• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

What is Motion Capture?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Aktie "What is Motion Capture?"

Copied!
61
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Capturing full body motion

Antoine Kaufmann

antoinek@student.ethz.ch

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 1

(2)

What is Motion Capture?

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 2

(3)

What is Motion Capture?

Motion capture is the process of recording the movement of objects or people... In filmmaking and video game

development, it refers to recording actions of human actors, and using that information to animate digital character models in 2D or 3D computer animation. [Wikipedia: Motion Capture]

Sources:http://lukemccann.wordpress.com/motion-capture/

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 3

(4)

What is it used for?

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 4

(5)

Applications: Filmmaking

Sources:http://www.fxguide.com/featured/the-hobbit-weta/ http://www.ugo.com/therush/avatar-moments-that-give-us-pause-6-gallery http://www.animationmagazine.net/events/ted-ruffles-feathers-at-the-oscars/

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 5

(6)

Applications: Game development

Sources:http://www.shipwrckd.com/2012/09/capturedinto-ubisofts-motion-capture-studio-launch- party/ http://gamerant.com/bioshock-infinite-elizabeth-trailer/

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 6

(7)

Applications: Gaming

Sources:http://123kinect.com/kinect-sports-season-achivements/25170/ http://pikigeek.com/2012/03/06/peter-molyneux-says-we-need-more-kinect-games-or-we-will-die/

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 7

(8)

Applications: Virtual Reality

Sources:http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/01/army-virtual-reality/ http://www.doolwind.com/blog/where-is-virtual-reality/

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 8

(9)

Applications: Biomechanics

Sources:http://orthopedics.childrenscolorado.org/our-programs/center-for-gait-and-movement- analysis http://www.motionanalysis.com/html/movement/movement.html

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 9

(10)

How can it be done?

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 10

(11)

System Types: Mechanical

Potentiometers and exoskeleton

Accurate

Post-processing straight forward

No global root-motion

Restricts range of motion

Sources:http://www.metamotion.com/gypsy/gypsy-motion-capture-system-workflow.htm

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 11

(12)

System Types: Inertial

Multiple inertial measurement units (IMUs) to track motion

Gyroscopes or accelerometers

Only relative position

Problems withdrift

Sources:Source:http://www.xsens.com/en/general/mvn

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 12

(13)

Problem: Drift

Occurs if only relative measurements are available

Due to inaccuracies of sensors and calculations

Sources:PracticalMotionCaptureinEverydaySurroundings,Vlasicetal.2007

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 13

(14)

System Types: Optical

Usually cameras and markers

Markers are

passive (reflective) or

active (controlled LEDs)

Can achieve high level of detail

Sources:http://beforevfx.tumblr.com/image/44047276135

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 14

(15)

System Types: Optical

Sources:http://www.cgadvertising.com/pages/posts/vicon-technologies-give-usc-students-hands- on-motion-capture-experience128.php Problems:

Occlusion

Marker-swapping

Requires good contrast and lighting

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 15

(16)

System Types

Mechanical

Inertial

Optical

Image based

Magnetic

Acoustic

Radio / Electromagnetic

Motion Tracking: No SIlver Bullet but a Respectable Arsenal by Greg Welch and Eric Foxlin

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 16

(17)

What’s wrong with existing systems?

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 17

(18)

Problems with existing systems

Heavy instrumentation of user and/or environment

Require line of sight

Limited range

Inaccurate

High latency

Expensive

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 18

(19)

Prakash

Prakash: Lignting Aware Motion Capture using Photosensing Markers and Multiplexed Illuminators

Ramesh Raskar (Mitsubishi Electric Research Labs) et al.

