W O R K I N G P A P E R
~ A l Y D F A Y I L Y ~ R ' r IN AGING
90QFllE9December 1986 WP-86-81
I n t e r n a t i o n a l l n s t ~ t u t e for Applied Systems Analysis
NOT M)R QUOTATION WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF THE AUTHOR
KINSHIP AND FAMILY 9UPPORT IN AGING
SOCIETiESDecember
1986 WP-86-81Working h p e r s are interim r e p o r t s on work of t h e International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
and
have moeived only limited mvlew. Views or opinions expressed herein do not neoessarfly r e p r e s e n t thaseof
t h e Instituteor
of i t s National Member Organizations.INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
This is
a
revised version ofa
paper originally presentedat
the United Nations International Symposium on Population Structure and Development, held in Tokyo, Japan f r o m 10-12 September 1986, andto
be published in 1987 by the United Na- tions. This researah was supported in part byG r a n t
No. AGO5153 from t h e U.S.National Institute on Aging. Important contributions
to
the researchwere
made by Nathan Keyfitz, Gun Stsnflo and JanBartlema.
Helpful comments on a nearlier
ver- sion of the paper w e r e provided by Naohiro Ogawa, S h i m Hoiruchi, Jack Habib and Shigemi Kono.The main direction of r e s e a r c h in IIASA's Population Program i s population aging-* phenomenon which
a l m o s t
all c o u n t r i e s in t h e world are experiencing today. Many social economic consequences of aging f o r s o c i e t y depend on t h e existing family s t r u c t u r e a n d i t s f u t u r e evolution.This p a p e r d e s c r i b e s t h e micro-simulation a p p r o a c h
to
t h e analysis of t h e kin- s h i p p a t t e r n s . The only d a t a which one needs are t h e data o n f e r t i l i t y a n d mortal- ity. Among o t h e r findings t h e p a p e r shows t h a t , as a r e s u l t of f e r t i l i t y reduction, t h e links between g e n e r a t i o n s became weaker.A n a t o l i Yashin Deputy L e a d e r Population P r o g r a m
Contents
I. INTRODUCTION
11. INDICATORS OF THE AGING PROCESS
111. DISAGGREGATING THE DEPENDENCY RATIO Modelling K i n s h i p Patterns
SimulaWons Perf o r n e d R e s u l t s
IV. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES
A p p e n d i x T a b l e A A p p e n d i x T a b l e B
KINSHIP AND FAUILY SUPPORT IN
AGING SlOCIETIESL
INTRODUCTIONA general aoncern with the worldwide phenomenon of increasingly aged popu- lations has existed f o r many years. This concern will presumably grow as the phenomenon continues i t s progress during the coming decades. I t is generally held that the aging of the world's population presents serious problems, o r , a t a minimum, makes necessary significant adjustments in public policies and social and eoonomic institutions (see, f o r example, United Nations, 1985a). The
issue
remains somewhat oontroversial, however: a reoent paper argues that,at
least f o r the Un- ited States, the burdens implied by the projected increase in the over-65 elderly a r e exaggerated (Aaron, 1986). Aaron suggests nonetheless that the prospective increase in the relative size of the over-80 population presents problems that have received insufficient attention. However problematic the transitionto
a more eld- erly world provesto
be, t h e r e wan be little doubt that the transition will be aocom- panied by important changes in the economic and sooial s t m a t u r e s of many aoun-tries.
This paper addresses issues related
to
kinship in increasingly w e d popula- tions: patterns of nuclear-family kin, the aonsequences of these patterns, and, especially, the way in whioh the aged "dependency burden" oan be allmated along family lines. The perspeotive adopted is that of the 16 oountries affiliated with the International Institute f o r Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), all of which are indus- trialized countries. A s shall be illustrated, t h e aging phenomenon exhibited in the IIASA uountries Is r a t h e r different from t h a t of the world asa
whole.%heme countries are: Austria, Bulgaria, Canada, Csechoslovakia. Finland, Prance, the Cerman Democratic Republic, the German Federal Republic, Hungary, Itoly, Japan, t h e Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, t h e Unlon of Soviet Socialist Republics, and the United States of America.
Kinship
patterns
r e p r e s e n t only one of numerous s o c i a l dimensions t h a tcan
be e x p e c t e dto
undergo change as a r e s u l t of population aging. A s oountries be- oomem o r e
aged, social institutions suoh as the eduoational system and t h e oonoept of family will ohange. Aspects of s w i a l s t r u a t u r e , s u c h as t h e s p a t i a l arrangement of the population, and t h e d e g r e e and n a t u r e of migration p a t t e r n s , will be affect- ed. With a n increasing s h a r e of t h e lifetime s p e n tat
ages c u r r e n t l y r e g a r d e d as"retirement age", t h e conception of t h e worklife, a n d possibly of productive ao- flvity itself, may undergo change. And,
norms
and expectations regarding lifetime upward mobility, and the implied lifetime path of consumption opportunities, will inevitably be changed as a consequence of new p a t t e r n s of l a b o r availabilityat
various levels of t h e seniority h i e r a r c h y , and the need f o r s u p p o r t o v e r a g r e a t e r range of years. P e r h a p s uniquely among t h e s e s e v e r a l social implications of aging populations, t h e issue of kinship p a t t e r n s lends itselfto
a demographic analysis.Kinship
patterns are
of p m c t i a a l importance f o r a number of reasons, prom- inent among which is the issue of s u p p o r t f o r t h e elderly. Family members, espe- oially nuclear-family members (spouse, siblings, children) play important roles i n t h e s u p p o r t f o r t h e e l d e r l y in many countries. S u p p o r t f o r t h e e l d e r l y oan take many forms, including t h e provision of d i r e c t f i ~ n a i a l s u p p o r t , the provision of informal health-care s e r v i c e s , and s h a r e d living arrangements. A t t h em o s t
basic level, t h e complete absenoe of s u c h family members from t h e kinship network means t h a t the potential f o r s u p p o r t of the elderly from t h i s important s o u r c e i s nonexistent. However, e v e n given t h e existence of s u c h family members, p a t t e r n s of s u p p o r t show considerable variation accordingto
t h e number, s e x e s , a g e s , and o t h e r demographic c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of individual members of t h e kin network. For example, r e o e n t r e s e a r c h oonducted by Wolf and Soldo (1986) using t h e U.S. 1982 National Long Term C a r e S u r v e y showed t h a t t h e probability t h a t a given child provides health careto an
elderly, disabled, formerly-married mother, ranges from n e a rzero to
n e a r one accordingto
t h e s e x , a g e ,marital
and workstatus
of t h e child, andto
t h e corresponding a t t r i b u t e s of a n y siblings.The plan of this p a p e r is as follows. In part 11, s e v e r a l a g g r e g a t e indicators of the aging p r o c e s s , as e x p e r i e n c e d by the IIASA countries,
are
brieflysummar-
ized. P a r t I11 p r e s e n t s r e s u l t s from a new a n a l p i s of kinship p a t t e r n , a n d uses these r e s u l t sto
show how the dependency burden c a n be disaggregated along fami- ly lines. Family linkages between t h e a g e d and t h e working-age populations are il- l u s t r a t e d f o r t h r e e a l t e r n a t i v e demographic soenarios, using a microanalytic simu- lation technique. P a r t IV summarizes and aoncludes t h e p a p e r .II.
