• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

On the Sensitivity of Linear Dynamic Models

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "On the Sensitivity of Linear Dynamic Models"

Copied!
12
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

NOT FOR QUOTATION WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE AUTHOR

ON THE SENSITIVITY OF LINEAR DYIJAMIC MODELS

M.M. Denisov

September 1979 WP-79-80

Working Papers are interim reports on work of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis and have received only limited review. Views or opinions expressed herein do not necessarily repre- sent those of the Institute or of its National Member Organizations.

INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria

(2)
(3)

INTRODUCTION

T h i s p a p e r r e p r e s e n t s t h e r e s u l t s of a t h r e e month s t u d y , i n which s e v e r a l J u n i o r S c i e n t i s t s from many c o u n t r i e s took p a r t d u r i n g t h e summer of 1 9 7 9 a t IIASA. While many o f t h e s e r e s u l t s a r e n o t f u l l y completed, and some r e p r e s e n t o n l y

p r e l i m i n a r y d i r e c t i o n s of r e s e a r c h , we f e e l t h a t t h e documenta- t i o n of t h e e f f o r t s of t h e J u n i o r S c i e n t i s t s i s j u s t i f i e d .

(4)
(5)

ABSTRACT

The exact expression of the trajectory deviation due to parameter changes is obtained for the linear dynamic models.

(6)
(7)

ON THE SENSITIVITY OF LINEAR DYNAMIC MODELS

M.M. Densiov

The sensitivity of a dynamic system to variations of its

parameters is one of the basic aspects in the treatment of dynamic systems, since there is always a certain discrepancy between the actual system and its mathematical model. Let the mathematical model of the dynamic system be given by the general discrete-time vector equation

where x --*

t, 0 represents the state vector at the time moment t, and

--* u represents the control vector at time t which brings the system

t --* --*

from initial state x o to the final state x

T I 0 and, in doing so, delivers a minimum value of a performance index of the form

Usually a real system cannot be identified exactly and the function ft in ( 1 ) represents the nominal law of the system be- havior but it can be changed due to the parameter variations and becomes

(8)

C o n s e q u e n t l y ( 3 ) w i l l b e c a l l e d t h e a c t u a l law o f t h e s y s t e m b e h a v i o r .

Suppose t h a t t h e c o n t r o l v e c t o r ut h a s been found t o b e +

o p t i m a l w i t h ? a r t i c u l a r r e g a r d t o nominal s y s t e m b e h a v i o r law ( 1 ) .

' 4

The a c t u a l l a w ( 3 ) c a n c h a n g e t h e s t a t e v e c t o r from x

t , O v a l u e

A

t o x t , a n d i t i s i m p o r t a n t t o f i n d t h e p e r f o r m a n c e i n d e x d e v i a t i o n A1 i n o r d e r t o j u d g e w h e t h e r t h e s o l u t i o n o f a n o p t i m i z a t i o n

p r o b l e m i s o f p r a c t i c a l . . u s e i n view o f t h e g i v e n s y s t e m b e h a v i o r t o l e r a n c e .

The g r e a t number o f o p t i m i z a t i o n p r o b l e m s o f p r a c t i c a l impor- t a n c e a r e t a k e n i n t o a c c o u n t by l i n e a r ( P r o p o i 1 9 7 9 ) .

o r s q u a r e (see, f o r example, B r i s o n 1979)

p e r f o r m a n c e i n d e x e s . F o r t h e s e c a s e s t h e d e v i a t i o n A1 c a n b e f o u n d e a s i l y i f t h e a c t u a l s t a t e v e c t o r x t c a n b e w r i t t e n -+ i n t h e form

I n t h i s c a s e a f t e r s u b s t i t u t i n g ( 6 ) f o r ( 4 ) o r ( 5 ) t h e p e r f o r m a n c e i n d e x c a n be w r i t t e n a s f o l l o w s

(9)

It is a common practice in sensitivity theory (Frank 1978) to represent the changing parameters of the system by a vector

+ +

(where at and at,b are actual and nominal parameter vectors) and to define a so-called sensitivity function S which relates the elements of the set of the parameter deviations Aat to the + elements of the set of the parameter-induced errors of the state vector Ax by the linear equation + t

This rel-ation is the first order approximation with respect to hat and is valid only for small parameter variations, i.e.,

1

A

1

< <

1

+ a ,

1 .

Moreover, for the investigation of the sensi-

tivity with respect to controller parameters sensitivity functions of higher orders should be applied (Wierzbicki 1977).

For the impomtant class of linear dynamic moaels

which describes a great variety of practical problems, the state vector deviation Ax due to changes of the system behavior law +

t

(induced by changes of parameter matrices At+AttattBcBt+bt)

can be derived exactly as a function..t5f system parameters, A, B, parameter changes a, b, control vector u and intiial state vector + -+

., For this purpose we rewrite the system equations (11) in the form

(10)

It is not difficult to see that (12) is the recurrant relation

and obtain by means of-iterative procedttrre-the following expression for +

+ + 3

where Axl = a 0 xo

+

bo uo.

--*

After exclusion of x ~ from (14) - ~ with the help of equation ~ ~ (1 0)

,

expression (1 4) takes the form

where

t-l t-1 + +

+ at(

L

9*AiBk-1Uk-1+Bt-lUt-l 1 1 k=l i=k

~xpressions (15) aqd (16) are rather complex but they do not contain the dependence on nominal system trajectroy.

(11)

It nay be interesting to compare exact expressions (14)-(16) with those derived in the first order approximation with respect to parameter changes. It can be seen from relation (13) that in order to derive the first order approximation one should put ai equal to zero in all factors Ai+ai in (14)-(16).

As a conclusion it should be noted that if the possible

-b -b

changes of control vector ttt from the nominal vector u t,O

are known they can also be taken into account in the same way

-b

as bt. In this case the expression for Axt+, takes the following form

+(I) + ( 2 ) '(3) are where u is the nominal control vector, Axt+,, AXt+l' AXt+l defined by (1 6) and

(12)

REFERENCES

Bryson, Arthur E., Jr., and Yu-Chi Ho (1969) Applied Optimal Control. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn.

Frank, Paul M. (1978) Introduction to System Sensitivity Theory.

New York: Academic Press.

Propoi, A. (1979) Models of Dynamical Linear Programming.

WP-79-37. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

Wierzbicki, Andrzej (1977) Models and Sensitivity of Control Systems. Warsaw: Widawnietwa Naukowo-Techniczne.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Käesolevas töös uuritakse eeliseid ja probleeme, mis sülearvuti igapäevase kasutamisega õppetöös kaasnevad, seda nii uurimuses osalenud õpilaste kui õpetajate poolt

Figure 3.18.: Purity versus efficiency plot for selected classifiers on test data sample with signal and MC background and only continuum suppression variables as input. The result

Because of the determined lack of data, a kind of semi-probabilistic approach was developed, to treat varying failure probability of different gate types.. The basic principle is

Freshwater inflow (runoff and net precipitation, P-E) in six 30 yr long regional climate simulations using RCAO and associated steady-state salinity calculated with the

We address this issue in the present paper comparing simulations carried out with the modular ocean model (MOM), which is set-up with coarse (1/4 ◦ ) and eddy (1/12 ◦ ) resolution.

In the history of political and economic culture of the world, facts have suggested that, while considering the relevant issues, intellectual effect can very well prevent the

Sensitivity of runoff t o climatic and other environmental changes is of particular interest t o water resource planners and decision makers because alterations in surface

•Tue major exceptions in Dram's data to this general inverse relation between a nation's size and its variability of food production are the anomalously high