• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

The catalogue of the monuments of art in Poland and its historical sources

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "The catalogue of the monuments of art in Poland and its historical sources"

Copied!
14
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

T h e Catalogue of the Monuments of Art in Poland and its Historical Sources

M A R I A K A L A M A J S K A - S A E E D

Editor-in-Chief, Catalogue of the Monuments of Ait in Poland, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw

The Historical Background

A L T H O U G H T H E P O L I S H Catalogue of Monuments h a s achieved g r e a t a c c o m p l i s h m e n t s d u r i n g its m o r e t h a n 5 0 years of existence, it d o e s n o t r a n k as o n e of t h e oldest a m o n g similar E u r o p e a n publications. W h e n t h e first sys­

t e m a t i c inventories of m o n u m e n t s were b e i n g established, P o l a n d did n o t formally exist as a state. I n d e e d , after 1795 P o l a n d was n o t p r e s e n t o n t h e m a p s of E u r o p e . Its lands w e r e u n d e r t h e control of, respectively, G e r m a n s , Russians, and Austrians. It is all t h e m o r e o u t s t a n d i n g that precisely in t h a t n o n ­ e x t a n t state t h e first E u r o p e a n i n v e n t o r y of m o n u m e n t s was carried o u t f r o m 1 8 4 4 ­ 1 8 4 5 , w h e n t h e G o v e r n o r of t h e Polish K i n g d o m , appointed by t h e Russian G o v e r n m e n t a f t e r t h e Polish I n s u r r e c t i o n of 1830, requested t h e C o m m i s s i o n of the I n t e r i o r and of Religious I n s t r u c t i o n (parallel to t h e m o d e r n M i n i s t r y of I n t e r i o r Affairs) to p r e p a r e a c o m p l e t e i n v e n t o r y of m o n u m e n t s of a r t in t h e six p r o v i n c e s of w h i c h t h e K i n g d o m was t h e n c o m p o s e d .1

Instructions to t h e official delegation appointed t o t h e task of inventorization (see Appendix) is the first of its kind in E u r o p e , p r e c e d i n g , a m o n g o t h e r s , i n s t r u c t i o n s to t h e N a t i o n a l M u s e u m in P r a g u e (1845) a n d t o t h e Russian Archaeological Society (1851). T h e w o r k s u n d e r t a k e n by K a z i m i e r z Stronczyiiski, w h o led t h e d e l e g a t i o n , and his t h r e e i m m e d i a t e associates resulted in f o u r v o l u m e s of i n v e n t o r y descriptions (with n u m e r o u s marginal designs of m a i n l y h e r a l d i c coats of a r m s of towns) and a l b u m s c o n ­ t a i n i n g over 420 large­size watercolours, m a d e by a staff of seven artists. A p a r t f r o m an official copy giving a c c o u n t of the w o r k d o n e by the delegation, t h e r e is a n o t h e r copy in h a n d w r i t i n g of Stronczyiiski, f u r n i s h e d with sketches h e m a d e relating t o 566 items, such as coats of arms, architec­

tural details and decorative arts objects.2

T h e delegation visited 4 1 0 localities. Its general r e p o r t describes t h e n u m b e r of m o n u m e n t s considered as being of i m p o r t a n c e . T h e items studied in detail (which d o n o t rep­

r e s e n t all t h e m o n u m e n t s r e p o r t e d o n by t h e d e l e g a t i o n ) w e r e : 10 a n c i e n t fortified castles, 10 c e m e t e r i e s , 14

trenches, 8 f r a g m e n t s of t o w n fortifications, 80 castles, 12 city halls, 13 palaces and c o u n t r y houses, 9 t e n e m e n t s , 15 m o n a s t e r y buildings, 250 c h u r c h e s , 8 bell t o w e r s a n d , of movable m o n u m e n t s : 37 altars, 2 O r t h o d o x iconostases, 2 Jewish A r o n h a ­ k o d e s h e s ( H o l y Arks), 6 pulpits, 10 stalls

and c h u r c h benches, 10 sculptures, 11 pictures, 14 m u r a l paintings, 4 stained glass windows, 9 bells, 13 baptisteries, 58 f r a g m e n t s and details of architecture, 104 epitaphs, 14 f u n e r a l m o n u m e n t s and 21 f o u n d a t i o n plates. Silverware and religious v e s t m e n t s w e r e o m i t t e d f r o m t h e r e p o r t o r o n l y occasionally m e n t i o n e d , as w e r e m o n u m e n t s of w o o d e n a r c h i t e c t u r e (two c h u r c h e s and o n e b e l l ­ t o w e r only) and Jewish synagogues. T h e selection of m o n u m e n t s was based o n t h e then­prevailing preference for buildings o f the M i d d l e Ages (for example, o u t of 250 c h u r c h e s carefully e x a m i n e d , 2 1 0 date f r o m b e f o r e 1500). T h e careful a n d accurate scientific t e r m i n o l o g y of Stronczyiiski s report and its acquaintance with the general typology of Polish archi­

tecture, especially t h a t of t h e M i d d l e Ages, is praiseworthy.

T h e scientific value of t h e c o m p l e t e d i n v e n t o r y is in t h e drawings, that record m a n y m o n u m e n t s that now are either c o m p l e t e l y built over, or n o l o n g e r extant, and in the c o n ­ s c i e n t i o u s historical basis for every d e s c r i p t i o n given b y Stronczyiiski, a p a l a e o g r a p h e r , e p i g r a p h i s t a n d archivist.

T h e efforts m a d e to print this material were limited to p u b ­ lication in t h e official

General Journal

in 1 8 6 1 ­ 1 8 6 2 of o n l y a p a r t of t h e results achieved by t h e delegation, o m i t t i n g t h e drawings.'

T h e d i s c o n t i n u a t i o n of t h e a u t o n o m y of t h e Polish K i n g d o m f o l l o w i n g t h e 1863 I n s u r r e c t i o n r e n d e r e d it impossible t o p r o c e e d with any inventory w o r k o n t h e t e r ­ ritory a n n e x e d by Russia. T h e p i o n e e r i n g and e x t r e m e l y valuable w o r k of Stronczyiiski r e m a i n e d u n k n o w n t o t h e wider public and at t h e time did n o t earn the admiration it deserved. T h u s it is all t h e m o r e interesting to w e l c o m e t h e first v o l u m e of its full edition p r o m i s e d in 2006 and elabo­

rated by Prof. J e r z y Kowalczyk, with an academic c o m m e n ­ tary and instructive juxtaposition of water­colors f r o m the inventory with c o n t e m p o r a r y p h o t o g r a p h s (Figs. 1, 2) taken

MS

Originalveröffentlichung in: Centropa 7 (2007), Nr. 1. S. 86-99

(2)

1 Water color. South-west view. Franciscan Church and Convent. Przasnysz. 1588-1618. South-west view. 1815 (From: K.

Stronczyriski's inventory, 1851, vol. V, table 43. Print Cabinet of the University Library in Warsaw, Rps. 243 A7) 2 Photo. South-west view. Franciscan Church and Convent. Przasnysz. 2005.

itnuD

(gfts 1,, ,.- 1

(3)

3 Lithograph. Interior o f the Trinitarian C h u r c h . \rilna. ( F r o m K. Wilczyiiski's Album dc I Una.

Paris. 1846.)

for the new edition of the book, and in the same perspective as that adopted by the original draughtsmen.1

T h e work of men like Stronczyriski, though on a much smaller scale and with private resources, were undertaken in other parts of the former Polish state. In Vilna (now capital of Lithuania) Kazimierz Wilczynski carried out a memo­

rable study which resulted in the four volumes of the Album de Vilna (1845­1850), published by the Paris lithographer Joseph Lemercier. Among its illustrations are views of the

monuments of Vilna: mainly churches, but also sculptures, paintings, liturgical vessels and vestments, and several sub­

urban residences (Fig. 3). Lemercier's chromolithographs were based on water­color drawings provided by local Vilna artists who were employed by yet another lover of national

mementoes, Count Eustachy Tyszkiewicz, creator of the Museum of Antiquities, inaugurated in Vilna in 1857. T h e Museum was closed by the Russian authorities ten years later, and the Museum's collection, including numerous inventory drawings of monuments from the territories of the former Grand Duchy of Lithuania that had been exe cuted in the 1830s and 1840s, were transported to Moscow, where the majority still remain.

