• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

19 Working without breaks – Violation of the regulations on breaks and rest periods for young employed persons

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "19 Working without breaks – Violation of the regulations on breaks and rest periods for young employed persons"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

19 baua: Facts

Social occupational safety comprises working time safeguards and the protection of the life and health of persons needing particular protection such as young employed persons. This fact sheet provides in- formation on violations of the form of breaks and rest periods for young employed persons of ages bet- ween 15 and 24 years. The data was collected within the framework of the BIBB/BAuA survey of young employed persons (2011/2012) and shows that the majority of the persons questioned attribute the loss of breaks to the high quantity of work and the organization of the work.

Breaks and rest periods

Regulations on the duration, timing and distribution of work breaks are fundamental components of social occupational safety. Work breaks are times during which work is inter- rupted and serve for recuperation. They have the objective of protecting employees against overexertion and ensuring their safety and health. From a legal point of view, there is a difference between „breaks“ during the daily working hours and „rest periods“ being the time without work between the individual working days (BMAS 2012 [German Federal Minis- try of Labour and Social Affairs]). In the BIBB/BAuA survey of young employed persons (2011/2012) 3,105 employees aged between 15 and 24 years were asked how matters were in respect of the adherence to and also of weekend work (in contrast of the BIBB/BAuA Employment Survey the persons polled also included apprentices and trainees). By reason of the different legal fundamentals for different age-groups in respect of occupational safety, it was appropriate to have se- parate analysis of the results for work breaks for the group of 18 to 24 year-olds (91 %) and for the group of 15 to 17 year-olds (9 %).

Breaks for employed persons aged 18 to 24 years

Breaks for employed persons over the age of 18 are regulated in the ArbZG (Working Hours Act). § 4 of this act lays down that with a working time in excess of six hours work is to be interrupted for at least 30 minutes and for at least 45 minu- tes with a working time in excess of nine hours. 23 % of the employees polled reported that in respect of workdays with more than six hours of work breaks (in excess of 15 minutes) were frequently absent. Women and men reported absence of breaks to more or less the same extent. Whereas this also holds good for women and men employed full-time, with the part-time employees (weekly working hours less than 35 hours) more women (26 %) than part-time employed men

(21 %) reported that they had to work non-stop (i.e. without a break). Differences in absence of breaks also are evident between the occupational groups (see Fig. 1): Employees in service-sector jobs (including above all occupations in the hotel and restaurant as well as social and education sector) miss breaks most frequently (36 %), followed by employees in construction-industry occupations (32 %). Breaks are ab- sent least in administrative and office occupations (15 %).

In total, 48 % of the employees aged between 18 and 24 stated that too much work was the reason for the absence of breaks.

Around one third (35 %) stated that breaks do not fit into the workflow while 17 % did not want any breaks. Women (54 %) stated more frequently than men (43 %) that they do not take breaks because of the quantity of work. On the other hand men (22 %) stated almost twice as often as women (12 %) that they do not take breaks because they do not want to (see Fig. 2).

Fig. 1 Percentage share of 18 to 24 year-old employed persons by occupational group reporting a frequent absence of breaks

in % Service-sector occupations

Construction-industry occupations

Other workers*

Transport/traffic related occupations

Business occupations Administrative and office occupations Technical professions*

Manufacturing industry, mining and mineral-winning occupations

Occupations in agriculture, animal husbandry, forestry, horticulture*

0 10 20 30 40 36 32 28 19 18 15

* Too few persons polled in the occupational group

BIBB/BAuA 2012

Working without breaks – Violation of the regulations

on breaks and rest periods for young employed persons

(2)

The pattern for the reasons for the absence of breaks was also confirmed in the occupational group comparison: In nearly all occupational groups the main reason stated for absence of breaks was too much work followed by a lack of compatibility of breaks with the workflow. The reason stated most rarely was that the persons themselves did not want to take a break.

Breaks for employed persons aged 15 to 17 years

The particular need for protection of young persons is reflec- ted in specific regulations of the JArbSchG (Youth Health and Safety at Work Act). § 11 of this act lays down that young persons have a right to a break of at least 30 minutes with a working time of more than four and a half hours and at least 60 minutes with a working time of more than six hours. 20 % of the young persons polled (males and females to almost the same degree) stated that breaks were frequently absent.

