wo sto soa (Re The hou a la and sec pub On foc def atta be arg hou adj par que leg
Th
Mo usu bub
1 La in t sign ben
W
Cinzia A originall CEPS Po aim of i timely fa persona Availabl
Centre f
hat with by f ould predict pped and ared and the einhart, 200
e current f using bust.
arge fiscal d d the ever ctor hang li
blic sector.1 n this groun cused recen
ficit in 20 ainable in 2 focused on gue that the using bub justment h rticular, we estions: Ho gacy of the b
he Spanish
ost commen ually in re
bble and arge fiscal de tax revenues nificant incr nefits.
W
Alcidi is LUIS ly published olicy Briefs p interjecting t ashion. Unle al capacity and
le for free dow for European
is the prob h a classic h
foreign cap t, once the
the bubbl e financial s 8).
fiscal prob The Spanis deficit as the
r-increasing ke the swo
1
nd, too much ntly on Sp 011 and w 2012. Instea n the factor e root prob bble was
has simply e provide a ow long it bubble and
h housing
ntators conc al terms, t its develop eficits are the s after the h rease in spe
SS Research by VoxEU, 1
resent concis the views of ss otherwise d not to any i wnloading fr Policy Studies
The
Cinzi
blem in Spa housing bu pital, and a
inflow of f le burst, u system wen
blems most sh governm e economy g losses in ord of Damo
h attention pain’s ove what defic d, more att rs behind th blem is tha
extreme a y been to novel angl
will take how much
g bubble
centrate on to measure pments (e.
consequence housing bubb ending for
Fellow at CE 5 April 2012 se, policy-orie
CEPS resear indicated, th institution wi rom the CEPS s▪ Place du Co
Span
ia Alcid
No. 2
ain? It start ubble financ as a textbo foreign capi nemployme nt bust as w
tly reflect t ment is runni remains we the banki ocles over t
has thus be ershooting cit might tention shou
he deficit. W at the Span and that t
oo slow.
le on two k to absorb t it will cost?
house pric e the housi .g. Münch
e of a huge d ble burst and
unemploym
EPS, and Dan (http://www ented analyse
rchers and a he views expr
ith which the S website (htt ongrès 1 ▪ B-1
nish H
di and
267, April
ted ced ook ital ent well
the ing eak ing the
een its be uld We nish the In key the
?
ces, ing au,
rop d a ment
20 ad ho to sti the sh inc sh bo im ren are be Th fol in the Fig
Sou
2 F
niel Gros is D w.voxeu.org/
es of topical is associates into ressed are att ey are associa
tp://www.ce 000 Brussels ▪
Hang
Daniel
l 2012
12). Data su djusted, but ouse price in
rents) at ro ill much ab e price-to-r hould not
crease in de hould mani
oth rents mmigration nts than on e likely to b e renting, ra he figure
llowed the the last qua e pre-bubbl gure 1. Hous
urce: OECD.
or more deta
Director of C /index.php?q ssues in Euro o the policy- tributable on ted.
eps.eu) y © C Tel: (32.2) 229
over
l Gros
uggest that t not enou ndex for Sp oughly the s bove its pre ent index to be affecte emand for fest itself i and prices should put n house pric
be short of ather than bu
confirms t price-to-re
arter of 200 le period.
se prices in S
ils, see Annex
CEPS. This pa q=node/7876 opean affairs, -making proc nly to the auth
EPS 2012 9.39.11 ▪ www
house price ugh. Figure
pain (measu same level e-2000 leve o the real p d by imm housing fro in upward s. If anyth
t even mor ces since mo
capital and uying.2 that house
nt index si 06 but are st
Spain
x 2 in Gros (2
aper was ).
with the cess in a hors in a
w.ceps.eu
es have ind e 1 shows ured as relat as in 2003 a els. We fav price becaus migration:
om that sou ds pressure hing, in f re pressure ost immigra d thus likely
e prices h nce their p till higher th
2007).