INDICATORSOF THE
AGlNCPBOCESS
In o r d e r
to
providea
context f o r the subsequent analysis. selected demo- graphic indicators f o r t h e IIASA countries as a whole, and f o r t h e world, are shown in Figures 1-4. The g r a p h s p r e s e n t historical d a t a beginning in 1950, and continue with projected d a t a through 2025; t h e source f o r t h e projections i s t h e United Na- tions publication World Population Prospects: Estimates and Projections as As- sessedin
-82. The d a t a shown f o r t h e IIASA countries as a group in Figures 1-3 are simply weighted totals, with weights based upon 1985 total population figures.Aocordingly, t h e data f o r IIASA oountries as
a
wholeare
heavily influenced by t h a t of t h e USSR and the US, whioh together receive 53.8 p e r c e n t of t h e weights used in t h e calculations.Figure 1. Total fertility
rates
f o r IIASA countries and world, 1950-2020.In general, t h e figures depiot a situation whereby t h e IIASA countries
are
f a r t h e r along t h e t r e n d than i s t h e worldat
Large with r e s p e c tto
t h e demographic determinants of increasingly aged population s t r u o t u r e , In Figure 1, t h e total f e r -tility
rate (TFR)
i s shown; t h e IIASA countries, all of whichare
industrialized, have much lower fertilityrates
in t h e r e c e n t past, and in t h e projected n e a r future, than does t h e worldat
large. F r o m 1980 onwards, t h eTFR
in t h e IIASA countries i s actually projectedto
rise somewhat, while t h a t of t h e world asa
whole i s projectedto
decline sharply. As a consequence, t h e differences between t h e IIASA aountries and t h e world as a whole w i l l be g r e a t l y diminished, although not aompletely elim- inated, by 2020. The projected world's TFR for 2020 isat a b o u t
t h e level shown by t h e IIASA countries in 1985.Together, fertility and mortality
rates
determine t h e a g e composition of t h e population. Indiaators of mortality rates-life expectancyat
b i r t h (for both s e x e s combined)--are pictured in Figure 2. Again, life expectancy in t h e IIASA countries presently exceeds t h a t of t h e worldas a
whole, but this g a p i s projectedto
dimin- ish g r e a t l y between now and 2020.Aspects of t h e population a g e s t r u c t u r e implied by t h e paths of fertility and mortality
are
presented in Figures 3 and 4. In Figure 3w e
see t h e median a g e of t h e population. Here, t h e IIASA countriesare
olderat
t h e outset than is t h e worldas a
whole, but t h e differenae between t h e two grows r a t h e r than diminishes throughout most of t h e period upto
2025. This, of course, r e f l e c t s t h e vastly dif- f e r e n t 'current a g e s t r u c t u r e of t h e industrialized countries comparedto
t h erest
of t h e world. The median a g e of t h e population of t h e combined IIASA countries, whiahw a s
about 28 y e a r s in 1950, will r i s eto
nearly 40 y e a r s by 2025.Finally, w e see in Ffgure 4 t h e aged dependency r a t i o , constructed as t h e ra- tio of persons o v e r 65
to
persons 20+4, f o r t h e IIASA countries and t h e world. As w e would expect, this r a t i o i s higher in t h e IIASA aountries than in t h e world in' g e n e r a l
at
present, and i s projectedto
remain higher throughout t h e period covered by t h e projection. The dependencyratio
is, in f a c t , one of t h e principal indiaators cited in discussions of t h e potential problems posed by population aging.In t h e following section, this p a p e r examines t h e dependency burden in g r e a t e r de- tail.
IIL
DISAGGEEGATINGTEE
DEPENDENCY RATIOAs mentioned before, t h e aged dependenay r a t i o
commands
considerableat-
tentionas
a n indiaator of t h e potential problems facing a n increasingly aged popu- lation. Computedas
t h eratio
of persons 65 and olderto
persons aged 20to
64, t h eratio
is roughly t h e number of r e t i r e e s p e r worker,or
potential worker. A s such,Figure 2. Life expectancy, for both sexes combined, IIASA countries and world, 1950-2020.
I\U worm
it
aan be taken asa
proxy f o r the w t i o of the elderly component of the dependent populationto
the economically active population. Obviously this interpretation of the w t i o embodies sevenid simplifying assumptions:it
ignores the facts that many persons over 65 a r e economically active, that many persons over 65 contributeto
their own support. and that many persons under 65 a r e themselves dependent-for example,as
a result of ill health or disability.Nonetheless, this aged dependency w t i o forms the basis f o r the following dis- cussion. Perhaps the leading mason f o r concern with the ratio lies in the extent
to
which currentresources are
allocatedto
the support of the aged. Thereare
t h r e e broad uategories of resources available for the support of the aged: the as-sets held by the aged themselves; collective resources, the ultimate origin of which is those currently working; and family members. In most IIASA muntries, collective resources, provided via programs administered by the state,
are a ma-
Figure 3. Median age of population in IIASA countries and world, 1950-2025.
