• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Robust food-energy-water-environmental security management: linking distributed sectorial and regional models

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Robust food-energy-water-environmental security management: linking distributed sectorial and regional models"

Copied!
16
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Yuri Ermoliev Tatiana Ermolieva Petr Havlik Elena Rovenskaya

Robust food-energy-water- environmental security

management: linking distributed sectorial and regional models

EU Conference on Modelling for Policy Support 26-27 November, 2019

1

(2)

Motivation

• Water, energy and food are essential element for human being.

• Independent plans for:

 Energy production

 Food production

 Water resource allocation

• How the sectors are linked?

Energy Productio

n

Water Resource

Allocatio n

Food Productio

n

(3)

Advanced Analysis of Interdependencies, Systemic Threats, Multi-Dimensional Systemic risks, and Systemic Security

Nested multi-model welfare analysis and

systemic security management Energy

Security

Water Security

Socio -Economic

Security Food Security

Energy security and water security;

supply standards; Energy & water prices; Diversification of energy supply;

Ex-ante and ex-post risk management;

electricity supply security;

global and local threats to electricity supply systems; endogenous risks;

cyberattacks;

protection of critical infrastructure

Control of water resources; reliability vs.

disasters; Monitoring of infrastructure reliability;

monitoring of water resources vulnerability and accessibility;

Monitoring & control of water contamination;

Incomes; economic and population growth; demand changes; life and nutrition standards; prices;

Impacts of energy prices on food prices;

Dependencies between agricultural and energy markets through bio-fuels;

Agricultural subsidies; renewables subsidies, etc.

Growing demand vs environmental standards (SDGs);

electricity infrastructure innovations and investments;

systemic security; increasing returns vs sunk costs;

climate change and uncertainty; strategic- and operational planning; long- vs short-term decisions;

competition for resources, etc

3, date

(4)

New threats, new risks, new challenges:

Risk-Based Decision Making

 Standard risks

 Generated by exogenous events

 Historical observations characterise risks by probability distributions

 Risk assessment is used for risk management

 Statistical decision theory, expected utility theory, cost-benefit analysis, levelized costs, annualization of profits or losses, etc.

 …

 Unknown (systemic) risks

 Catastrophic risks, missing observations

 Interdependencies

 Unknowable (systemic) threats, risks, and security management

 New interdependent systems, missing observations

 Endogenous risks

 Risks generated by decisions of agents

 Blackouts of energy system due to natural disasters, triggered by rains, hurricanes, and earthquakes in combination with inappropriate land use planning, maintenance of flood protection systems and behavior of various stake holders

 High GHG goals, energy prices and volatility, global climate change concerns create high demand for biomass

 The need to design new systems, which are robust against possible “unknown

and unknowable” risks

4, date

(5)

Examples of linkages:

representation of the energy-water nexus, UK

A. Majid, T. Ermolieva, Y. Ermoliev et al., 2018-2019

5, date

(6)

Example of distributed models linkage: a robust distributed local-global network system, IIASA-NASU FWEES Security Project

6

(7)

Linkage of distributed energy-agriculture-water models

Coal related industry

Coal Mining

Agriculture

Water resource Quantity

Water resource

Quality

Air Pollution

Coal quantity Drainage water

Power coke

Crop stucture

crop quantity Dry/reuse

of water

Power Cooling

technology dry quenching

reuse

Waste water treatment

Waste water treatment

7, date

(8)

Coal in China

• 67% of total consumption in China

• Shanxi produce 26% coal in 2012

• About 64% coal exported to other provinces (5.8/9.1)

• About 80% GDP from coal related industry in Shanxi

• Serious environmental, social, and economic impacts

23.96 66.20%

3.26 9.00%

6.81 18.80%

1.95 5.40%

0.60%0.22

Energy consumption Structure in 2012

Coal Renewable crude oil Gas Nuclear

Hebei Shandong Henan Guizhou Yunnan Shannxi Inner Mogolia Anhui Shanxi Xinjiang Others

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

0.09 0.15 0.15 0.18 0.1

0.43

1.06 0.15

0.91 0.14

0.29

Coal Production in 2012

Unit: Billion Tons

Energy security

Unsustainable development

8, date

(9)

Water shortage

83% of China’s coal lies in water scarce and water stressed regions.

Geographical mismatch between water availability and coal industry

Source: Pan, Y., et al.

