• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

EDITORIAL: Please note! / Bitte beachten!

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "EDITORIAL: Please note! / Bitte beachten!"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

1/1

EDITORIAL: Please note! / Bitte beachten!

ArtHist.net Redaktion Dear subscribers,

Please note that the editorial staff of ArtHist.net will have its seasonal break from December 21, 2021 until January 3, 2022.

The editorial board --

Liebe Leserinnen und Leser,

Wir möchten Sie vorweg darauf hinweisen, dass die Redaktion von ArtHist.net vom 21. Dezember 2021 bis zum 3. Januar 2022 pausiert.

Die Redaktion

Reference:

EDITORIAL: Please note! / Bitte beachten!. In: ArtHist.net, Dec 13, 2021 (accessed Feb 27, 2022),

<https://arthist.net/archive/35538>.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

En realidad, las posturas sobre posibles criterios para la investigación cualitativa parecen ser bastante heterogéneas: éstas contienen la idea de adaptar los clásicos

Wir hoffen, in dieser Rubrik demnächst ein breites Spektrum an Besprechungen von Medieneinheiten präsentieren zu können, wobei dann auch – anders als in der aktuellen Ausgabe

In the spirit of FQS, the rubric reviews will hopefully also experience productive exchange amongst the readers and writers: We are interested in all comments, replies, additions

Desde el momento en que consideramos la opinión expresada en una reseña, que es escrita desde un punto de vista (individual), esperamos que otras opiniones o puntos de vista

Please note that the editorial staff of ArtHist.net will have its seasonal break from December 22, 2020 until January 4, 2021.. With our best wishes, Your

This turbulent year is slowly coming to an end, and the editorial team is taking a holiday break from December 21 until January 4, 2022.. We will be back in service for you in the

Agriensis on April 12, 2000, and was accepted for publication after a positive referee’s report not later than July 10, 2000.. With regard to the contents, the article

The result was that the Dmitriyev paper is considered as incorrect and the Sfarti response as correct though not offering new high level results in the field.. On this basis the