deed the tive and vour se it any urce on fact, e on ants y to
have peak han
An full pri late clo adj Wh ma less use rea (esp rela sho for Eur Fig
Not as a per Sou
3 He mai eng of t goin has
n analogous l hump-sh ce/rent rat e 1990s. W se to comp justment is hile this mi acroeconom s important ed in the ho al economy
pecially em ative to th ows spendin
the two co rope: Irelan gure 2. Housi
te: The vertic a share of GD
iod 1970-2000 urce: European ere we consid in subsectors gineering con the dwellings ng from 6.7%
increased fro
s figure for haped cur tio already While Irelan plete, one c still only ab ight be true mic develop
t than the a ousing sect is the size o
mployment he long-run ng in constr ountries wit nd and Spai
ing overhang
al axis show DP. The red 0.
n Commissio der total cons s: dwellings a struction. Bet s as a share o
% to 12.5%, w om 7.3% to 9.
r Ireland w rve, with back to th nd’s price could argue bout halfwa e, we argue ments, hou amount of tor. What m
of the const t) and its n equilibriu ruction as a
th the bigg n.3
g in Spain an
s investment line is the a n services (A struction, whi and non-resid tween 1997 an of GDP has a while the rest
7%.
would show the curre he level of t
adjustment e that Spai ay complete e here that use prices a
real resour matters for t
truction sec s time pa um. Figure a share of GD
est bubbles
nd Ireland
t in construct average over Ameco).
ich includes t dential and c nd 2006, the s almost doubl t of construct
w a ent the t is in’s ed.
for are ces the ctor ath e 2
DP s in
tion the
two civil size led, tion
Th the tw hu inv ou est fix ex eq GD bil It the va alr av co po mo
H pr
Th lon pr do su bu In inc the me
•
•
4 O ov sus rel
5 S cou for
he figure ca e housing o wo countries ump curve vestment in ur estimate
timate of th xed structu
cess of con quivalent to DP. In the c
llion or 37%
is often arg ere is a s acation hom ready take verage as s nstruction oints higher
ost Europea
ow far alo rocess?
he area belo ng-run con ocess of ab o not deca upply and
uilding less.
both co complete in e absorptio easuring th
In Ireland high spee has alread In Spain, the foreca for 2012 a line) sugg stagnate.
Our measure erhang becau stainable leve lated activitie Spain’s long-r untries, not o r dwellings.
an be used t overhang an
s. In each g and above n construct of excess c he overhan ures).4 For nstruction b o about €99 case of Spa
% of (2010) G gued that S strong dem mes. While t
en into ac shown by
spending r in Spain th an countries
ong is the
ow the red nstruction i bsorption of y rapidly, demand b
ountries, t n the sense on is much he overhang
d, the adjus ed and abou dy been abs
absorption asts from th and 2013 (r gest that th
e is likely to use during th el as it conta es taking place run average i
only for the o
THE SPANIS
to compare nd its absor graph, the a e the long-r
tion (red li construction ng (of hous Ireland, t between 199
billion, or in, this is m GDP.
Spain is dif mand by
this might count in an ‘equilib
(relative han in Irela s.5
e adjustm
line represe investment f the bubble the only back into
the proces e that the a
h smaller g.
stment has ut one-third sorbed.
n has hardl he Europea represented he adjustme
o understate
he boom GD ained constru
e at an unsus s higher than overall const
SH HANGOVER
e the genesi rption in th area below run average ine) represe n and thus
sing and ot the cumula 97 and 200 55% of (20 more than €
fferent beca foreigners be true, thi the long brium’ rate
to GDP) and and ab
ment
enting aver measures e. Since hou
way to br balance is
ss is clea area measur
than the a
taken place d of the bub
ly started a n Commiss by the dot ent is likely
the size of DP was above
uction and o stainable pace n other Europ truction, but
R |2
s of hese the e of ents
our ther ated 8 is 008)
€380
ause for is is
run e of
5%
bove
rage the uses ring by
arly ring area
e at bble
and sion tted y to
the e its other
e.
pean also
If rela abs yea on the mig act also adj rev The eco the bot sec del Ou ove sec – per rep a s by esti pro Spa sav Fig
Th
A h to dom Un
constructio atively hig sorption of ars. More r housing sta e Commiss
ght unders ivity, which o be the m justment) w vised downw
e relative onomy in 20 e fact that d
th the gove ctor slowed
lay are now ur very rou
erhang also ctor may be at least rspective. In presents the
ector whos credit. It imated tota ovisions an
anish bank vings banks gure 3. Spain deficit
he source
housing ov an acute fi mestic savi nfortunately
on were to gh rate of
the bubble recent data,
arts (and co ion’s forec state the f
h is acceler main reason why growth
wards.
