• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Achieving Climate-Land-Energy-Water Sustainable Development Goals in the Indus Basin

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Achieving Climate-Land-Energy-Water Sustainable Development Goals in the Indus Basin"

Copied!
17
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Achieving Climate-Land-Energy-Water Sustainable Development Goals in the Indus Basin

Adriano Vinca, Simon Parkinson, Edward Byers, Peter Burek and colleagues

April 10, 2019

International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)

Laxenburg, Austria

(2)

Water stress and other challenges

Challenges Water and land

Complex canal and irrigation system

Groundwater depletion and water storage

Very little flow reaches the sea

Lack of wastewater treatment

Food self-dependence

Burning of crops leads to air pollution

Energy systems

Electricity can be unreliable

Air pollution and GHGs increasing

Hydropower generation

Combined indicator of vulnerability hotspots in water, energy and land

Byers el al. (2018),ERL

(3)

How to strike a balance between objectives and challenges?

… and at what cost?

3

Integrated Policy Analysis

SDGs

India

A fg h a n is ta n

Pakistan

Transboundary Agreements

(4)

First round of meetings (2018)

• Identifying challenges

• Collecting regional data

• Generating stakeholders’ pathways, possible future scenarios

Vienna, May 2018

Stakeholder engagement

Second round of meetings (later this year)

• Round of results checking and discussion

• Capacity building

(5)

5

The core model

CWaTM MESSAGE

NExus Solutions Tools (NEST )

Infrastructure Planning MESSAGEix

(Huppmann et al., 2018) Distributed Hydrology

Community Water Model (CWatM) (Burek et al., 2018)

Water Techs

Energy Techs Land

Techs

Minimize total system cost Downscaling

Water and land-use

Upscaling

Potential ET

Effective precipitations Runoff availability

Vinca et al., (forthcoming)

(6)

Water

Waterdemand Urban*(and industrial) Rural*

Energy sector

Landsector

wastewater treatment and recycle

Waterreturn flowsfrom energy sector Return flows*

Electricity Urban

Rural

Hydroelectric potential Waterdistribution

Electricity Pumping

Desalination Waterdiversion

Waterdistribu- tion

nodeup node nodedown

Internal surface water+

Seawater

Groundwater+

Storage

Surfacewater Environmental fows

* exogenous

+limints are imposed based oninformation fromhydrolocialmodel Rivernetwork

recharge from rivers, canals and crop field

Data:

SSP-RCP water demand scenarios

Surface water availability

Current river flow, canals

Fossil groundwater, aquifer recharge

Storage, current and planned reservoir capacity

Water supply, diversion and treatment technologies

Indus water treaty

allocations

(7)

7

Energy

Water for cooling

Retunfows

Bio-fuel^ (ethanol or solid biomass)

Hydroelectric potential

Powerplants Fossil (natural gas,coal, oil, ccs)

Nuclear

Biomass &

co-firing

Solar & Wind

Hydroelectric

Electricitydemand

Urban* (and industrial)

Rural*

Watersector

Landsector Powertransmission

TransmissionHV (to other nodes) Distribution (internal)

Ruralgeneration Diesel generator SmallPV

Ethanol generator

Bio-fuel^ (ethanol or solid biomass)

* exogenous

^ crop residuescanbe transported assolid biomassor converted in ethanol, technolgies not represented here CO

2

and other emissions

Data:

• Solar, wind and hydropower potential

• SSP electricity sectoral demand

• Transmission and distribution networks

• Power and cooling

technology

(8)

Land

* exogenous.

§ total available areafor agriculture based on historical data Crops

Irrigated

Rainfed only

Irrigation systems Flood

Srinkler Drip Waterfor

irrigation

Electricity from grid or local generators

Cropproducts demand*

by country

Landavailability§

Biomass

transportation/

conversion Energy sector

Waterfor bio-fuel production

Crop residues

Total land constraints Crop products

Irrigation losses

CH

4

, other emissions, waterpollutants

Data:

• Land use/ availability maps

• SSP-RCP crop yields

• SSP crop products demand

• Irrigation technologies

(9)

9

Scenarios

Scenario Description Implementation

Common

assumptions to all scenarios

SSP2. RCP 6.0. Indus Water Treaty allocations. Planned hydropower projects in 2030. Current renewable energy policies. Maximum electricity imports fixed to baseline

Limited fossil groundwater extraction.