jor sourae of support for t h e aged. And i t is the prospect of pressure on the
state's
resouraes, resulting from a n increase in the size of the recipient popula- tions of these programs-especially, in relationto
the size of the working popula- tions f r o m whom t h eresources
come--which motivates much of t h e policy concern about population aging.One possible response
to
t h e prospective pressures upon public programs for the support of t h e aged i s a n attemptto
shift some of the potential burden ofcar-
ing for the aged away from public programs, and onto t h e family (for a policy- oriented discussion of this issue,see
S c h o r r , 1980).However, t h e very demographic trends that
are
producing t h e dramatic ongo- ing and projected t r e n d s in t h e age s t n a t u r e of the populationare
also altering t h e patterns of family networks t h a t can, in theory, s e r v eto
substitute f o r the public (that is, t h e working population as a whole) In providing support for t h e aged. Reduced fertilityrates
and i n c r e d n g longevity each influence t h e pattern of llnkages between members of the aged population and thelr offspring within t h e working-age population. The study of this pattern requiresa
model of kinship,to
whichw e
now turn.Figure 4. Aged dependency
ratio
for IIASA countries and world, 1950-2025.Podding Kiruhip
Patter-
Demographers have a long tradition of analyzing kinship s t r u c t u r e s . A t p r e s e n t , work on t h i s issue c a n be alassified into analytic models and simulation models. Examples of analytic models include t h e work of Goodman, Keyfitz, and Pullum (1974, 1975), f u r t h e r elaborated in Keyfitz (1985); Krishnamoorthy (1980);
Pullum (1982); and Joffe and Waugh (1982). The Goodman
et
al. approach has been extendedand
applied by o t h e r s , including Goldman (1978, 1986), Schmueli (1985), and Bartlema and d e Jong (1985). Simulation analyses of kinship p a t t e r n s have been r e p o r t e d by s e v e r a l a u t h o r s , among whichare
Howell and Lehotay (1978), Hammel, Wachter and McDaniel (1981).Le
Bras and Wachter (1978), and Bartlemaand
Winkelbauer (1986). The analytic models, whilem o r e
elegant formally,are
lim- ited with r e s p e a tto
t h e goals of t h e p r e s e n t analysis: as so f a r developed, theyare
unableto
r e p r e s e n t t h e frequency distribution of kin o v e r t h e life cyole. Con- sequently, the simulation a p p r o a c h i s adopted h e r e .The advantage of t h e m i c r d m u l a t i o n methodology used h e r e is t h a t i t gen-
erates
observations on hypothetical i n d i v i d u a l s ,to
which a t t r i b u t e s such as sex and the dates of birth and death are associated. Moreover, e a c h hypothetical indi- vidual i s linkedto
o t h e r individuals, with t h e i r corresponding attributes, in t h e s a m e hypothetical population. The r e s u l t s presented below are generated by a new simulation procedure based upon a continuous-time stochastic event-history pro- aess; details regarding t h e features of t h e event-history process, and t h e tech- nique usedto
simulate t h e process, can be found in Wolf (1986).The assumptions underlying t h e simulations r e p o r t e d h e r e are in many r e s p e c t s identical
to
those adopted by Goodmanet
al. (1974). In particular, t h e population i s assumedto
be stable and homogeneous with r e s p e c tto
rates of dying and childbearing; birthrates
are also assumed notto
depend upon parity. Howev- e r , in t h e p r e s e n t simulations a minimum interval of exactly 12 months between births i s assumed. And, t h e simulations employ a two-sex model, in t h e limited sense t h a t both daughters and sonsare
bornto
t h e women in t h e hypothetiad po- pulation; t h e r e is, however, no mating or "marriage market". Thus, the simulation model in its p r e s e n t stage of development can r e p r e s e n t t h e distributions of broth- ers and sons as w e l l as of s i s t e r s and daughters, but aannot r e p r e s e n t spouses and fathers.Basiaally, the approach aonsists of simulating lanrily trees which evolve in aalendar time, and then sampling from t h e resulting population in cross-section
to
obtain a picture of the kinship p a t t e r n s then prevailing. Figure 5 helpsto
clarify t h e problem. The horizontal axis in Figure 5 r e p r e s e n t s aalendar time,set
a r b i - t r a r i l yto
z e r oat
t h e leftmost point. Horizontal line segments shown above t h e t i m e axis depict individual lifetimes; t h e left endpoint ofa
segment r e p r e s e n t s one's own d a t e of birth, while t h e r i g h t endpoint ofa
segment r e p r e s e n t s one's own d a t e of death.x's
along t h e segments r e p r e s e n t timesat
which one's ahildren are born.Flgure 5 depicts t h e lifetimes of 11 hypothetiaal individuals, labelled a through k . This i s in f a a t
an
e x a e r p t from a family t r e e , sinae individuals b -kare
all desaended from individual a . The vertiaal dashed lines in t h e figure connect mothers with t h e i r ahildren. Thus, band c are
a's children; d i s b's child; e and f are c 's children; and so on. I t follows t h a t d, e ,
and f are a's grandchildren;m o r e distant relationships
can
be additionally derived.Figure 5. Pictorial representation of family-tree simulation problem.
A cross-sectional picture of t h e population pictured in Figure 5 uan be ob- tained by "sampling" from t h e population
at
a n a r b i t r a r i l y ohosen time, shown as t*in t h e figure. A t
t i m e t*,
individuals e through i , and k , are alive. Each individual's ageat
t h e time of the "survey" can readily be determined: f o r exam- ple, point z on t h e t i m eaxis
oorrespondsto
A's date of birth; therefore. A's ageat
the time of the survey i st*
-2. Similarly,it
is easyto
establish how many Wing kin, in each possible kin relationship, cxan be associated with eaah person livingat
timet* .
For example, in Figure 5, individual A 's mother (designated as f ), one of two siblings ever-born (individual f ), and child (individnal k ) areall
alive.The simulations r e p o r t e d below consist of the generation of a l a r g e sample of family t r e e s , each of which begins with a single initial mother o r 'heed". Each seed produoes offspring, and each of these offspring produoes f u r t h e r offspring.
and s o on, until some Limit (expressed relative
to
calendar time) is reached. To each individual i s attaohed a life-history, which oonsists of (1) event-history data--a sequence of items representing dates of own birth and death, and dates, if any, of one's children's births-and (2) "accounting" o r cross referencing data-that is, identifying numbers, and r e f e r e n c e s t o t h e identifying numbers of one's mother and any ahildren. Each such life-history is entered into a data base, which is subse- quently "sampled", as depicted in Figure 5, t h e sample information being then tabu- lated f o r analysis.
The only input data required in o r d e r
to
carry out such a simulation are schedules of birth and death r a t e s , and t h e r a t l o of malesto
females among all births. For t h e simulations r e p o r t e d h e r e , sex-specific vitalrates
f o r 5-year age groupswere
used. Therates
w e r e t r e a t e d as t h e parameters of a n age-dependent continuous-time semi-Markovian event-history p r m e s s , a special aase of t h e gen- eral framework laid out in Wolf (1986). In particular, t h e probability of f i r s t birthat
a g e a is given byand t h e probability of a b i r t h
at
age at, given t h a t t h e r e was a previous birthat
a g e Is given byprovided t h a t
9
r+
+I.In (1) and (2) d z ) is t h e death
rate
f o r femalesat
a g e z , taken directiy from t h e Input data. b * ( z ) is t h e b i r t hrate at
age z , adjusted upward from t h e ob- served birth r a t e s d ( z ) - - i n o r d e rto
oompensate f o r t h e imposition ofa
minimum waiting time of exactly one y e a r between births.This adjustment is derived as follows.
First
note t h a t t h e birthrate at
e x a c t a g ez
oan be expressed aswhere
n,
is t h e proportion of women notat
risk of childbearingat
age z , dueto
ahildbirthat
some time in t h e preceding 1 2 months. However, t h e proportionn,
is simply t h e probability of giving b i r t h betweenz
-1 and z , given byThus. (3) can be r e a r r a n g e d , yielding
which allows
us to
e x p r e s s t h e birthrate
f o r those actuallyat
risk in terms of t h e observed birthrate.