good perfo 010–11 mig during these
ernment ac down. Th w becoming ugh estima o informs th
facing onc from a n the end, th e amount of se expenditu t goes wi al of €380 b
d write dow king system s) so far.
n: Constructi t
of fundin
erhang per inancial cris
ings (like i y, this as not
o continue today, th would take , from diffe ompletions)
asts for 20 fall in the rating again n (rather th h rates for Sp
ormance of ht thus hav e years the ccounts and he long-term
apparent.
ate of the he losses tha
e adjustmen an order- he construc f real resour
ure was fin thout sayi billion excee
wns accum m (and in p
ion and curre
ng matters
se does not sis if it wa in Japan an
t the case in
e at the s he process
e more than erent sourc ), indicate th 012 and 20 constructi n. This mig han the fis pain are bei
f the Span ve been due
adjustment d the housi m costs of t
constructi at the banki nt is compl -of-magnitu
tion overha rces wasted nanced mos ing that o eds by far t mulated by t particular t
ent account
s
t have to le s financed nd German n Spain.
still of n 30 ces, hat 013 ion ght scal ing
nish e to t in ing this
ion ing lete ude ang d in stly our the the the
ead by ny).
Fig co acc acc
•
•
Th cu tre by thi be
W
Fig ad slo co ru fur de Th co fur Of lib em the we tra an to rel ma su ho in un cu
6 A Wa no
gure 3 sho nstruction cumulation count).
Over the l stock of fo The Mac scoreboar Spain’s fo Greece (E he foreign urrent accou
ends, it wo y 2016 (abo is point, Sp eing cut off f
What can b
gure 3 s djustment, w
owed consi nstruction s n task for S rther foreig epends on c his can be
nstruction rther resour f course, th berated by t mployed els e economy ell.6 This r adable sect nd will requ
the rest of lative to G arket in wh upply. The owever, is r Figure 4 nemployme urve) in Spai
A recent stud
atch, 2012) sh t fast enough
ows that in has clo n of foreig
last decade, oreign debt croeconomic rd of the
oreign deb uropean Co
debt leve unt is still uld increas out the leve pain would from the m
be done?
hows that which was derably wh sector slow Spain is to gn debt so t continuing i
e achieved sector (w rces) were a his can wo the shrinkin sewhere in t y can grow reallocation tor is proce uire a fall in the eurozo Germany.
hich wages Spanish r rather disco 4 from th ent and wa
in.
dy by a Spa hows that exp h to keep unem
nvestment e osely trac gn debt (i.e
, Spain has close to 90%
c Imbalanc Commissio bt already e
ommission, el is rising
l in defici se to about el of Portug d clearly be
arket.
t the cur s very quic hen the adju
ed as well.
stop the ac that the cou inflows of f d quickly which pro allowed to s ork only if ng construc the econom only if ex n of labour
eeding only n wages – a
ne, and thu This requ can fall if record on ouraging – he relation age growth
anish bank ( ports are inde mployment fr
expenditure cked Spa e. the curr
accumulate
% of GDP.
ces Proced on shows t equals that 2012).
g because t. On pres 100% of G gal today).
e in danger
rrent acco ck in 2008–
ustment in The key sh ccumulation untry no lon
foreign capi only if obably wa
shrink furth the resour ction sector my; at this st xports grow r towards y very slow at least relat us in particu ires a lab there is exc
this accou as can be s nship betw h (the Phil
BBVA Econo eed growing, rom rising.
e in ain’s
rent
ed a
dure that t of
the sent GDP At r of
ount –09, the hort-
n of nger ital.
the stes her.
