• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

European electricity grid infrastructure: barriers for further development and recommendations

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "European electricity grid infrastructure: barriers for further development and recommendations"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012

www.PosterPresentations.com

The European electric grid infrastructure was designed to satisfy national electricity needs, based on fossil and nuclear generating plants located near load areas. Climate change and energy security

concerns changed landscape of energy generation and requirements on transmission grid. Already today the existing European electricity grid is inadequate to cope with increasing volumes of renewable

electricity, which is generally concentrated in regions with low load, and then needs to be transmitted to high load and storage sites. The majority of grids is 30-40 years old, and needs to be replaced,

upgraded and expanded, especially in the case of cross-border

interconnectors. Considering the existing studies, two main questions remain unanswered, both in the context of super grid developments, and in terms of additional infrastructure needed for “smart grid”

integration of more distributed renewable power generation. First, and most importantly, is the question of whether the current

regulatory systems are sufficient. Do stakeholders view the current regulatory barriers to be associated with poor implementation of

existing laws and rules, or are the existing laws and rules themselves the problem? Could improved or amended regulations also influence the public acceptance issues? Second, and closely related to the

previous question, is the need to understand what the solutions could be at scales from local to European.

To answer these questions, we conducted a survey, supplemented with qualitative interviews and focus group discussions. Altogether we

received 108 complete questionnaires. The majority of stakeholders were from academia (22.1%), followed by energy supplier (13%),

renewable energy sector (10.6%), consultancy (9.6%) and

representatives of a variety of stakeholders from government, grid operators, NGO community and politics.

Introduction

Results: Regulatory Barriers

Results: Public Acceptance Issues

Public resistance is currently one of the major barriers for further development of grids. Suggested solutions to deal with public

acceptance issues clearly indicated the need for improved

implementation of existing regulations, although the most frequent category did call for additional and new regulations concerning sitting (table 3).

Table 3: Recommendations to improve public acceptance

Discussion

The results of the survey deliver two core findings: 1) there is a need for better, simplified, and standardised regulations; and 2) these

regulations should provide the basis for a strong and transparent

consultation process in all stages, from early planning to realisation.

Our results suggest that technology availability and maturity is not

problematic for further development of the European electricity grid.

In the presence of a suitable regulatory framework, neither the cost of technology, nor access to capital are considered problematic. Rather, the lack of regulations and acceptance for overhead lines are the

major bottlenecks. The inability to properly address public acceptance issues causes enormous delays.

Upcoming legislation on permitting, recently published by the

European Commission (COM 2011 658 final), begins the process of pan- European regulatory reform. The recent establishment of ENTSO-E and ACER begins to provide the institutional support for this to occur.

Moreover, developments on the ground show a clear interest of stakeholders to move towards the realization of these

recommendations. In October 2011, the European Commission has proposed legislation for speeding up the permitting process. All of these could prove to be important political steps, and could begin to provide the necessary regulatory framework to enable stakeholders to fully act and sufficiently address public concerns. More research will need to evaluate their effectiveness, and the needs for additional policies over the coming years.

Acknowledgment and Contact

The authors would like to thank the European Climate Foundation as well as the Smart Energy for Europe Platform (SEFEP), which

generously supported the research and writing of this paper. We are also very grateful to several experts, who found time to participate in stakeholders´ interviews and the focus group and were generous with their information and recommendations. We also would like to thank the SuperSmart Grid and the Renewable Grid Initiative, which

facilitated contact and identification of experts.

Contact

Nadejda Komendantova, IIASA, Risk, Policy and Vulnerability Program Schlossplatz 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria Email:

komendan@iiasa.ac.at In terms of barriers, the two most listed categories pointed to the

insufficiency or inappropriateness of current regulations, rather than to their poor implementation (table 1).

Table 1: Regulatory Barriers

International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)

Nadejda Komendantova, Patricia Brtnik, Anthony Patt, Antonella Battaglini

European electricity grid infrastructure: barriers for further development and recommendations

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Lack of comprehensive and stable regulations

Regulations do not reflect current situation in Europe

Grid planning is driven by national interests and coordination at the…

Lengthy and complex permitting

In terms of recommendations to overcome the barriers, the four most frequent categories suggested the need for new regulations, while only the fifth and least frequent sets of answers, involving more

stakeholders, left open room for improved implementation of the existing architecture (table 2).

Table 2: Recommendations to overcome regulatory barriers

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

Common European approach for regulations

Improvement of permission procedures

New approach for ownership and management of the grid

Improvement of regulations for new technologies

Involvement of additional stakeholders

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

Improve regulations for minimum distance near settlements Clear political statements and political

leadership

Improve nature protection legislation, environmental impact assessment of…

Introduction of common norms for magnetic fields in all EU countries Ensure transparency, accountability and

property rights

Nationalize electricity generation or grids

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

The hypothesis was thus con- firmed that free fluoride ions in solution around the tooth or enamel crystals play a much more important role in caries prevention than

Pavel Kabat, Director General and Chief Executive Officer, IIASA; Evgeny Vinokurov, Director, Centre for Integration Studies, Eurasian Development Bank; Paul de Lusignan,

bachelor's or master's thesis, the university shall only accept liability in the event of breaches by the supervisor or examiner. In the event of breaches committed by the

In contrast to the GDPR, the revised Data Protection Act (revDPA) applies to all compa- nies that have a registered office in Switzerland or whose processing has an impact here

On 27 August 2018 the Federal Office for National Economic Supply (FONES) published the Minimum Standard for Improving ICT Resilience (minimum ICT standard), together with

One idea for risk management for biocides was the development of harmonised codes of good practise for the application of biocidal products.. Examples were presented during the

The resulting framework is a genericised pathway to develop innovations in the digital health field; starting with the clinical need and idea, progressing through development,

The analysis of supply-demand interactions and of the social, economic, and technological implications of changes in demand level, induced by both supply constraints and changes in