• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment of Electricity Demand in Swiss Buildings

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment of Electricity Demand in Swiss Buildings"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

CORE-SCCER CONFERENCE, 20 November 2020, Bern

CORE-SCCER CONFERENCE, 20 November 2020, Bern

KEY RESULTS

 Carbon footprint of the Swiss consumed electricity:

 Substantial seasonal fluctuations:

 Winter peaks are mainly explained by high imports from neighbouring countries

 High impact of the imported electricity

 Lower values for Spring & Summer are linked to indigenous electricity production

 Swiss national production has a low impact (but can not supply alone the winter demand), the impacts are driven by imports

Performing hourly assessments every year would be necessary to identify the influence of the energy turnaround

 At the building level:

 Winter seasonal electricity demand (in particular related to heat pump use for space heating)

 Higher impact with hourly carbon footprint profile instead of annual value (+25%)

 Non seasonal demand (electric appliances has low seasonal fluctuation)

Hourly considerations do not affect the result substantially

Considering the carbon footprint fluctuations is especially important when energy demands change substantially over a certain period like the seasonality of space heating

Energy management strategies could fit consumption periods with moments when the carbon footprint is lower

Energy research conference, 20 November 2020, Biel

Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment of

Electricity Demand in Swiss Buildings

HOW

Three-step approach:

1. Collect data on hourly electricity production mixes for Switzerland

& neighbouring countries (Big data approach)

2. Model the hourly Swiss electricity supply mix with imports &

characterise its environmental impacts

3. Collect data regarding buildings’ electricity demand per usage &

decentralised electricity production (monitoring approach)

Environmental impacts of the building electricity demand per usage and for various time step known

Variability of the electricity impact characterized and proposal to reduce the building energy demand environmental footprints Contact: Pierryves Padey – pierryves.padey@heig-vd.ch

WHY

• The environmental assessment of the Swiss consumed electricity is based currently on average annual statistics of energy flows

• This modelling simplification raises concerns because:

• The environmental impacts of the Swiss electricity mix varies substantially throughout the year

• The buildings’ energy consumption also fluctuates but rarely with similar trends

It is therefore necessary to investigate how this mismatch

between production and consumption can influence the impacts of building uses (or charging of electric vehicles)

WHAT

• To consider the dynamics of energy flows when assessing the life cycle environmental impacts of buildings

To evaluate how the environmental impacts of the Swiss electricity mix evolve on a hourly basis

• To analyse how different time resolutions might affect the

environmental assessments of energy demands in buildings

WHO

• School of Management and Engineering Vaud (HES-SO / HEIG- VD – project leader)

• Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa)

• Scuola Universitaria Professionale della Svizzera Italiana (SUPSI)

• Advisory board: ecoinvent, PSI, ETHZ, EWZ, Stadt Zürich - Amt für Hochbauten

Research supported by:

Swiss Federal Office of Energy

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Here, activities focused on the current market development for external power supply units, the forthcoming EU directive on energy using products, the current status of efficiency

The systematic “netting” of contractual, trade-based electricity imports and exports results in a significant reduction in Switzerland’s import/export volumes from/to Germany, in

Appendix X: POM demand and gas based electricity supply with winter security (P-Gas-S-win)

• Life-cycle indicators are calculated for the energy technologies (e.g. coal power plant). • ex-post analysis of the total environmental burden of the

Developments of Swiss TIMES electricity model Model input data sources. (Caveat: So far the focus has been on model methodology and structure. Input dada to

This study assesses three different battery technologies with regard to their environmental and economic life cycle performance when used as large-scale storage systems for renewable

The scenario assumes a relatively large amount of (stochastic) solar and wind generation; excess generation is assumed to be partially converted to storable energy carriers

SCS (elc) (from BFE) na Simulation na Model is only for year 2050 Greenpeace Simulation Simulation (from SCS) yes Electricity demand is.