rces are tage w as
the wly tive ular bour cess unt, seen ween llips
omic , but
Fig
It i det wa une pro wh hig of une wa con une
Co
All adj bub uns to shr rea slow wa
gure 4. Spain
is apparent teriorated s as much hig
employmen obably due hich transm gher oil pric this figu employmen age inflatio
ntrast, wag employmen
onclusion
l in all, it a justed to th bble, whic sustainable
fall further rink furthe allocation o wed down ages from fa
n’s recent Phi
that in Spa ince 2007 (t gher in 200 nt as during to the back mits the term
ces to the la ure seems nt rate of ov n close to ge inflation nt rate of ab
appears that he collapse
h propelle path until r and the co
er at the of labour n by a labo alling quickl
illips curve
ain the Phil the rate of w 08 for the g the early 2 kwards wag
ms-of-trade abour mark to sugg ver 20% is n zero. In n went to bout 10%.
t Spain has of its enorm ed its econ
2008. Hou onstruction same tim
towards e ur market ly enough.
lips curve h wage inflati
same level 2000s). This
ge indexati e shocks fro ket. Inspecti gest that needed to ke Germany, o zero at
s not yet fu mous housi nomy on se prices ha n sector has
me that t exportables
that preve has
ion of s is on, om ion an eep by an
ully ing an ave s to
the is nts
Re
BB
Eu
Gr
Mü
Re
eferences
BVA Econ stereotype competitiv any oth Research, (http://w /bin/ing/
Nove348_
uropean Co Report”, 1 ros, Daniel Longer-Te Housing P Working October.
ünchau, W siesta for March.
einhart, Ca years of fi
nomic Wa es behin veness and her eurozo
www.bbvare /publi/esp _197005.jsp?
ommission ( 14 February (2007), “B erm Com Prices in Eu
Document
olfgang (20 the euroz
armen M.
inancial foll
THE SPANIS
atch (201 nd: Spai d productiv
one econo 10 esearch.com
ana/noved
?id=tcm:348 (2012), “Ale y.
Bubbles in mparative
urope and t No. 276, C
012), “There zone”, Finan
(2008), “E ly”, VoxEU
SH HANGOVER
2), “Leav in recov vity faster th
omy”, BB A m/KETD/ke dades/detal
8-183383-64 ert Mechan
real estate?
Analysis the US”, CE CEPS, Bruss
e is no Span ncial Times,
Eight hund .org, 19 Apr
R |4
ving vers han BVA April etd le/
4).
nism
? A of EPS sels,
nish , 18
dred ril.
CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN POLICY STUDIES, Place du Congrès 1, B‐1000 Brussels, Belgium Tel: 32 (0)2 229 39 11 • Fax: 32 (0)2 219 41 51 • www.ceps.eu • VAT: BE 0424.123.986
ABOUT CEPS
Founded in Brussels in 1983, the Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) is widely recognised as the most experienced and authoritative think tank operating in the European Union today. CEPS acts as a leading forum for debate on EU affairs, distinguished by its strong in-house research capacity, complemented by an extensive network of partner institutes throughout the world.
Goals
• Carry out state-of-the-art policy research leading to innovative solutions to the challenges facing Europe today,
• Maintain the highest standards of academic excellence and unqualified independence
• Act as a forum for discussion among all stakeholders in the European policy process, and
• Provide a regular flow of authoritative publications offering policy analysis and recommendations,
Assets
• Multidisciplinary, multinational & multicultural research team of knowledgeable analysts,
• Participation in several research networks, comprising other highly reputable research institutes from throughout Europe, to complement and consolidate CEPS’ research expertise and to extend its outreach,
• An extensive membership base of some 132 Corporate Members and 118 Institutional Members, which provide expertise and practical experience and act as a sounding board for the feasibility of CEPS policy proposals.
Programme Structure
In-house Research Programmes
Economic and Social Welfare Policies Financial Institutions and Markets
Energy and Climate Change
EU Foreign, Security and Neighbourhood Policy Justice and Home Affairs
Politics and Institutions Regulatory Affairs Agricultural and Rural Policy
Independent Research Institutes managed by CEPS
European Capital Markets Institute (ECMI) European Credit Research Institute (ECRI)
Research Networks organised by CEPS
European Climate Platform (ECP) European Network for Better Regulation (ENBR)
European Network of Economic Policy Research Institutes (ENEPRI) European Policy Institutes Network (EPIN)