• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

OutputfluctuationsandmonetaryshocksinColombia:AreplytoGarcia Reinhart,Carmen MunichPersonalRePEcArchive

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "OutputfluctuationsandmonetaryshocksinColombia:AreplytoGarcia Reinhart,Carmen MunichPersonalRePEcArchive"

Copied!
5
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Munich Personal RePEc Archive

Output fluctuations and monetary shocks in Colombia: A reply to Garcia

Reinhart, Carmen

University of Maryland, College Park, Department of Economics

December 1993

Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/13354/

MPRA Paper No. 13354, posted 14 Feb 2009 14:35 UTC

(2)

Output Fluctuations and Monetary Shocks in Colombia:

Reply to Garcia

Carmen M. Reinhart and Vincent R. Reinhart December 1993

In her note, Maria Garcia revisited our work on macroeconomic linkages in Colombia. Employing recently available quarterly data and a more recent sample, she estimated a vector autoregression (VAR) using levels rather than first differences of the data and a Bayesian statistical technique (BVAR) rather than our structural VARs. Her investigation found that the time series properties of the major macroeconomic variables were similar to what we reported and, while the pattern of causation

apparently shifted, the macroeconomic multipliers were mostly unchanged.

While we are encouraged by the similarities in results, our sense is that the reported differences in causal patterns do not owe to the choice of technique, which Garcia emphasized, but rather to her application of those techniques to a later time period. . .

As to the econometrics, most Colombian macroeconomic variables that are stated in nominal terms exhibit a high degree of persistence. This shows up in findings that show they have unit roots, which were reported in both papers. Since statistical inference becomes. more complicated when variables that have unit roots appear on both sides of the equation

(3)

to be estimated we dealt with that problem by differencing the data.

Garcia correctly noted that those macroeconomic relationships could be estimated in levels if some combination of the data forms cointegrating vectors. She did not, however, explicitly impose such structures on the levels relationships, by estimating, for example the equations in the error-

correction form or using Johansen s maximum-likelihood technique (both of which are explained in Campbell and Perron (1991)). As a result, the statistical tests on individual or blocks of coefficients (these

are the basis of the reported causality tests) from her levels equations do not have standard properties.

As to the choice of time period, Garcia worked with data from 1976 to 1993, whereas we estimated our equations with an earlier sample, from 1960 to 1987. Our results indicated that money was "exogenous" in the Granger sense, as causality ran from money to the other variables and not the other way around. This result is not entirely surprising. During the early part of our sample, a variety of controls impeded the free flow of international capital, giving the Colombian monetary authorities a greater measure of independence in determining the nominal money stock. This greater control was then properly reflected in our finding that money appeared at the top of a causal ordering. However, the substantial pace of financial innovation and explicit measures to liberalize the capital account over the past few years have moved Colombia closer to the paradigm of a small, open economy. In that circumstance, a central bank

(4)

attempting to manage the float of its currency surrenders its control of the domestic money stock. That is, we would expect to find that money can be explained by earlier movements of other macroeconomic variables- it is not exogenous in the Granger sense. Garcia found just that

result.

Since other macroeconomic properties, such as the neutrality of money, are less sensitive to the degree of capital mobility, it is not surprising that Garcia arrived at similar conclusions to our own on the nature of dynamic multipliers. Monetary shocks have real consequences in the short run but these real effects diminish as prices and other nominal magnitudes adjust.

(5)

References

Campbell, John and Pierre Perron, "Pitfalls and Opportunities: What Macroeconomists Should Know About Unit Roots," NBER Macroeconomics Annual 6 (1991), 144- 200.

Reinhart, Carmen M. and Vincent R. Reinhart, “Output Fluctuations and Monetary Shocks: Evidence from Colombia,” IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 38 No. 4, December 1991, 705-735.

Reinhart, Carmen M. and Vincent R. Reinhart, “Output Fluctuations and Monetary Shocks: Evidence from Colombia: A Reply to García,” IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 40 No. 4, (December 1993), 876-878.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Sources: International Monetary Fund, Annual Report on Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions and International Financial Statistics , Pick and Sedillot (1971),

3 As with the parallel market premium, we divide the export misinvoicing estimates into three categories (as a percent of the value of total exports): low (less than 10 percent

February 1, 1948–September 1966 Managed floating/Parallel Market Official rate is pegged to US dollar October 1966–September 1978 De facto crawling band around US..

Goldstein, Kaminsky, and Reinhart (2000), who examine the links between currency and banking crises and changes in sovereign credit ratings for 20 countries for Institutional

Instead, they argue that the Korean banking and currency crises had their origins in the financial liberalization that took place in the earlier part of the

The model, however, would have to be substantially amended to shed light on the issue of bond flows and other short-term flows, which were also extremely important in explaining

As regards the political contugion model, it is evident that this paper offers valuable insights in understanding a “peer pressure” mechanism that may play a key role in

Like the literature on currency crises, very different interpretations of the causes of the twin crises have been offered and this paper lays out some of the key differences