lnformation and Urban Development in Japan and GermanY
Michael Wegener
Professor, lnstitute of Spatial Planning University of Dortmund
Germany
B äHI: üÜ A,H+E L äßffi'ffiä
äffiIlt. Hzir ü t*4 ) o)*tsfialßt)g6rht{M,rüü:*jü) bffiWatli*tJ/tLtv;tfri|'f b{aTür7a" ttiNt
4i§vr it.
Fütdd)E_fuq :, 7 7
r'.o)$vt, J >
>t - #ä a h, ? U < A,
> t * a 7, ) u ) * r,il'l§ 7a
fr§t§.af;t:tlv./jj-I Lr§e 3 ä" llaüiäv.(J
r]#iäLk!ü.{i5ffi4?ft?.rt§W.reäfl-/:oüJ. fl+a7') ,t-ffI+wtiffi,afrrw2961fltffiv,e v,ä t:e>Thr,
1"'4vä§18+hlLtfüt:lDllt€rso>tJ.,
t'"4'v
a a l v f *
rt§lf-^t++tu1/l-A]ffrt,a+,
Tätä t F'.-tl <
ä /: . L
L E€ En§ö
7, t ä )-
b tu b
"
lntroduction
We all share the experience that information tech- nology has changed our lives. Within less than two decades,
we
have been involved in a technological revolutionof
amazing dimensions.As
citizens or customers, travelling or at workwe
have been ex- posed to and become paft ofa
multitude of comput- erised information systems in which more and moreof
our daily activities have been transformed into electronic transactions. As consumerswe
have re- alised that we are the final targets of logistic chains o{ ever increasing complexity and diversity. Televi- sion and telephone, electronic mail, videotext and the fax machine have become indispensable parts of our lives.However,
the information revolution is not
onlychanging production
systemsand lifestyles,
but also transforming settlement systems andthe
or- ganization of cities. On a global scale, new kinds ol world cities are emerging as international corporate and financialcentres
linked through voice, image and data transmission by satellite. Onthe
national scale, a few major cities are concentrating informa- tion-intensive control, service and cultural functions at the expense ofthe
majorityof
medium-sized cit- ies. Within metropolitan areas, inner cities are de- fending their traditional roleas
employment, serv- ice and retail centres against new industrial parks, office centres and shopping malls at the urban pe- riphery.One major force behind all this is the proliferation ol computers in all fields of organization and decision- making. Large companies
control their vast
net-works
of
suppliers, subsidiaries, production sites and distribution outlets with efficient computerised information and decision support systems. Large metropolitan governments are not unlike large cor- porations in that they employ great numbers of staff and are responsible for the administration and allo- cationof
substantial long-term investments,so
itcan be expected that computerization will also have
a
profound effect onthe
process and modeof
ur- ban policy making and Planning.Urban Planning
in
Japan and West GermanyThere are strong historical links between
urban planning in Japan and Germany. Japan'sfirst
Ur-ban
Planning Lawof
'1919
adoptedthe
German systemof
Umlegung (land readjustment). Also the New Urban Planning Lawof
1968 owed much tothe
Bundesbaugesetzo{
1960, althoughit
settledlor a
much lesser degree of development control. lttook until
1980to
introducean
equivalentto
the Bebauungsplan into the Japanese planning legisla-tion,
howeveronly
relativelyfew
major develop- ment projects have since been subjectto its
de- tailed specifications. The vast majorityof
all build- ingsin
Japanese cities are erected without public review. ln general utöan planning in Japan is more concerned withthe
allocation of growthand
lesswith
development controlthan
urban planning in Germany (cf. Wegener and Shibasaki, 1989).Accordingly,
there are
distinct dissimilarities be- tweenthe
problems perceived by Japanese urban planners and their West German colleagues:74
-
ForJapanese
planners,the main
problems ol Japanese cities are their lackof
infrastructure and amenities. They are very conscious ofthe
speed and intensity of urban growth in postwar Japan and of the enormous achievement to create today's cit- ies in so shon a time, and they are rightly proud ol the contribution oftheir
professionto it.
