• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Design and Analysis of a Box-like Wing Configura-tion through Panel-Methods

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Design and Analysis of a Box-like Wing Configura-tion through Panel-Methods"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

1

Design and Analysis of a Box-like Wing Configura- tion through Panel-Methods

Project work towards a thesis at LULEÅ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, LTU

Background

According to Prandtl 1924, the best wing system for minimum induced drag is the box-wing- like configuration followed closely by the C-wing configuration. The consideration implies identical lift distribution and total lift of both horizontal wings and a butterfly shaped lift dis- tribution on the vertical tip wings. In this condition, the velocity induced by the free vortices is constant along horizontal wings and identically zero on the vertical side wings. The reduc- tion in induced drag is dependent on the ratio of vertical tip height h and wing span b. With h/b about 10 % to 15 % a reduction of about 20 % to 30 % in induced drag can be noticed (Frediani 2003).

Due to time limitations in aircraft preliminary design, panel-method-based computer pro- grams are preferably used for predicting the aerodynamics of the whole configuration. Those methods are capable of analyzing complex geometries by considering an inviscid, irrotational and linear flow. In a first step, it must be shown that the effect of the Prandtl’s best wing sys- tems is predicted with panel-methods such as the vortex-lattice method Tornado (2007) or the multi-lifting-line method LIFTING-LINE (2009). Analyses shall include lattice conver- gence studies. Results are to be verified by calculating each wing separately, comparing it with values found in literature and with values of the box-like wing configuration. Skin- friction drag and form drag are to be approximated through hand-book methods. Additionally, CFD (FLUENT) will be available for further detailed computations and analyses.

In a final step, parameter variations (h/b, wing area, wing sweep, etc.) shall be conducted to get an overview of the design space for later optimization runs. A selected (optimum) wing configuration shall be compared with a conventional aircraft wing in terms of aerodynamic coefficients and wing weight (bar model).

DEPARTMENT OF AUTOMOTIVE AND AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING

(2)

2

Task

• Literature research on box-wing like aircraft configurations, Prandtl’s best wing sys- tems and suggested panel-methods

• Geometry development of a basic box-wing configuration

• Analysis with Tornado and LIFTING LINE through lattice convergence studies

• Approximation of skin-friction drag and form drag through hand-book methods

• Verification and discussion of results and selection of the favoured panel-method used for further computations

• Parameter variations and analyses

• Comparison of the (optimum) result with a conventional aircraft wing in terms of aero- dynamic coefficients and wing weight (bar model).

• Discussion of the results.

The report has to be written in English based on German or international standards on report writing.

Basic Literature

Frediani 2003 FREDIANI, A.; BALIS CREMA, L.; CHIOCCHIA, G.; et al.: Development of an Innovative Configuration for Transport Aircraft; A Project of five Italian Universities. In : AIDAA: XVII Congresso Nazionale AIDAA (Roma, 2003)

LIFTING-LINE 2009 LIFTING LINE - A multi-lifting-line method for design and check of nonplanar wing-configurations; URL: http://www.dlr.de/as/en/

desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-188/379_read-625/ (2009-11-19)

Prandtl 1924 PRANDTL, Ludwig: Induced Drag of Multiplanes (Technische Berichte, Volume III, No. 7, pp. 309-315). NASA Technical Reports Server, URL: http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp (NACA-TN-182)

Tornado 2007 Tornado – The Vortex Lattice Method; URL: http://www.redhammer.

se/tornado/TBG.html (2009-11-19); Published 2007-12-18

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

• Investigation and preliminary optimization of SBWA configurations including high versus low wing, standard tail versus T-Tail, engines on wing versus engines on aft

• Investigation and preliminary optimization of SBWA configurations including high versus low wing, standard tail versus T-Tail, engines on wing versus engines on aft

The vertical distance between the forward wing trailing vortices and the aft wing is assumed to be the same as the vertical distance between these two wings. This can be justified

As far as box-wing is concerned, it is reducing drag by two techniques: winglets increase the span efficiency and dividing the single wing into wings having double or slightly

Sind für Einstellungen des modellierten Box-Wing-Flugzeuges keine Werte angegeben, können diese bei Bedarf im Anhang B nachgelesen werden.. Der Großteil der verwendeten

Fig.. A comparison between the flap masses computed by the WINGmass system and the statistically determined flap masses by PESTsewi is shown in Fig. As both methods are calibrated

• Das Angebot an elektronischen Ressourcen (Datenbanken, E-Journals und E-Books) ist für alle Campus gleich?. • Das Angebot an Printmedien ist thematisch an die

Präsident Klose von der Baugenos- senschaft Halde, Zürich, sieht für die Zukunft ein großes Sparpotential und ist erleichtert, dank STRATUS einen genauen Überblick über Zustände