In the north­western provinces of the country (Pomerania and Great Poland, which belonged then to Germany) work on inventories was pioneered by Karol Ney who, using material previously collected, published a com­

posite outline of Polish sacral architecture in 1846. In 1847 Jozef Lepkowski, future head of the first Polish Chair of

8 8 C E N T R O P A 7.1: J A N U A R Y 2 0 0 7

(4)

U-P iff Hfl

tsr. •

1 : ^ . w

rrfr ? S

I

m

E E

r A

>\ a

yixvtS

H

mm i M

iBasra

^ T r n H F r a - - " ?

4 Line drawing. Facade. Cameldolite Church.

Bielany near Cracow. (From: Tomkowicz, The Portfolio of Western Galicia Conservators' Cluster, 1900, p. 10).

5 Plan. Cameldolite Church in Bielany near Cracow, (From: Tomkowicz, The Portfolio of Western Galicia Conservators' Cluster, 1900, p. 11)

3 3 r 4

I

: .12

m

(5)

Fig. as. BMuy. Epimlmm Xikobja U'olaUw.

D K O O P T I M O M A X . M E M O I U ^ i Q V E I L LM I. L). NICOEAJ W O E S K I DE PODHAYCE SUPIiEMI REGNI P O L O N I . E MAHSCHAIXI R E L I G I O N S IN DEVM P I E T A T E IN D1YOS OBSEHVANTIA IN ECCLESIAM K1DE IN ItEGEM E T ItEGNVM, B E N E F I C Y S IMMOIiTALIBVS IN SACHVM CAMALIJVI-VM OKDINEM HKIiOIS Pll.ESTANTM.

CVIVS U B E l i A L I T A T E M HEUOICAM E R G A 0OMICIL1V.M H « C ROMVALDINVM ET HSXS 8PLENDIDA TEMPLA, E T IPSA OJELI VOLVMINA, .KTEKNV.M V S Q V E L O Q V B N T V R

GUATITVDINIS V E H O 8 V * , II) QVAl.ECY'NQVE MONVMENTVM ANIMIS POTIVS, QVAM MAKMOItlBVS EXAKRANDVM1) FVNDATOIil *) 8 V O M V N I F I C E T I S S ' . ' ) P< >STEAQVAM') ANIMO CXUB KEDDITO, E X V V I A S T E I I H E N A S

C O R P O R I S MOIUBVNIII HIC UEPOSV1T CAMAI,DVI,ENSES A R G E N T E I MONTIS EKEMICOL.E NON SINE VOTIS, E T LACHKYMIS CALENTIBYS P. P.

OBYT A. D. 1630 DIE 19 MAHTY .UTATIS V E R O SV.*; 75*)

t

6 T h e e p i t a p h o f W o l s k i , f o u n d e r of t h e C a r m e l i t e C h u r c h in Bielany ( F r o m : T o m k o w i c z , The Portfolio of Western Galicia Conservators' Cluster,

1906. p. 31).

7 T o m b of P i o t r S u l o w s k i . P a r i s h c h u r c h . Biecz ( F r o m : I b m k o w i c z , The Portfolio of Western Galicia Consei-vators' Cluster, 1900, p. 1 9 6 - 1 9 7 ) .

a. P h o t o o f e n t i r e t o m b b. D r a w i n g o f b a s r e l i e f .

y.

9 0 C E N ' T R O P A 7 . 1 : J A N U A R Y 2 0 0 7

(6)

Archaeology founded 1867 at Jagiellonian University in Cracow, initiated his exploratory travels in Galicia (southern region of the former Polish state, which had been annexed by Austrian Empire), in which he documented more than

1,500 localities. The results of his work were published in the annuals of the Cracow Scientific Society in 1852 and 1863.>

However, the first fully professional Polish inventories of his­

torical monuments were authored by the art historian Stanislaw Tomkowicz, an honorary conservator of some Galicia communes and from 1894 also the conservator of Cracow's monuments. Published in 1900 and 1906, and, though modeled on foreign (mainly German) examples, they were actually much ampler and richer since they included more modest monuments, valuable for the insight they pro­

vide into the cultural landscape of the regions they describe (Figs. 4­7)/' Tomkowicz's work became the model for topo­

graphic inventories created in the Polish state, when it was restored in 1918. Already in 1919 its first government estab­

lished an office in charge of inventory­making and issued a

"detailed instruction to delegates."7

In 1929 the state Central Office for Art Inventory was established, and from 1930 it carried out intensive field­

work, collecting photographs, surveys and other descriptive material for detailed inventories. Until the outbreak of World War II several communes had been surveyed and two first volumes of the Topographic Inventory of Monuments in Poland was published in 1938 (The Nowy Targ District) and 1939 (The Rawa Mazowiecka District).

At the time the intention was planned to include all monuments of art throughout the whole territory of the Polish state in the publication, reporting on their number, type and most essential historical and stylistic data. T h e project was never completed because of the historical tur­

moil that followed. The inventorial activity, perfectly organ­

ized and progressing smoothly, was interrupted by World War II, to which not only numerous monuments but also people capable of assessing them fell victim, since Polish intelligentsia were being annihilated with an equal deter­

mination by the Nazis and by the Soviets. Almost half of the pre­war territory of Poland was annexed in 1939 and retained by the Soviet Union. Having been deprived of their eastern territories, Poles were also robbed of a large part of their cultural heritage, which over the last 67 years has been to a great extent nullified. Its still­impressive rem­

nants (Fig. 8) are recorded in the published series: Materials for the History of Sacral Art in the Eastern Territories of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, that focuses on Roman Catholic churches and convents, both preserved and destroyed or converted into secular use after 1945." This work is the product of inventories carried out since 1993 by

H

8 Painted bas-relief. Virgin with Child, ca 1620 (From: Sacral Art in the Eastern Territories of the Polish-Lithuanian Commamweakb, part II: Former Nowogrodek voivodship (now Belarus), vol. 1, Cracow 2003, fig. 153)

Polish historians of art in Ukraine, Lithuania, and Belarus.

It complements a multi­volume work by R. Aftanazy:

History of Residencies in the Foiy>ier Borderland of the Polish- Lithuanian Commotiwealth, published in 1991­1997.1'

T h e Catalogue

The Institute of Art of the Polish Academy of Sciences has been publishing the series entitled Catalogue of the Monu­

ments of Art in Poland since 1951. T h e scheme of the series is simple, reflecting the administrative division of Poland, which included 16 provinces (voivodships) and 379 districts, the latter containing 65 municipalities or towns exceeding 100,000 inhabitants. However, in 1975 administrative reform created a greater number of provinces, and the organization of the New Series of the Catalogue adjusted to reflect the new departmental divisions, while continuing to comply with the topographical arrangement adopted at the onset of the work. T h e series is still divided into volumes

(7)

9 M a p f r o m Catalogue of the Monuments of Ait in Poland. Darker areas represent locations that have b e e n published.

entitled respectively, with the names of the provinces or cities they analyze, each volume including several sections, or fascicles (published as separate books), their number depending on the size of the territory it contains.

T h e series of 195 fascicles (Fig. 9) will soon increase by yet another, 196th, fascicle i.e. Gdansk. The Principal City, which is now being printed. Although the individual parts of this series are referred to as fascicles, they are often very bulky books, for example The Biala Podlaska District (2006) includes 383 pages of text, a map, 2 town plans, 11 ground plans and 677 illustrations (Fig. 10), whereas this most recent 'fascicle' will attain 500 pages and include 976 illustrations (See Appendix 2). However, the fascicles are 6V2" x 6", with quite a modest graphic layout, as the publi­

cation, in principle, is intended not to become an album but to constitute a possibly not extremely impressive, but thor­

ough, basic compendium of knowledge of the monuments in the region discussed in that fascicle.

T h e entire Catalogue should be seen as a list of monu­

ments prepared with scholarly discipline, reflecting only the current status quo. It does not include items that no longer exist (even if they are well known from records), or those transferred to museums. Its contents are a result of a thor­

ough penetration of the territory, the consultation of basic­

literature on the subject and select archival sources, both written and iconographic. I listorical information is limited only to the most essential facts, and the description of par­

ticular monuments is restricted to brief characteristics.

Measurements are not cited, and in the majority of cases both the material and technology used in construction are omitted, and there is no mention of inscriptions.