In
m o s t
applied demographic analysis t h e b ( z ) schedule is t r e a t e d as piece- w i s e constant. The dah used in this analysls included birthrates
c o n s h n t o v e r 5- y e a r a g e groups 15-19, 20-24, and s o on. In t h e seaond through fifth y e a r s of any such group, b**(z) as given by (4) is also constant. In t h e f i r s t y e a r of each group, however, t h e b** ( z ) transformation is nonconstant. In particular,at
age y such t h a t z<
y= z +
&< z +
1 ,A constant-rate equivalent
to
b** ( a ) f o r use on the interval 2.2 + I can be ob- h i n e d by integrating b** (a) o v e r this interval, yieldingEquation (6) was used
to
calculate t h e adjusted birthrates
used in t h e simulations r e p o r t e d below.F u r t h e r generality could b e incorporated into t h e analysis, f o r example by in- troducing "duration dependenae" as well as a g e dependenae, by using parity- specific birth rates. and by taking acaount of persistent intergenerational pat- terns, suah as positive correlations between t h e fertility behavior of mothers and t h e i r daughters (see Preston, 1976). or between t h e longevity of p a r e n t s and t h e i r offspring (Jaquard, 1982; Hrubec
et
al., 1984); suah generalizations a r e , however, beyond t h e saope of t h e p r e s e n t paper.Simulations Perfoxmed
Three variants of t h e simulation procedure described above w e r e performed f o r this study. A l l are based upon period fertility and mortality data f o r t h e Neth- erlands, supplied by Jan Bartlema (for
a
r a t h e r different approachto
t h e study of kinship, based upon t h e same data, see Bartlema and Winkelbauer, 1986). The baserun
uses a fertility schedule implying atotal
fertilityrate
of 2.65, which i s ap- proximately t h erate
prevailing in 1 - 7 0 , anda
mortality schedule implying life ex- peotanciesat
birth of approximately 78 y e a r s f o r women, and 72 y e a r s f o r men (figures closeto
those prevailing in t h e period data f o r 1980). Sinoe t h e simula- tions produce kin frequencies f o r t h e s t a b l e populations implied by the input parameters, t h e r e s u l t sare to
be interpreted as illustrative of a givenpattern
of b i r t h s and deaths, r a t h e r than a representation of a real population.Two variants upon t h e base simulation
were
also performed. The f i r s t ,a
low- mortality variant, used age-specific mortalityrates
uniformly 25 p e r c e n t lower than those in t h e base run. This modification implies, in turn, abouta
5 p e r c e n t in- o r e a s e in life expectancy. This increase i s only slightly higher than t h e projected increase, by 2020, for t h e Netherlandsas
given in t h e United Nations projections.The second simulation variant,
a
low-fertility variant, assumes a uniform 40 p e r c e n t d r o p in age-specific fertility r a t e s ; t h a t is,a
d r o pto
atotal
fertilityrate
of approximately 1.6. A d r o p this dramatic was, in fact, attained in t h e Nether- lands between 1970 and 1980. Accordingto
t h e United Nations projections, t h e to- tal fertilityrate
in t h e Netherlands w i l l be only slightly below the 1.6 level f o r t h erest
of t h e 20th century, and will again rise, ands u r p a s s
this level, e a r l y in t h e next century. Thet w o
variant simulationsare
included in o r d e rto
assess t h e like- ly consequences-with r e s p e c tto
t h epatterns
of living kin availableto
provide support f o r aged parents--of realistic demographic trends.Base sirnulortion. The
results
obtained f o r the base simulation aresummar-
ized in Table 1, which p r e s e n t s kin patterns from t h e viewpoint of women. This table refersto a
simulated population containing approximately 30,000 women. The population w a s generated by simulating t h e successive offspring ofa
l a r g e number of "seeds", as explained above, and sampling from t h e resulting population a f t e r 300 y e a r s of simulated evolution. Column (2) of t h e table shows t h e distribution of t h e cross-sectional population a f t e r 300 y e a r s of evolution by %year a g e groups;this distribution a g r e e s quite w e l l with t h e stable age distribution obtained when t h e same vital
rates
are usedto
constructa
conventional life table. In o t h e r words, t h e simulation a p p e a r sto
have successfully represented t h e stable popula- tion implied by t h e input data.Table 1. Summary of simulated kinship patterns, base simulation.
Basic r e s u l t
Key t o colusns:
Age group
Proportion o f population i n age group Proportion i n age group with l i v i n g mother
Average age o f l i v i n g mothers of those i n age group Hean number o f l i v i n g daughters o f those i n age group Average age o f l i v i n g daughters o f those i n age group Proportion i n age group with no l i v i n g daughters Hean number o f l i v i n g sons o f those i n age group Average age o f l i v i n g sons o f those i n age group Proportion i n age group with no l i v i n g sons
Hean number o f l i v i n g children o f those i n age group Average age o f l i v i n g children o f those i n age group Proportion i n age group with no l i v i n g children
Existing kinship models, notably t h a t developed by Goodman, Keyfitz and Pul- lum (1974), yield Information such as t h a t shown in columns (3) and (5) of the table:
t h e mean numbers, respectively, of living mothers and daughters of living
m e m b e r s
of t h e stable population. The expected patterns a p p e a r h e r e as well:at
birth,everyone's mother i s alive (in t h i s simulated population, no one under t h e a g e of 5 has lost t h e i r mother); t h e proportion with a living mother declines steadily, slowly
at
f i r s t , and more rapidly in t h e middle ages, reaching z e r o in t h e 80-84 a g e group.Column (5) shows t h a t t h e mean number of d a u g h t e r s exhibits a n inverted-u s h a p e o v e r t h e lifetime: t h e mean becomes positive in t h e earliest a g e g r o u p exhi- biting f e r t i l i t y behavior-the 15-19 a g e g r o u p - a n d rises
to
i t s maximumat
approx- imately t h e oompletion of childbearing.' T h e r e a f t e r , t h e Alean number of living d a u g h t e r s drops, reflecting mortality among t h e daughters. The mean number of sons [aolumn (8)] and of all children [column (11)] behave e x a c t l y as does t h e mean number of daughters.However, t h e miorosimulation a p p r o a c h
to
studying kinship permits usto
go beyond t h e use of a v e r a g e values, viewing t h e living-kin phenomenon in consider- a b l y g r e a t e r detail. Of p a r t i c u l a r i n t e r e s tare
columns (7), (lo), a n d (13) which p r e s e n t information on t h e frequency distribution of living offspring byage.
