• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Numerical Analysis of Differential Equations Initial Value Problems (II)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Aktie "Numerical Analysis of Differential Equations Initial Value Problems (II)"

Copied!
3
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Fakult¨at f¨ur Mathematik und Informatik 8. Mai 2012 TU Bergakademie Freiberg

W. Queck/M. Helm

Numerical Analysis of Differential Equations Initial Value Problems (II)

====

Part A – to be prepared before the date of problem session

=====

Exercise 1

Determine an approximate solution for the initial value problem y0=−(y+ 1)(y+ 3), 0≤t≤2 y(0) =−2

applying

a) the explicitEulerscheme, b) the modifiedEulermethod, c) the improvedEuler method

with step sizeh= 0.5 andh= 0.2. Compare your approximations with the corresponding values of the exact solutiony(t) =−3 + 2(1 +e−2t)−1.

Exercise 2

Rewrite each of the followingButcher/Runge-Kuttatableaus as a set of explicit formulae for the calculation ofyj+1. Do they describe explicit or implicit methods?

a) four-stageEnglandformula 0

1/2 1/2 1/2 1/4 1/4

1 0 -1 2

1/6 0 2/3 1/6 b) Butcher’s formula

0

1/8 1/8

1/4 0 1/4

1/2 1/2 -1 1

3/4 3/16 0 0 9/16

1 -5/7 4/7 12/7 -12/7 8/7

7/90 0 32/90 12/90 32/90 7/90 c) (one)RadauIIA method

1/3 5/12 -1/12

1 3/4 1/4

3/4 1/4

(2)

Initial Value Problems 2

============

Part B – Main Part

========================

Exercise 3

Find an approximate solution to the initial value problem y0(x) =−1000(y−e−x)−e−x y(0) = 1

with step sizeh= 0.1 by application of the a) explicitEulermethod,

b) implicitEulermethod.

Compare the approximations forx= 0.1, x= 0.5 andx= 1.0 with the exact solutiony(x) =e−x. Exercise 4

For the solutiony(x) of the initial value problem

y0=−(y+ 1)(y+ 3), 0≤x≤1 y(0) =−2

find an approximation ofy(1) using the classical Runge–Kuttamethod with step size h= 0.5.

Exercise 5

Determine an approximate solution to the following system of ODEs

˙ y(t) =

6 −3

2 1

y(t), y(0) = 5

3

, 0≤t≤1 Therefor apply

a) the explicitEulermethod with step sizeh= 0.25, b) Heun’s method with step size h= 0.5.

Compare the approximations with the exact solution y(t) =

exp(3t) 3 exp(4t) exp(3t) 2 exp(4t)

−1 2

.

Exercise 6

Consider the following initial value problem fory(t).

y000 =1

2y2, t≥1

y(1) = 1, y0(1) =−1, y00(1) = 0.5

Determine approximations toy(2),y0(2) undy00(2) by application of the explicit and the implicit Eulermethod. Take a step size ofh= 1 in both cases.

(3)

Initial Value Problems 3 Exercise 7

Check the consistency order of Heun’s method by verification of the order conditions (for explicit Runge-Kuttamethods up to order three) known from the lecture.

0 1/3 1/3

2/3 0 2/3 0

1/4 0 3/4

Exercise 8

The following tableau definesRunge’s method. Show that this method possesses consistency order three by checking the necessary conditions for RKM for l = 1, k = 3 and the expansion of the local truncation error in powers ofh.

0 1/2 1/2

1 0 1

1 0 0 1

1/6 2/3 0 1/6

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

It will be shown that the projected Runge-Kutta method inherits the order of convergence from the underlying classical Runge-Kutta scheme applied to the index 3 DAE, i.e.,

This paper suggests that first-order conditions derived from optimization prob- lems are not sufficient to find Calvo New Keynesian model

Hint: This exercises should be done during the problem session on June, 13. Draw a picture of the exact and the numerical solutions. Play with the step size parameter h.. b)

For purposes of comparison notice, that the exact solution is given by u(x, y) = 400xy if the boundaries with zero boundary condition are placed along the

The construction with lifting of the direction field gives a possibility to reduce the classification of characteristic net singularities of generic linear second order mixed type

Then, the multi-step generalized differential transform method (MSGDTM) is employed to compute an approximation to the solution of the model of fractional order.. Finally, the

Z.Naturforsch.65a, 453 – 460 (2010); received June 30, 2009 / revised September 16, 2009 In many fields of the contemporary science and technology, systems with delaying links often

Parameter-elliptic boundary value problems and a priori estimates for them were treated, e.g., in [ADF] (scalar problems), [DFM] (systems of homogeneous type), and [F]