• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Supplemental Table 1: Preoperative Evaluation. All data are collected anonymously.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Supplemental Table 1: Preoperative Evaluation. All data are collected anonymously."

Copied!
3
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Supplemental Table 1: Preoperative Evaluation. All data are collected anonymously.

Preoperative Primary Data (basic)

Secondary Basic Data (advanced)

Demographic Patient ID Smoking (+Pack Years)

Birthday Alcohol

Gender Employment Status

BMI, Weight, Height Job Description

ASA-Classification Sports

Study Agreement Previous Surgeries

Co-Morbidities Surgical /

Arthroplasty

Admission report + date Approach Discharge report + date Patient Position Procedure (Primary/Secondary) Surgeon + Experience

Date of Surgery Duration Surgery

Side operated, Dominance Additional Measures Name of Surgery (c&p) Stem Length + Diameter Indication to Surgery (c&p) Inlay high

Indication (prespecified fields) Glenoid Grafting Arthroplasty Manufacturer Glenoid Peg Length

Stem Type Glenoid Glenosphere Size

Cementation used

Surgical report (c&p) Stem Manufacturer Survey of the anesthesiologist (c&p) Stem Name

Stem Humeral Cup Glenoid Manufacturer Glenoid Name

Clinical Report (c&p) Range of Motion

Constant-Murley-Score [3]

Subjective Shoulder Value [6]

Satisfaction Radiographic

x-ray

Date x-ray

Evaluating physician Side

Critical Shoulder Angle [11]

Acromio-Humeral-Distance Class: Samilson&Prieto [12]

Class: Hamada [7]

Class: Favard Glenoid[8]

Class: Bigliani Acromion[9]

Maurer Angle[10]

Deltoid Tuberosity Index [15]

Radiographic CT Date CT

Walch Classification [16]

Subluxation Humeral Head (%) Glenoid-Version Friedmann[5]

Fatty Infiltration Rotator Cuff in Hounsfield Units

Abbreviations: C&P – Copy & Paste; CT – Computed Tomography.

(2)

Supplemental Table 2: Follow-up Evaluation. All data are collected anonymously.

Follow-up Regularly all 2-3 years + unregular

Clinical Report + Date

Range of Motion

Constant-Murley-Score [3]

Subjective Shoulder Value [6]

Satisfaction

Radiographic [4] Type (xray/CT) + Date Evaluating physician Notching (Sirveaux) [13]

Subluxation

Radiolucent Lines [14]

DSA & LSA [2]

Critical Shoulder Angle [11]

Humeral Offset [17, 18]

Heterotopic Ossification

Complication / Adverse Event [1]

Adverse Event [1] Date

Intraoperative vs. Postoperative Local (surgical site) vs. systemic Description

Exact Name (prespecified fields) Outcome

Reintervention Surgical Report + Date Indication

Name of surgery Surgical report Side

Surgeon + Experience Approach

Patient Position

Reoperation vs. Revision Changed components Additional Measures

Lost to follow-up Latest Update on Patient Information Latest Report available in the System Time from Surgery

Lost to follow + Reason if yes

Time of Lost to Follow-up from Surgery Abbreviations: CT – Computed Tomography

(3)

Classification References

1. Audigé L, Schwyzer H-K, Durchholz H et al. (2019) Core set of unfavorable events of shoulder arthroplasty: an international Delphi consensus process. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 28:2061-2071

2. Boutsiadis A, Lenoir H, Denard PJ et al. (2018) The lateralization and distalization shoulder angles are important determinants of clinical outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 27:1226-1234

3. Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res:160-164

4. Durchholz H, Salomonsson B, Moroder P et al. (2019) Core Set of Radiographic Parameters for Shoulder Arthroplasty Monitoring: Criteria Defined by an International Delphi Consensus Process. JB JS Open Access 4:e0025

5. Friedman RJ, Hawthorne KB, Genez BM (1992) The use of computerized

tomography in the measurement of glenoid version. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:1032- 1037

6. Gilbart MK, Gerber C (2007) Comparison of the subjective shoulder value and the Constant score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:717-721

7. Hamada K, Fukuda H, Mikasa M et al. (1990) Roentgenographic findings in massive rotator cuff tears. A long-term observation. Clin Orthop Relat Res:92-96

8. Huguet D, Favard L, Lautmann S et al. (2000) Épidémiologie, imaginerie,

classification del'omarthrose avecrrupture massive et non reparable de la coiffe. In:

Walch G, Boileau P, D M (eds) Shoulder prostheses 2-10 year follow-up.

Saurampsmedical, p 233-240

9. Lu B, Ds M, Ew A (1986) The morphology of the acromion and its relationship to rotator cuff tears. Ortho Trans. 10

10. Maurer A, Fucentese SF, Pfirrmann CW et al. (2012) Assessment of glenoid

inclination on routine clinical radiographs and computed tomography examinations of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:1096-1103

11. Moor BK, Bouaicha S, Rothenfluh DA et al. (2013) Is there an association between the individual anatomy of the scapula and the development of rotator cuff tears or osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint?: A radiological study of the critical shoulder angle. Bone Joint J 95-B:935-941

12. Samilson RL, Prieto V (1983) Dislocation arthropathy of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:456-460

13. Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D et al. (2004) Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume 86-B:388-395 14. Sperling JW, Cofield RH, O'driscoll SW et al. (2000) Radiographic assessment of

ingrowth total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 9:507-513

15. Spross C, Kaestle N, Benninger E et al. (2015) Deltoid Tuberosity Index: A Simple Radiographic Tool to Assess Local Bone Quality in Proximal Humerus Fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:3038-3045

16. Walch G, Badet R, Boulahia A et al. (1999) Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 14:756-760

17. Werthel J-D, Schoch BS, Van Veen SC et al. (2018) Acromial Fractures in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Clinical and Radiographic Analysis. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Arthroplasty 2:247154921877762

18. Zmistowski B, Gutman M, Horvath Y et al. (2020) Acromial stress fracture following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: incidence and predictors. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 29:799-806

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Author contributions BB has led overall research activities from proposal development to data compilation, data entry and processing, data analysis, and interpretation of the result

The now annual Data Challenge Expo is jointly sponsored by three sections of the American Statistical Association: Sta- tistical Computing, Statistical Graphics, and

The true reasons for an emperor’s lack of tears, may have been complex and related to individual circumstance (for example, the age of the deceased, the cause of death, the place

We included studies if they were randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials that compared doxycycline at any dosage and any formulation with placebo or no intervention in

„Mit organisationaler reflexiver Handlungsfähigkeit ist eine kollektive Kompetenz gemeint, welche die Fähigkeit, Fertigkeit und Bereitschaft von Kollektiven bezeichnet,

Among the benefits offered by the e-learning platform we find the following: the integrated and unified training and testing of employees, improving the efficiency

Machine language programs can also be written from BASIC with the individual bytes of the program written in decimal values in DATA statements.. The decimal

basic, APL, fortran, and SPL, experience with digital electr. Need: mass memory such as floppy disk and a hard-copy device. Designing automated Measurement system