented at Colloquia Series 2011 Institut Jean Nicod Paris, November 7th.
Kubuş, Okan. 2011b. Relative clause constructions in Turkish Sign Language (Türk İşaret Dili –TİD). Paper presented at The Nijmegen Gesture Centre lecture series, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, February 2nd.
Kubuş, Okan & Christian Rathmann. 2011. Analysis of relative clause constructions in Turkish Sign Language in Discourse Modes. Paper presentend at the 33rd Annual Conference of the German Linguistic Society, Georg August University Göttingen, 23rd–25th February.
Lambrecht, Knud. 2001. A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions.
Linguistics 39(3). 463–516.
Larson, Richard K. 1987. ‘Missing prepositions’ and the analysis of English free relatives. Linguistic Inquiry 18. 239–266.
Laudanna, Alessandro. 1987. Ordine dei segni nella frase. In Virginia Volterra (ed.), La Lingua Italiana dei Segni, 211–30. Bologna: il Mulino.
Lees, Robert B. 1960. The grammar of english nominalizations. Mouton: The Hague.
Lees, Robert B. 1961. The constituent structure of noun phrases. American Speech 36. 159–168.
Lefebvre, Claire & Pieter Muysken. 1988. Mixed categories: Nominalizations in Quechua. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Lehmann, Christian. 1984. Der Relativesatz. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
Liddell, Scott. 1978. Non-manual signals and relative clauses in ASL. In Patricia Siple (ed.), Understanding Language through Sign Language Research, 59–
90. New York: Academic Press.
Liddell, Scott. 1980. American Sign Language syntax. The Hague: Mouton.
Liddell, Scott. 1986. Head thrust in ASL conditional marking. Sign Language Studies 52. 243–262.
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1995. The point of view predicate in American Sign Language.
In Karen Emmorey & Judy S. Reilly (eds.), Language, Gesture and Space, 155–170. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lipták, Anikó. 1998. On restrictive versus appositive relative clauses. Talk presented at the Taalkunde in Nederland Conference, Utrecht.
Lipták, Anikó. 2005. Correlative topicalization. The adventures of correlatives in the left periphery. Manuscript. ULCL, Leiden University.
http://people.umass.edu/bhatt/752-s05/liptak-hungarian-correlatives.PDF (accessed 16 December 2013).
Logan, Karen, Murray Mayberry & Janet Fletcher. 1996. The short-term memory of profoundly deaf people for words, signs, and abstract spatial stimuli. Applied Cognitive Psychology 10. 105–119.
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. Reference and proper names: A theory of n-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 25. 609–665.
Lucas, Ceil & Clayton Valli. 1989. Language contact in the American deaf community. In Ceil Lucas (ed.), The Sociolinguistics of the Deaf Community, 11–40. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Lucas, Ceil & Clayton Valli. 1990. ASL, English and contact signing. In Ceil Lucas (eds.), Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues, 288–307. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Lucas, Ceil, Robert Bayley & Clayton Valli. 2001. Sociolinguistic variation in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press, Lumsden, John. 1990. The bi-clausal structure of Haitian clefts. Linguistics 28.
741–759.
MacLaughlin, Dawn. 1997. The structure of determiner phrases: Evidence from American Sign Language. Boston University dissertation.
Mahajan, Anoop. 2000. Relative asymmetries and Hindi correlatives. In Alexiadou Artemis, Paul Law, André Meinunger & Chris Wilder (eds), The Syntax of Relative Clauses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mantovan, Lara. 2011. La distribuzione degli aggettivi nella Lingua dei Segni Italiana: un’analisi quantitativa. Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia MA thesis, Manzini, Rita. 1994. Syntactic Dependencies and Their Properties: A note on strong
islands. University College of London Working Papers in Linguistics 6. 205–
218.
Manzini, Rita & Kenneth Wexler. 1987. Parameters, binding theory, and learnability.
Linguistic Inquiry 18. 413–444.
Marzullo, Ciro. 1857. La grammatica dei les sordo-muti. Palermo: tipografia di Michele Amenta.