In t h e b a s e simulation t h e p r o p o r t i o n of women with n o living children r e a c h e s i t s low of 0.04 in t h e 40-44 a g e g r o u p , remaining virtually unchangedat
t h a t level through t h e 70-74 a g e group. T h e r e i s an indication that t h e proportion childless beginsto
r i s e r a t h e r rapidly among t h e oldest-old, especially those 90 and o v e r . This must remain a r a t h e r tentative conclusion, since so few members of t h e simulated popu- lation fall into t h e s e a g e groups. For example, t h e proportion childless in t h e 95- 99 a g e g r o u p (0.19) i s based upon a sample of 2 1 hypothetical women; ina
random sample froma
r e a l population yielding t h esame
r e s u l t s , a 95-peroent confidence i n t e r v a l f o r t h e t r u e p r o p o r t i o n childless would r a n g e from 0.022to
0.358. More- o v e r , t h e oonclusion i s of l i t t l e significance in pop&tions with t h e s t r u o t u r e of t h a t depicted in Table 1; in sucha
population less t h a n one p e r c e n t of t h e popula- tion falls into t h e 90-and-over category. However, if p r e s e n t demographic t r e n d s oontinue t h e oldest-old g r o u p s will g r e a t l y i n c r e a s e in r e l a t i v e terms, a n d t h e i r unique family situation w i l l take o n added significance.Also of i n t e r e s t i s t h e
data
provided in column (12) of Table 1: t h e a v e r a g e age of t h e living c h i l d r e n availableto
t h e population by age group. This a v e r a g e is, of c o u r s e , inoreasing o v e r t h e life cyole. N o t e t h a t ,on
t h e a v e r a g e , t h e chil- d r e n of t h e "oldest-old"are
themselves approaching r e t i r e m e n t age.%here are aorne minor irregularities In column (5)-and elsewhere in Table 1-reflecting the inev- itable presence of HontbCarlo "suapllng error" in the dmulation; even a simulated population of over 30,000 l a "small" f o r purposes of some of the diaaggregated statistics shown in Table 1.
Table 1 advances somewhat o u r understanding of t h e constmints faced by a society which wishes
to
t u r nto
t h e family as a source of support f o r the aged po- pulation. A s w e oonsider successively older ages, an increasing proportion of t h e elderly a r e without living offspring; among those with living offspring, t h e average age of t h e offspring i s itself approaohing, or within, t h e bounds of t h e aged category.However, w e
can
gain additional insights into t h e problem by taking f u r t h e r advantage of the microsimulation approaoh, and tabulating t h e simulated popula- tion along family lines. Table 2 does this, ina
r a t h e r simple way. taking account only of t h e mother-child relationship. Two age groups are reoognized: 20-64 and 85 plus, t h etwo
groups used in calculating t h e aged dependency ratio. In Table 2 members of t h e aged groupare
tabulated aceordingto
t h e number of living ohil- d r e n they have. Only womenare
counted in t h e tabulation of t h e aged group. Those in t h e 20-64 a g e groupare
tabulated aooordingto
(1) whether t h e i r mother is alive a d 65or
older, and (2) t h e size of t h e i r "sibship"-that is, t h e number of broth- ers and s i s t e r s they have, plus one (for themselves). Both men and womenare
in- cluded in t h e tabulation of t h e 20-64 group. sinoe both s e x e s r e p r e s e n t potential souroes of support f o r t h e i r elderly mothers.In Table 2, a woman i n t h e 65+ a g e category will be counted twice if h e r moth- er i s alive; onoe as one of t h e ahildren of h e r noth her, and once as
an
aged mother herself, classified accordingto
t h e number of living children (age 20+) s h e has.The table i s a r r a n g e d such t h a t as
we
r e a d down t h e oolumns,w e
encounter ohil- d r e nat
increcrstng risk of being responsible f o r t h e o a r e ofan
elderly mother, and w e encounter mothers with a demOQStng pool of child-resouroesto
osll upon f o r support. Thus. in column(I),
which shows t h e number of children aocordingto
t h e existelme of a n aged mother and t h e size of sibship, w e see t h a t 69.8 percent of ohildren 20-64 d o not have a n aged mother. This can mean e i t h e r t h a t t h e i r mother is alive but less than 65 y e a r s old,or
t h a t t h e i r mother i s not alive. The next fig-ure
in oolumn (1) is f o r children with an aged mother, and from sibships of five orm o r e .
Such ohildren, beoalm~e they have s e v e r a l b r o t h e r s and/or s i s t e r s , b e a r proportionately less of t h e burden of parental oare than d o children fromsmaller
s i bships-at least, on average. Moving down this oolumn, w esee
t h a t 2.4 percent of all persons aged 20-64, in t h e simulated population, are only ahildren-more pre- cisely. only Ltving children-with a living mother 85 or older.Table 2. Cross-tabulation of aged mothers and working-age children, base simulation.
Population Group
Children Mothers
Age 2084 Age 65+
(1) (2) (3) (4 (5) (6 (7) (8)
CumulaUve Proportion Cumulatlve
Proportion Proportion of 20-64 Proportlon Proportlon Number of Total of Total Number Group Number of Total of Total
N o living mother 65+ 21442 .698 .698
- - - - -
Mother 65+;
slbshlp = 5+ 1107 .036 -734 13 -012 300 .075 -075
slbshlp = 4 2208 .072 .808 36 .016 570 .I43 218
sibshlp = 3
slbshlp = 2
elbshlp = 1 737 .024 1.00 20 .027 775 .I95 .B55
N o Hvlng ahildren
- - - - -
176 .044 .999Total 30699 1.00 180 3976 1.00
In reoognition of t h e f a c t t h a t those 65 or older may not be forced
to
rely ex- clusively on family members under 65, columns (4) and (5) of Table 2 show t h e numbers of "old siblings": these are children, aged 65 or more, of a living mother.In all cases, of oourse, t h e living mother i s
at
least 80 y e a r s old. The numbers are also expressed as ratiosto
t h e number of w o r k i n g w e children in each sibship [in column (5)]. The "old sibling" group ranges in size from 1.2 p e r c e n tto
2.7 percent of t h e oorresponding "young sibling" group.3 In o t h e r words, t h e pool of &nd- older siblings, availableto
assist w o r k i n g w e children in t h e care and support of aged mothers, i s relatively small.Columns (6) and (7) p r e s e n t t h e distribution of aged mothers acoording
to
t h e number of living children. The l a r g e s t single groupare
those witht w o
living chil- d r e n (28 percent of t h e total); a A t h e r small 4.4 p e r c e n t of t h e women 65 or older have no living children.The figures given in Table 2 allow
us to construct
an aged dependency ratio t h a t i s family-based, as w e l l as t h e usual population-based dependency ratio. Thus, we c a n establish t h e boundaries of family-based support f o r t h e aged population.This in t u r n should b e of considerable i n t e r e s t
to
those who s e e kto
use t h e instru- ments of public policyto
encourage a s h i f t of responsibility f o r t h e support of t h e elderly away from t h e s t a t e , and onto t h e family.First, t h e oonventional aged dependency r a t i o f o r t h e simulated population represented in Table 2 i s readily oomputed as 3976-the size of t h e 65+
population4ivided by 30699 in t h e w o r k i n g w e group, yielding a ratio of 0.13. In o t h e r words, if t h e prevailing policy f o r this population dictated t h a t t h e working- age population s h a r e d fully and equally t h e burden of support of t h e aged, and if t h e aged all received a n equal level of support, then each w o r k i n g w e individual would b e required
to
provide .13 units of support f o r t h e aged (ignoring, in this ar-tificial situation, t h e existenae of aged men).
