• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Foraging Ecology of Emperor Penguins Ilka Zimmer

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Foraging Ecology of Emperor Penguins Ilka Zimmer"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

0 10 20 30 40 50

CPUE

The relatively high provisioning rates necessary during chick- rearing result in emperor penguin foraging close to the colonies and over the Antarctic Shelf at this time.

0 20 40 60 80100120140160180200220240 0

2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000

Vertical extent

Trip duration (h)

0 20 40 60 80 100120140160180200220240 0

50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 350000

ARS-Index

Trip duration (h)

Emperor penguins, Aptenodytes forsteri,play an important role as top predators in high Antarctic marine ecosystems.

Being central place foragers they execute foraging trips to remote locations and consistently return to a central place, the colony, to deliver food to the chick. The present study focuses on the critical two month-period before fledging, when maximum growth of chicks occurs and food demand is high at the Pointe Géologie emperor penguin colony of about 3000 breeding pairs (Fig. 1).

First results

Foraging distribution

Diving activity

Introduction

Fig. 5.Bottom topography off Adélie Land as calculated from ETOPO1 minute gridded evaluation database. Foraging trips (n=21) of chick-rearing emperor penguins (n=10) in Nov/Dec 2005 (a). Pre-moult trips (n = 5) between Nov 2005 – Jan 2006; the last at-sea positions are shown by date (b).

Trips during the late chick-rearing period (Fig. 5a):

• Birds centred foraging over the shelf north-east of the colony.

• Median trip duration was 8.1 days (range 1.8 - 19.3 days).

• Median trip length was 396.5 km (range 81 - 858.7 km).

Trips prior to the moulting period (Fig. 5b):

• Birds dispersed widely to forage over deep water up to 600 km off the coast, and then moved back to the coastal shelf to moult.

• Median trip duration was 42.2 days (range 31 - 54 days).

• Median trip length was 3056.4 km (range 1762.3 - 3686.1 km).

• Last transmission occurred in the end of January.

5b

Mertz Glacier

Antarctic Continent Adélie Land Dumont D´Urville

Sea

111 km

12 Jan 2006 31 Dec 2005 20 Jan 2006

15 Jan 2006

14 Jan 2006 Pointe Géologie

5a

Pointe Géologie

Antarctic Continent Adélie Land

Mertz Glacier

Dumont D´Urville Sea

111 km

Conclusions

Foraging Ecology of Emperor Penguins

Ilka Zimmer 1, Rory Wilson 2, Joachim Plötz1, André Ancel3 1 Alfred-Wegener-Institut für Polar- und Meeresforschung in Bremerhaven (AWI) , Germany

2 University of Wales Swansea, UK

3 Département Écologie, Physiologie et Éthologie / Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique à Strasbourg (DEPE/CNRS), France

Fig. 1.Study site at 66°40´S, 140°00´E

Weddell Sea

Ross Sea Amundsen Sea

Davis

Dumont D´Urville Sea Sea

Fig. 2.Satellite Transmitter Wildlife Computers, USA.

Fig. 3.Devices attached on the lower back feathers of an adult emperor penguin.

Methods

• Study period:

From end October 2005 to end of January 2006.

• Cooperation between the AWI and the DEPE/CNRS.

• Equipped adult penguins: n = 18

• Devices: Two types of ARGOS transmitters (Fig. 2).

• Attachment: Tape-method (Fig. 3).

• Parameters measured: At-sea locations, dive depth, temperature and light.

SPLASH/

SPOT5

SPLASH+ SPOT5 SPLASH +

19 cm 17 cm

8 cm 7 cm

Ca. 80 g Ca. 100 g

Fig. 6.(a) Horizontal tortuosity and effort allocated to depth for a foraging trip made by an emperor penguin to elucidate prey search strategies (b) The area-restricted search index and catch per unit effort data (derived from counting irregularities in the depth profile) shows how these vary with time into the foraging trip (c) This example shows a foraging trip of 10 days duration, 667 km length with n = 1763 dives > 2 m over the Antarctic shelf.

