• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Figure 1 (a-d): Results of the MCA for the Not-for-profit sector stakeholders

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Figure 1 (a-d): Results of the MCA for the Not-for-profit sector stakeholders"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Supplementary D: Stakeholder Group Example

As discussed in the manuscript we present detailed results on selected stakeholders from the Not- for-profit group.

Figure 1 (a-d): Results of the MCA for the Not-for-profit sector stakeholders. S1, S2, S3 are referring to options 1, 2 and 3.

Fig. 1 a) Results for respondent 1 in the Not-for-Profit group

Fig. 1 b) Results for respondent 2 in the Not-for-Profit group

Fig. 1 c) Results for respondent 3 in the Not-for-Profit group

Fig. 1d) Results for the Not-for- Profit group

(2)

According to Figure 1a, respondent 1 showed the highest satisfaction level for option 2.

Additionally, almost all single indicators for option 2 showed larger satisfaction levels compared to the other two options, with the exception of solidarity, equity and implementation costs, in which option 3 showed higher satisfaction levels. Thus one can conclude that stakeholder 1 had a higher preference (in terms of satisfaction) for option 2 and option 3, and valued option 1 the least. Stakeholder 2 (Figure 1b) valued option 3 the most, option 1 the second, and option 2 the least. Nearly all options received similar scores on most of the indicators; however, there are large discrepancies for the promotion of DRR indicator. According to stakeholder 2, this indicator showed higher satisfaction levels for option 1 and option 3. Stakeholder 3 valued option 2 (similar to stakeholder 1) the most, which was then followed by option 1 and option 3 (Figure 1c). Highest satisfaction levels are found for option 2, especially for the indicators support from MS and insurers, regulatory and overall feasibility and the promotion of DRR. The latter was seen as especially superior. Overall, option 2 was the preferred option for the not-for- profit group (Figure 1d), which is followed by option 3 and option 1. However, overall satisfaction of option 2 was achieved mainly through stakeholder 1 and stakeholder 3 and least valued by stakeholder 2. Hence, while from an overall satisfaction perspective, option 2 appears to be the most preferable, from the perspective that satisfaction should be equally distributed, option 3 may be better suited. The results can be used to address different concerns within this group, including the promotion of DRR as well as feasibility issues for the three options.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

the shared objective of achieving global SD, but our analysis emphasises that the climate activities in the NDCs can support the achievement of a multitude of SDGs and

performance of tests can be mitigated by confirmatory testing by RT-PCR (see below for examples of settings and needs for confirmatory testing and figure 1), or by using a scheme

The objective of WP6 task 6.3, is to propose a model(s) addressing the sustainability of the outcomes and concepts developed in PARADIGM taking into account the needs and

A dynamic LP is then just a linear program comprising of such static models which are interlinked via various state variables (i.e., different types of "inventories",

Para analizar el impacto del aumento del precio de los commodities sobre el sector externo de la economía argentina, se dividirá esta sección dos partes: en la primera

In this paper one of the most popular methods towards that end, the environmental input-output analysis with the use of NAMEA tables, is being combined with

After the review, based on international comparisons, the overall impression is that the existing framework for sustainable development and the Policy Cycle of the Chinese forest

The r a t e of production is constrained by wood supply (which is one of the major links between t h e submodels), by final demand for forest products, by labor