However, they feel that more needs to be done to make Japa- nese cities live up to their own high standards and those of a great industrial nation.- German planners, on the other hand, are
not proud of the way German cities have been rebuilt after the war. They are critical of the growth orienta- tion ofthe
1960s which resultedin
monofunctional city centres, faceless suburbs and ubiquitous traffic congestion and pollution. They feel that the social and environmental balance in cities has been lost for the sake of material growth and thatit
is neces- saryto
returnto a
more equitable and ecologically sustainable urban development.One of the clues for these differences
in
problem perception lies in the educationof
planners in the two countries. ln Japan the majorityof
urban plan-ners are educated at engineering
departments.With few exceptions planning courses have
a strong orientation towards physical planning and infrastructure provision(cf.
Masser and Yorisaki, 1988). West Germany, however, has followed the American and British example of establishing inter- disciplinary planning schools. Therefore the typical West German urban planner has been acquaintedin
his studies witha
broad range of social-science and economics subjects.Connected with the differences in training are dif- ferent perceptions of the role of the planner in soci- ety:
-
Japanese planners view themselves primarily as engineers, i.e. as technical experts whose task it isto
propose technical solutions. They would not feel called uponto
propose economic or social policies.They entertain excellent relations
to the
business community, as many industrial leaders, in particularin the
influentialconstruction industry,
have the same engineering background. The public privatepartnership, the informal cooperation
between business and government, is not an American inno- vatlon ofthe
Reagan era, buta
Japanese tradition since the early Meiji period when samurai became administrators or entrepreneurs.-
The typical German planner,at
leastuntil
very recently,has
no affinityto
business interests butPlanning Administration No.28 sees himself
as
an advocateof
his constituency if necessary against economic interests. He does not feel as a technical expert but as an actor ina
politi- cal process in which the interests of various groups compete for attention. So the range of his options is much wider than technical solutions;they
include regulatory and fiscal policies as well as all sorts of procedural stratagems or even non-decision. Onlyin
recent years, planners working in municipal eco- nomic promotiondepartments
have developed a market-oriented attitudeto
attract investors.Perhaps the most striking difference
between Japanese and German planners is the one in atti- tude towards technology.Japanese planners, in the best of engineering tradition, tendto
view technol- ogy primarilyas
beneficial and as an instrument to improve and enrich humanlife. ln
contrast, plan- nersin
West Germancities are
more concerned aboutthe
negative side effects of technology. Thisis
alsotrue for their
attitudetowards
information technology.lnformation Technology and Urban Develop-
mentlnformation technologies have been adopted
inWest German cities like in other
industrialised countries though notas
rapidlyand
enthusiasti- cally as in Japan or the United States or some other European countries.Telephone penetration in West Germany is slightly higher than in Japan but much less than in the US, Norway or Sweden. Cellular telephones have only
recently been legalized. Fax machines are
still much less used than in Japan though the market israpidly expanding. Videotext, unlike the
French minitel, has so far turned outto
be a flop, so have video conferences. There are much less cash ma- chinesin
Germany thanin
Japanor the
UK and,probably because of the well organized
Euro- cheque system, credit cards are much lessin
usethan
inthe US.
Narrowband ISDN services com- mercially startedin
1988,just as in Japan,
how-ever, ISDN has not yet replaced
conventional packet-switching networksand
value-added cir- cuits. There are only one tenthas
many industrial robots atwok
in West German factories as in Ja- pan.Nevertheless information technology will in the long run also in Germany revolutionize goods and pas- senger transport, production and distribution and
all
kindsof
services. The emerging consensus isthat
telecommunicationtechnology in the
earlyphase o, its introduction tends to reinforce the exist- ing hierarchy of cities, but that it equalizes commu- nication opportunities
once
becoming universally available.The impacts of information technology on the inter- nal organization of cities are only slowly becoming visible. Surprisingly,
the
introductionof
computer networks has notyet
ledto a
spatial dispersal of high-level service activities suchas
banking from the city centres. Alsothe
expected substitution of travel by telecommunications has notyet
material-ised, it seems that telecommunications
instead tendsto
increase the demand for face-to-face con-tacts.
