• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Electronic Supplementary Materials Differential effects of prone position in COVID-19-related ARDS in low and high recruiters

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Electronic Supplementary Materials Differential effects of prone position in COVID-19-related ARDS in low and high recruiters"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Electronic Supplementary Materials

Differential effects of prone position in COVID-19-related ARDS in low and high recruiters

Supplementary Methods

Measurements was performed during volume control with Evita XL or Infinity C500 ventilators (Dräger Medical, Lübeck, Germany) in either supine semi-recumbent (30°) position or in prone mild reverse Tredelenburg (15°) position. Chest CT images done as part of daily management were also analyzed.

Partial pressure of oxygen/ inspired fraction of oxygen (PaO

2

/FiO

2

) and ventilatory ratios were assessed at clinical positive end-expiratory level (PEEP). At each timepoint, airway opening pressure (AOP) and recruitment-to-inflation ratio (R/I) were determined, as previously described [4, 5]. Briefly, the R/I ratio was determined with high PEEP set at 15 cmH

2

O (for 30 minutes) and low PEEP set at 5 cmH

2

O. AOP was assessed during a low flow insufflation (<7 l/min), as previously described [4]. The recruited volume (Vrec) from low to high PEEP (i.e. 5 to 15 cmH

2

O) divided by the effective pressure change gave the compliance of the recruited lung (Crec); the ratio of Crec to the respiratory system compliance (Crs) at PEEP 5 cmH

2

O led to the R/I. In the event that AOP was >5 cmH

2

O (i.e. low PEEP), R/I was calculated with AOP instead of 5 cmH

2

O [4, 5]. During R/I ratio measurement, oxygenation was estimated using the pulse oximetry saturation/inspired fraction of oxygen ratio (SpO

2

/FiO

2

).

Data are expressed as median (first-to-third quartile) or count (%). Comparisons were done using Mann-Whitney U or Fisher’s exact test. Correlations were assessed with the Rho Spearman’s correlation test. Differences between groups across timepoints were tested by one-way ANOVA for repeated measures or Friedman test, as appropriate.

1

(2)

Supplementary Table S1 - Patients characteristics and respiratory mechanics at baseline All patients

(n=18)

Low recruiters (n=9)

High recruiters (n=9)

P

Demographics

Age – years 63 [59-69] 63 [61-71] 60 [58-67] 0.423

Male gender – n (%) 11 (61) 5 (56) 6 (67) >0.99

Body mass index – kg/m2 31 [27-33] 29 [24-36] 33 [29-33] 0.421

Simplified acute physiology score II 38 [31-44] 39 [34-45] 33 [30-45] 0.681

Delays – Days

Between symptoms and ICU admission 9 [7-9] 9 [7-11] 9 [8-9] 0.886

Between ICU admission and intubation 1 [0-4] 1 [0-4] 3 [2-7] 0.234

Between intubation and inclusion 2 [0-4] 3 [1-10] 1 [1-2] 0.097

Consolidation on CT scan – n (%) 9 (50) 6 (67) 3 (33) 0.350

High flow oxygen therapy > 24 hours – n (%) 12 (67) 4 (44) 8 (89) 0.130

Lowest PaO2/FiO2 before inclusion – mmHg 77 [58-104] 90 [65-109] 68 [49-100] 0.297

Number of prone cycling at inclusion 1 [0-2] 1 [0-2] 1 [0-2] 0.646

Baseline respiratory data (supine position)

Tidal volume– mL/kg(PBW) 5.7 [5.3-6.1] 5.6 [5.3-6.0] 5.9 [5.3-6.1] 0.746

Respiratory rate 20 [18-24] 20 [18-25] 21 [19-24] 0.382

PEEP – cmH2O 11 [9-14] 12 [9-13] 10 [10-15] 0.883

FiO2 – % 60 [45-80] 50 [50-90] 60 [53-78] 0.968

Airway opening pressure > 5 cmH2O – n (%) 4 (22) 1 (11) 3 (33) 0.580

Peak pressure – cmH2O 36 [29-40] 34 [31-39] 37 [29-41] 0.985

Plateau pressure – cmH2O 24 [20-25] 23 [21-27] 24 [20-25] 0.678

Driving pressure – cmH2O 11 [9-15] 12 [10-14] 10 [10-13] 0.477

Crs – ml/cmH2O 32 [25-42] 26 [25-37] 41 [26-45] 0.267

Volume of the recruited lung – ml 236 [131-338] 133 [113-198] 330 [261-448] <0.001 Compliance of the recruited lung – ml/cmH2O 24 [13-36] 13 [11-20] 36 [26-50] <0.001

SpO2/FiO2a 1 [-1.5 to 9] 1 [-1.5 to 9] 28 [3-38] 0.042

PaO2/FiO2 ratio – mmHg 127 [99-153] 128 [98-153] 127 [100-154] 0.982

PaCO2 – mmHg 44 [36-52] 48 [41-52] 40 [35-51] 0.372

Ventilatory ratio 1.29 [1.21-1.74] 1.33 [1.12-2.12] 1.26 [1.22-1.69] 0.779

Discharged alive from ICU 15 (83) 6 (67) 9 (100) 0.210

Data are expressed as median [first to third quartile] or counts (percentage). PBW: predicted body weight; P EEP: positive end-expiratory pressure; ICU: intensive care unit; FiO2 : inspired fraction of oxygen; SpO2 : pulse oximetry saturation; Crs: compliance of the respiratory system.

aSpO2/FiO2 = SpO2/FiO2at PEEP 15 cmH2O - SpO2/FiO2at PEEP 15 cmH2O.

2

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Also noting the need for international assistance as part of a comprehensive strategy to support national and regional ef- forts to assist States in the region with their efforts

By using the method derived from Murd and Bachmann (2011) and adding electroencephalographic (EEG) measuring, we tried to find and confirm the correlates of

Different paradigms are used to develop such BCI spellers, in which the frequency- modulated visual evoked potential (f-VEP) and the code- modulated visual evoked potential (c-VEP)

– under Article 15 of the GDPR to request information from us about your personal data which we have processed. In particular you may request information about the purposes for

Fifty years of research in ARDS why is acute res- piratory distress syndrome so important for critical care. Am J Respir Crit

Additional Table: Biochemical assessments of the COVID-19 patients according to the severity

Such vascular abnormalities could be also found in SPECT/CT through an increased perfusion in normally aerated lung regions (or hyperventilated) [9], as shown, but not described,

The continuous line shows the linear regression (with 95% confidence intervals in dashed lines) between recruitment-to-inflation (R/I) ratio in supine position and changes in