May, Robert. 1985. Logical form: Its structure and derivation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
McCaskill, Carolyn, Ceil Lucas, Robert Bayley & Joseph Hill. 2011. The hidden treasure of Black ASL: Its History and Structure. Washington, D.C: Gallaudet University Press.
McCawley, James D. 1982. Parentheticals and discontinuous constituent structure.
Linguistic Inquiry 13. 91–106.
McCawley, James D. 1988. The syntactic phenomena of English Vol. 2. Chicago:
The University of Chicago Press.
McCloskey, James. 1991. There, it and agreement. Linguistic Inquiry 22. 563–567.
McIntire, Marian & Judy Reilly. 1988. Non-manual behaviors in L1 & L2 learners of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 17(61). 351–375.
Meier, Richard P. 1990. Person deixis in American Sign Language. In Susan D.
Fischer & Patricia Siple (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research.
Vol. 1: Linguistics, 175–190. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Meier, Richard P. & Elissa Newport. 1990. Out of the hands of babes: On a possible sign advantage in language acquisition. Language 66. 1–23.
Meinunger, André. 1996. Speculations on the syntax of (pseudo-)clefts.
Berlin: Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Typologie und Universalienforschung. Manuscript.
Meinunger, André. 2000. Syntactic aspects of topic and comment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Miller, Dana. 1990. ASL relative clauses and their interaction with null categories.
In Ceil Lucas (ed.), Sign Language Research. Theoretical Issues, 223–237.
Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Mohanan, K. P. 1978. Grammatical relations and clause structure in Malayalam.
In Joan Bresnan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, 504–589. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Montague, Richard. 1974. English as a formal language. In Richmond H. Thomason (ed.), Formal Philosophy: Selected papers of Richard Montague, 188–221.
New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Mosella, Marta. 2011. The position of fronted and postposed relative clauses in Catalan Sign Language (LSC). Paper presented at the 1st Formal and Experimental Advances in Sign Language Theory (FEAST). Università Ca’
Foscari Venezia, 20–22 June.
Mosella, Marta. 2012. Les construccions relatives en Llengua de Signes Catalana (LSC). Universitat de Barcelona dissertation.
Munn, Alan. 1994. A minimalist account of reconstruction asymmetries. NELS.
397–410.
Munro, Pamela. 1976. Mojave syntax. New York: Garland.
Neidle, Carol. 2002. Language across modalities: ASL focus and question constructions. In Pierre Pica & Johan Rooryck (eds.), Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2, 71–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Benjamin Bahan, Debra Aarons & Dawn MacLaughlin.
1997. Rightward wh-movement in American Sign Language. In Henk Van Riemsdijk, David Le Blanc & Dorothee Beerman (eds.), Rightward Movement, 247–278. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin, Benjamin Bahan & Robert G. Lee.
2000. The syntax of American Sign Language. Functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Nespor, Marina. & Wendy Sandler. 1999. Prosody in Israeli Sign Language.
Language and Speech 42(2–3). 143–176.
Newport, Elissa & Ted Supalla. 1980. The structuring of language: Clues from the acquisition of sign and spoken language. In Ursula Bellugi & Michael Studdert-Kennedy (eds.), Sign and Spoken Language: Biological Constraints on Linguistic Form, 187–212. Dahlem Konferenzen. Weinheim: Verlag Chemie.
Newport, Elissa & Richard P. Meier. 1985. The acquisition of American Sign Language. In Dan Isaac Slobin (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Langauge Acquisition 1, The Data, 881–938. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Nishigauchi, Taisuke. 2003. Head-internal relative clauses in Japanese and the interpretation of indefinite NPs. Manuscript.
Nunes, Jairo & Ronice M. de Quadros. 2004. Phonetic realization of multiple copies in Brazilian Sign Language. Paper presented at the 8th Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR 8), Barcelona, September.
Ogle, Richard. 1974. Natural order and dislocated syntax. UCLA, Los Angeles, California dissertation.
Padden, Carol. 1990. The relation between space and grammar in ASL verb morphology. In Ceil Lucas (ed.), Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues, 118–132. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Padden, Carol & David M. Perlmutter. 1987. American Sign Language and the architecture of phonological theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5. 335–375.
