• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Flashing Jet

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Flashing Jet"

Copied!
14
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Hygroscopic and Flashing Jet

Impaction Models in the RN Package

Presented by

Jesse Phillips

jphill@sandia.gov

(2)

RN Hygro and Jet Models

• The following topics are discussed

–Hygroscopic (Hygro) Model

• Discussion some functions of the model

• Nuances that may be overlooked (what else changes when Hygro is on?)

–Flashing Jet Impaction Model

• Flashing, jet expansion, and aerosol deposition

(3)

Hygroscopic Model

• Hygro is OFF by default

–By default, water condensation onto aerosols is a

suspension of supersaturation within a control volume –Newly created aerosol mass (CVH fog) is dispersed

across the existing aerosols distribution, using Mason Equation

• When Hygro is ON

–RN calculates water vapor condensation/evaporation onto aerosols, not CVH

–Solute, Kelvin, and Latent Heat effects are considered in condensation/evaporation rate equation, Mason Equation

(4)

Hygro – Solute Effect

• Aerosol growth by vapor diffusion is given by the Mason Equation.

• Aerosols are mixtures of soluble and in-soluble material

• Soluble fission products (CsOH, CsI, NaOH, etc.) enhance water adsorption

– In solution, equilibrium vapor pressure at the surface of a droplet is modified

• Ar is limited by maximum solubility

 

b a

S S r dt

dr r

1

Pruppacher, H.R. and J.D. Klett, Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation, D. Reidel Publishing Co. Dordrecht, Holland (1980).

Murata K. et.al. CONTAIN Manual 2.0, NUREG/CR-653, SAND97-1735, June 1997.





r RT A M

S

w w r

r

exp 2

i w

i i

r n

A exp n

(5)

Hygro – Kelvin Effect

• Kelvin effect account for surface tension increasing water vapor pressure.

• Increasing the surface tension, or reducing the radius of the droplet promote evaporation

• Small droplets may evaporate in saturated environments due to the Kelvin effect

 

b a

S S r dt

dr r

1





r RT A M

S

w w r

r

exp 2

KE

(6)

Hygro – Latent Heat Effect

• Surface temperature

expression relates heat and mass transfer at the surface

• T(r) is a function of the mass exchange at the surface and conduction rate of the

atmosphere

• Surface saturation considers the mass exchange in the

temperature evaluation

(7)

Hygro – RN Components

• Reminder on RN Components

–RN Components group RN Classes and share a size distribution

–If soluble RN Classes are grouped with insoluble

Classes within a Component then growth will impact size distributions of insoluble Classes.

–Water must be assigned to its own Component (and

is by default)

(8)

Flashing Jet Impaction Model

• Models impingement of flashing water on a plate

–Flashing

• Isenthalpic pressure flashing model

–Jet expansion

• Conservation of mass

–Aerosol deposition

• Cutoff diameter

(9)

FJIM – User Input

• The user specifies sufficient information to provide the enthalpy of the entering fluid, area jet of the

entrance, the local ambient pressure and density, and the distance to and name of the heat structure.

• Limitations for a given Jet Impaction

–Only one jet is permissible

–Only one HS may be identified

–The definition of the target CV (ambient condition

volume) impacts conditions at should be specified

appropriately

(10)

Jet Impaction – Flashing Model

(11)

Flashing Model w/ RN

• Partitioning liquid water between Aerosol and Pool

• w/ RN a Rosin-Rammler distribution greater than the user defined (or default) maximum aerosol size

Where,

G gamma function

dp is a given particle diameter M is mass of particles

ds Sauter mean diameter as 65micron k is set as 5.32

• At 50micron maximum size aerosol, ~90% of unflashed water is placed into the Pool.

0.896764724

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

0 20 40 60 80 100

CCDF

Diameter dp, micron

Eltkobt Droplet Size Disbtribution

(12)

FJIM – Jet Expansion

• Exit conditions, e, are obtained from available FL information

• Using the momentum equation

o e 1 2

Jet Expansion CV,a

y

U = velocity G = Mass flow rate v = sp. density A = Area P = Pressure D = Diameter

S1 = Standoff Distance UserSpc.

S2 = Distance to deflection y = deflection distance

m = mixture e = entrance o = origin

a = ambient conditions A1 representing only jet A2m represents only jet A2 represents entrainment+jet

(13)

FJIM – Stokes Cutoff

• Aerosol impaction and removal is determined from a using a stokes cutoff criterion.

• The Jet velocity, U2, is used to determine the departure from the slip stream leading to impaction

dp,50%, diameter corresponding to 50% removal efficiency Stm,50%, Stokes number evaluated at dp,50%

Cu, Cunningham factor (size bin dependent) 0.268, represents circular break Stm,50% cutoff

• Fraction of particles greater than dp,50% are available for capture (Linear?)

• Scaled by min(heat structure area / A2 , 1.0)

(14)

Questions

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

The MOP solution is often uncomputable (meaning that it is undecid- able): the existence of a general algorithm for the MOP solution would imply the decidability of the Modified

Within this hierarchical multi-scale approach, the com- puted material parameters (the exchange constant matrix as well as the magnetic moments) were thereafter used as mat-

In these circumstances, a shear displacement at the end of seismic excitation exceeding the critical level s 0 is regarded as a “catastrophic failure” (Trandafir and Sassa 2005a)

With the variable separation approach and based on the general reduction theory, we successfully obtain the variable separation solutions for the (2+1)-dimensional breaking

In summary, six kinds of new nonclassical potential symmetry generators of the Burgers equation are deter- mined in this paper, and three classes of new explicit solutions are

In conclusion, we have shown how to simulate the Dirac equation in 3 1 dimensions for a free spin-1=2 particle, and quantum-relativistic effects like the Zitterbewegung and

The results show that the mixing contributions of river discharge and evaporation are almost equal, although the freshwater transport due to evaporation is about one order

We investigate this problem for the linear heat equation, extending Altm¨uller and Gr¨une (2012) by including the case of Neumann boundary control and comparing this case with