• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

BCI-controlled Brain Painting at home:years of use

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "BCI-controlled Brain Painting at home:years of use"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

BCI-controlled Brain Painting at home:

years of use

A. Kübler*, L. Botrel, E. Holz,

Institute of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany

*Marcusstraße 9-11, 97070 Würzburg, Germany. E-mail: andrea.kuebler@uni-wuerzburg.de

Introduction: Brain Painting (BP) is a P300-BCI controlled application that allows for creating pictures [1]. BP has been adapted for home use following the user-centred design (UCD) approach [2] and was installed at two patients’ home (JT and HP). Both patients were diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in the locked-in state. Since January 2012 (HP) and September 2013 both end-users have been painting at home inde- pendently of experts being present. Caregivers and family members were trained to set-up the system. After every session end-users are asked to rate their satisfaction, frustration, and joy. Here we report painting duration and satisfaction across the entire time of enrollment.

Material, Methods and Results: End-user HP: female, 76, diagnosed with ALS in 2007, locked-in state, retired teacher, impressionist lay painter, communication with eye movements possible. BP installed at home 26th Janu- ary 2012; Einstein face stimulation [3] was added October 19, 2012 after 96 sessions. End-user JT: male, 74, diagnosed with ALS in 2006, locked in state, retired architect and professional painter, communication with eye movements possible. BP installed at home 16th September 2013, after 158 BP Version 2 was installed December 10, 2014. At the end of each session satisfaction is rated on a visual analogue scale (range 1-10; 1 = not at all satisfied, 10 = absolutely satisfied). All results are stored on the local PC and automatically transferred to a re- mote server owned by UNI WUE. LB and EH provide remote supervision and technical support if necessary.

Until December 10, 2015 HP has been painting for N=418 sessions with an average duration of 93.7 min SD=51.4. Satisfaction was on average M=7.11, SD=3.42 (see Fig. 1 left). JT has been painting for N=222 with an average duration of 59.6 min, SD=34.2. Satisfaction was on average M= 7.56 SD= 2.57 (see Fig. 1 right).

Figure 1. Satisfaction (top) and painting duration (bottom) for HP (left) and JT (right). Due to the high number of sessions, single sessions were summarized in 3- months periods. Most right data of each plot show the average across the entire painting years.

Discussion: BP has been used for 4 (HP) and 2 (JT) years. Fluc- tuations in satisfaction did not lead to aban- doning of BP. P300- BCI use requires atten- tion and concentration and has been used be- tween 1 and 2 hours,

which may be indicative for the maximum duration of BCI use per session.

Significance: BCI-controlled applications can be long-term used at home independent of experts being present. If the application matches end-users needs, they keep using the BCI despite known shortcomings (EEG cap, fluctu- ations in performance). Simple metrics to monitor satisfaction with the device are tolerated by the end-users and can be applied after each session.

Acknowledgements: This work was supported by the European FP7 grant 288566 (Backhome) and the Volks- bank Würzburg. This abstract only reflects the authors' views.

References

[1] Münßinger JI, Halder S, Kleih SC, Furdea A, Raco V, Hösle A, Kübler A. Brain Painting: First Evaluation of a New Brain-Computer Interface Application with ALS-Patients and Healthy Volunteers. Front Neurosci. 2010 Nov 22;4:182.

[2] Kübler A, Holz EM, Riccio A, Zickler C, Kaufmann T, Kleih SC, Staiger-Sälzer P, Desideri L, Hoogerwerf EJ, Mattia D. The user- centered design as novel perspective for evaluating the usability of BCI-controlled applications. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 3;9(12):e112392 [3] Kaufmann T, Schulz SM, Köblitz A, Renner G, Wessig C, Kübler A. Face stimuli effectively prevent brain-computer interface inefficiency in patients with neurodegenerative disease. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013 May;124(5):893-900

DOI: 10.3217/978-3-85125-467-9-231 Proceedings of the 6th International Brain-Computer Interface Meeting, organized by the BCI Society

Published by Verlag der TU Graz, Graz University of Technology, sponsored by g.tec medical engineering GmbH 231

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Considering feedback from the extended use of Brain Painting V1 at home by two locked-in patients, we developed a new version of Brain Painting including auto-calibration,

ABSTRACT: We report a case study where a user provided with a fully implantable Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) has been using the BCI at home for almost three

Figures show correct classification rate versus frequency band for four subjects.. [1] Barbero A,

Yet few have investigated these groups together to determine end users’ feelings about how ethical issues ought to be addressed and researchers’ perceptions of barriers

Discussion: Results indicate the attended stimulus can elicit a distinguishable SSVEP pattern with high accuracy rate.. This is because the amplitude and latency of visual

Brain Painting V2: evaluation of P300-based brain-computer interface for creative expression by an end-user following the user-centered design. What would brain-computer

“yes” and “no” response in the fNIRS channels placed on the left hemisphere of fronto-central brain region. Our result also suggests that, although the patient

The resulting data are analyzed to provide two figures: the averaged ERPs of target and nontarget trials; and an accuracy plot, showing how well the ERPs can