Partee, Barbara. 1975. Montague grammar and transformational grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 6(2). 203–300.
Partee, Barbara. [1973] 1976. Some transformational extensions of Montague grammar. In Barbara Partee (ed.), Montague Grammar, 51–76. New York:
Academic Press.
Partee, Barbara. 1987. Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In Jeroen Groenendijk & Martin Stokhof (eds.), GRASS 8, 115–43. Dordrecht:
Foris.
Perazzato, Elena. 2013. Analisi di un confronto: le costruzioni scisse in LIS e russo.
Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia BA thesis.
Percus, Orin. 1997. Prying open the cleft. In Kiyomi Kusumoto (ed.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistics Society, 337–351.
GLSA.
Petitto, Laura Ann. 1983. From gesture to symbol: The acquisition of personal pronouns in American Sign Language. Harvard University dissertation.
Petitto, Laura & Paula F. Marentette. 1991. Babbling in the manual mode: Evidence for the ontogeny of language. Science 251. 1493–1496.
Petronio, Karen. 1991. A focus position in ASL. In Jonathan Bobaljik & Tony Bures (eds.), Proceedings of the Third Student Conference in Linguistics 14, 211–
225. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Petronio, Karen & Diane Lillo-Martin. 1997. wh- movement and the position of Spec, CP: Evidence from American Sign Language. Language 73. 18–57.
Pfau, Roland & Josep Quer. 2007. On the syntax of negation and modals in Catalan Sign Language and German Sign Language (LSC). In Perniss, Pamela, Roland Pfau, and Markus Steinbach (eds.), Visible variation: Cross-linguistic studies on sign language structure. 129–161. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach. 2005. Relative clauses in German Sign Language:
Extraposition and ceconstruction. In Leah Bateman & Cherlon Ussery (eds.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 35) 2, 507–521.
Amherst: GLSA.
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach. 2006. Modality-independent and modality-specific aspects of grammaticalization in sign languages. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
Pizzuto, Elena. 1987. Aspetti morfosintattici. In Virginia Volterra (ed.), La Lingua Italiana dei Segni, 179–209. Bologna: il Mulino.
Pizzuto Elena. 2002. The development of Italian Sign Language (LIS) in deaf preschoolers. In Gary Morgan & Bencie Woll (eds.), Directions in Sign Language Acquisition, 77–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pizzuto, Elena, Enza Giuranna & Giuseppe Gambino. 1990. Manual and non-manual morphology in Italian Sign Language: Grammatical constraints and discourse processes. In Ceil Lucas (ed.), Sign Language Research Theoretical Issues, 83–102. Washinghton, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Pizzuto, Elena & Serena Corazza. 1996. Noun morphology in Italian Sign Language (LIS). Lingua 98. 169–196.
Pizzuto, Elena & Virginia Volterra. 2000. Iconicity and transparency in sign languages: a cross-linguistic cross-cultural view. In Karen Emmorey & Harlan Lane (eds.), The Signs of Language Revisited: An Anthology to Honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 261–286. Mahwak, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Pizzuto Elena & Paola Pietrandrea. 2001. The notation of sign texts: open questions and indications for further research. [Special Issue on Sign Transcription and Database Storage of Sign Information]. Sign Language & Linguistics 4 (1/2).
29–43.
Platero, Paul R. 1974. The Navajo relative clause. International Journal of American Linguistics 40. 365–424.
Platzack, Christer. 1997. A representational account of restrictive and non-restrictive relatives: The case of Swedish. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 59.
65–95.
Platzack, Christer. 2000. A Complement-of-N° account of restrictive and non- restrictive relatives: The case of Swedish. In Artemis Alexiadou, Paul Law, André Meinungen & Chris Wilder (eds), The Syntax of Relative Clauses, 265–
308. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Poizner, Howard & Judy Kegl. 1992. The neural basis of language and motor behavior: Perspectives from American Sign Language. Aphasiology 6. 219–
256.
