• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Subversive Mimicry in Contemporary Art and Culture

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Subversive Mimicry in Contemporary Art and Culture"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

1/2

Subversive Mimicry in Contemporary Art and Culture

Deadline: Jun 30, 2021 Maia Toteva

Call for Contributions to an Edited Volume on Subversive Mimicry in Contemporary Art and Cul- ture

Editors seek contributions to a collection of essays dedicated to mimicry and power in the “post- truth” era. The volume, tentatively titled “Walking with the Enemy: Reclaiming the Language of Power and Manipulation in the Post-Truth Era,” will examine the ways that writers, visual artists, and performers often mirror the language and performance of power in times of ideological crisis.

Rather than opposing political power directly, these artists and cultural figures imitate its lan- guage, symbolism, and structures, including propaganda, ideology, stereotypes, and other mech- anisms that sustain the status quo. The book offers the first in-depth comparison and theoretical analysis of subversive mimicry from a transnational perspective. It provides an account of the debates and controversies surrounding the current deployments of this strategy in art and culture at large.

Editors-in-chief: Gediminas Gasparavicius (University of Akron), Maia Toteva (Texas Tech Universi- ty), and Tom Williams (Belmont University).

Potential contributions could address (but should not be limited to) the following topics:

• ”Overidentification” or “Subversive Affirmation” in the work of Socialist-era artists and artists groups such as the Moscow Conceptualists, NSK in Slovenia, and The Orange Alternative in Poland.

• Mimicry as activism and spectacle in contemporary politics in the work of groups such as the Yes Men or comedians (e.g., Stephen Colbert or Sacha Baron Cohen).

• The uses of mimicry in contemporary artistic practices such as parafiction, the stereotypical grotesque, and mimetic exacerbation.

• The adoption of irony and mimicry by the political right during the past decade.

• The politics of mimicry in a post-truth moment when reality and fantasy have become difficult to distinguish.

• Aesthetic and political mimicry in colonial, post-colonial, and decolonial contexts.

We welcome contributions from scholars in various disciplines, including but not limited to art his- tory, history, political science, cultural studies, literature, and media studies. Interested contribu- tors are invited to submit abstracts (200 words) and a CV to Gediminas Gasparavicius, Maia Tote- va, and Tom Williams at: walkingwiththeenemy2021@gmail.com by June 30, 2021. Notification of acceptance will be sent out by July 31, 2021. As we plan to publish the edited volume in 2023,

(2)

ArtHist.net

2/2

selected contributors are expected to submit their drafts of articles (3500-5000 words) by March 2022.

DEADLINES:

June 30, 2021: for the abstract (notification by July 31, 2021) March 2022: for the article

Email for submission and contact: walkingwiththeenemy2021@gmail.com

Reference:

CFP: Subversive Mimicry in Contemporary Art and Culture. In: ArtHist.net, Jun 5, 2021 (accessed Feb 27, 2022), <https://arthist.net/archive/34268>.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Este artículo muestra algunos aspectos destacados de un fenómeno histórico de dimensiones planetarias: la globalización comercial y artística que, iniciada en la segunda mitad

However, at least during the historical periods in Mesopotamia, ominous signs were indeed interpreted as divine revelations and insights into the intentions of

This is followed by a full page copperplate engraving with female personifications of sculpture, painting - the latter being enhanced - and of architecture.. Then comes

Yet, Hofstede’s definition of culture will have less explanatory value if recent economic developments are the reason for changes in privacy legislation (e.g. introduce an open

The Idumaean Incursion into the Region of Southern Judaea 3 survival in Transjordan of the earlier tribes (Edomites, Moabites, and Am- monites) alongside the Arab tribes (headed

Acceptance of the idea of African ways of knowing would render difficult, if not impos- sible, a distinction between knowledge and superstition, or other kinds of irrational

A more elaborate Coptic legal language is attested for the last time in a monastic archive of sale documents dating from 833 to 850 CE.93 The few Coptic legal texts issued later,

Because flowers are so vastly different, as the insects serving them, the unifying concept must be quite abstract, like the value system mentioned above.. With physics and