• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

2005 1 MT3610A/MT5461A 1. (a) Let E

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "2005 1 MT3610A/MT5461A 1. (a) Let E"

Copied!
3
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

2005 1 MT3610A/MT5461A

1. (a) LetEn denote the binary even weight code of lengthn.

(i) Prove that En is a linear code.

(ii) Determine M, k, and d (in terms of n).

(iii) Give the generator matrix Gand the parity check matrix H. (Clearly state the dimension of the matrices).

(iv) List all codewords of the dual code En.

(b) Prove that in a binary linear code either all codewords have even weight, or exactly half of the codewords have even weight and half have odd weight. Also show that in a non-linear code this is not necessarily the case.

2. (a) Letq = 11 and n= 10. Consider the ISBN-code with

C1 ={x1x2· · ·x10 ∈Z1011:

10

X

i=1

ixi ≡0 mod 11}.

(i) Show that x10 =P9

i=1ixi mod 11.

(ii) Show that this code can be used to detect any single error.

(iii) Show that this code can be used to detect any transposition, i.e. any swap of two symbols;

e.g. 0123456789↔0423156789.

(iv) What is the minimum distance?

(v) Can the code be used to correct an arbitrary single error?

(vi) Can the code be used to detect an arbitrary pair of two errors?

(b) Consider two other codes defined by

C2 ={x1x2· · ·x10∈Z1015 :

10

X

i=1

ixi ≡0 mod 15}

and

C3 ={x1x2· · ·x10 ∈Z1011:

10

X

i=1

xi ≡0 mod 11}.

What are the disadvantages of these codes, compared withC1?

TURN OVER

(2)

MT3610A/MT5461A 2 2005

3. (a) DefineAq(n, d).

(b) Construct, if possible, binary (n, M, d)-codes with the parameters below. If no such code exists, state why.

(i) (7,2,7) (ii) (2,4,1) (iii) (6,3,5) (iv) (12,400,5)

(c) (i) Prove the existence of a linear [7,4,3] code.

(ii) From this show that A2(7,3) = 16.

(iii) Prove the following theorem:

Let d be odd. A binary (n, M, d)-code exists

if and only if a binary (n+ 1, M, d+ 1)-code exists.

(iv) From (ii) and (iii) determine A2(8,4).

(3)

2005 3 MT3610A/MT5461A

4. (a) Let the binary codes C1, C2, C3 be defined by the following generator matrices:

G1 =

"

0 1 1 0

#

, G2 =

"

1 0 1 1 1 0

#

and G3 =

"

0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0

# .

(i) Give generator matrices in standard form for these three codes.

(ii) Construct standard arrays for the three codes. Using the 3rd array decode 1101.

(b) (i) Assume the above codes and standard arrays are used for decoding. Let the error probability of a binary symmetric channel be p. For each of the three codes determine the probability perr(C) that any received vector is incorrectly decoded.

(ii) Assume that p is small. Compare the three codes: distinguish two appli- cations, where in one of these high accuracy is most important, and in the other one a good rate is more important.

(c) The binary repetition code of length 3 is used for communication on a binary symmetric channel with error probability p in the following way: whenever an error is detected one asks for retransmission. Evaluate the overall probability of accepting an error.

5. (a) State the Singleton bound on Aq(n, d).

(b) Prove the Gilbert-Varshamov bound

Aq(n, d)≥ qn Pd−1

r=0(q−1)r nr.

(c) (i) Define a Hadamard matrix of order m.

(ii) Prove: If a Hadamard matrix of order m exists, then also one of order 2m exists. Deduce that a Hadamard matrix of order 2mexists, for eachm= 2k, (k = 0,1,2, . . .).

(d) Prove thatAq(4,3) =q2if and only if there exists a pair of orthogonal Latin squares of order q.

END Christian Elsholtz

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

In this paper, I will examine the idea of error and, in particular, the notion of "random error" vis-à-vis the concept of development with an eye toward the question

To show that LWE with binary error is considerably easier than expected, we modify the hybrid lattice-reduction and meet-in-the-middle attack by Howgrave-Graham [25] (ref- ered to

(a) Write the residual for a(w, v) = f (v) in weak (Definition 2.3.8) and strong (Definition 2.3.11) form.. Compare to

Error rates and response times of correct responses were subjected to two-way analy- ses of variance (ANOVAs) with repeated measurement on the variables congruency

Consequently, including the large geoid omission errors associated with smaller scales in a box inverse model of the Southern Ocean increases the posterior errors of transport

This im- plies several improved upper bounds for constant- dimension codes, used in random linear network coding, and partial spreads.. Index Terms—divisible codes, projective

Modifying the mentioned code of size 329 we found a code of cardinality 333 with an automorphism group of order 4 , which currently is the best known construction of

In Section 3 automorphisms of order 3 of general binary q-analogs of Steiner triple systems STS 2 (v) will be investigated.. The main result is Theorem 2, which excludes about half