Nearly half stated the reason to be too much work. The num- ber of persons polled was too small to permit an occupatio- nal group comparison.

Weekend work of young employed persons

Repose on Sundays and public holidays is fundamentally to be guaranteed for employees (§ 9 of the ArbZG). Around one third (34 % of the employed persons aged between 18 and 24 years stated that they worked on Sundays and public holidays.

8 % stated that they worked on average on more than two Sun- days a month. By reason of the manifold legal exception rules no statement can be made on violations on the basis of the underlying data.

In principle the weekend repose is to be guaranteed for young persons. According to § 16 Para. 2 and § 17 Para. 2 of the

JArbSchG young persons may be employed on Saturdays and Sundays only in particular areas of work (e.g. in hospitals and restaurants). Whether young persons work at the weekend in areas of work for which there is no exception rule cannot be stated unambiguously on the basis of the data held. However, a number of occupations were named which suggest this (e.g.

layers of parquet and floors as well as bricklayers). In addition the law specifies that two Saturdays a month should remain free of work and that two Sundays a month must remain free of work. Exceptions exist here only in agriculture and restau- rants during the peak season. A little more than half (51 %) of the young persons polled stated that they work on Saturdays.

Nearly a quarter (23 %) of the young persons polled stated that they work on more than two Saturdays a month. Overall, fewer young persons reported working on Sundays; however a quar- ter of those polled reported that they also work on Sundays.

Planning work with times for recovery

The legal regulations on work breaks underline the impor- tance of rest/recovery from work and of the associated abi- lity to participate in social activities. Around one fifth of the

employed persons of between 15 and 24 years frequently do not take their breaks. The majority of the persons affected attribute this not to their own decision but to their high wor- kload and the organisation of the work. This can be targeted by appropriate preventive measures for the organisation and arrangement of work because according to the lawmakers, the responsibility for the adherence to rest/recovery times for purposes of protecting the health of employees lies with the employer. The latter is obliged to agree workflows and workloads with the employees in such a way that compliance with breaks and rest periods is actually possible.

19

Do not want to

take a break 12 %

To much work 54 % Breaks do not fit

into the workflow 34 % Do

not want to

take a break

22 % To much work

43 %

Breaks do not fit into the workflow

35 %

Fig. 2 Reasons for absence of breaks with men and women in comparison in percent

Imprint | Publisher: Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin (BAuA), Friedrich-Henkel-Weg 1 – 25, 44149 Dortmund, Phone: +49 231 9071-2071, Email: info-zentrum@baua.bund.de, Internet: www.baua.de | Authors: J. Rehling, W. Wrage, S. Schmiederer, Design: R. Grahl | doi:10.21934/baua:facts20170602 | June 2017

Further information

1 Factsheet 04. Working non-stop? A plea for breaks.

www.baua.de/DE/Angebote/Publikationen/Fakten/

BIBB-BAuA-04e.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2 2 Factsheet 07. Working when others have a day off

– Weekend working by employees.

www.baua.de/DE/Angebote/Publikationen/Fakten/

BIBB-BAuA-07e.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2 3 BMAS (2012). Übersicht über das Arbeitsrecht/Ar-

beitsschutzrecht [Overview of the labor law/work protection law]. 6 Auflage. Nürnberg: BW Bildung und Wissen.

baua: Facts Exposures to dust, smoke, gases and vapours 2

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

The negative prognostic impact of young age has been substantiated in numerous studies of clinical databases [1–4] including a recent population-based analysis of patients with stage

Through reference to interview data relating to the study of illegal file-sharing, we consider the methodological implications of moving from a diagrammatic technology that

Keywords: international migration law; admission of aliens; refugees; expulsion of foreign nationals; human rights of migrants; diplomatic protection; migrant workers;

This result (in the opposite direction to the all women estimate in the first column) flows directly from the fact that the miscarriage effect is positive. However, as for

Table 2 suggests that while new democracies with lower levels of ethnic fractionalization on average have a significantly higher rate of economic growth during the first five

(2) If sending States deem it legal and necessary to deport such persons, certain expelled and deported persons who require special attention, such as children, especially

To sum up, we observe that all the no-fault and unilateral reforms can be associated with permanent changes in the divorce rate series, since the years of the reforms are quite close

Trafficking for sexual exploitation remains an important form of victimization, the second after labour exploitation, although the incidence of the total number of victims