Potts, Christopher. 2005. The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prince, Ellen F. 1978. A comparison of wh-clefts and it-clefts in discourse. Language 54(4). 883–906.
Quadros, Ronice Müller de. 2003. Phrase structure of Brazilian Sign Language. In Cross-linguistic perspectives in sign language research. Selected papers from TISLR 2000. 141–162. Hamburg: Signum Press.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1972. A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.
Radford, Andrew. 1981. Transformational syntax. A students guide to Chomsky’s extended standard theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.
Radutzky, Elena. [1992] 2001. Dizionario bilingue elementare della Lingua dei Segni Italiana. Roma: Edizioni Kappa.
Reilly, Judy, Marian McIntire & Ursula Bellugi. 1990. Faces: The relationship between language and affect. In Virginia Volterra & Carol J. Erting (eds.), From Gesture to Language in Hearing and Deaf Children, 128–141. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Reilly, Judy, Marian McIntire & Howie Seago. 1992. Affective prosody in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 21(75). 113–128.
Reilly, Judy & Ursula Bellugi. 1996. Competition on the face: affect and language in ASL motherese. Journal of Child Language 23. 219–239.
Reinhart, Tanya. 1983. Coreference and bound anaphora: A restatement of the anaphora questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 6. 47–88.
Renzi, Lorenzo, Giampaolo Salvi & Anna Cardinaletti (eds.). 2001. Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, Vol. I. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1984. Teoria e spiegazione grammaticale. Padova: CLESP.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1991. Residual verb second and the wh criterion. Technical Reports in Formal and Computational Linguistics 2. University of Genova.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar. Handbook in Generative Syntax, 281–337.
Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Rizzi, Luigi. 2001. On the position “Int(errogative)” in the left periphery of the clause. In Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 287–296. New York: Elsevier.
Rizzi, Luigi. 2004a. Locality and left periphery. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and Beyond: Cartography of Syntactic Structures 3, 104–131. New York:
Oxford University Press.
Rizzi, Luigi (ed.). 2004b. The structure of IP and CP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 2, Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rochemont, Michael. 1986. Focus in generative grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Romeo, Orazio. 1991. Dizionario dei segni. La lingua dei segni in 1400 immagini.
Bologna: Zanichelli.
Rooth, Mats. 1995. Focus. In Shalom Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, 271–298. Blackwell, Oxford..
Ross, John R. 1967. Constraint on variables in syntax. Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
Ross, John R. 1972. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1. 117–121.
Rossini, Paolo, Judy Reilly, Daniela Fabbretti & Virginia Volterra. 1998. Aspetti non manuali nelle narrazioni in LIS. Viaggio nella città invisibile. Atti del II Convegno Nazionale sulla Lingua Italiana dei Segni. Genova, 25–27 settembre.
Roussou, Anna. 1992. Factive complements and wh movement in Modern Greek.
University College of London Working Papers in Linguistics 4. 123–147.
Rudin, Catherine. 1986. Aspects of bulgarian syntax: Complementizers and wh constructions. Slavica Columbus.
Russo, Cardona Tommaso, Rosaria Giuranna & Elena Pizzuto. 2001. Italian Sign Language (LIS) poetry: Iconic properties and structural regularities. Sign Language Studies 2, I, Fall. 84–112.
Russo, Cardona Tommaso & Virginia Volterra. 2007. Le lingue dei segni. Roma:
Carocci.
Safir, Ken. 1986. Relative clauses in a theory of binding and levels. Linguistic Inquiry 17. 663–689.
Sauerland, Uli. 1998. The meaning of chains. Cambridge, MA, Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation. Distributed by MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Sauerland, Uli. 2000. Two structures for English restrictive relative clauses. In Mamoru Saito et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Nanzan GLOW, 351–366.
Nanzan University, Nagoya, Japan.
Sauerland, Uli. 2002. Unpronounced heads in relative clauses. In Kerstin Schwabe and Susanne Winkler (eds.), The Interfaces: Deriving and Interpreting Omitted Structures, 205–226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schachter, Paul. 1973. Focus and relativization. Language 49. 19–46.
Schein, Jerome D. & Marcus T. Delk. 1974. The deaf population of the United States.
