• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

The current status and near future of Open Access – Top-down and bottom-up movements meeting in the middle?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "The current status and near future of Open Access – Top-down and bottom-up movements meeting in the middle?"

Copied!
27
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

The current status and near future of Open Access – Top-down and bottom-up movements meeting in the middle?

Mikael Laakso, D.Sc. (Econ.) Associate Professor

Hanken School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland

@mikaellaakso 6.4.2020

(2)

Open Access is constantly evolving

Open Access

The Needs of Scholarly Communication

Technology

Development Financial Aspects

Science Policy

Laakso (2014)

http://hdl.handle.net/10138/45238

(3)

EC Open Science Monitor:

Percentage of Open Access publications 2009-2018

https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/strategy/goals-research-and-innovation-policy/open-science/open-science-monitor/trends-open-access-publications_en

(4)

Per country

https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/strategy/goals-research- and-innovation-policy/open-science/open-science-monitor/trends-open- access-publications_en

Open Access does not happen by accident, the countries that have grown their OA output have strong policies driving the

adoption.

(5)

Per discipline

https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/strategy/goals-research- and-innovation-policy/open-science/open-science-monitor/trends-open- access-publications_en

Life sciences are

dominating the top, with a much larger share coming from Gold OA journals than the social sciences.

(6)

Researchers

Interrelated interests at many levels within the same organisation

Universities

Libraries

Conduct research and get it published Build collaboration networks

Get positions Get grants

Teach interesting and successful courses Have societal impact

Secure funding

Get competitive applicants

Appear attractive in rankings and comparions

*not an exhaustive list

How to best provide support for all of this, while facilitating Open Access?

(7)

Researchers Universities

Libraries

Intern. Science Policy

National Science Policy

Commercial Publishers

Research Funders

How to best grow Open Access by aligning

individual and

organisational goals and actions with science

policy?

(8)

Aligning and mixing carrots and sticks

Let´s have a look at some of these actors and try to identify various types of carrots and sticks at play….

(9)

The majority of European

institutions already have an open access policy in place

https://eua.eu/resources/publications/

826:2017-2018-eua-open-access-su

Universities

(10)

The five largest publishers now publish

around half of all scholarly journals Commercial Publishers

(11)

A hard fact

» Commercial companies, particularly publicly traded, are out to increase profits and seek growth.

» That is what makes shareholders happy and the leadership of the companies keep their jobs.

» This growth can come from expanding business into new areas, or it can come from increasing market share and/or prices in existing segments.

https://www.change.org/p/elsevier-boycott- elsevier-and-support-affordable-open- access-scholarly-publishing/sign

Commercial Publishers

(12)

Plan S

Obtaining attractive research funding (carrot) comes with the requirement of fulfilling requirements for Open

Access of results (stick).

Provides incentives for

journals to create compatible ways to publish.

Research Funders

(13)

Researchers are in general risk averse when it comes to merit accumulation

» Short-term employment with a strong ”up-or-out”

principle guides a lot of decison-making among researchers.

» (e.g. in Finland 70% of research and teaching staff is non-permanent).

» Primary focus on estabilished mechanisms and criteria for accumulating merit.

» Only after that can one be more adventurous, if there is any energy or sanity left.

» The decisions, needs, and priorities of

researchers are balancing between short- and

long-term (primarily individual) interests. http://www.acatiimi.fi/7_2018/12.php

Researchers

(14)

Researchers

(15)

Alignment of reward systems

» Without diversifying academic evaluation and merit systems change will be needlessly hard.

» It does not look likely that major publishers will initiate wide- scale ”flipping” of journals to open access, even in cases where hybrid OA uptake is rising.

Researchers

(16)

Need to be supported to guide OA

efforts to sustainable platforms

Researchers

(17)

It is possible: Editorial boards abandoning leading journals, “declaring independence”

It´s ultimately the scholars that

have the power for enabling change but coordinated effort is needed.

Researchers

(18)

The changing role of libraries

Libraries

(19)

Consortias are good for alignment.

The larger, yet unified in goals, the better

There is potential to further increase international collaboration

Libraries

(20)

Essential steps for transition

1. Open access made a common priority

2. Aligning financial decisions with policy decisions 3. Commitment, collaboration, and communication 4. Monitoring and analysis

Libraries

(21)

In what ways can libraries/universities fund open access publishing?

» Front end funding

(Supporting the system from the front)

» Back end funding

(Supporting the system from the back) A useful differentiation:

Libraries

(22)

Without a policy

there is no direction

» National policy for open access drafted with consideration for research funder

requirements, negotiations with international publishers, and goals for the development of national journal publishing.

» Things do not need to be 1-1, but there should be compatibility to reduce dissonance and

confusion among the national research community.

National Science Policy

https://avointiede.fi/sites/default/files/2020-03/openaccess2019.pdf

(23)

Setting up regional portals is a

good way to support OA locally

National Science Policy

(24)

Key takeaways

» Open access is increasingly required by different stakeholders and can be perceived as an additional burden, however, it is for the good of everyone.

» Co-ordination is needed to make wide-scale change happen, funders, universities and national consortia should collaborate to push towards the common goal of open access. But even individual acts by researchers matter!

» Don´t throw researchers under the bus, if something is required there needs to be incentives, support and likely funding for doing it.

(25)

© Hanken

Thank You!

(26)

Want to know more?

https://youtu.be/3rmbeWGgrWE

(27)

Q & A

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Alongside other elements of Open Science (such as Open Data, Open Educational Resources and Open Source Soft- ware), open access to quality-assured academic publi- cations in

• The National Library of Sweden supports the development of Open Access publishing within higher education, in the form of institutional Open Access repositories as well as

› 12 funders encourage and 7 require immediate open access through publication of articles in open access or hybrid journals (Gold OA). 29-Oct-15

Allerdings wird verschiedentlich auch darauf verwiesen, dass beim Zugang zu einem Forschungsfeld weder eine fixe Grenze überschritten werde noch sich das Feld nach Überschreiten

—perspectives on the publishing process of open-access journals: namely the view of an information provider experienced in international co-operation, the online journal

Genau wie B lade R unneR etabliert B lade R unneR 2049 einen Parallelismus zur Geschichte der afroamerikanischen Versklavung, jedoch wird in diesem Fall das

25.10.2013 Pekka Olsbo, Open Access Week, Tartu University... The Focus of

Given that self-archiving at such an early point in time de facto bypasses peer review, and given that peer review is highly regarded in both disciplines, it is asked in a next