Similarly,the
expected substitutionoi
worktrips by teleworking and of shopping trips
by teleshopping has only minimally become reality.However,
the 'logistic
revolution'taking place
in manufacturing and distribution has already ledto
a substantial increasein
intraregional goods trans- pon and will continueto
doso
in the future. Cer- tainly it will also havea
strong impact on the loca-tion of manutacturing industries. Most
experts agreethat
inthe
long runit will
favour suburban locations at the expense of the core and thus rein- force the decentralisation tendenciesin
metropoli- tan areas and its negative effects suchas
increas- ing transportand
mobilityand
land consumption (Henckelet
al., 1984; Deutscher Städtetag, 1989).It is
generally teltthat,
beyond these foreseeable and paftly already observable tendencies,the
im-pact
ofthe
information revolution'on
urban form and lifestyles will be less than revolutionary. ln par- ticular the acceptanceof
new information technolo-gies and services by private
householdswill
be much slower than in the business world.Moreover,
the
public debate among telecommuni-cations experts, planners and social
scientists about the introductionof
new information technolo-gies is characterised not so much by
hopes for socialand
economic progressthan by
concerns abouttheir
social acceptability.ln
particularit
is feared thatthe
massive introductionof
new infor- mation technologies might makejobs
redundant, enforce involuntarywork at
home, dequalify for- merly skilled workers, entail serious health hazards through radiation from CRT monitors, reduce per- sonal communicationand
servicesand
facilitate the misuse of personal data and diminish the rights of workers in firms (Deutscher Städtetag, 1989).Other critics point to the social selectiveness of the new technologies
which
mainly addressthe
pur-chasing power of the middle class
(e.9.Häußermann and Siebel, 1985): With growing mar- ket penetration of the new services, traditional serv-
ices are
reducedor even disappear or
become unaffordable for the'communication-illiterate' whodo
not have the terminalsto
participate inthe
sys-tem
or the skillsto
operate them. There are evencases where
monopolistsuppliers
have deliber- ately neglected traditional services in orderto
push more profitable ones;the
deteriorationof
conven- tional mail services in West Germany isa
pertinent example.Although some of these concerns have turned out
to
be unfoundedor
much exaggerated,they
have neverthelessleit their
markon public opinion
in West Germany.To
be sure, there are proponents of the information society, some of which are pow- erful:the
electronics and telecommunications in-dustry
andtheir allies in the
Federal Ministry of Researchand Technology
(BMFT)and the
Tel- ekom division ofthe
Bundespostas
suppliers and the economic promotion depanmentsof
local gov- ernments and the regional chambers of commerce representing business demand. However, the gen- eral public sees the advent of the information soci- ety with disinterest or even scepticism.ln Japan,
however,the information society
has been greeted with unanimous enthusiasm. lts pro-motion has been made a national target in
the Fourth Comprehensive National Development Plan (National Land Agency, 1987). This commitment is in line with earlier national policies to promote infor- mation technologies dating back as far as the loun- dation of Tsukuba Science City more than 20 yearsago and including such major initiatives as
theTeletopia project (1982), the Technopolis
pro- gramme (1983),the
New Media Community Con-cept
(1984),the
Advanced lnformation Metropolis Project (1986) and most recentlythe
lntelligent Cit-ies
Project,ol
whichthe
'hardwiring'of
Kawasaki (Batty, 1987) is only the most ambitious.One
particularly eloquent and persuasive expres- sion of these ideas isthe
suggestion thatjust
as advanced information technologiesenable
high- tech production systemsto
respond to the personal needsof a
multitude oJ individual customers, lhe 'intormatised'city
might seryeas
an adaptive 'life- style production system' enabling peopleto
select their own lifestyles for seltrealization. The analogyis
intriguing,but is it
valid?The
assumption that lack of information is the major barrier to the adop-tion of
individual lifestyles remains opento
ques- tion. There are other more powerful barriers such76
as
income or time constraints orthe
less tangible constraints relatedto
class, education, language, ethnic originor
religion. High land prices and tight housing markets resultingin
smallflats and
long commuting times may severely restrict the freedom to choose among and participatein
many potential activities. Finally it seems that without an education system promoting individual self-determination and self-expressionthe
prospectsfor a
diversityof
ur- ban lifestyles to develop are not overwhelming.Of
the
information-rich and communication-literate, to whom the above constraints do not apply, some will enjoyto
be linked to the world even in their lei- sure. lndeedit
has becomea
status symbol of theactive and mobile to be informed,
monitored, served and entertained wherever they go bya
hostof intelligent' devices such as cellular
phones, pagersor
lap-top computers. However,as
thesegadgets become available to everybody,
their valueas
status symbolsis
likelyto
fade away. lnthe
ultimately 'informatized' city,the
real privilege will be to be able to go away without them: to one'ssecond home or yacht, a mountain resort or
a monastery where thereis
no television, no fax and no phone except for one's friends.lnformation Technology and Urban
Planning The differencesin
education and attitude towards technology between Japanese and West German planners have also determined the adoptionof
in- formation technology for urban planning:-
Quantitative methods and computer applications play a considerable role in the university educationof
Japanese planners. Many Japanese plannersare
proficientIn statistics, forecasting and
com- puter mapping.ln
recent years, geographical infor- mation systems (GlS) have been installedin
manylocal governments. There are large
consulting companies specialisingin
GIS workfor
local gov-ernments. Many universities have
established laboratoriesfor GIS
research(cf.