Silver Spring, MD: National Association of the Deaf.
Schembri, Adam, David McKee, Rachel McKee, Sara Pivac, Trevor Johnston &
Della Goswell. 2009. Phonological variation and change in Australian and New Zealand Sign Languages: The location variable. Language Variation and Change 21. 193–231.
Schlenker, Philippe. 2003. Clausal equations: A note on the connectivity problem.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21. 157–214.
Schmitt, Cristina. 2000. Some consequences of the complement analysis for relative clauses, demonstratives and wrong adjectives. In Artemis Alexiadou, Paul Law, André Meinunger & Chris Wilder (eds.), The Syntax of Relative Clauses, 309–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sells, Peter. 1985. Restrictive and non-restrictive modification. CSLI Report No.
CSLI-85-28. Stanford, California.
Sevinç, Ayça Müge. 2006. Grammatical relations and word order in Turkish Sign Language (TİD). The Graduate School of Informatics of the Middle East Technical University dissertation.
Sharvit, Yael. 1999. Connectivity in specificational sentences. Natural Language Semantics 7. 299–304.
Shimoyama, Junko. 1999. Internally headed relative clauses in Japanese and E-type anaphora. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8. 147–182.
Shlonsky, Ur. 1992. Resumptive pronouns as a last resort. Linguistic Inquiry 23(3).
443–468.
Singleton, J. 1989. Reconstructing of language from impoverished input. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Siple, Patricia. 1978. Visual constraints for sign language communication. Sign Language Studies 19(7). 95–110.
Smith, Carlota S. 1969 [1964]. Determiners and relative clauses in a generative grammar of English. In David E. Reibel & Sanford A. Schane (eds.), Modern Studies in English, 247–63. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Smits, Rik. 1988. The relative and cleft constructions of the Germanic and Romance languages. Katholieke Universitaet Brabant dissertation. Foris: Dordrecht.
Spector, Ilona. 2012. It’s Hebrew clefts that this paper is about. Proceedings of ConSOLE XIX 2012, 309–330.
http://media.leidenuniv.nl/legacy/console19-proceedings-spector.pdf (accessed 16 December 2013).
Sportiche, Dominique. 1988. A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 19. 425–449.
von Stechow, Arnim. 1984. Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 1. 1–77.
Stockwell, Robert, Paul Schachter & Barbara Partee. 1973. The major syntactic structures of English. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Stokoe, Wiliam. 1960. Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. Studies in Linguistics Occasional Papers 8. Buffalo, NY: University of Buffalo, Department of Anthropology and Linguistics.
Stowell, Tim. 1983. Subjects across categories. The Linguistic Review 2.3. 285–312.
Stowell, Tim. 1991. Small clause restructuring. In Robert Freidin (ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, 182–218. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Subbarao, Karumuri V. 1984. Complementation in Hindi syntax. Delhi: Academic Publications.
Suñer, Margarita. 1983. Free relatives and the pro head hypothesis. In Wayne Harbert, (ed.), Cornell Working Papers 4: Papers from the Cornell Conference on Government and Binding Theory, 223–248. June 1982.
Suñer, Margarita. 1984. Free relatives and the matching parameter. The Linguistic Review 3(4). 363–87.
Supalla, Samuel J. 1991. Manually coded English: The modality question in sign language development. In Patricia Siple & Susan Fischer (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research 2, Psychology, 85–109. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Szabolcsi, Anna. 1987. Functional categories in the Noun Phrase. In István Kenesei (ed.), Approaches to Hungarian 2: Theories and analyses, 167–189. Szeged:
JATE.
Szabolcsi, Anna. 1992. Subordination: Articles and complementizers. In István Kenesei & Csaba Pléh (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian 4: The structure of Hungarian, 123–137. Szeged: JATE.
Sze, Felix. 2003. Word order of Hong Kong Sign Language. In Anne Baker, Beppie van den Bogaerde & Onno Crashborn (eds.), Cross-linguistic Perspectives in Sign Language Research (Selected Papers from TISLR 2000), 163–191.
Hamburg: Signum.
