• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

THE LANDSLIDE SOUTH OF IMMENSTADT/ALLGÄU A COMBINED LANDSLIDE CAUSING DANGERS TO THE TOWN AND INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "THE LANDSLIDE SOUTH OF IMMENSTADT/ALLGÄU A COMBINED LANDSLIDE CAUSING DANGERS TO THE TOWN AND INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

– 8 – – 8 –

THE LANDSLIDE SOUTH OF IMMENSTADT/ALLGÄU

A COMBINED LANDSLIDE CAUSING DANGERS TO THE TOWN AND INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES

Karl Mayer1, Günther Bunza2

In the night between March, 14th and 15th 2006 a landslide at the southern outskirts of Immen- stadt started to move. The landslide is situated at the eastern slope of the Immenstädter Horn mountain (1.166 m a.s.l.). Due to the fact, that the landslide was very close to the town it was observed since a very early stage, so that a detailed documentation of further developments was possible.

GEOLOGICAL SITUATION

From the geological point of view the whole area south of the town Immenstadt is situated in the folded Molasse, the most northern tectonic unit of the Bavarian Alps. In the west of the Steigbach and so in the landslide area, Steigbachschichten can be found in the lower slope area. The upper slope area is made up of the Kojenschichten. A morphological terrace at 850 m a.s.l. marks the boundary between these two stratigraphic units. The Steigbachschichten as well as the Kojenschichten are characterized by alternating layers of conglomerates, sand- stones and marlstones.

DEVELOPMENT OF THE LANDSLIDE

The landslide is located in an area, which was already known as a dormant landslide area.

Between the Steigbach and the peak of the Immenstädter Horn old rock fall material and creeping areas can be found between 760 m a.s.l. and 1090 m a.s.l..

In August 2005 heavy rainfalls caused first active movements at the crown of the landslide at 950 m a.s.l.. During the following strong winter no greater movements were recognized until the 14th March 2006. Between March, 14th and 17th fast movements started, so that an area of about 6000 m² between 860 m a.s.l. and 950 m a.s.l. was affected by the landslide.

Until March, 23rd the landslide area took about 10.000 m². The whole landslide material was accumulated in a morphological terrace at 860 m a.s.l.

The weight of the landslide masses in this morphological terrace caused a collapse of the lower slope area between 850 m a.s.l. and the Steigbach so that a secondary landslide devel- oped. Until Oktober 2006 the primary landslide took about 25.000 m². The area affected by the secondary landslide is about 21.000 m². The estimated volume of the whole landslide is about 400.000 – 500.000 m³.

1 Karl Mayer Dipl.-Geol., Bayerisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Geologischer Dienst, Ref. Angewandte Geologie Süd, Bürgermeister-Ulrich-Str. 160, 86179 Augsburg, Deutschland (Tel.: +49-89-9214-2679; Fax: +49-89- 9214-1435; email: karl.mayer@lfu.bayern.de)

2 Assoc. Prof. Dr. Günther Bunza Dipl.-Geol., Bayerisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Ref. Hochwasserschutz und alpine Naturgefahren, Bürgermeister-Ulrich-Str. 160, 86179 Augsburg, Deutschland (Tel.: +49-89-9214-1027;

Fax: +49-89-9214-1435; email: guenther.bunza@lfu.bayern.de)

(2)

– 8 – – 8 –

Fig. 1: View from the north to the landslide area. The white triangle shows the position of the morphological terrace which divides the primary and the secondary landslide area. The white square indicates the position of the water supply of Immenstadt

The landslide area can be divided in two parts. The upper part above the morphological terrace is the primary landslide; the lower part is the secon- dary landslide. From March 2006 until January 2007 the activity has not ceased.

Detailed investigations like seismic refraction surveying, engineering geological and morpho- logical mappings and geotechnical investigations gave a good overview to estimate the future development of the landslide.

DANGERS

The landslide causes three main dangers:

x damming the Steigbach

x destroying the roads to the Steigbach valley x destroying the water supply of Immenstadt

PRELIMINARY MEASURES OF RISK MITIGATION

Sediment inputs by slides and mud-rock-flows in consequence of the continuous movements into the Steigbach are possible at any time. Such inputs have destroyed a check dam already at the beginning of the landslide. Therefore peak flows with different bed load transport rates could arise especially during high water discharges. If failures and/or blockages would hap- pen the settlement area of Immenstadt would be endangered directly. Also the only access to the Steigbach valley, with several houses and important pasture and forest interests, is fre- quently cut by the landslide and the main water supply of Immenstadt is directly endangered.

Hence protective measures are realized at present: a check dam is built at the toe of the land- slide masses. In connection with these measures drainages by bedded rock fills and longitudi- nal constructions by ripraps are made. Beyond that an open debris retention dam is built in the lower course. A drain channel was built to protect the water supply. Geodetic observations in the landslide area and in the area around the landslide are carried out (frequently) to detect a further extension of the landslide area in time.

Keywords: landslide, risk mitigation, debris flow

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

In the landslide longitudinal profile of Iya district, the calculated slid soil sediment zone and measured zone show relatively good resemblance, but in the

In comparison with other models for estimating the rainfall- runoff relationship in mountainous areas, this method estimates only the total amount of rainfall needed

When using LSFLOW to make a prediction, by setting the parameter φ s = φ m , it is possible to predict the shape of deposition with which the most dangerous dam height is

This study assumed that the landslide trigger by an extreme rainfall event and occur firstly and part of area will cause debris flow occurrence.. The disaster

The 2008 Iwate-Miyagi Nairiku Earthquake with a magnitude 7.2 induced numerous slope failures on steep inner valleys along the Ichihasama River, the Nihasama River and the

The procedure has been developed and assessed on the basis of high quality experimental results of flexible falling rock protection barriers (Gottardi and Govoni, 2010) and

A precise knowledge of the behaviour of the existing falling rock protection barriers (as well as other protection systems) becomes especially crucial when a rock fall risk analysis

The massive collapse of debris flowed down along the Otsuki River in the form of a large-scale debris avalanche and blocked the Chikuma River channel, upstream of the Shinano