Illustrations, though abundant, are limited to the most artis­

tic monuments, those most typical of a given stylistic period or those most characteristic of a given region. Measured drawings in the text (1: 750 000 scale) are included only for more complex buildings. Reference to the illustrated build­

9 2 C E X T R O P A 7.1: J A N U A R Y 2 0 0 7

(8)

K A T A L O G Z A B Y T K O W SZTIIK1 VV P O L S C E

ings is included in schematic maps of the regions covered in the volumes and with plans of larger localities, in which the location and layout of monumental buildings is marked.

Such a publication format has no model among foreign monument inventory publications. It is much ampler than that of the classical Handbuch of Georg Dehio, produced in the beginning of the 20th century, since it includes all the extant monuments except for those in museum and private collections; it is much more detailed than Dehio's work, with respect to historical and descriptive information, and at the same time it is completely objective, without refer­

ence to or evaluation of the artistic character of the item described. Beginning in 1970 these remarks have been con­

tained in the preface, where overall regional characteristics are given, including its geographical features (location and topography), history (including changes of the state and Church administration boundaries, development of settle­

ments, forms of land ownership, etc.), and an inclusive, eval­

uative analysis of groups of artistic issues in which a chronological order is applied to brick and wood secular and sacral architecture, urban planning, and interior items, including furniture, paintings, sculptures, goldsmithery, liturgical vestments, textiles, and other works of artistic craftsmanship.

Despite rigorous adherence to a strictly professional and extremely self­restrained language of the descriptions, the size of the volume of each subsequent fascicle has grad­

ually increased, mainly owing to the enlarged basic formula of the Catalogue as the chronological framework has expanded. T h e expansion implies a change in the selection of eligible monuments. T h e initial chronological boundary determined in 1951 has been pushed up from the mid­19th century by almost one hundred years, increasing not only the number of recorded items, but also the factual content of the work. Now such monuments as railway stations and the more interesting examples of industrial architecture and farm buildings on country estates are included.

T h e scope of historical information has also been enlarged in the new series, to include both the history of localities (as a rule the development and spatial character­

istics of all the localities that once enjoyed town privileges are provided) and of particular monuments. T h e informa­

tion provided for an architectural monument includes alter­

ations to the monument, its builders, founders and owners, and even mention of previous buildings that existed on the site. Moreover, additions to the topics, such as descriptions of building furnishings, and iconographic information, include the elements of altars—the sculptures, paintings and goldsmith­work—and all figural representations; illumi­

nated manuscripts are described including all the miniatures

A

10 The most recent fascicle of Catalogue of the Monuments ofAft in Poland, vol. M i l (Lublin voivodship), fasc. 8, Warsaw 2006.

and figural initials, while older volumes of The Catalogue included only the number and the topics of the illustrations.

Similarly, mural paintings and sculpted interior furnishings, now characterize not only the overall program but also its particular elements. Additionally, information on the char­

acter and extent of the conservation (such as dates of the restoration works, their authors, and the whereabouts of conservation reports) is now supplied.

Each fascicle now includes an larger bibliography of literature on the subject, together with an ample selection of archival sources and manuscripts. Moreover, each fasci­

cle of the new series of the Catalogue encloses a sizeable index including data that, for purposes of clarification of the main text, has been transferred to the index.

All the artistic activity in a given region, whether mediocre or craftsmanlike, is presented fully in the Catalogue, but only in its contemporary status. T h e Catalogue also notes the appearance of more general artis­

tic phenomena and defines their territorial extent. For instance, thanks to full records, a complex of more than 100

(9)

centrally planned domed chapels from the years 1590-1650, their local variants and major concentrations have been identified. T h e records have also permitted the identifica­

tion of the scope of interesting phenomena, such as the sec­

ond half of the 16th century mass migration of master­builders and stucco­workers from the border between Italy and Switzerland, whose activity met with a vivid response in Poland by local building circles, and had a far­reaching impact on the spatial forms and characteris­

tic features of late Renaissance and Mannerist ornaments in Polish architecture, penetrating from Lublin (the then­

major artistic center) into central and southern Poland, and also far into the north and east of the Polish­Lithuanian Commonwealth, now the territories of Lithuania, Belarus, and Ukraine.

T h e list of advantages resulting from access to this vast and not previously analyzed data base is very long; even without taking into consideration the importance of the inventory for any further studies in the history of art, or its use for such historical sciences as genealogy and heraldry, it is essential to emphasize its practical importance for the preservation of Polish cultural heritage. T h e Catalogue, in identifying a given item as a historical monument, commits it to the care of the Polish citizen; without being a legally binding document, it preserves works of art merely by iden­

tifying and describing them.

APPENDIX 1

INSTRUCTION

T O DELEGATES T O PREPARE AN INVENTORY OF A N C I E N T M O N U M E N T S A N D WORKS OF ART IN T H E ESTATES O W N E D BY T H E

KINGDOM OF POLAND.

1844.

In view of the need to obtain exact descriptions of all ancient monuments of art in the Kingdom, the Government of the Kingdom of Poland decided to give the matter over to an official, delegated by the Commission of the Interior and Religious Instruction, whose work would consist of recording all the ancient monuments and works of art found in governmental estates.

T h e recording of such monuments in private estates is to be conducted through the medium of local authorities. T h e following regulations are issued to the delegate of the Commission of the Interior and Religious Instruction.

§1-

It is the duty of the delegate to describe all ancient monuments and works of art in the governmental estates, that is: casdes, churches, fortifications, monuments and in general everything worth recording from the point of view of history, architecture and ancient art.

§2.

It should be understood that governmental estates include towns under the administration of die government, and all monuments and works of art

belonging to such a city, to municipal institutions and to die government should be described in detail by the delegate. T h e description of monuments of art owned by private people or owners of estates and villages, should be recorded through the medium of local administrative audiorities.

§3.

T h e government desires to have an exact account of the monuments of art recorded by die delegate, pertaining to the age of the monument, its object, history, its present condition and of the place such a monument could take in die history of art, considering the originality of conception, precise fin­

ishing and conservation.

§4.

All information concerning the past of a monument, should be gathered principally from the monument itself. T h e delegate should pay particular attention to inscriptions and emblems with which the monument is adorned and give the government a precise report of same.

§5.

Finally, if the monument itself does not supply such information, the dele­

gate may gather it from local sources, municipal archives, legends told by old people and give his description on this basis. In case that all above men­

tioned sources are not sufficient he may refer to printed material on diis subject, which he can cite widi criticism.

§6.

In describing die present state of a monument, die delegate should state of what material the monument is made, give an exact plan of it, a precise drawing, emphasizing the most important particulars.

§7.

In regard to the latter, if need be, the delegate may request die help of local engineers.

§8.

In view of the fact that the recording of monuments of art belonging to owners of private estates should be worked out through the medium of local authorities, and that the above instructions should be applied to recording of such monuments, the Commission of the Interior and Religious Instruction w ill give the delegate the authority to superintend die work of administrative authorities, hut he must communicate with diem first and supply them with such precise information and instructions as may be required.

§9.

If it will not increase the cost of journey, die delegate may use local Archives, particularly old records and give the government an exact report, in regard to their state and security from being damaged.

§ 10.

T h e journey of the delegate will be undertaken during the summer mondis, and during diis the delegate will present a general preliminary report to die government about his activities, each month. After completing this jour­

ney the delegate will make out an exact report and present it to the Governmental Commission.

9 4 C E N ' T R O P A 7.1: J A N U A R Y 2 0 0 7

(10)

A P P E N D I X 2: Catalogue of the Monuments of Art in Poland

VOL, I—DEPARTMENT KRAKOW

Fasc. 1. Disttict Biala,]. Szablowski, W a r s a w 1951 [35 pp.+ m a p , 59 fot.]

Fasc. 2. Disttict Bothnia,). Szablowski, W a r s a w 1951 [29 pp.+ m a p , 3 plans, 52 fot.]

Fasc. 3. District Btzesko,). D u t k i e w i c z , W a r s a w 1951 [pp. 21, m a p , 1 plan, 5 0 fot.]

Fasc. 4. District Clrrzandv:,). Szablowsld, W a r s a w 1952 [pp. 36, m a p , 3 plans, 72 fot.]