Tang, Gladys & Prudence Lau. 2012. Coordination and subordination. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign Language: An international handbook (HSK - Handbooks of linguistics and communication science), 340–
365. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Tang, Sze-Wing. 2001. Nominal predication and focus anchoring. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 22. 159–172.
Tang, Sze-Wing & Thomas H. T. Lee. 2000. Focus as an anchoring condition. Paper presented at International Symposium on Topic and Focus in Chinese, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
Teng, Shou-Hsin. 1979. Remarks on cleft sentences in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 7. 101–112.
Thompson, Henry. 1977. The lack of subordination in American Sign Language. In Lyn Friedman (ed.), On the Other Hand: New Perspectives on American Sign Language, 78–94. New York: Academic Press.
Tomasuolo, Elena. 2006. La valutazione delle abilità linguistiche in bambini e ragazzi sordi. Università degli Studi di Roma ‘La Sapienza’ dissertation.
Toribio, Almeida Jacqueline. 1992. Proper government in Spanish subject relativization. Probus 4. 291–304.
Vergnaud, Jean Roger. 1974. French relative clauses. Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
Verma, Manindra K. 1966. The noun phrase in Hindi and English. New Delhi: Motilal.
Volterra, Virginia. 2011. La ricerca sulla lingua dei segni in Italia: passato, presente e prospettive future. In Anna Cardinaletti, Carlo Cecchetto & Caterina Donati (eds.), Grammatica, lessico e dimensioni di variazione nella LIS, 27–44.
FrancoAngeli, Milano, Italy.
Volterra, Virginia, Alessandro Laudanna, Serena Corazza, Elena Radutzky &
Francesco Natale. 1984. Italian Sign Language: The order of elements in the
declarative sentence. Recent Research on European Sign Languages. Lisse:
Swets & Zeitlinger B.V.
Volterra, Virginia (ed.). [1987] 2004. La Lingua Italiana dei Segni. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Vries, Mark de. 1996. Relatieve bijzinnen in de zinsstructuur van Kayne.
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen MA thesis.
Vries, Mark de. 2002. The syntax of relativization. Utrecht: Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalwetenschap.
Watanabe, Akira. 1992. Wh in situ, subjacency and chain formation. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Watanabe, Akira. 2002. Parametrization of quantificational determiners and head- internal relatives. Paper presented at GLOW in Asia 2002. Taiwan: National Tsing Hua University.
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1979. American Sign Language and sign systems: Research and application. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1994. Foregrounding structures in American Sign Language.
Journal of Pragmatics 22. 647–672.
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1996. Evidence for the function and structure of wh-clefts in American Sign Language. International Review of Sign Linguistics 2. 209–
256.
Wilbur, Ronnie B. & Cynthia Patschke. 1999. Syntactic correlates of brow raise in ASL. Sign Language & Linguistics 2. 3–41.
Williams, Edwin. 1980. Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11. 203–238.
Williamson, Janis S. 1987. An indefiniteness restriction for relative clauses in Lakhota. In Eric Reuland & Alice ter Meulen (eds.), The Representation of (In)Definiteness, 168–190. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Wirth, Jessica R. 1978. The derivation of cleft sentences in English. Glossa 12.
58–81.
Zhang, Niina. 2001. Sell non-restrictive relative clauses. National Chung Cheng University. Manuscript.
Zucchi, Sandro. 2003. The semantics of FATTO: a case of grammaticalization. Paper presented at the Fourteenth Amsterdam Colloquium.
Zucchi, Sandro. 2009. Along the time line: tense and time adverbs in Italian Sign Language. Natural Language Semantics 17. 99–139.
Zucchi, Sandro, Carol Neidle, Carlo Geraci, Quentin Duffy & Carlo Cecchetto. 2010.
Functional markers in sign languages. In Diane Brentari (ed.) Sign Languages, 437–492. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zwart, Jan-Wouter 2000. A head raising analysis of relative clauses in Dutch. In Artemis Alexiadou, André Meinungen, Chris Wilder & Paul Law (eds.), The Syntax of Relative Clauses, Linguistik Aktuell 32, 349–385. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
