• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Regional Climate Change

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Regional Climate Change"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Helmholtz Climate Initiative

Regional Climate Change

Topic1: Evaluation of Arctic Land Snow Cover Characteristics, Surface Albedo, and Temperature for Spring from RCM simulations and Satellite Data

X. Zhou,

1

H. Matthes,

1

A. Rinke,

1

K. Klehmet,

2

B. Heim,

1

W. Dorn,

1

D. Klaus,

1

K. Dethloff

1

and B. Rockel

2

1, Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Telegrafenberg A45, 14473 Potsdam Germany 2, Institute of Coastal Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum, Geesthacht, Max-Plank-Strasse 1, 21502 Geesthacht, Germany

Email: xzhou@awi.de

Conclusion

>>HIRHAM5 can generally capture the main characteristics of the spatial patterns and the annual cycle of SWE, SCF, albedo and LST, although significant biases are detected.

>>The albedo and temperature bias in spring for Siberian deciduous tree forest could be caused by neglecting the snow-masking effect of fallen leaves and branches for deciduous tree forest in the SCF parameterization [5].

>>Suggestions: Consider different forest types (e.g. as done in CCLM) for the albedo parameterization and implement the effect of fallen leaves and branches on snow.

Introduction

 Study [1] area: Arctic. The key regions in the global climate system, evidenced by many rapid environmental changes (e.g. [2,3]).

 Simulation time period: 2008-2010.

 Background: Land surface temperature (LST) reflects the surface energy budget. Snow cover characteristics have significant impacts on the LST (e.g. [4]). E.g. isolating snow effect, snow phase change, snow-albedo feedback mechanism.

 Motivation

 Is the HIRHAM5 model able to reproduce LSTs correctly?

 Does the influence of albedo on LST play a key role?

 How does the influence of snow on LST differ between forest and bare ground?

 Can biases in the modeled LST be explained with biases in snow cover characteristics?

Forest cover fraction %

CCLM application area (Siberia)

 HIRHAM5 and CCLM (Cosmo-CLM) tend to underestimate SWE (snow water equivalent) in forest areas compared to CMC (Canadian Meteorological Centre), GlobSnow and ERA-Interim.

 Both models are better in reproducing SWE over non-forest areas than over forest areas. Possible reason: the complexity of forest vegetation snow feedback.

 Over forest and non-forest areas, HIRHAM5 strongly underestimates SCF (snow cover fraction) by 0.2-0.5 in April and May compared to MODIS and GlobSnow. In October and November, HIRHAM5 agrees with GlobSnow, while MODIS shows higher SCF especially over non-forest areas.

 HIRHAM5 has a positive albedo bias over forest in spring compared to ERA- Interim and MODIS, i.e. over the West Russian Arctic, Lena River basin and parts of river basins in Alaska and Canada.

 Largest overestimation occurs in spring in Siberia (by more than 0.2: ca 60%- 70%) compared to MODIS. Possible explanation: fallen leaves and branches on snow coverage, which are not considered in the albedo parameterization in HIRHAM5, and would cause a much darker albedo despite snow coverage.

 Over non-forest regions, the HIRHAM5 albedo shows better agreement with MODIS than over forest regions.

 CCLM shows a better performance for SCF and albedo. Separate consideration of deciduous and evergreen forest => influence on the snow and albedo over forests.

Results and discussion

References

>>[1], Zhou et al., “Evaluation of Arctic land snow cover characteristics, surface albedo and temperature during the transition seasons from regional climate model simulations and satellite data”. Advance in Meteorology, Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 604157.

>>[2], Serreze et al., “Processes and impacts of Arctic amplification: A research synthesis.” Global and Planetary Change 77, 85, 2011.

>>[3], Jeffries et al “Arctic Report Card 2013,” http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/reportcard, 2013.

>>[4], Lawrence D. , and A. Slater. “The contribution of snow condition trends to future ground Climate.” Climate Dynamics, 34:969–981, 2010.

>>[5], Roesch et al., “Assessment of snow cover and surface albedo in the ECHAM5 general circulation model”.

Journal of Climate, 19, p. 3828-3843, 2005.

HIRHAM5 SWE

CMC SWE

HIRHAM5- CMC

SWE

GlobSnow SWE

HIRHAM5- GlobSnow

SWE

cm cm

HIRHAM5- MODIS

albedo HIRHAM5-

ERA-Interim albedo

HIRHAM5- ERA-Interim

LST

°C

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Here, we analyze European spring (MAM) and autumn (SON) temperature variability, recon- structed on the basis of monthly instrumental temperature time series in combination

Determining within entry equilibrium the number of physicians per capita within a region, we show how the regional supply of physicians depends on the stream of current and

Monthly carbon fluxes from 2000 to 2009 by were estimated by inversion using dense C 0 2 measurements from a Siberian observational network, consisting of nine towers

In this paper, we present a preliminary description of the silvics of seven of these species - their ranges, optimum climatic and soil conditions, regeneration

For similar analysis calling for closer EU-Turkish cooperation with respect to the Arab Spring and the southern Mediterranean see for example Eduard Soler i Lecha, “The EU, Turkey

Her main research themes are forest policy and governance in climate change mitigation and adaptation, the political economy of tropical deforestation, policy and institutional

Figure 3 RDA ordination plots showing the effect of tree diversity level and distance from the forest edge (m) on plant species composition in spring and summer with minimum

In the Arab world, climate change has acted as a threat multiplier, exacerbating environmental, social, economic, and political drivers of unrest, including drought, water