Fasc. 5. District Dqbravca Tatitazcska, W a r s a w 1951, J . D u t k i e w i c z [pp. 10, m a p , 16 fot.]

Fasc. 6. District Krakord,}. L e p i a r c z y k , W a r s a w 1951 [pp. 37, m a p , 2 plans, 51 fot.]

Fasc. 7. District l.imancrcca,). D u t k i e w i c z , W a r s a w 1951 [pp. 21, m a p , 1 plan, f o t . 32]

Fasc. 8. District Miecbou; Z . B o c z k o w s k a , W a r s a w 1953 [ p p . 4 7 , 1 plan, m a p , 85 fot.]

Fasc. 9 . District Mxslettice, K K u t r z e b i a n k a , W a r s a w 1951 [pp. 30, m a p , 35 fot]

F a s c . 10. District Nvay Sacz, A. M i s i l g - B o c h e r i s k a a n d T . D o b r o w o l s k i , W a r s a w 1951 [pp. 52, m a p , 1 plan, 5 0 fot.]

Fasc. 11. Disttict Natry Targ, W a r s a w 1951 [pp. 32, 2 plans, m a p , 52 fot.]

F a s c . 12. Disttict Olkusz, K . K u t r z e b i a n k a , W a r s a w 1953 [pp. 4 1 , m a p , 3 plans, 81 fot.]

Fasc. 13. District Tanithi-,). D u t k i e w i c z , W a r s a w 1953 [pp. 28, m a p , 1 plan, 7 4 fot.]

Fasc. 14. Disttict Wadozice,). Szablowski, W a r s a w 1953 [pp. 62, m a p , 1 plan, 132 fot.]

Fasc. 15. District Zyziec,]. Szablowski, W a r s a w 1951 [pp. 27, f o t 34]

VOL. II—DEPARTMENT LODZ

F a s c . l . DistttaBtzeziny, B. Wolff, E. Kozlowska, W a r s a w 1953 [pp. 22, m a p , 4 8 fot.]

Fasc. 2. District Ktitrio, D . Kaczmarzyk, W a r s a w 1953 [pp. 14, 1 plan, map, 2 6 fot.]

Fasc. 3. Disttitt Ijisk, M Kwiczala, Warsaw 1953 [pp. 24, map, 1 plan, 4 9 fot.]

Fasc. 4. Disnia Leczyca, ML Kwiczala, K. Szczepkowska, W a r s a w 1953 [pp. 36, m a p , 2 plans, 80 fot.]

Fasc. 5. Disttict Louicz, S. Kozaldewicz.J. A M i l o b e d z k i , W a r s a w 1953 [pp. 70, m a p , 3 plans, 140 f o t ]

Fasc. 6. Disttict&city Lodz, ML Kwiczala, W a r s a w 1953 [pp. 16, m a p , 14 f o t ] Fasc.7. Disttict Piotrkoz- Ttyhnmlski, W a r s a w 1953 [pp. 31, map, 1 plan, 6 0 f o t ] Fasc. 8. Disttict Radomsko, H . H o h e n s e e - C i s z e w s k a , J . Lozinski, W a r s a w 1953

[pp. 27, m a p , f o t 53]

Fasc. 9. Disttia Ktw* Mazcaiecka, B. Kopydtowski, W a r s a w 1954 [pp. 22, map, 65 f o t ]

Fasc. 10. D«T77iT Sieradz, K Szczepkowska, W a r s a w 1953 [pp. 49, map, 3 plans, 9 8 f o t ]

Fasc. 11 DistrictSJtMlnitwict, V.S a m a . T . Sulcrzyska, W a r s a w 1953 [pp. 21, map, 2 4 f o t ]

Fasc. 12. Dtsmct ifieluit, H . H o h e n s e e - C i s z e w s k a . B. Wolff, Warsaw 1953 [pp.

28, m a p , 6 6 f o t ]

VOL. ffl—DEPARTMENT KJELCE

Fasc. \. Disttict Busko-Zdroj, K K u t r z e b i a n k a , W a r s a w 1957 [pp.91, m a p , 10 plans, 145 f o t ]

Fasc. 2. Disttict BU, O . P u c i a t a , Z . S w i e c h o w s k i , W a r s a w 1957 [pp.38, m a p , 2 plans, 7 9 f o t ]

Fasc. 3. District Jedrzejovc, T . P r z y p k o w s k i , W a r s a w 1957 [pp. 4 6 , m a p , 6 plans, 116 f o t ]

Fasc. 4. District Kiclcc, T . P r z y p k o w s k i , W a r s a w 1957 [pp. 71, m a p , 8 plans, 158 f o t ]

Fasc. 5. District Konskie, M . K w i c z a l a , W a r s a w 1958 [pp. 4 2 , m a p , 5 plans, 6 0 f o t ]

Fasc. 6. District Koziiettice, M . Kwiczala, W a r s a w 1 9 5 8 [pp. 33, m a p , 2 plans, 62 f o t ]

Fasc. 7. District Optitotr, collective w o r k , W a r s a w 1959 [pp. 85, m a p , 6 plans, 4 7 f o t ]

Fasc. 8. District Opoczno, collective w o r k , W arsaw 1958 [pp. 65, m a p , 7 plans, 160 fot]

Fasc. 9. District Pinczaw, K . K u t r z e b i a n k a , J . Z . L o z i n s k i , B. W o l f f , W a r s a w 1961 [pp. 109, m a p , 8 p l a n s , 2 8 9 f o t ]

F a s c . 10. District Rctdont, K . S z c z e p k o w s k a , E . K r y g i e r , J . Z . L o z i n s k i , W a r s a w 1961 [pp. 64, m a p , 4 plans, 110 f o t ]

Fasc. 11. District Satidomierz, J . Z . L o z i n s k i , T . P r z y p k o w s k i , W a r s a w 1962 [pp. 129, m a p , 2 0 plans, 4 3 1 f o t ]

F a s c . 12. Distiict Whszczerwa, T . P r z y p k o w s k i , J . Z . L o z i n s k i , B. W o l f f , W a r s a w 1966 [pp. 67, m a p , 4 plans, 301 f o t ]

VOL. IV—CTTY OF KRAKOW

Fasc. 1. Wauel Royal Castle, e d . J . S z a b l o w s k i , W a r s a w 1965 [ 2 6 0 p p . , 10 plans, 8 9 9 f o t ]

Facs. 2. The Center. Churches and monasteties 1, e d . A. B o c h n a k a n d J . S a m e k , W a r s a w 1971 [230 p p . , 9 p l a n s , 1 0 0 6 f o t ]

Fasc. 3. The Center. Churches and monasteries 2, ed. A. B o c h n a k a n d J . S a m e k , 1 9 7 8 [274 p p . , 13 p l a n s , 1123 f o t ]

F a s c . 4 . Kazimierz and Stradom. Churches and monasteries 1, e d . I. a n d J . S a m e k , 1987 [203 p p , 6 plans, 1011 f o t ]

Fasc. 5. Kazimierz and Stradom. Churches and monasteties 2, e d . I. a n d J . S a m e k , 1993 [ 1 5 9 pp., 4 p l a n s , 6 2 0 f o t ]

Fasc. 6. Kazimierz and Strado?n. Judaica: synagogues, public buildings and ceme­

teries, e d . I. a n d J . S a m e k , 1 9 9 5 [ 1 5 9 p p . , 10 plans, 3 6 9 f o t ] Fasc. 7. Zu ierzyniec, \oiry Sviat, Pokcsie Zzierzynieckie, e d . J . D a r a n o w s k a -

E u k a s z e w s k a a n d R . H e n o c h - M a r e n d z i u k , W a r s a w 1995 [87 p p . , 4 plans, 525 fot]

Fasc. 8. Kleparz. Churches and monasteries, e d . I. a n d J . S a m e k , 2 0 0 0 [135 pp., 4 plans, 3 9 0 f o t ]

Fasc. 10. The Center. Defending n­alls and team gates, the Main Market Square, e d . M . Mysliriski, W a r s a w 2 0 0 5 [ 1 8 4 p p . , 9 p l a n s , 3 2 3 fot]

VOL. V—DEPARTMENT POZNAN

Fasc. 1. Disttict Chodziez, U . Czartoryska i M . K u t z n e r , W arsaw 1965 [14 pp., m a p , 33 tot.]