(2012)

9, date

(10)

Energy-water-food security, Shanxi province, China

Xu, X., Gao, J., Cao, G.-Y., Ermoliev, Y., Ermolieva, T., Kryazhimskiy, A.V. and

Rovenskaya, E. (2015): Modeling water-energy-food nexus for planning energy and agriculture developments: case study of coal mining industry in Shanxi province, China. IIASA Interim Report 15-020

• Coal (energy) vs. crops

• Tight water constraints

• 11 locations (prefectures)

• Sector-specific constraints on production

• Demand – supply equilibrium

• Stochastic agro-energy demand

• Stochastic water supply

• Joint constraints on water consumption and land use

• Stochastic water supply

10, date

(11)

Model of sector/region A Model of sector/region E Minimizing costs

Constraints on volume of production Constraints on

available resources (land,

water, etc.) Can be separated for simplicity but in reality are inter-linked!

  

Iterative algorithms for ML of robust distributed systems:

Distributed systems linkage with SQG iterative learning for robust decisions

11

0

min ,

A

A A A

A A A

A x A

x

y x M

x R

x c

A

0

min ,

E

E E E

E E

E E x E

x

y x M

x R

x c

A

d y D y

D

A A

E E

A A

A

y d

DD

E

y

E

d

E

(12)

“Naïve” approach: direct iterative exchange between models

12

0

min ,

A

A A A

A A A

A x A

x

y x M

x R

x c

A

0

min ,

E

E E E

E E

E E x E

x

y x M

x R

x c

A

d y D y

D

A A

E E

) (k yA

) 1 ( ), 1

(ky k

xA A

d y D k y

DA A( ) E E  )

( ), (k y k xE E

) (k yE

d k

y D y

DA A E E( 1)

(13)

“Naïve” approach: example – dependence on the initial condition!

13

0

min ,

A

A A A

A A A

A x A

x

y x M

x R

x c

A

0

min ,

E

E E E

E E

E E x E

x

y x M

x R

x c

A

d y D y

D

A A

E E

(14)

Hard linking approach: minimization of the overall welfare function

Implementation may be challenging – computing time, needs to re-code etc.

14

 0

A

A A A

A A

A

x

y x M

x

R

 0

E

E E E

E E E

x

y x M

x

R

d y D y

D

A A

E E

E A x E x

E A

A

x c x

c ,  ,  min

,

(15)

Linking models via a central “hub” under uncertainty and asymmetric information

15

0 ,

0

min )

( ,

,

,

E E

E E E E

E

E u E E

E

u

c M

u R

k y u

E E

d y

D y

D y

y

y ( 0 )  (

A

( 0 ),

E

( 0 )) :

A A

( 0 ) 

E E

( 0 ) 

0 ,

0

min )

( ,

,

,

A A

A A A A

A

A u A A

A

u

c M

u R

k y u

A A

} 0 ,

0 ,

: ) , {(

)) ( ) ( ) ( ( )

1 (

)) ( ) ( ) ( ( )

1 (

E A

E E A A E

A

E E

E E

A A

Y A

y y

d y D y

D y

y Y

k k

k y k

y

k k

k y k

y

 )

A

(k

 

E

(k )

(16)

Convergence theorem

Let Then where

• Yuri Ermoliev (1988), Yuri Ermoliev et al. ( 2017, 2019) for Deterministic and stochastic cases

16

1

) ( , ,

0 ) ( : 0 ) (

k

k k

k

k

 

) , ( ))

( ), ( ( )

( k y

A

k y

E

k y

*

y

*A

y

E*

y   

: ) ,

(

* *

*

E A

y y y

0

&

0

0

&

0

&

&

min ,

,

, , ,

E A

E A

E E E A

A A

E E E A

A A

y y x E x

E A

A

y y

x x

y x M y

x M

x R x

R

x c x

c

E A E A

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Figure 13: The four panels show a comparison between some banks balance sheets trait, (namely banks total assets, banks interbank liabilities, bank interbank assets, and banks

The water, energy, and food sectors each face their own specific supply risks and cor- responding political challenges, but they are also interdependent as part of the water,

In this paper, we discuss the implementation of the two-stage STO approach within a multi-regional, multi-sectorial recursive-dynamic, partial-equilibrium Global Biosphere

increases the net value created by the supply chain It can increase volatility under intense perturbations Final producers can significantly reduce systemic risks Among other firms,

Keywords: Extreme events; food-energy-water-environment security; Global and Regional Interdependent land use systems; robust solutions; stochastic optimisa- tion; strategic

 Expected shortfalls and storage capacities have a close relation with Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) risk measures.  Calculated Value

• quantifies systemic relevance of node in financial network with economically meaningful number.. • economic value in network that is affected by

• In relation to food security, aggregate national or regional land use projections derived with global economic land use planning models give no insights into potentially