Set of different constraints, present also in the baseline (with the exception of those that refer to the baseline)

SDG 2, Achieve food security and promote sustainable

agriculture scenarios

SDG 2.4 By 2030, 100% implementation of modern so-called smart irrigation technologies that increase productivity and production relative

to 2015

SDG 2.4: No flood irrigation (except for rice) after 2030.

Smart irrigation is available.

Baseline: no smart irrigation technologies adopted before 2030

SDG 6 Water sector development scenarios

SDG 6.6 By 2020, protect and restore water-related ecosystems, including mountains, forests, wetlands, rivers, aquifers and lakes

SDG 6.3 By 2030, improve water quality by reducing pollution, halving the proportion of untreated wastewater and substantially increasing recycling and safe reuse globally

SDG 6.6 Minimum of 20% of natural flow left in rivers and aquifers by 2030.

SDG 6.3 Treat half of return flows treated by 2030, recycle one quarter of return

flows.

Baseline: no targets

SDG 7 Clean and Affordable Energy

Development Scenarios

SDG 7.2 By 2030, 50% By 2030 the share of renewable energy in the global energy mix = 50%

SDG 7.b By 2030, expand infrastructure and upgrade technology for supplying modern and sustainable energy services for all

SDG 7.2 Target on share of renewables (wind, solar, geothermal). Phase out of coal

SDG 7.b Phase out of once-through cooling, imposing capacity constraint.

Baseline: no targets

SDG 13 Climate

action SDG 13.a Implement the commitment undertaken by to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

SDG 13.a Ghg emission budget and climate scenario accordingly.

Baseline: no emission targets

(10)

10

Preliminary results

Comparing baseline with preliminary SDG 2+ 6 + 7 + 13 scenario

Low carbon tech and wastewater distribution and treatment.

Use of more efficient, but costly irrigation technologies.

Higher land requirements

Average yearly costs for the entire basin (2020-2050) Average yearly cross-sectoral energy, water and biomass flows

Less water used in agriculture

Much more energy required for pumping, treating, water infrastructure, power plants

Indus investment

Indus operational

baseline multiple_SDG baseline multiple_SDG 0

10 20 30

Billion USD peryear

type

electricity grid electricity import fossil_energy hydro

irrigation land use nuclear & ccs renewables

wastewater treatment water distrib

(11)

11

Single SDG, multi sector

-50 0 50 100

CO2

cost

fossil energy

groundwater

land use

river flow

total energy

Percentage variation from baseline

SDG13 SDG2 SDG6 SDG7

If positive:       

Sum (cost, emissions, energy) or average (others) between 2020 and 2050

SDG2: no significant changes SDG6: water constraints, more fossil fuel than in baseline

higher cost for water distribution

SDG7 and 13 similar even

though targets are different

(12)

SDG6 (water)

• Less water available for various uses, more groundwater

• Rain-fed agriculture, where land is available

• Land sector more

stressed when multiple SDG are achieved (nuclear water consumption)

Indus investment

Indus operational

baseline SDG6 baseline SDG6

0 10 20 30

BillionUSDperyear

type

electricity grid electricity import fossil_energy hydro irrigation land use nuclear & ccs renewables

wastewater treatment water distrib

IND PAK

2020 2030 2040 2050 2020 2030 2040 2050 0

10 20

Mha

baseline

IND PAK

2020 2030 2040 2050 2020 2030 2040 2050 0

10 20

Mha

SDG6

crop cottonfodder pulsesrice sugarcanewheat method irrigated rain

IND PAK

2020 2030 2040 2050 2020 2030 2040 2050 0

10 20

Mha

multiple_SDG

Ye ar ly la n d a llo ca ti o n f o r ag ri cu lt u re

Average yearly costs for the entire basin

(13)

13

Conclusions

• Environmental flow constraint strongly affect available surface water for energy and agriculture.

• SDG7 and 13 have a clear overlap as mitigation strategy, although different costs and advantages

• Rain-fed agriculture to adapt to water scarcity, more efficient irrigation technologies when the available land is limited.

Next steps:

• Re-discussing critical assumptions with stakeholders (i.e. groundwater, environmental flows, demand projections)

• Multi-criteria optimization,

• exploring different scenarios and questions:

national interests, reservoir expansion, hydropower

Indus Valley near Leh, Wikipedia

(14)

Adriano Vinca

Energy Program International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Laxenburg, Austria vinca@iiasa.ac.at

Thank you very much for your attention!