6a 6b 6c

To examine how emperor penguins allocate their time to foraging in certain areas, we examined location and depth data recorded for full foraging trips (n = 5) and show an example (Fig. 6) for a single trip conducted during late chick-rearing. Trips were cut into sections and the effort put into vertical movement (derived from diving depths) and the horizontal tortuosity (derived from the straight line distance travelled between two points versus the total horizontal distance swum underwater between these points) examined for each section. Horizontal tortuosity appeared to change out of phase with vertical movement effort (Fig. 6a). Two overall measures for the foraging activity over a trip were the

“Area-Restricted-Search Index” (ARS) (derived from the total distance spent travelling underwater over a defined time interval divided by the straight-line horizontal distance travelled during that period) and the “Catch Per Unit Effort” (CPUE) (derived from the putative number of prey caught using points of inflections in the dive trace divided by the time spent underwater) (Fig. 6b). Both indices indicate that maxima tend to occur in the middle of the foraging track and minima at the start and end (Fig. 6c) auguring for rapid movement away from the colony to distant sites where prey concentrations are higher and best exploited by area- restricted search at depth.

Transit Search and acquisition Single emperor penguin track

27.75 km

Colony at Pointe Géologie 0.000

0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018

Horizontal tortuosity

Objectives were to:

• identify the foraging distribution and feeding grounds during late chick-rearing and before the adult moult by satellite tracking.

• determine the length and duration of feeding trips.

• describe the extent of horizontal and vertical movements during single foraging trips.

• reconstruct the foraging time/activity budget by the calculation of an Area-Restricted-Search index (ARS).

Acknowledgements

We thank the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, the Institut Polaire Français (IPEV) and Terres Australes and Antarctiques Françaises (TAAF) for their financial help and logistics support in realizing this project. Many thanks to C. Gilbert, M. Beaulieu, T. Raclot and A. Dervaux for help in field data collection and their advice.

14 Nov 12 Nov

6 Nov 8 Nov 10 Nov 16 Nov

Day of foraging trip

Divedepth(m)

0 - 50 - 100 - 150 - 200 - 250 - 300 - 350 - 400 - 450

Preliminary data indicate that during foraging in the late chick- rearing period, emperor penguins display both highly directed travelling and area-restricted search according to locality and this is likely to be due to maximizing the rate of net energy gain according to prey distribution and the costs of transport.

„Middle“ of foraging trip

The pre-moult foraging period allows extended periods at sea and the movements of birds indicate that this concession results in a different choice of foraging area to that observed during chick- rearing, with birds exploiting deep water far from the Antarctic shelf.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Theoretical rate of gain of prey (assuming a constant rate of ingestion per unit time during the bottom phase of the dive), calculated over the whole dive cy- cle, as a function of

The objectives of this study were: (1) to identify the foraging distribution of breeding emperor penguins from Pointe Ge´ologie during winter, late chick-rearing and adult

The foraging behaviour of 20 Chinstrap Penguins Pygoscelis antarctica breeding at Ardley Island, King George Island, Antarctica was studied during the austral summers of 1991/2

Absuact: DeplQyment ef devices which record timing and magnitude of food ingestion in two wandering albatrosses Diomedea exulans at sub-Antarctic Marion Island shows that

Similarly, the African penguins that we studied were feeding in water that was less than 40 m deep so that in both instances the predators diving capabilities

(c) Pooled two- and (d) one-dimensional x-axes ( y-axis similar, not shown) move length distribution of snails in the fractal landscape with maximum-likelihood fits of

• central line associated bloodstream infection treatment duration coagulase negative. • central line associated bloodstream infection treatment duration

In his reply, Dingemanse (2017) agrees with our first criticism and continues to illustrate our second point by arguing that personality research has adapted quantitative