• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

View of Editorial: The "Special Issue: FQS Reviews III"

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "View of Editorial: The "Special Issue: FQS Reviews III""

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Editorial "Special Issue: FQS Reviews III"

Katja Mruck

Dear Readers,

When we started thinking about launching a multidisciplinary online journal for qualitative research in 1999, we were cautiously optimistic: "It would be really great," said one of the editors during a meeting, "if we can get just three FQS issues out." [1]

In January 2000, the first issue—Qualitative Research: National, Disciplinary, Methodical and Empirical Examples—was published. Keeping the demand for interdisciplinary research under consideration, issues providing insights into various disciplines and their perspectives followed. The intent was to inform researchers about unknown disciplines, which would then enable them to carry out interdisciplinary endeavors. These issues include: German language Psychology, Cultural Sciences, Criminology, and Sport Sciences. However, issues dealing with topics important for qualitative researchers regardless of their disciplinary backgrounds were also part of the FQS spectrum. These issues include: Text . Archive . Re-Analysis, Qualitative and Quantitative Research:

Conjunctions and Divergences, Using Technology in the Qualitative Research Process, and Part I and Part II on Subjectivity and Reflexivity in Qualitative Research. Last but not least, the issue Doing Biographical Research was published in September 2003. It made the potentials of the Internet apparent as researchers from different countries and disciplines discussed their interpretive perspectives in an interview, which is available to readers to provide further analyses and commentaries in German and in English. For quantitative data on the usage of FQS during 2000-2003, you may visit http://www.qualitative- research.net/fqs/fqs-e/zugriffe-e.htm. [2]

The Current Issue

The Special Issue: FQS Reviews III is our third issue involving book reviews. To access the past two issues, see: Special Issue: FQS Reviews I , May 2001 and Special Issue: FQS Reviews II , November 2002. [3]

From the very beginning, FQS Reviews played a crucial role in our journal policy

—an obvious fact if you consider that altogether about 200 review notes and review essays were published in FQS. Since its launch, FQS has become the most important distributor of book reviews in the field of qualitative research. [4]

This development is a result of FQS' effort to establish a special profile of the reviews published: the publications are detailed and provide an idea of the

content of the respective book as well as of its value within the particular research field. Günter MEY, the FQS Book Review Editor, underlined the potential

importance of book reviews for (qualitative) research in several Editorial Notes (see for example MEY 2000, 2002, 2004). According to MEY also book reviews

© 2004 FQS http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/

Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research (ISSN 1438-5627)

Volume 5, No. 1, Art. 22 January 2004

FORUM: QUALITATIVE

SOCIAL RESEARCH

SOZIALFORSCHUNG

(2)

FQS 5(1), Art. 22, Katja Mruck: Editorial "Special Issue: FQS Reviews III"

need quality control, similar to the peer review process for other scientific

contributions. And book reviews can offer—retrospectively, after a book has been published—quality control for the respective book and in some cases

improvements for future contributions. [5]

It is our hope that the articles published in this issue will provide you, the reader, some useful information about the books under review, raise your curiosity and help you decide whether you would like to read the entire book or not.

Furthermore the articles should also offer you some ideas about research areas under discussion and create impulses for future commentaries and debates. [6]

As always, in addition to the contributions belonging to Reviews, selected single contributions, some articles on the ongoing FQS Debate Doing Successful Research in the Social Sciences—Ethnography of the Career Politics of an Occupational Group, and some recent conference reports are also available. All in all, 39 articles created FQS 5(1) with contributions from authors from eight countries and various disciplines. Some of the authors being experienced

representatives from their field, such as Barney G. GLASER, Christian LÜDERS, Alexander von PLATO, Wolf-Michael ROTH, Jaan VALSINER and Tom

WENGRAF, and some who recently began their academic career such as Stefanie GROSSE, Hiltrud KREY or Yew-Jin LEE, to mention a few. [7]

In order to connect the interest of the authors' and you readers to be well- informed about current discussions and developments in the field of qualitative research, colleagues from all over the world were involved in the publication of this issue. So, I would like to cordially thank the issue editors Günter MEY and Kip JONES, the numerous authors and reviewers, and the FQS-Team members, César A. CISNEROS PUEBLA, Robert FAUX, Daniel Domínguez FIGAREDO, Michaela LEDEBUR, Tina PATEL and Wolf-Michael ROTH for their work and commitment in improving the quality of the contributions published. [8]

Enjoy reading!

Katja Mruck, FQS Editor

Citation

Mruck, Katja (2004). Editorial "Special Issue: FQS Reviews III" [8 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 5(1), Art. 22, http://nbn-

resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0401226.

Revised 6/2008

© 2004 FQS http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

http://www.dini.de/veranstaltung/workshop/goettingen_2005-05-23/programm.php sowie SIETMANN 2005 für eine kurze Zusammenfassung; ebenfalls online verfügbar ist die

presentation on "The Art of Doing Open Access: some considerations about the impact of open access movement, self-archiving and publishing on the humanities and

Neben Beiträgen, die unmittelbar dem Schwerpunktthema zugehören, enthält FQS 5(2) wie alle Schwerpunktausgaben in FQS ausgewählte Einzelbeiträge: zur Grounded Theory, zur Analyse

The Exchange Between Academic and Applied Social Research: The Current State of Qualitative Market, Media and Opinion Research [17 paragraphs]. Editorial: The FQS-Issue

Al final pero no menos importante, en septiembre 2003 se realizó la edición de Haciendo investigación biográfica que hizo visibles los potenciales del internet ya que

Auch wenn ich eingangs erwähnt habe, dass einige der über Mailinglisten verteilten Besprechungen nicht fristgerecht eingereicht wurden und dass bei einigen Besprechungen

Die Beiträge, in die wir im Folgenden zusammenfassend einführen, geben erste Antworten auf diese wichtige Frage: indem sie die prinzipielle Relevanz von Subjektivität

provisional) answers: by discussing more principally the relevance of subjectivity and reflexivity in and to the process of scientific knowledge construction and by offering