(15)

15

SDG7 (energy) and SDG13 (climate)

• Very high hydro potential in Pakistan

• Solar, Wind, geothermal, more expensive than nuclear, less water intensive

• Hydro and nuclear, more water consumption

Indus investment

Indus operational

baseline SDG13 SDG7 baseline SDG13 SDG7 0

10 20

BillionUSDperyear

type

electricity grid electricity import fossil_energy hydro irrigation land use nuclear & ccs renewables water distrib

IND PAK

2020 2030 2040 2050 2020 2030 2040 2050 0

100 200 300

TWh

baseline

IND PAK

2020 2030 2040 2050 2020 2030 2040 2050 0

100 200 300

TWh

SDG7

IND PAK

2020 2030 2040 2050 2020 2030 2040 2050 0

100 200 300

TWh

SDG13

technology imp_expwind solarrural gen. hydrogeothermal gas

SDG 7 and 13 presnt two alternative pathways to carbon neutrality, SDG7 is more costly

Ye ar ly e le ct ri ci ty g e n e ra ti o n

Average yearly costs for the entire basin

(16)

Sensitivity analysis

2500 5000 7500 10000

CO2eq emission

rcp rcp26 rcp60

model ensemble gfdl-esm2m hadgem2-es ipsl-cm5a-lr

SSP2

60 80 100

2020 2030 2040 2050

Nodal cost, Billion USD

rcp rcp26 rcp60

model ensemble gfdl-esm2m hadgem2-es ipsl-cm5a-lr

SSP2

0 5000 10000 15000 20000

CO2eq emission

model ensemble gfdl-esm2m hadgem2-es ipsl-cm5a-lr

ssp SSP1 SSP2 SSP5 40

80 120 160

2020 2030 2040 2050

Nodal cost, Billion USD

model ensemble gfdl-esm2m hadgem2-es ipsl-cm5a-lr

ssp SSP1 SSP2 SSP5

Cost

CO2eq emission

0

500 1000 1500

2 4 6 8 10 12

internal runoff

rcp rcp26 rcp60

model ensemble gfdl-esm2m hadgem2-es ipsl-cm5a-lr

2020

Internal runoff

from CWATM same for all SSP

500 1000

2020 2030 2040 2050

Groundwater extraction

rcp rcp26 rcp60

model ensemble gfdl-esm2m hadgem2-es ipsl-cm5a-lr

Water use:

Most noticeable differences among models and scenarios, rather than SSPs

Need to continue testing on the SDG scenario

Groundwater extraction MESSAGEix outputs

baseline scenario, different SSPs, climate models and climate scenarios (RCP 2.6 and 6.0)

(17)

17

Integrated solution framework

• Water-energy-land/food and climate

• River basin scale, up to 2050

• Hard linked integrated optimization

Include non-linearities across sectors

Integrate multi-sector social/distributional aspects (i.e. clean water/food/energy access) Limited detail compared to single sector models Time, effort, expertise for new development

• MESSAGEix framework

Open source framework ixmp toolbox

The nexus: interlinkages across resources and the SDGs

Source: Bleischwitz et al. 2018, Nature Sustainability

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Here, we propose an integrated nexus modeling framework co-designed with regional stakeholders from the four riparian countries of the Indus River Basin and discuss challenges

Groundwater Pumping in 2010 [ billion cubic meters per year ] Wind and PV average capacity factor (based on hourly data) Urban and rural water withdrawal and electricity demand.

The following equation [3] is used to express water withdrawal or consumption intensity i (e.g., m 3 /kWh net power output) as a function of heat-rate (how efficiently the

Matthew Gidden, Edward Byers, Peter Burek, Kristie Ebi 2 , Peter Greve, Petr Havlik, Astrid Hillers 3 , Nils Johnson, Taher Kahil, Volker Krey, Simon Langan, David Leclère,

• Water market and irrigation subsidy policies further reduce environmental flows compared to a climate change scenario without any policy intervention, with larger flow reductions

Water demand from other sectors (domestic, industry) is growing and in some cases exceeds the surface.

A common feature of the aforementioned agreements is their failure to address environmental objectives associated with joint management of surface and groundwater, and yet this

[r]