• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Longer (more detailed) version.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Longer (more detailed) version."

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

American Mathematical Monthly Problem 11407 by Erwin Just

Let p be a prime such that p > 3. Let R be a ring (not necessarily commutative and not necessarily having a multiplicative identity) such that

p

X

i=1

x2i−1 = 0 (1)

holds for everyx∈R. Prove that R = 0, where 0 means the trivial ring (i. e. the ring consisting of one element only).

Solution by Darij Grinberg.

Every x∈R satisfies

x−x2p+1 =x2·1−1−x2(p+1)−1 =

p

X

i=1

x2i−1

p+1

X

i=2

x2i−1

=

p

X

i=1

x2i−1

p

X

i=1

x2(i+1)−1

| {z }

=x2x2i−1

(here we substitutedi+ 1 for i in the second sum)

=

p

X

i=1

x2i−1

| {z }

=0 by (1)

−x2

p

X

i=1

x2i−1

| {z }

=0 by (1)

= 0−0 = 0.

Thus,

x=x2p+1 (2)

for every x∈R.

Now, let y∈R. Then, (2) (applied to x=y) yields y=y2p+1, so that y2p2

=y4p =y(2p−1)+(2p+1)

=y2p−1y2p+1 =y2p−1y=y2p. Thus,y2p is idempotent; hence,

y2pk

=y2p (3)

for every integer k ≥1.Applying (1) to x=y2p yields

p

P

i=1

(y2p)2i−1 = 0; thus,

0 =

p

X

i=1

y2p2i−1

| {z }

=y2pby (3)

=

p

X

i=1

y2p =py2p. (4)

On the other hand, applying (2) to x= 2y2p yields 2y2p = (2y2p)2p+1; thus, 2y2p = 2y2p2p+1

= 22p+1 y2p2p+1

| {z }

=y2pby (3)

= 22p+1y2p,

so that

0 = 22p+1y2p−2y2p = 22p+1−2

y2p. (5)

1

(2)

Butp >3 yieldsp >4 (sincepis a prime, and 4 is not a prime), and thus 4p−1 ≡1 modp (by Fermat’s Little Theorem). Besides,p is a prime, so that every positive integer less thanpis invertible modulop.Hence, 2 and 3 are invertible modulop(since 2<3< p).

Now,

22p+1−2 = 23+2(p−1)−2 = 23·22(p−1)−2 = 23· 22p−1

−2 = 23· 4p−1

|{z}

≡1 modp

−2≡23·1−2 = 6 = 2·3 modp.

Thus, 22p+1−2 is invertible modulo p(since 2·3 is invertible modulop, since 2 and 3 are invertible modulop). In other words, 22p+1−2 is coprime top.Hence, by Bezout’s theorem, there exist integers a and b such that a(22p+1−2) +bp = 1. Hence,

y2p = 1y2p = a 22p+1−2 +bp

y2p =a 22p+1−2 y2p

| {z }

=0 by (5)

+b py2p

|{z}

=0 by (4)

= 0 + 0 = 0.

Applying (2) to x=y yields y=y2p+1,so that y=y2py = 0y= 0.

Thus, we have proven that y= 0 for every y∈R. Hence, R = 0, qed.

2

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

In this (self-contained) note, we are going to prove three identities that hold in arbitrary noncommutative rings, and generalize some well-known combinatorial identities (known as

Recall that every permutation statistic that is left-shuffle-compatible and right- shuffle-compatible must automatically be LR-shuffle-compatible (by Corollary 3.23) and therefore

In this note, we shall employ these same notions to restate in a simpler form, and reprove in a more elementary fashion, a formula for the antipode in the Hopf algebra QSym

Several answers to this question have been suggested, but the simplest one appears to be given in a 2013 paper by Berg, Bergeron, Saliola, Serrano and Zabrocki [BBSSZ13a]: They

Section 1 (Integrality over rings) mainly consists of known facts (Theorem 1.1, Theorem 1.5, Theorem 1.7) and a generalized exercise from [4] (Corollary 1.12) with a few

If h is a Lie subalgebra of a k-Lie algebra g, then we can canonically make every g-module into an h-module according to the following definition:..

The theory of the Clifford algebra of a vector space with a given symmetric bilinear form is rather well-understood: One of the basic properties of the Clifford algebra gives

American Mathematical Monthly Problem 11391 by Marian Tetiva (edited).. Let p be a prime number, and s a