Fasc. 2. Disttict Czaniktm; I. Trybowski i O . Zagorow sld, W a r s a w 1966 [24 pp.

map, 1 p l a n ,9 4 fot-l

Fasc. 3. Disttict Gtiiezno, T . Ruszczyriska, A Slawska a n d others, W arsaw 1963 [103 pp., m a p , 7 plans, 511 f o t ]

Fasc. 4. District GostytX Z . Bialtowicz-Krygierowa, Warsaw 1961 [49 pp., m a p , 4 plans, 175 f o t ]

Fasc. 5. DisttictJarocin, A K o d u r o w a , Warsaw 1969 [25 pp., m a p , 1 plan, 85 f o t ] Fasc. 6. Disttict Kalisz,T. Ruszczyriska, A Slawska, Z . W i n i a r z , Warsaw 1960 [69

pp., map, 7 plans, 169 f o t ]

Fasc. 7. Disttitt Kcpno, T . Chrzanow ski, ML Kornecki,J. Samek, W a r s a w 1958 [23 pp., m a p , 1 plan, 6 6 f o t ]

Fasc. 8. Disttict Koto,). Rutkowska, W a r s a w 1968 [25 pp., m a p , 3 plans, 6 0 f o t ] Fasc. 9. DitmiT Konin,). E c k h a r d t i J . Orariska, W a r s a w 1952 [26 pp., map, 1

plan, 85 fot.]

(11)

Fasc. 10. District Koscian, T. Ruszczyriska i A. Slawska and P. Skubiszewski, Warsaw. 1980 [124 pp., map, 10 plans, 515 fot.]

Fasc. 11. District Krotoszyn, Z. and J. Keblowscy, Warsaw 1973 [74 pp., map, 12 plans, 278 fot]

Fasc. 12. District Lesziio, R. and T. Jurasz, T. Ruszczyriska and A. Slawska, Warsaw 1975 [110 pp., map, 14 plans, 372 fot.]

Fasc. 13. Distiict Miedzychod, collective work, Warsaw 1968 [25 pp., map, 3 plans, 108 fot.]

Fasc. 14. Distiict Nmvy Toinys'l, R. and E. Linette, Warsaw 1969 [52 pp., map, 8 plans, 164 fot]

Fasc. 15. District Obomiki, I. Galicka, I. Kaczorowska and H. Sygietyftska, Warsaw 1965 [25 pp., map, 4 plans, 76 fot]

Fasc. 16. Distiict Ostiva; A Kodurowa and others, Warsaw 1958 [20 pp., map, 1 plan, 57 fot]

Fasc. 17. Distiict Ostizeszmi; T. Chrzanowski, M. Kornecki and J. Samek, Warsaw 1958 [17 pp., map, 1 plan, 49 fot]

Fasc. 18. Distiict Tizciaii/t, I. Trybowski and O. Zagorowski, Warsaw 1966 [17 pp., map, 1 plan, 24 fot]

Fasc. 19. Distiict Pleszra\ A Kodurowa and others, Warsaw 1959 [23 pp., map, 3 plans, 63 fot]

Fasc. 20. District Poziuii\ T. Ruszczyriska, A Slawska, Warsaw 1977 [65 pp., map, 4 plans, 253 fot]

Fasc. 21. District Rairicz, R. and T. Jurasz, T. Ruszczjiiska and A. Slawska, Warsaw 1971 [43 pp., map, 4 plans, 156 fot]

Fasc. 22. Distiict Shipca,]. Eckhardtowna, J. Orariska and M. Kwiczala, Warsaw 1960 [23 pp., map, 2 plans, 81 fot]

Fasc. 23. Distiict SzamotiiSy, R. and T. Jurasz, T. Ruszczyriska, A Slawska, Warsaw 1966 [42 pp., map, 10 plans, 161 fot]

Fasc. 24. Distiict Sroda, collective work, Warsaw 1964 [37 pp., map, 7 plans, 106 fot]

Fasc. 25. Distiict Stem, Z. Biallowicz-Krygierowa, Warsaw 1961 [58 pp., map, 6 plans, 117 fot]

Fasc. 26. Distiict Turek, M Kwiczala, Warsaw 1959 [28 pp., map, 2 plans, 58 fot]

Fasc. 27. District Wqgrtrcciec, I. Galicka, I. Kaczorowska and H. Sygieryriska, Warsaw 1964 [41 pp., map, 3 plans, 126 fot]

Fasc. 28. Distiict Wolsztyn, I. Galicka, I. Kaczorowska and H. Sygieryriska, Warsaw 1970 [38 pp., map, 3 plans, 167 fot]

Fasc. 29. Distiict IVizesnia, M. Kwiczala, Warsaw 1960 [22 pp., map, 73 fot]

VOL. VI—DEPARTMENT KAT( UV1CE

Fasc. 1. District Bpdzin, E. and M. Gutowscy, Warsaw 1961 [30 pp., map, 1 plan, 81 f o t ]

Fasc. 2. Distiict Bielsko-Biaia, E. and M. Gutowscy, Warsaw 1967 [92 pp., map, 2 plans, 138 fot]

Fasc. 3. Distiict and City Cieszyn, T. .Marikowska-Holcerowa, J. MaAkowska- Jurczakowa, R. Brykowski and Z. Winiarz, Warsaw 1974 [148 pp., map,

8 plans, 301 f o t ]

Fasc. 4. Distiict Czestocbotca, P. Maliszewski, A. Malkiewicz, I. Rejduch- Samkowa and J. Samek, Warsaw 1979 [54 pp., map, 5 plans, 198 f o t ] Fasc. 5. District Glhrice, E. and M. Gutowscy, K. Kutrzebianka, Warsaw

1966 [123 pp., map, 111 plans, 371 fot]

Fasc. 6. District Kiobuck, T. Malkowska-Holcerowa, J. .Marikowska- Jurczakowa, Warsaw 1963 [44 pp., map, 5 plans, 107 f o t ]

Fasc. 7. Distiict Lubliniec, M. Kornecki, I. Rejduch-Samkowa, Warsaw 1960 [38 pp., map, 2 plans, 88 f o t ]

Fasc. 8. Distiict Myszkmi; A M. Olszewski, O. Solarzowna, Warsaw 1962 [33 pp., map, 4 plans, 105 f o t ]

Fasc. 9. District Pszczyiia, T. Chrzanowski, M. Kornecki, Warsaw 1961 [48 pp., map, 1 plan, 88 f o t ]

Fasc. 10. District Rylmik,). Lepiarczyk, Warsaw 1964 [42 pp., map, 7 plans, 100 fot]

Fasc. 11. District Tamatcskie Gdiy, I. Plazak,J. Przala, Warsaw 1968 [39 pp., map, 2 plans, 98 fot.]

Fasc. 12. Distiict Tycby, K Dzuryriska, A. M. Olszewski, Warsaw 1964 [34 pp., map, 1 plan, 37 f o t ]

Fasc. 13. Distiict Wodzisiaz-, M. Kornecki, J. Samek, Warsaw 1960 [26 pp., map, 2 plans, 59 fot]

Fasc. 14. Distiict Ztnriercie, K. Dzuryriska, A. M. Olszewski, Warsaw 1962 [31 pp., map, 4 plans, 66 f o t ]

VOL. YTi—DEPARTMENT OPOLE

Fasc. 1. Distiict Btzeg, T. Chrzanowski, M. Kornecki and M. Zlat, Warsaw 1961 [89 pp., map, 7 plans, 210 f o t ]

Fasc. 2. District Gtubczyce, T. Chrzanowski, M. Kornecki, Warsaw 1961 [96 pp., map, 3 plans, 146 f o t ]

Fasc. 3. Distiict Grodkou-, T. Chrzanowski, M. Kornecki, Warsaw 1964 [110 pp., map, 7 plans, 266 f o t ]

Fasc. 4. Distiict Kliuzbork, T. Chrzanowski, A. Ciechanowiecki, Warsaw 1960 [52 pp., map, 2 plans, 113 f o t ]

Fasc. 5. Distiict Kozle, K Dzuryriska, T. Zurkowska, Warsaw 1965 [72 pp., map, 4 plans, 113 f o t ]

Fasc. 6. Distiict Krapkcraice, J.T. Frazik, M. Kornecki, Warsaw 1963 [41 pp., map, 7 plans, 106 f o t ]

Fasc. 7. Distiict Namysivu; I. Galicka, H . Sygieryriska, Warsaw 1965 [75 pp., map, 6 plans, 204 f o t ]

Fasc. 8. Distiict Niemodlin, E. and M. Gutowscy, Warsaw 1962 [58 pp., map, 4 plans, 69 f o t ]

Fasc. 9. Distiict Nysa, T. Chrzanowski, M. Kornecki, Warsaw 1963 [216 pp., map, 15 plans, 440 fot.]