A t t h e opposite extreme, w e might envision a s y s t e m whereby t h e
state
pro- vides no support f o r t h e elderly, and r e q u i r e s any such supportto
aome from fami- ly members. However improbable sucha
scheme may seem, i t is instructiveto ex-
amine t h e distribution of t h e aged dependency burden in such
a
situation. First, i t i s a p p a r e n t t h a t between 4 and 5 peroent of t h e aged, under this extreme policy,%he "older/younger" distinction i s not npproprlate in the came of only children; the relevant row of Table 2 tells ue that of all llvlng only chlldren with a mother of 65 or older, 737 were ln t h e 20- 64 age group, and 20 were in the 65+ age group.
have access
to
no support from the working-age population whatsoever. Moreover, nearly 70 p e r c e n t of t h e working-age population b e a r s none of t h e aged dependen- ay burden whatsoever. Among those working-age individuals who do have an aged parent, t h e dependency r a t i o is quite high: i t is 3976 minus 176 (or, t h e number of aged with a t least one living working-age offspring) divided by 30699 minus 21422 (or, t h e number of working-age children with a living aged mother), or 0.41.An intermediate scheme f o r t h e provision of support
to
the aged population can also be examined. Imagine, f o r example, t h e following simple scheme: thestate
provides a minimum level of supportto
all members of t h e aged population;those with no family members
to
call upon receive only this minimum. Those aged with working-age f d l y members reaeive a standard supplementto
t h e minimum, t h ecost
of which i s s h a r e d within working-age "sibships". Thus, a working-age in- dividual with a n aged p a r e n tto
support, but with no working-age siblings, must contribute a full s h a r e of t h e supplemental support allowance;a
working-age indi- vidual with a n aged parent, and with one working-age sibling, need contribute only half a s h a r e of t h e supplemental support allowanae; and so on. In this plan, aged with many offspring are no b e t t e r off than aged with few offspring.Each of t h e t h r e e hypothetical support systems described above-the population-based scheme, t h e family-based scheme, and t h e mixed scheme-implies a different distribution of t h e aged dependency burden across t h e working-age po- pulation. These distributions
are
represented pictorially, as Lorenz curves, in Figure 6. In this figure t h e horizontal axis r e p r e s e n t s cumulative proportions of t h e working-age population, and t h e vertical axis r e p r e s e n t s cumulative propor- tions of t h e support burden borne by this population. The working-age population i s o r d e r e d , by individual, accordingto
t h e s h a r e of t h e support burden individual- ly borne. The ordering i s from t h e lowestto
t h e highest s h a r e s of t h e aged sup- p o r t burden borne. Thus, in t h e extreme family-only scheme, eaah of t h e nearly 70 p e r c e n t of t h e working-age population without living aged parents b e a r s none of t h e support burden, and comes f i r s t in t h e a r r a y .Next
c o m e children from t h e largest "sibshipsf', since theym u s t
provide t h esmallest
fraation of a unit of sup- port; last c o m e only-children (that is, only-working-age ahildren) witha
living aged parent, eaah of whom i s fully responsible f o r t h e support of t h e i r parent.This scheme is represented by t h e lowest of t h e t h r e e lines graphed in Figure 6, t h e d a t a f o r which can be found in columns (3)--representing the horizontal axis, cumulative proportion of children by support burden borne--and (6)--representing t h e cumulative amount of s u p p o r t burden borne--of Table 2.
Figure 6. Distribution of aged dependency burden under alternative support schemes: base simulation.
The uppermost line shown in Figure 6 shows the distribution of t h e aged dependency burden under t h e population-based support scheme: this is a scheme characterized by complete equality, and hence i t a p p e a r s as a 45-degree s t r a i g h t line. The middle line r e p r e s e n t s a mixed system, in which one-half of a "standard unft" of support fs collectively provided, while family members s h a r e equally in the provision of t h e remaining half of t h e standard unit. Even this intermediate scheme dfstributes the burden of support f o r t h e elderly r a t h e r unequally, as indi- cated by the divergence of t h e line from t h e 4 5 4 e g r e e line of uomplete equality.
The distributions shown in Figure 6, i t must be remembered, r e f e r only to t h e s u p p o r t burden borne by t h e working-age population. The distribution of support received by t h e aged themselves under t h e t h r e e schemes i s a completely different matter, although t h e relative p a t t e r n s of inequality in t h e provision and reueipt of
support are t h e
s a m e
across schemes: the population-based scheme confers equal s h a r e s of the burden across t h e e n t i r e working-age population, and bestows equal benefits across t h e aged population. A t the o t h e r extreme, the strictly family- based scheme distributes both the support burden, and the provision of support,m o s t
unequally: a majority of the working-age population b e a r s no support burden, and a small minority (about 4 percent) of t h e aged population receives no support.The mixed scheme i s intermediate, with respect
to
both the working-age and the aged population.W e have seen how prevailing population parameters constrain t h e scope f o r shifting the burden of support f o r the aged from t h e
state to
t h e family. How does this picture change, ifat
all, when w e consider t h e situation under alternative demographic scenarios?-that is, in t h ecase
of increased life expectancy and re- duced fertility, both of which are expected t o take place? For a nanswer to
this question, w e can examine t h e patterns implied by each of t h e variant simulations described e a r l i e r .kriant s i m u l a t i o n s . The reduced-mortality and reduced-fertility variant simulations allow us to explore t h e partial effects of ongoing demographic trends t h a t are being experienced in both IIASA and non-IIASA countries. Appendix Tables A and B-identical in format
to
Table 1-present details of the kinship pat-terns
generated by the t w o variant simulations. The most important change caused by a d r o p in mortalityrates
i s a r i s e in t h e proportion of the population with a liv- ing mother. This r i s e f i r s t becomes a p p a r e n t in t h e 25-29 age group, and i s on t h e o r d e r of a 50-100 percent increase f o r those approaching retirement age.A comparison of the reduced-fertility scenario
to
the base simulation revealsa
substantial increase in t h e proportion of t h e population o v e r 65, and in the pro- portion childlessat
virtually a l l ages 15 and over. However, while t h e r e are dramatic changes with respectto
offspring, t h e r e i s essentially no change with r e s p e c tto
parents: t h e proportion with a living mother i s about t h e same,at
all ages, as in the base simulation.Key findings from all t h r e e simulations
are
displayed in Table 3. For each in- dicator shown, t h e reduced-mortaiity simulation differs very little from t h e base simulation. Recall that in this alternative scenario, life expectancyat
birthw a s
given a modest five p e r c e n t increase. Accordingly, under the alternative scenario t h e proportion of the population o v e r 65 shows a modest increase: from 0.13to
0.15. Correspondingly slight changes can be found f o r each of t h e o t h e r indica-tors
shown.Table 3. Summary of kinship indicators for t h r e e alternative simulations.
