Experimental set up
Fig. S1 Incubation system during composting process
Thermogravimetric analysis: graphs and raw data
Fig. S2 TGA and DTGA graphs of MB at day 0, 20 and 60
Table S1 Characteristic temperatures and weight derived from TGA analysis, related to the peak of starch in MB
MB (starch)
0 20_1 20_2 20_3 60_1 60_2 60_3
T peak °C 317 305 302 303
%water 0 4 4 1 12 11 3
%residue 0 22 26 22 22 29 25
initial weight% 100 96 96 99 77 80 88
final weight% 70 80 78 81 76 81 87
Table S2 Characteristic temperatures and weight derived from TGA analysis, related to the peak of PBAT in MB
MB (PBAT)
0 20_1 20_2 20_3 60_1 60_2 60_3
T peak °C 395 397 395 397 395 395 395
%water 0 4 4 1 12 11 3
%residue 0 22 26 22 22 29 25
initial weight% 70 80 78 81 76 81 87
final weight% 4 24 28 24 22 32 32
weight % 66 56 50 57 54 49 55
weight loss % 15 24 14 18 26 17
Weight loss normalized on water % 15 23 14 16 23 16
Table S3 Example of calculation using Equations 2 and 3 (in the Manuscript) to extrapolate weight loss from TGA raw data. The example is made using values of MB(PBAT) day 60 reactor 1 (60_1), coloured in grey in Table 2.
Equation Calculation Result
Peak Area
PA (¿¿60)PBAT(%)
∫
T0Tinf
dw dT dT=¿
76 (%) – 22 (%) 54 (%)
Weight Loss*
PA PA
(¿¿0)PBAT∗100=(WL¿60)PBAT(%) (¿¿60)PBAT
100−¿¿
100−54(%)
66(%)∗100 18 (%)
Weight Loss Normalized
on Water
WL¿100−%water
100 =(W L60)PBAT(%) 18∗100−12
100 16 (%)
*This value needs to be normalized on water content
Fig. S3 TGA and DTGA graphs of PBAT at day 0, 20 and 60
Table S4 Characteristic temperatures and weight derived from TGA analysis, related to the peak of PBAT
PBAT
0 20_1 20_2 20_3 60_1 60_2 60_3
T peak °C 397 400 399 397 399 400 400
%water 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
%residue 0 7 11 12 10 11 10
initial weight% 100 100 99 99 99 99 99
final weight% 7 8 12 13 11 12 11
weight % 93 92 87 86 88 87 88
weight loss % 1 6 8 5 6 5
Weight loss normalized on water % 1 6 8 5 6 5
Fig. S4 TGA and DTGA graphs of PLA at day 0, 20 and 6
Table S5 Characteristic temperatures and weight derived from TGA analysis, related to the peak of PLA
PLA 0
20_
1 20_2 20_
3
60_
1 60_2 60_3
T peak °C 361 347 353 348 329 347 339
%water 0 3 1 2 3 1 2
%residue 0 0 0 0 1 1 4
initial weight% 100 97 99 98 97 99 98
final weight% 1 1 1 1 2 1 5
weight % 99 96 98 97 95 98 93
weight loss % 3 1 2 4 1 6
Weight normalized on water % 3 1 2 4 1 6
Fig. S5 TGA and DTGA graphs of LDPE at day 0, 20 and 6
Table S6 Characteristic temperatures and weight derived from TGA analysis, related to the peak of LDPE
LDPE
0 20_1 20_2 20_3 60_1 60_2 60_3
T peak °C 467 466 473 468 470 471 470
%water 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
%residue 0 0 0 0 5 0 1
initial weight% 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
final weight% 0 0 0 0 5 0 1
weight % 100 100 100 100 95 100 99
weight loss % 0 0 0 5 0 1
Weight loss normalized on water % 0 0 0 5 0 1
Scanning Electron Microscope
Experimental weight loss: raw data and further picture
Table S7 Experimental weight loss and adjustment in accordance with Equation 1 (in the Manuscript)
weight (g) not
adjusted adjustment weight (g) adjusted macro micro total water
(%)
residues (%)
Water + residues (%)
macro micro total
Weight loss adjusted (%) MB1 6,21 2,65 8,86 17 22 39 3,7881 1,6165 5,4046 45,954 MB2 5,48 2,89 8,37 15 29 44 3,0688 1,6184 4,6872 53,128
MB3 9,11 9,11 3 25 28 6,5592 0 6,5592 34,408
PLA1 9,4 0,9 10,3 3 1 4 9,024 0,864 9,888 1,12
PLA2 9,8 9,8 1 1 2 9,604 0 9,604 3,96
PLA3 9,7 0,62 10,32 2 4 6 9,118 0,5828 9,7008 2,992
PBAT1 10,6 10,6 1 10 11 9,434 0 9,434 5,66
PBAT2 10,5 10,5 1 11 12 9,24 0 9,24 7,6
PBAT3 9,9 9,9 1 10 11 8,811 0 8,811 11,89
LDPE1 10,2 10,2 0 5 5 9,69 0 9,69 3,1
LDPE2 9,7 9,7 0 0 0 9,7 0 9,7 3
LDPE3 10,5 10,5 0 1 1 10,395 0 10,395 -3,95