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 19

(20)

Prakash

Address the following problems:

Expensive high-speed cameras required

Limited number of markers

Marker swapping

Special clothing and lighting required

Sources:http://www.vicon.com/products/cameras.html http://parasite.usc.edu/?p=403

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 20

(21)

Prakash

Main Idea: Use most basic optical devices

LEDs as transmitters that are fixed in the scene

Photosensors as tags to be tracked

Cheap components

Sources:http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Uvled_highres_macro.jpg https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Photodiode-closeup.jpg

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 21

(22)

Prakash: Receiver Tags

Photosensors, a micro controller and a transmitter

Multiple photosensors used for different measurements

Sources:Prakashpaper

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 22

(23)

Prakash: Projectors

Projectors built from multiple LEDs

Labelling space with binary mask

Sources:Prakashpaper

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 23

(24)

Prakash: Location

Sources:Prakashpaperandpresentation

Basically binary search

Accuracy doubled by every LED

3 projectors needed for 3D location

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 24

(25)

Prakash: Orientation

Multiple fixed beacons

Analog photosensor without lens

Cosine fall-off for estimation of angles

Sources:Prakashpaper

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 25

(26)

Prakash: Illumination

Measure RGB illumination

Use one photosensor per color

Sources:Prakashpresentation

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 26

(27)

Prakash: Advantages

IDs for markers: no swapping

Not sensitive to lighting conditions

Imperceptible tags in regular clothing

Orientation and illumination information

Faster than regular cameras

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 27

(28)

Prakash: Drawbacks

No solution for occlusion

Wires on tags

Not suitable if motion is too fast

Simultaneity assumption: Tags don’t move while lit by projector

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 28

(29)

Prakash: My thoughts

Elegant idea using simple means

Nice fit for filmmaking

Basically a distributed system

How does it scale in practice?

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 29

(30)

Body-Mounted Cameras

Motion Capture from Body-Mounted Cameras Takaaki Shiratori (Disney Research) et al.

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 30

(31)

Body-Mounted Cameras

Address the following problems:

Heavy instrumentation of environment

System confined to studios

Sources:http://www.creativeplanetnetwork.com/the_wire/2008/07/29/vicon-house-of-moves-builds- new-motion-capture-sound-stage-expands-staff-with-full-service-animation-team/

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 31

(32)

Body-Mounted Cameras

Attach multiple outward looking cameras to the subject

No instrumentation of the environment

Use structure-from-motion to recover movements from camera footage

Sources:Body-MountedCameraPaper

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 32

(33)

Body-Mounted Cameras: Approach

Sources:Body-MountedCameraPaper

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 33

(34)

Body-Mounted Cameras: Approach

Sources:Body-MountedCameraPaper

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 34

(35)

Body-Mounted Cameras: Approach

Sources:Body-MountedCameraPaper

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 35

(36)

Body-Mounted Cameras: Global Optimization

Why global optimization?

Keep motion smooth and minimize reprojection error

Sources:Body-MountedCameraPaper

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 36

(37)

Body-Mounted Cameras: Advantages

No instrumentation of the environment

Works outside: no limited range

Motion of skeleton and global root motion

3D structure of scene as byproduct

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 37

(38)

Body-Mounted Cameras: Drawbacks

Heavy instrumentation of user

Very long processing time

Problems with motion-blur

Motion in the scene problematic

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 38

(39)

Body-Mounted Cameras: My thoughts

Useful as soon as cameras are significantly smaller

Main application: biomechanics research and sports

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 39

(40)

Humantenna

Humantenna: Using the Body as an Antenna for Real-Time Whole-Body Interaction

Gabe Cohn (Microsoft Research) et al.

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 40

(41)

Humantenna

Address the following problems:

Heavy instrumentation of environment and/or user

High latency

Portability

Sources:Body-MountedCameraPaper

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 41

(42)

Humantenna

Body as an antenna for receiving EM noise

No instrumentation of the environment

Minimal instrumentation of the user

Goals:

Gesture recognition

Location classification

Sources:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Antistatic_wrist_strap.jpg http://mizzoumagarchives.missouri.edu/2011-Summer/features/the-struggle-for-signal/index.php

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 42

(43)

Humantenna

Sources of electromagnetic noise:

Sources:HumantennaPaper

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 43

(44)

Humantenna: Gesture Recognition

Predefined whole body gestures

Offline approach (initially)

Manual hints for start/end of gesture

Machine learning for classifying gestures

Sources:HumantennaPaper

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 44

(45)

Humantenna: Gesture Recognition

Sources:HumantennaPaper

Three steps for recognizing a gesture:

1. Segmentation 2. Feature extraction 3. Classification

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 45

(46)

Humantenna: Gesture Recognition

Sources:HumantennaPaper

Step 1: Segmentation

1. Down-sample (to 244S/s) and low-pass filter→DC waveform 2. Divide waveform into≈100mswindows

3. Check every window if it is active

4. Everything between first and last active window is the gesture

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 46

(47)

Humantenna: Gesture Recognition

Sources:HumantennaPaper

Step 2: Feature extraction 1. Divide gesture into 5+2 windows

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 47

(48)

Humantenna: Gesture Recognition

Step 2: Feature extraction

2. Compute features for each window

Mean of the DC waveform

Apply high-pass and compute root-mean-square

Compute FFT, frequencies 0 - 500Hz.