Fasc. 10. Distiict Olesno, R. and E. Linette, Warsaw 1960 [34 pp., map, 1 plan, 80 fot.]

Fasc. 11. Distiict and City Opole, T. Chrzanowski, M. Kornecki, S. Gumiriski and A M. Olszewski, Warsaw 1968 [152 pp., map, 14 plans, 431 fot]

Fasc. 12. District Prndiiik, R. and T. Jurasz, T. Chrzanowski, M . Kornecki, Warsaw 1960 [82 pp., map, 10 plans, 176 fot.)

Fasc. 13. Distiict Racibdiz, T. Chrzanowski, M Kornecki, Warsaw 1967 [89 pp., map, 9 plans, 244 fot]

Fasc. 14. District Strzclce, E. Dwornik-Gutowska, E. Symbratowicz, Warsaw 1961 [62 pp., map, 1 plan, 121 f o t ]

VOL. Vin—DEPARTMENT LUBLIN

Fasc. 1. District Beliyce, collective work, Warsaw 1960 [14 pp. + 2 plans, map, 22 f o t ]

Fasc. 2. Distiict Biaia Podlaska, K. Kolendo-Korczakowa, A. Oleriska, M.

Zgliriski, Warsaw 2006 [369 pp. + 16 plans, map, 677 fot.) Fasc. 3. District Biigaraj, M. Kwiczala, K. Szczepkowska, R. Brykowski,

Warsaw 1960 [33 pp. + 3 plans, map, 64 fot.]

Fasc. 4. Distiict Bychana, Zbiorowe, Warsaw 1960 [10 pp. + plan 1, map, 18 f o t ]

Fasc. 5. Distiict Chetm, K. Kutrzebianka and E. Smulikowska, Warsaw 1968 [83 pp., 10 plans, map, 214 f o t ]

Fasc. 6. District Hrubieszmi; T. Chrzanowski, M. Kornecki and J. Samek, 1964 [75 pp. + map, 6 plans, 138 fot]

Fasc. 7. Distiict Janaic Lubelski, I. Galicka and E. Smulikowska, Warsaw 1961 [14 pp.4 1 plan, map, 34 fot]

Fasc. 8. Distiict Krasynstau; T. Sulerzyska, F. Uniechowska, E. Smulikowska, Warsaw 1964 [pp. 90, 10 plans, map, 146 f o t ]

Fasc. 9. District Kramik, I. Galicka i E. Smulikowska, Warsaw 1961 [pp. 43, plans 3, map, 89 f o t ]

9 6 C E N T R O P A 7.1: J A N U A R Y 20(17

(12)

Fasc. 10. District Lublin, R. Brykowski and others, Warsaw 1967 [pp. 51, plans 6, fot. 137]

Fasc. 11. District Lubartau; R. Brykowski, Z. Kossakowska, J. Rutkowska, Warsaw 1975 [pp. 97, plans 8, fot. 233]

Fasc. 13. District Opole Lubelskie,). Werciriska, Z. Winiarz, Warsaw 1962 [pp. 38, plans 4, map, fot. 94]

Fasc. 14. District Parczrd; R. Brykowski and others, Warsaw 1970 [pp., 18, plan 1, map, fot. 57]

Fasc. 17. District Tomasztkr Lubelski, R. Brykowski, K Kutrzeba, Warsaw 1982 [pp. 125, plans 5, map, fot. 219]

Fasc. 18. District Hlodatra,]. Rutkowska, E. Smulikowska, Warsaw 1975 [pp. 118, plans 8, map, fot. 239]

VOL. IX—DEPARTMENT SZCZECUB

Fasc. 8. District Mys'liborz, H. Kozakiewicz, Z. Swiechowski, Warsaw 1952 [12 pp., map, 22 fot.]

V< )L. X—DEPARTMENT WARSAW

Fasc. 1. Disnia Ciechamk; by 1. Galicka, H. Sygietyriska, Z. Kossakowska and J.

Rutkowska,, Warsaw 1977 [101 pp. + map, 6 plans, 193 fot.)

Fasc. 2. Disnict Gnwulil, I. Galicka, H. Sygietyriska, D. Kaczmarzyk, Warsaw 1967 [43 pp. + 2 plans, 72 fot]

Fasc. 3. Disnict Gostyiihi, I. Galicka, H. Sygietyriska and D. Kaczmarzyk, Warsaw 1975 [69 pp. + map, 9 plans, 144 fot.]

Fasc. 4. Disnict Grodzisk Mazoiriecki, I. Galicka, H. Sygietyriska and D.

Kaczmarzyk, Warsaw 1967 [51 pp. + map, 4 plans, 128 fot.]

Fasc. 5. Disnict Grqjec, I. Galicka, H. Sygietyriska and D. Kaczmarzyk, Warsaw 1971 [109 pp.+ map, 9 plans, 281 fot]

Fasc. 6. Disnict Losice, I. Galicka, H. Sygietyriska and D. Kaczmarzyk, Warsaw 1965 [33 pp. + map, 1 plan, 68 fot]

Fasc. 7. Disnia Makoir Mazoziecki, I. Galicka and H. Sygietyriska, Warsaw 1982 [42 pp. + map, 2 plans,74 fot]

Fasc. 8. Disnict Mh'tsk Mazmiiecki, I. Galicka and H. Sygietyriska, Warsaw 1968 [44 pp. + map, 6 plans, 117 fot.]

Fasc. 9. Disma Mlcm a, I. Galicka, H. Sygietyriska and M Kwiczala, Warsaw 1985 [58 pp. + map, 2 plans, 151 fot]

Fasc. 10. Disnict Niruy Dii'drMuzmiitrki, I. Galicka, H. Sygietyriska, C. Gfuszek,

•A. Gruszecki, Warsaw 1987 [110 pp. + map, 8 plans, 220 fot]

Fasc. 11. Disnict Osnvlfka, I. Galicka, H. Sygietyriska, M. Kwiczala, Warsaw 1983 [57 pp. + map, 4 plans, 137 fot]

Fasc. 12. Disnia Osnvzc Mazrdiecka, I. Galicka, H. Sygietyriska, D. Kaczmarzyk, Warsaw 1974 [39 pp. + map, 3 plans. 96 fot]

Fasc. 13. Disnict Ofcock, E. Zylko, D. Kaczmarzyk, Warsaw 1963 [18 pp. + map, 2 plans, 55 fot]

Fasc. 14. Disnict Piasecziio, E. Zylko, D. Kaczmarzyk, Warsaw 1962 [35 pp. + map, 4 plans, 109 fot]

Fasc. 15. Disnict Pbck, I. Galicka, H. Sygietyriska, D. Kaczmarzyk, Warsaw 1993 [168 pp. + map, 3 plans, 324 fot]

Fasc. 16. Disma Pioiisk, I. Galicka , H. Sygietyriska, D. Kaczmarzyk, Warsaw 1979 [113 pp. + map, 2 plans, 255 fot]

Fasc. 17. Disnict Pniszktfc; I. Galicka. H. Sygietyriska, D. Kaczmarzyk, Warsaw 1970 [58 pp. + map, 8 plans, 113 fot]

Fasc. 18. Disnict Przastiysz, I. Galicka, H. Sygietyriska, A. Bartczakowa, F.