Low-mortality Low-fertllity
Base variant variant
Proportion of population aged 65+ .13
.
I 5 .23 Proportlon of working-aged populationwithout aged parents .70 .66
Proportion of aged population without
working-age offspring .04 .05
Population-based aged dependency ratio .I3 -13 .21
Family-based aged dependency ratio .41 .37 .53
In contrast, t h e reduced-fertility simulation produces dramatic shifts in the a g e and kinship
structure
of t h e population. Again, this simulation assumes fertili- ty rates t h a t are 40 p e r c e n t lowerat
all ages than in t h e base simulation. A s a result, t h e proportion of t h e population in t h e a g e 65+ group r i s e s significantly, from 0.13 to 0.23. A s already mentioned, however, t h e proportion of t h e working- age population with a living aged mother changes little--a d r o p from 0.70to
0.66- while t h e proportion of t h e aged population without working-age offspring is great- ly increased, from about 0.04to
0.17.Both t h e population-based dependency r a t i o - t h e r a t i o of elders
to
t h e working-age population--and t h e family-based dependency r a t i o - t h e r a t i o of eld-ers
with working-age offspringto
working-age individuals with a living aged parent--are distinctly higher in t h e simulated reduced-fertility world. The former exhibits a 62-percent increase, while t h elatter
exhibits a m o r e modest 3 0 p e r c e n t increase. Y e t within t h e working-age population, t h e distribution of relutive s h a r e s of parental support obligations i s almost indistinguishable across all t h r e e simulations; illustrations of this distribution, analogousto
t h a t shown in Figure 6 f o r t h e base simulation,are
virtually identical in appearance, and henceare
not shown.The
m o s t
striking c o n t r a s t s suggested by t h e t h r e e sets of results, then, per- tainto
t h e LmeLs of dependency burdens, and the gross, overall patterns of poten- tial kin-support linkages between t h e aged and working-age populations. Reducedfertility not only raises t h e aged dependency r a t i o , i t r a i s e s t h e proportion of eld- ers with no working-age offspring
to
call upon ( o r f o r t h estate
t o t u r n to); i t in- creases t h e a v e r a g e number of aged p a r e n t s p e r working-age adults with living aged parents, but d a e s not particularly a f f e c t t h e proportion of working-age adults witha
living aged p a r e n t .W e close this section with
a
reminder t h a t t h e simulation model used in t h e analysis, like all models, omits c e r t a i n elements of t h e phenomenon being studied.Since t h e model used d a e s not i n c o r p o r a t e nuptiality, t h e existence of husbands and f a t h e r s cannot b e taken into account. Accordingly c e r t a i n qualifications must b e placed on t h e analysis. Spouses are in f a c t
a
leading s o u r c e of s u p p o r t f o r t h e dependent elderly. By omitting spouses, w e ignore a potential s o u r a e of s u p p o r t f o r t h e o l d e r women in t h e population. Even more, however, we ignore a potential demand upon t h e o l d e r women: namely, t h e demands of aaregivingto
t h e i r own aged spouse. Similarly, from t h e perspective of w o r k i n g e e children o u r ignoring of f a t h e r s means t h a t w e o v e r s t a t e t h e e x t e n t of dependency among t h e i r mothers.However,
w e
ignore a n additional (but empirically minor) c l a i m upon t h e working-age children: t h e existenoe of widowed f a t h e r s .IV. SUMMARY AND
CONCLUSIONSTo summarize, this p a p e r h a s examined t h e aged dependency burden issue
at
a microanalytic level,at
t h e level of individual kin-network ties. Aggregate popula- tion data f o r t h e r e c e n t past, and projections f o r t h e aoming decades, r e v e a l pat- t e r n s of low fertility and rising life expectancy f o r t h e world as a whole, and f o r t h e IIASA countries in particular. These t r e n d s in vitalrates
will, in t u r n , lead t o increasingly aged population s t r u c t u r e s , with a higher r a t i o of o v e r 4 5 peopleto
working-age-defined as t h e 2 0 4 4 a g e group-people.This p a p e r h a s presented findings from simulation analyses designed
to
r e v e a l the p a t t e r n of linkages between individuals within t h e aged and t h e working-age populations. For t h e r a t h e r simple models used h e r e , t h e only necessary input data w e r e age-specific schedules of fertility and mortality. Yet the type of infor- mation g e n e r a t e d by t h e model i s not generally available: f o r those countries which maintain complete population r e g i s t r y systems, suchas
t h e Scandinavian countries, kin-linkage information could b e e x t r a c t e d with some e f f o r t ; in o t h e r countries, d a t a on kinship linkages has, on only a few occasions, been obtained in sample surveys.The principal finding of t h e analysis
w a s
a pronounced lack of overlap of t h e aged and t h e working-age populations, with r e s p e c tto
nuclear-family kinship ties.Using d a t a which imply a s t a b l e population similar in s t r u c t u r e
to
t h e Netherlands in 1984, w e find t h a t nearly 70 p e r c e n t of t h e working-age population does not have a living aged p a r e n t , while about 4 p e r c e n t of t h e aged population has no offspring in t h e working-age group. F u r t h e r reductions in mortality will tendto
e x a c e r b a t e this lack of overlap only slightly, while reductions in fertility ona
scale t h a t h a s actually been observed i n s o m e industrialized nations will signifi- cantly e x a c e r b a t e t h e situation.A tabulation of t h e working-age and aged populations according
to
t h e ex- istence of living kin in e a c h a g e group helpsto
define t h e extreme bounds f o r t h e use of family membersas
a n alternativeto
collective s u p p o r t of t h e elderly. Demo- g r a p h i c realities preclude t h euse
of t h e family as t h esole
s o u r c e of s u p p o r t f o r t h e elderly, since some of t h e aged population i s without working-age family membersto
t u r nto
f o r support. Mixed schemes of s u p p o r t f o r t h e aged c a n b e usedto
combine collective and kin-based responsibility f o r supporting t h e aged population; t h e resulting public policy problem involves tradeoffs among t h e fol- lowing t h r e e factors: t h e adequacy of s u p p o r t given t h e worst-off aged, t h e bur- den placed on t h e public budget by t h e universal component of t h e aged-support scheme, and t h e burden placed on those with aged p a r e n t s by t h e family-based component of t h e aged-support scheme. To each possible solutionto
t h e policy problem t h e r e correspondst w o
distributional analyses, one pertainingto
t h e sup- p o r t burden borne by t h e working-age population (illustrated, f o r example, in Fig-ure
6) and one pertainingto
t h e benefits enjoyed by t h e aged population.The analysis presented in this p a p e r is, of course, only a f i r s t step. More complicated demographic models c a n easily b e envisioned. However, a
more
com- plete analysism u s t
g o beyond demography, and t a k e account of t h e incentive ef- f e c t s of public policies. Attemptsto
compel a shift of t h e burden of supporting t h e aged away from t h e public budget and onto family members may, in t h e long run, in- fluence t h e v e r y behaviors t h a t give riseto
kinship p a t t e r n s in t h e f i r s t place.Aaron, Henry J. (1986) When i s
a
Burden Not a Burden? The Elderly in A m e r i c a . The Brookings Review, Summer 1986, pp. 17-24.Bartlema, Jan and P e t e r d e Jong (1985) S h r i n k i n g Kinship-support Networks i n the Netherlands: The Numerical Results of a S m u l a t w n . Catholic Universi- ty of Tilburg, P r o g r e s s Report.