Sources:HumantennaPaper

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 48

(49)

Humantenna: Gesture Recognition

Step 3: Classification

1. Use support vector machine to classify gesture

Sources:http://docs.opencv.org/doc/tutorials/ml/introduction_to_svm/introduction_to_svm.html

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 49

(50)

Humantenna: Gesture Recognition

Experimental results

Performed experiments in multiple homes and rooms

Different participant used for every home

Trained classifier on 36 examples, tested on 4

µ σ Min Max

92% 3% 86% 98%

Table: Accuracy across homes and participants

A training set of only 4 gestures still results in 84% accuracy

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 50

(51)

Humantenna: Gesture Recognition

Sources:HumantennaPaper

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 51

(52)

Humantenna: Location Classification

Just use the first 0.5 seconds instead of segmentation

Use same DC and RMS features as for gesture recognition

High frequency peaks provide a lot of information about the location

Use frequencies up to 125kHz

Sources:http://activerain.com/blogsview/1022299/viewpoint-midtown-buy-one-get-one-free-what- a-deal-

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 52

(53)

Humantenna: Location Classification

Experimental results

Three participants and two homes, two participants per home

8 locations per home, each participant performed gestures in 5

System achieves an accuracy of 99.6% (σ=0.4%)

Classifier works across users with an accuracy of 96%

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 53

(54)

Humantenna: Advantages

No instrumentation of environment

Minimal instrumentation of the user

Gesture recognition and location classification in real time

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 54

(55)

Humantenna: Drawbacks

By design coarse-grained

Training is necessary

Only works inside the home

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 55

(56)

Humantenna: My thoughts

Again a simple and elegant solution

Weak evaluation in the paper

Might be very interesting in connection with a smart phone

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 56

(57)

Conclusions: Basics

Prakash

Optical, inside-looking-out

Instrumentation of user and environment Body-Mounted Cameras

Optical, inside-looking-out

Instrumentation of user Humantenna

Electromagnetic, inside-looking-out

Minimal instrumentation of user

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 57

(58)

Conclusions: Accuracy

Prakash

As accurate as desired

Fast movements possible Body-Mounted Cameras

Limited by camera performance

Difficulty with fast movements Humantenna

Coarse-grained: only classification of predefined gestures

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 58

(59)

Conclusions: Latency and Cost

Latency Costs

Prakash Very low: 1ms Cheap

Body-Mounted Cameras Very high: days Expensive

Humantenna Low: 0.5s Cheap

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 59

(60)

Conclusions

Motion Tracking:

No Silver Bullet, but a Respectable Arsenal

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 60

(61)

Questions?

April 9, 2013 Distributed Systems Seminar 61

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Attempts to generate a new framework or new umbrella term (e.g., NPR, 2015; EdWeek, 2015) while well-intentioned, are not designed to address what we see as the

In the context of developing countries, systems analysis has been used on problems like these: routing and scheduling the buses in Baroda, India; developing the water and power uses

Safety standards such as IEC 61508, DO-178B suggest development according to V-model:.  Verification and validation link specification and

Keller (Universit¨ at Basel) Planning and Optimization September 19, 2018 2 / 34.. Content of

• Protects data transfers throughout the Internet, procuring Authentication, Integrity, Encryption.. • Transparent to

(single-label tree with additional node info, e.g. node type) Elements, attributes, and text values are nodes. DOM parsers load XML into main memory random access by traversing

insert new node v as k-th child of p Insert and delete are inverse edit operations (i.e., insert undoes delete and vice versa).

In some cases NationaliAESTE Committees can be divided into Local Committees/Subcommittees wh ich take care of regional work and are established at Universities and