Uniechowska, Warsaw 1980 [53 pp. + map, 3 plans, 105 fot]

Fasc. 20. Disnia Pufritsk, M Omilanow ska,J. Sito, Warsaw 1999 [485 pp. + map, 10 plans, 538 fot]

Fasc. 21. District Ryki, I. Galicka, 11. Sygietyriska, U. Kaczmarzyk, Warsaw 1967 [25 pp. + map, 3 plans, 85 fot]

Fasc. 22. Disnia Siedlce, I. Galicka, H. Sygietyriska, D- Kaczmarzyk, Warsaw

1965 [54 pp. + map, 4 plans, 127 fot]

Fasc. 23. Disnict Sieipc, I. Galicka, H. Sygietyriska, D. Kaczmarzyk, Warsaw 1971 [39 pp. + map, 3 plans, 139 fot]

Fasc. 24. Disnict SocbaczTiV, I. Galicka, H. Sygietyriska, D. Kaczmarzyk, Warsaw 1973 [58 pp. + map, 3 plans, 130 fot]

Fasc. 25. Disnict Sokohfc; I. Galicka, H. Sygietyriska, B. Kopydlowski, Warsaw 1965 [36 pp. + map, 3 plans, 27 fot]

Fasc. 26. Disnict Wfgirfc; I. Galicka, D. Kaczmarzyk, Warsaw 1964 [47 pp. + map, 5 plans, 164 fot]

Fasc. 27. Disnia Wohmm, I. Galicka, H. Sygietyriska, D. Kaczmarzyk, Warsaw 1969 [32 pp. + map, 2 plans, 73 fot]

Fasc. 28. Disnia IVyszktni; I. Galicka, H. Sygietyriska, D. Kaczmarzyk, Warsaw 1974 [39 pp. + map, 1 plan, 63 fot]

Fasc. 29. Disnia Zurmniti, I. Galicka, H. Sygietyriska, D. Kaczmarzyk, Warsaw 1975 [37 pp. + map, 2 plans, 83 fot]

VOL. XI—DEPARTMENT BYDOGOSZCZ

Fasc. 1. Disnia Akksandronr Kujau-ski,]. Frycz, T. Chrzanowski and M.

Kornecki, Warsaw 1969 [53 pp. + map, 3 plans, 182 f o t ]

Fasc. 2. Disnia Brodiiica, T. Chrzanow ski and T. Zurkowska, Warsaw 1971 [71 pp. + map, 6 plans, 206 f o t ]

Fasc.3. Disnia Bydgoszcz, T. Chrzanowski, M. Kornecki, R. and T. Jurasz, Warsaw 1977 [111 pp. + map, 5 plans, 243 f o t ]

Fasc. 4. Disnia Cbebmio, T. Mroczko, Warsaw 1975 [177 pp. + map, 10 plans, 423 fot]

Fasc. 5. Disnict Cbojnict, P. Palamarz, J. Petrus, Warsaw 1979 [116 pp. + map, 3 plans, 225 f o t ]

Fasc. 6. Distria Golub-Dobrzyn, T. Chrzanowski, M Kornecki, Warsaw 1973 [66 pp. + map, 5 plans, 161 f o t ]

Fasc. 7. Disnia Giudzilqdz, R. Brykowski, T. Zurkowska, Warsaw 1974 [102 pp. + map, 6 plans, 198 f o t ]

Fasc. 8. Distria ImiWIVthw, T. Chrzanowski and M. Kornecki, Warsaw 1974 [111 pp. + map, 7 plans, 258 f o t ]

Fasc. 9. D/.ffrirf Lipno, R. Brykowski, I. Galicka, H. Sygietyriska, Warsaw 1969 [83 pp. + map, 5 plans, map, f o t 230]

Fasc. 10. Disnia Mogilno, Z. BiaHowicz-Krygierowa, Warsaw 1982 [158 pp. +map, 12 plans, 331 fot]

Fasc. 11. Disnia Radziej&u,]. Frycz, T. Chrzanowski, M. Kornecki, Warsaw 1968 [29 pp. + map, 1 plan, 75 f o t ]

Fasc. 12. Distria Rypin, B. Kaczyriska and B. Szymanowska, Warsaw 1971 [34 pp. + map, 2 plans, 73 f o t ]

Fasc. 13. Disnia Scpohw, T. Chrzanowski, T. Zurkowska, Warsaw 1970 [42 pp. + map, 1 plans, 139 f o t ]

Fasc. 14. Disnict Szubin, M . Lewicka, B. Szymanowska, Warsaw 1977 [73 pp. + map, 4 plans, 126 f o t ]

Fasc. 15. Disnia Sziecie, T. Chrzanowski, T. Zurkowska, Warsaw 1970 [73 pp. + map, 7 plans, 202 f o t ]

Fasc. 16. Disnia Toruii, T. Chrzanowski, M Kornecki, Warsaw 1972 [95 pp. + map, 5 plans, 280 fot]

Fasc. 17. Disma Tuchola, B. Biedroriska-Slota, Warsaw 1979 [44 pp. + map, 1 plan, 77 fot]

Fasc. 18. Disnia Wlodtrccek, M. Pazdzior, W. Puget, T. Chrzanowski, M.

Kornecki, Z. Rozanow, Warsaw 1988 [259 pp. + map, 15 plans, 575 f o t ] Fasc. 19. Disnia U'abrzeztio, T. Chrzanowski, M. Kornecki, Warsaw 1967

[52 pp. + map, 4 plans, 211 fot]

Fasc. 20. Disnia U'yrzysk, T. Chrzanowski, M. Kornecki, Warsaw 1980 [74 pp. + map, 1 plan, 123 f o t ]

Fasc. 21. Districtt*to, B. Kaczyriska, M. Werzbicki, Warsaw 1979 [73 pp.

+ map, 2 plans, 151 f o t ]

(13)

VOL. XIII—DEPARTMENT RZESZOW

Fasc. 2. District Brzozou-, ed. M. Kornecki, J. Samek, Warsaw 1974 [138 pp. + map, 8 plans, 228 fot.]

N e w Series

VOL. I—DEPARTMENT KROSNO

Fasc. 1. Krosrno, Dukla and region, E. Sniezynska-Stolotowa, F. Stolot, K.

Kutrzebianka, M. Lemariska-Trepinska, J. Ross, Warsaw 1977 [195 pp., map, 10 plans, 419 fot.]

Fasc. 2. Lesko, Sanok, Ustrzyki Do/ne and region, E. Sniezynska-Stolotowa, F.

Stolot, R. Brykowski, K. Kutrzebianka, Warsaw 1982 [204 pp., map, 8 plans, 374 fot.]

VOL. n—DEPARTMENT ELBLAG

Fasc. 1. Braniewo, Frombork, Orneta and region, M. Arszynski, M. Kutzner, P. Skubiszewski, E. Struszyhska, Warsaw 1980-81 [262 pp., map, 10 plans, 510 fot.]

VOL. m—DEPARTMENT RZESZIW

Fasc. 1. Ropczyce, Strzyioir and region, E. Sniezynska-Stolotowa, F. Stolot, J.

Banach, A. Fischinger, R Krakowski, M. Lemanska-Trepiriska, Warsaw 1978 [133 pp., map, 7 plans, 272 fot.]

Fasc. 3. Kolbuszowa, Mielecandregion, E. Sniezynska-Stolotowa, F. Stolot, K.

Kutrzebianka, Warsaw 1991 [79 pp., map, 2 plans, 229 fot.]

Fasc. 4. Lezajsk, Sokol&ir Malopohki and region, E. Sniezynska-Stolotowa, F.

Stolot, Warsaw 1989 [154 pp., map, 2 plans, 544 fot.]

Fasc. 5. Lai'icut and region, M. Omilanowska, J. Sito, Warsaw 1994 [183 pp., map, 6 plans, 663 fot.]

VOL. IV—DEPARTMENT WROCL AW

Fasc. 1. Olesnica, Bicrutonx and region, A. Cbrzanowska, M. Starzewska, A.

Ziomecka, ed. J. Pokora, M. Zlat,Warsaw 1983 [156 pp., map, 13 plans, 337 fot.]

Fasc. 2. Sobo'tka, Kqty Wroclavskie and region, A. Cbrzanowska, M.

Starzewska, A Ziomecka, ed. J. Pokora, M. Zlat, Warsaw 1991 [267 pp., map, 20 plans, 734 fot.]

Fasc. 3. Milicz, Zmigrod, Tirardogora and region,]. Wrabec, ed. J. Pokora, Warsaw 1997 [398 pp., map, 14 plans, 422 fot.]

VOL. V—DEPARTMENT GD ANSK

Fasc. 1. Pruszcz Gdamki and region, B. Roll, 1. Strzelecka, Warsaw 1986 [104 pp., map, 4 plans, 389 fot.]