Bartlema, Jan and Lothar Winkelbauer (1986) Modelling K i n s h i p with
UP:
A 2 b o - S ~ model of Kin-Counts. WP-86-69. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute f o r Applied Systems Analysis.Goldman, Noreen (1978) Estimating t h e Intrinsic Rate of Increase of a Population from t h e Average Numbers of
Younger
and Older Sisters. h o g r a p h y 15:499-507.Goldman, Noreen (1986) Effects of Mortality Levels on Kinship. Consequehces of Mortalit y 7hwuis a n d ~ r e n t i a l s (Department of International Economic and Social Affairs, Population Studies, No. 95). N e w York: The Unit- e d Nations.
Goodman, Leo A., Nathan Keyfitz, and Thomas W. Pullum (1974) Family Formation and t h e Frequency of Various Kinship Relationships. Thsoretical Population Biology 5:1-27.
Goodman, Leo A., Nathan Keyfitz, and Thomas W. Pullum (1975) Addendum. Theoret- ical Population Biotogy 8:376-381.
Hammel, E.A., K.W. Wachter, and C.K. McDaniel (1981) The Kin of t h e Aged in A.D.
2000: The Chickens Come Home
to
Roost. In S.B. Keisler, J.M. Morgan, and V.K. Oppenheimer (eds.), Aging: Social Change. N e w York: Academic Press.Howell, Nancy and Victor A. Lehotay (1978) AMBUSH: A Computer Program f o r Sto- chastic Microsimulation of Small Human Populations. American Anthropolo- gist 80:905-922.
Hrubec, Z., B. Floderus-Myrhed, V. d e Faire and S. S a r n a (1984) Familial Factors in Mortality with Control of Epidemiological Covariables: Swedish Twins Born 1886-1925. A d a Ogneticae Medicae Qemllogia 33:403-412.
Jaquard, A. (1982) Heritability of Human Longevity. In S.H. Preston (ed.), Bip logical a n d Social A s p e d s of Mortality a n d the Length o f L m . Liege, Belgi- um: Ordina Editions.
Joffe, A., and W.A. O'N. Waugh (1982) Exact Distributions of Kin Numbers in
a
Galton-Watson Proaess. Journal o f d p p l i e d ProbabiLity 19:767-775.Keyfitz, Nathan (1985) Applied Mathematical Damography. Second edition. N e w York: Springer-Verlag.
Krishnamoorthy, S. (1980) Effects of Fertility and Mortality on Extinction of Family and Number of Living Children. Sbcial B i o t o w 27:62-69.
L e B m , H. and K.W. Wachter (1978) Living Forbears in Stable Populations. In K.W.
Wachter, E.A. Hammel and P. Laslett (eds.), S a t i s t i c a l S u d i e s of Historical Social S r u c t u r e . N e w York: Aaademic
Press.
Preston, Samuel H. (1976) Family Sizes of Children and Family Sizes of Women.
Dgmography 13:105-114.
Pullum, Thomas W. (1982) The Eventual Frequency of Kin in
a
Stable Population.Dwroography 19549-566.
Schmueli, Amir (1985) Family Support f o r the Elderly and Changing Demographic Regimes: Israel, 1960-1980. Extended version of a paper presented
at
the XIIIth International Congress of Gerontology, N e w York, July 1985.Schorr, Alvin (1980) "...Thy Fbther % Thy Mother...": A Second Look a t RZiaZ ResponsibiZity % Family Policy. U.S. Department of Health and Human Ser- vices, Social Seaurity Administration.
United Nations, Department of International Economic and Social Affairs (1985a) The World Aging S t u a t i o h : Strategies a n d Policies.
United Nations, Department of International Economic and Social A f f a i r s (1985b) World Population Prospects: Estimates a n d Projections as Assessed tn iBgZ. Population Studies series, no. 86.
Wolf. Douglas A. (1986) Simulation Methods f o r Analyzing Continuous-Time Event- History Models. In Nanay Turna, (ed.), Soctological Methodology S88.
Washington, D.C.: The Ameriaan Sociological Association.
Wolf, Douglas A. and Beth J. Soldo (1986) A Microanalytic Model of Community Care Arrangements. Presented
at
the Annual Saientific Meeting of the Gerontologi- cal Society of America, November 14-21, 1986, Chicago, Illinois.Appendix Table A
Summary of Simulated Kinship Patterns, Variant Simulation:
Reduced-Mortality Scenario
Reduced Mor t a l i tv Regime
Key t o columns:
(1) Age group
(2) Proportion o f population i n age group (3) Proportion i n age group n i t h l i v i n g rother
(4) A v e r a g e a g e o f l i v i n g m o t h e r s o f t h o s e i n a g e g r o u p ( 5 ) Mean nunber o f l i v i n g daughters o f those i n age group (6) Average age of l i v i n g daughters o f those i n age group (71 Propor t i o n i n age group n i th no l i v i n g daughters (8) Mean nunber o f l i v i n g sons o f those i n age group (9) Average age o f l i v i n g sons o f those i n age group (10) Proportion i n age group n i t h no l i v i n g sons
(11) Hean nunber o f l i v i n g children o f those i n age group (12) Average age o f l i v i n g children o f those i n age g r w p (13) Proportion i n age group with no l i v i n g children
-
- O ~ C - C - N - N - C . - W ~ O C U ~ - ~CQ o - r ~ - a c o ~ c o w ~ W c o ~ r - h ~ - a m m
-
d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d dm m m m U u - O * O * O ' J * O r - h . ~ ~ ~ r + ~ - O O
-
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0-
N d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d- W L w L W L w a
s . r l . r l g
s !q z-gs z.s; z.5
O + d w =J w + =J w + 3 a + L L L r n E r n L C r n L C r n L e n o o a a aao aao aao
n n L C L n E L n C L n w 0 0 w a a w 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ w 0
Z h h S ~ Z h P l h P l h