Nakamura and Shimizu,'t989).- The adoption of information technology tor urban planning in West Germany has been much slower than expected. Several attempts
to
introduce GISlechnology into the local
planningpractice
havebeen
abandoned;today only few cities
operateGlS.
Recent initiativesto
establish standards for GISin
local governments originate from surveying departments, planning depanmentswill
not benefit from these etforts in the near future.Planning Administration No.28
The main reason for this difference in the adoption
of
information technology is thatthe
informal and policy-orientedplanning style in West
Germany does not requireso
much quantitative information (cf. Wegener, 1988). Today's planning information systems are of little value for this style of planning:They miss out on the more important, informal paft of information needed for building ties of loyalty and trust. Therefore most planners and decision mak- ers
are
simply not interestedin
planning informa- tion systems.Conclusions
The paradigm of
the
lnformation City isa
powerful metaphor illustrating the future-orientation and opti- mismof
Japanese planners. However,there is
a danger that the hope for a better and more humane urban environmentthey
associate withthis
para- digm may not materialise.The
more cautious atti-tude
o{ German plannerstowards
new technolo-gies
maybe
more realistic and makeit
easier to avoid their undesirable consequences, but there is also the danger that because of these concerns thechallenges of these innovations remain
unex- plored.lt
is attractive to think o{a
planning culture combining thetwo
attitudes, the engineer and the advocate, the daring and the cautious,in
order to arrive ata
richer setof
options for urban develop- ment.Helerences
Batty,
M.
(1987):The
lntelligenl Plazais
only the Beginning. The Guardian, '17
September 1987, 19.Deutscher Städtetag (1989): Telematik
und Stadtentwicklung(Telematicsand
Urban Develop-ment). DST-Beiträge zur Stadtentwicklung
undzum Umweltschutz Reihe E Heft
17.Köiln :Deutscher Städtetag.
Henckel, D,, E. Nopper and N. Rauch (1984):
lnformationstechnologie und Stadtentwicklung (ln- formation Technology
and
Urban Development).Schriften des Deutschen lnstituts
lür
Urbanistik 71.Köln: Kohlhammer Verlag.
Masser,
l.
andT.
Yorisaki (1988):The
lnstitutional Contextof
Japanese Planning:The
Developmentof
Pro{essional Associations and Planning Educa-tion.
TRP 81. Sheffield: Departmentof
Town andRegional Planning, University of Sheffield.
Nakamura H. and E. Shimizu (1989): Development
and
Utilizationof
Geographical lnformation Sys- tems-
Reviewed from Examples in Japan. Unpub- lished Paper. Tokyo: Department of Civil Engineer- ing, University of Tokyo.National Land Agency, Government of
Japan (1987):The
Fourth Comprehensive National De- velopment Plan. Tokyo: National Land Agency.Wegener,
M.
(1988): lnformation Technology, So- ciety, andthe Future
ofPlanning. ln: Giaoutzi, M., Nijkamp, P., eds.: lnformation and Regional Devel- opment. Aldershot: Avebury,42-55.