Fasc. 2. Puck, Zamowiec and region, T. Chrzanowski, M. Kornecki, B. Roll, I. Strzelecka, Warsaw 1989 [135 pp., map, 4 plans, 389 fot.]

Fasc. 3. Koscierzyna, Skarszrdy and region, B. Roll, I. Strzelecka, Warsaw 1993 [106 pp., map, 6 plans, 252 fot.]

VOL. VI—CITY OF CZESTOCHOWA

Fasc. 1. Old and New City, Czestochowka and suburbs, Z. Rozanow i E.

Smulikowska, Warsaw 1995 [183 pp., general plan, 5 plans, 454 fot]

VOL. vn—cm' OF POZNAN

Fasc. 1. Ostrotr Tumski. Sro'dka and Komandoria, E. Linette, Z. Kurzawa and A. Kusztelski, Warsaw 1983 [222 pp., 4 maps, 10 plans, 747 fot.]

Fasc. 2. The Center. Churches and monasteries, Z. Kurzawa and A. Kusztelski [part 1, Warsaw 1998: 167 pp., 7 plans, 707 fot.; part 2, Warsaw 2002 : 153 pp., 7 plans, 550 fot.]

VOL. VIII—CITY OF GDANSK

Fasc. 1. The Principal City, ed. B. Roll, I. Strzelecka, Warsaw 2006 [451 pp., 11 plans, 964 fot.]

VOL. DC—DEPARTMENT LO.MZA

Fasc. 1. Lamia and region, M. Kalamajska-Saeed, Warsaw 1982 [116 pp., 5 plans, 2 maps, 304 fot.]

Fasc. 2. Ciechanowiec, Zambrow, Wysokie Mazotvieckie and region, M.

Kalamajska-Saeed, Warsaw 1986 [114 pp., 6 plans, 2 maps, 394 fot.]

Fasc. 3. Kohio, Grajeuo and region, ed. M. Kalamajska-Saeed, Warsaw 1988 [107 pp., 7 plans, 2 maps, 144 fot.]

VOL. X—CITY OF PRZEMYSL

Fasc. 1. Churches and monasteries, P. Krasny and J. Sito, Warsaw 2004 [2 31 pp., 11 plans, 678 fot.]

VOL. XI—CITY OF WARSAW

Fasc. 1. Old City quarter, ed. J. Z. Lozinski and A. Rottermund, Warsaw 1993 [472 pp., general plan of Warsaw and plan of the quarter, 12 plans, 590 fot.]

Fasc. 2. Neir City quarter, ed. M. Kalamajska-Saeed, Warsaw 2001 [207 pp., plan of the quarter, 11 plans, 467 fot.]

VOL. XII—DEPARTMENT BUALYSTOK (PODLASIE)

Fasc. 1. Siemiatycze, Drohiczyn and region, M. Kalamajska-Saeed, Warsaw 1996 [343 pp., map, 8 plans, 441 fot.] [

AUTHOR'S N O T E: This article is dedicated to Professor Jerzy Lozinski, the first Editor-in-Chief (1951-1996) o fT h e Catalogue of the Monuments of Art in Polaud.The research has been funded in p a n by a fel­

lowship from the United States Institute of Peace.

Notes

1. T h e history of inventor}' making in Poland is discussed in: M. Walicki, Sprawa inixentatyzacji zabytkow irdobie Kiolesma Polskiego (1827­1862) [ T h e Problem of the Invcntarizaoon of Ancient Monuments during the Period of the Polish Kingdom (1827­1862)] Warsaw. 1931;J. Szablowski. "Dzieje inwentaryzacji zabytkow sztuki w Polsce. W dwudziesta rocznice Centralnego Biura Inwentaryzacji Zabytkow Sztuki" (History of Inventory of Monuments in Poland. On the 20th Anniversary of the Central Monument Inventory Office), Ochrona Zabytkow. II, no. 2. 1949. 73­83;

J. Lozinski. "Katalog Zalrytkow Sztuki w Polsce. Stan prac - przegli/d dorobku - penpektywy" (Catalogue of the Monuments of Art in Poland. Current State of Works ­ Overview of Accomplishments ­ Prospects), Rocznik HisUrii Sztuki. VII: 1969.267­315.

2. Manuscript and designs in the Print Cabinet of the Warsaw University Library, call no. Rps. 243, Opisy zalrytkow staroiytnosci przcz Delegacjf wyslatia 2 polecenia Rady Admimstracyjnej Kiolestwa w latach 1844 i 1846 zebrane i ryamkmu 0 osolmych atlasach zauartemi objasnione 1850-185$ (4 vols.) and I Vidoki zabytkva staroiytnosci v Krdlesnrie Polskim, sluzqcc do objasnienia opisu, 1850-1855 (7 vols.).

3. Dziennik PoivszechnyAm-.Kr 38,42, 52, 58,64, 73; 1862: Nos. 9, 21, 35, 42,64,70,77,79,121,124,127,137,148,152,159,164,174,187,200,208, 216,221,239.

98 CENTROPA 7.1: JANUARY 2007

(14)

4. Kazimierz Stronczynskis descriptions and views of ancient monuments in the Kingdom of Poland (1844-1855) (ed. Jerzy Kowalczyk) Warsaw University Press (10 volumes, the first one will appear in 2007).

5. J. Lepkowski. TbwarzystB* Naukoirego Krakowskiego. I. 1852. pp. 229-243 (Sprawozdanie z podrozy archeologicznej po Sadecczyenie); V. 1861, pp. 97-318 (Przegl 1 d zabytkow przeszlosci z okolic Krakowa).

6. Stanislaw Tomkowicz, Invnitaiyzacya zabytktn? Galicyi Zachodniej, "Teka Grona Konserwatorow Galicyi Zachodniej" (The Portfolio of Western Galicia Conservators' Cluster). I. 1900. pp. 95-319 (The Grybow and Gorlice Districts); II, 1906. 1-318 (The Cracow Disctrict).

7. J. Remer, "Program inwentaryzacji zabytkow sztuki w Polsce" (Program of the Works on die Inventory of Monuments of Art in Poland), Ocbrona Zabytktm: 1930/31. no. 4. pp. 415-416.

8. Matcria/y do dziej&w sztuki sakralnej ua ziemiach wschodnicb danmej Rzeczypospolitej (ed. Jan K. Ostrowski), part I: Kos'ciofy i k/asztoiy rzymskoka- tolickie dawncgo ~d-ojevddzma ruskiego (Roman Catholic Churches and Convents of the Former Ruthenian Voivodship), ed. Jan K. Ostrowski.

I - X W . Cracow. 1993-2006; part II: Kos'ciofy i klasztoiy rzymskokatolickie daz'nego -ocojeTZodzrcca novogrodzkiego (Roman Catholic Churches and Convents of the Former Nowogrodek Voivodship), ed. M . Kalamajska- Saeed. I. Cracow. 2003; II. Cracow. 2006; III: Kos'cioly i klasztoiy i-zymskoka- tolickie dairuego wojnrodznra wilenskiego (Roman Catholic Churches and Convents of the Former VUna Voivodship). I. Crakow. 2005.

9. R. Aftanazy. Dzieje rezydencji na datx-nych kresach Rzeczypospolitej (History of Residencies in the Former Borderland of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth). 12 vols. Wroclaw. 1991-1997.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

^° This is also a very central point in most Jewish stories concerning the creation of an artificial being, see, e.g., Scholem: Die VorsteUung vom Golem, pp.. We

To bring the resulting data products of GlobPermafrost closer to the permafrost user communities, the Permafrost Information System (PerSys) has been conceptualized as an open

Practically all Egyptian rulers following the first period of Persian rule - that is every ruler whose name was actually mentioned in the text at all - are subject to

With much of this work having been carried out in academia, actual catalyst recovery and recycling have been investigated and reported only in a portion of this expanding body

14 The Abdülhamid Çeşmesi thus Ottomanizes the classical Athenian legacy — through the form of the monument of Lysicrates — by placing it with the Ottoman urban context

The trees and other vegetation located around monuments can play an important role in increasing of cultural and historical monuments' impact in the landscape. In some cases they

Therefore, the present paper is an attempt to examine the existence of business cycles in Iran's economy and analyze the causes and roots of its development in the

Quite apart from such a rigorous modeling of non-standard labor values, Kliman (2007) is a strong proponent of what is known as the Temporal Single-System Interpre- tation of