• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Black Holes II — Exercise sheet 7 (17.1)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Black Holes II — Exercise sheet 7 (17.1)"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Daniel Grumiller May 3rd 2010

Black Holes II — Exercise sheet 7

(17.1) First Law

The first law of black hole mechanics states dM = κ

8π dA+ ΩHdJ+ ΦHdQ

where M, κ, A,ΩH, J,ΦH and Q are mass, surface gravity, event hori- zon area, angular velocity ΩH, angular momentum J, electric potential ΦH and electric charge Q of the black hole. “Derive” this result a la Gibbons from the Smarr formula

M = κA

4π + 2ΩHJ+ ΦHQ

Compare with the first law of thermodynamics and relate corresponding quantities. Calculate κ for a solar mass Schwarzschild black hole and convert the result into Kelvin.

(17.2) Second Law

The second law of black hole mechanics states dA≥0

where A is the event horizon area. By comparison with (17.1)A must be proportional to entropy. CalculateAfor a solar mass Schwarzschild black hole and provide an estimate of the number of microstates of such a black hole. Discuss (either colloquially or with formulas) what hap- pens when you take a box filled with photons of a certain temperature, energy and entropy and drop it into the black hole.

(17.3) Third Law

The third law of black hole mechanics states that physical processes that lead to

κ→0

are not possible in finite time. Discuss for a Schwarzschild black hole how you could attempt to violate the third law and why such attempts do not work. Generalize this discussion to Reissner–Nordstr¨om black holes.

Note: The three laws above are valid under the assumptions mentioned in the lectures.

These exercises are due on May 10th 2010.

(2)

Hints:

• Recall the mass dimensions of A, J and Q2, and exploit Euler’s for- mula for homogeneous functions. Convert the Q2-dependence into Q- dependence (you may assume that Q ≥ 0 with no loss of generality).

For the comparison with thermodynamics note that mass and energy are the same physical quantities, and that changing angular momen- tum or charge corresponds to work terms. Regarding the last part: if you forgot the relation between surface gravity and Killing norm look at exercise (8.2).

• Calculate A in natural units and recall how the number of microstates scales with entropy. For the colloquial discussion compare with exercise (8.3).

• Remember how surface gravity is related to mass and consider what you would have to do with the mass of a Schwarzschild black hole in order to make surface gravity vanish. For the Reissner–Nordstr¨om case start with a sub-extremal black hole |Q|< M and try to make it extremal by dropping charged particles into it. Note that the particle only falls into the black hole if gravitational attraction overcomes the electrostatic repulsion.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Calculate the force differ- ence per mass (a.k.a. relative acceleration) between head and feet that stretches the observer for (a) a 10 solar mass black hole, (b) a super-

Presumably you also remember that a Killing horizon corresponds to a locus in spacetime where the norm of that Killing vector vanishes.. Now it is a matter of simple algebra

Consider a piece of coal at zero temperature and a laser beam (a pure quantum state with some finite energy and entropy) in vacuum as initial state.. Provided the laser beam is

Consider a piece of coal at zero temperature and a laser beam (a pure quantum state with some finite energy and entropy) in vacuum as initial state.. Provided the laser beam is

Finally, check which constraints have (weakly) vanishing Poisson brackets among themselves and with the Hamiltonian — these are then first class constraints, while all other

Note: I am not sure what is the most efficient way of doing this calcula- tion; I started with the variation δ(g µν ∇ µ n ν ) and proceeded from there, but there might be a

Use this ar- gument to find a representation of the full quantum gravity partition function that is as simple as possible.. These exercises are due on June 14

But conceptually this exercise may be non- trivial, so remember what is a thermal state in AdS 3 , look up the Brown–Henneaux result for the central charges and recall that the sum