• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

UNIVERSIT¨ AT KONSTANZ Fachbereich Physik

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Aktie "UNIVERSIT¨ AT KONSTANZ Fachbereich Physik"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

UNIVERSIT¨ AT KONSTANZ Fachbereich Physik

Prof. Dr. Matthias Fuchs

Raum P 907, Tel. (07531)88-4678 E-mail: matthias.fuchs@uni-konstanz.de

Renormierungsgruppe und Feldtheorie Sommersemester 2008

Ubungsblatt 4, Ausgabe 28.05.2008, abzugeben bis 04.06.2008 ¨

3. The Spherical Model

The n-vector model (often denoted the O(n) model) is a useful model in statistical physics in which n-component classical spins of fixed length are placed on the vertices of a lattice of dimension d. The Hamiltonian for this model is given by

H = 1 2

X

i,j

J ij s i · s j ,

where J ij is the coupling between sites i and j . The spin variable s i is an n-component vector s i = (s (1) i , s (2) i , · · · , s (n) i ), where i labels the lattice site and there are N sites in total. The vector s i is subject to the constraint that s i · s i = n. Special cases of the model are n = 0 (self avoiding walk), n = 1 (Ising model), n = 2 (XY model) and n = 3 (Heisenberg model). In 1968 H.E. Stanley showed that the n → ∞ limit of the n-vector model is equilivilent to the Berlin-Kac spherical model, first introduced in 1952. The advantage of studying the spherical model is that it is exactly soluble and yields non-classical values for the critical exponents.

(a) Why is the integral representation Z(K) =

Z

−∞

ds 1 · · · Z

−∞

ds N W ({s N }) exp − 1 2 β X

i,j

J ij s i s j

!

, (1)

equivilent to the standard expression for the partition function of the Ising model when the weight function is given by W ({s N }) = Q N

i=1 δ(s 2 i − 1)?

(b) The spherical model is a generalization of the Ising model in which the spin variables are allowed to take a continuous range of values (−∞ < s i < ∞). The spherical model partition function is again given by Eq.(1) but with the weight function

W ({s N }) = δ P N

i=1 s 2 i − N

. Discuss the differences between the spherical and Ising models. Why do we call this model ‘spherical’ ?

(c) The delta function can be usefully expressed using the Laplace representation

δ X

i

s 2 i − N

!

= 1 2πi

Z i ∞

− i ∞

dp exp p N − X

i

s 2 i

!!

. Use the identity − 1 2 β P

i,j J ij s i s j = N α − α P

i s 2 i1 2 β P

i,j J ij s i s j , to show that the partition function is given by

Z = e N α 2πi

Z α+i ∞

α − i ∞

dp e pN Z

ds 1 · · · Z

ds N exp − X

ij

ij + 1 2 βJ ij

s i s j

!

, (2)

where p ≡ p + α for arbitrary α. Why was it necessary to introduce the parameter α?

(HINT: Consider the convergence of the integrals).

(2)

(d) Assume translational invariance J ij = J i − j to show that Z = π N/2 e N α

2πi

Z α+i ∞

α − i ∞

dp exp pN − 1 2

X

q

log

p + 1 2 βJ q

!

, (3)

where J q ≡ P

j J j e 2πi(j · q)/L is the discrete Fourier transform of J i − j .

(e) We now specify to nearest neighbour interactions for which J ij = −ǫ (i, j nearest neighbours) and J ij = 0 (otherwise). First show that J q = −2ǫ P d

l=1 cos(2πq l /L), where L ≡ N 1/d . Next, replace the sum by an integral to show that

Z = (βǫ) 1 N/2 π N/2 e N α 2πi

Z α+i ∞

α − i ∞

dξe g(ξ) , (4)

where ξ ≡ p/βǫ and α is a large real number. The function g(ξ) ≡ N (βǫξ − φ(ξ)/2), where

φ(ξ) = 1 (2π) d

Z 2π

0

dω 1 · · · Z 2π

0

dω d log ξ −

d

X

k=1

cos(ω k )

!

and ω l ≡ 2πq l /L.

(f) Following all this rearrangement, the result (4) is suitable for approximation by the method of steepest descents, which becomes exact in the limit N → ∞. Use this approximation method to show that

Z ≈ (βǫ) 1 N/2 π N/2 e N α e g(ξ

s

)

p 2πg ′′ (ξ s ) , (5) where ξ s is the location of the maximum in g(ξ), obtained from solution of the equation

2βǫ = 1 (2π) d

Z 2π

0

1 · · · Z 2π

0

d 1

ξ s − P

k cos(ω k ) . (6)

In d = 1 and d = 2 the spherical model exhibits no phase transition. In d = 3 it can be shown that ξ s is a smooth function of β only for β < 0.25272/ǫ, thus identifying a critical point, β c = 0.25272/ǫ. Take the logarithm of Z followed by the limit N → ∞ to obtain the exact free energy per site of the spherical model

βf = 1

2 log(βǫ/π) − βǫξ s + 1 2

1 (2π) d

Z 2π

0

dω 1 · · · Z 2π

0

dω d log ξ s −

d

X

k=1

cos(ω k )

!

− α (7) (g) We can now use our results to calculate some critical exponents. Specializing to d = 3,

prove that near β c we have (ξ s − 3) ∼ (β c − β) 2 (HINT: The integral in (6) is dominated by the low ω behaviour of the integrand). Thus calculate the susceptibility and show that χ ∼ |t| γ , where t = (T − T c )/T c , with exponent γ = 2. Calculate the internal energy per site u = dβf and thus the specific heat per site c = −β 2 du . Show that the specific heat exponent α = −1, where c ∼ |t| α ), i.e. there is no specific heat anomaly. The remaining exponents of the spherical model can all be calculated exactly, but require more involved calculations. The spherical model values β = 1 2 , δ = 5, η = 0 and ν = 1 should be

contrasted with the results from mean field theory and the Gaussian model.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

A host of researchers in the last 15 years [8] have suggested another way to explain software architectures: Instead of pre- senting an architectural model as a

The Allocation of Feed Costs to Livestock Feed Allocation for t h e Basic Linked Approach An Allocation Between Four Livestock Classes Derived Feed

The key parameters of the F2 layer, namely the maximum electron density, the corresponding height and the scale height, are estimated from the combination of GPS-STEC observations

The AdS/CFT correspondence according to this suggestion may be seen as a two- step procedure: Starting from the correlation functions in the large N expansion of the conformal

1In our analysis we will couple all parameters to the illumination time t. However, for ease of readability we omit the subscripts t , i.e.. Figure 2.1: Resolution as a

There is no change of energy supply pattern (Figure 3.8). 6) As for the demand sector of miscellaneous thermal uses, while LWR electricity meets about 40% of the total demand

One more remark should be made on statistical and systematic errors which seem to be closely linked in the following way. As it can be seen from figures 4.6 to 4.9, the larger

Problem, Algorithm and Program Problem –given: the encoding of an input over an alphabet Σ –output: the encoding of the answer to a given question Example: –given: two natural