• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

percentage of total employment

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "percentage of total employment"

Copied!
26
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

The Management of Restructuring and Demographic Change – Challenges for German Labor Relations

Demographic Challenges for Human Resource Management and Labor Market

Policies

-- A German-Japanese Comparison – Tokyo, October 5-6, 2005

Institute for Work and Technology,

Gelsenkirchen

(2)

Outline

• structural change and labor market transitions

• early retirement – traditional mode of negotiated redundancy

• demographic challenge: opting out of early retirement

• negotiated outplacement: the new pathway

• new demands on social actors

(3)

Sectoral Shift of Employment, Germany 1957 – 2003 (Thousands)

0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000

195 7

196 1

196 5

196 9

197 3

197 7

198 1

198 5

198 9

199 2

199 6

200 0

services

manufacturing,

construction & mining agriculture

unification

Source: Federal Bureau of Statistics

(4)

Distribution of Workforce*) over Establishment Size Categories, West Germany

22,3 22,6 24,5 24,2 25,9 27,5 27,3

22,1 22,1 21,9 22,3 23,9 24,8 24,8

24,6 24,6 24,0 24,2 24,6 25,1 25,3

31,0 30,6 29,7 29,3 25,5 22,7 22,6

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1977 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2003

percentage of total employment

>=500 100-499 20-99

< 20

Source: Own calculations from employment register sample

*) only wage and salary earners subject to social security contributions

(5)

Entry, Exit, and Labor Turnover Rates*), West Germany, 1976 – 2000

18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38

1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000

Turnover Rates

90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140

Employment Index (1980=100)

employment entry rate exit rate LTR

*) only wage and salary earners subject to social security contributions

Source: Own calculations from employment register sample

(6)

Job Separations by Type, West Germany 1985—2001

23,7 20,2 21,6

16,3 11,5 17,7 20,4 23,2

34,5 32,7 30,6 29,9 33,5

26,0 21,8 20,1 27,0 36,5 40,5 38,4

41,5 50,2

48,6 39,9 41,5

36,5

31,5 36,0 30,0

33,2 39,7

39,8 44,9 39,9 39,8 39,3 40,0 42,2 38,3 33,7

39,7 35,3 29,0

35,8 33,4

40,1 33,3 34,3

38,4 35,0 33,1

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

198 5

198 6

198 7

198 8

198 9

199 0

199 1

199 2

199 3

199 4

199 5

199 6

199 7

199 8

199 9

200 0

200 1

p e rce n ta g e o f se p a ra ti o n s

dismissals quits other (e.g. end of fixed term)

Source: Own calculations from GSOEP

(7)

Traditional Pathway to Early Retirement (Earliest Possibility)

50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65

still employed

full pension officially

free from jobsearch obligation unemployment benefit

+ compensation short time

allowance

(8)

Legal Employment Protection

• dismissal for ‘operational reasons’ socially justified if in selection for dismissal duly considered:

• tenure

• age

• obligations to support (children or other dependents)

• disability

⇒ three out of four criteria protect older workers downsizing following the letter of the law

⇒ older workforce than before

• dismissals of certain order of magnitude negotiated with works council

⇒ social compensation plan

(9)

(Dis-) Advantages of Voluntary Separations of Older Workers in Comparison to Dismissals

for the worker:

• higher severance payment (if offered)

• avoiding psychological hardship

• earlier retirement

for the employer:

• freedom of selection

• no risk of legal recourse

• shortening of notice period

• rejuvenation of workforce

for the remaining workforce and the works council:

• higher productivity, better competitiveness, more job security

for the general public:

more unemployment

benefits (1/3 of unemployed 50+)

lower social security contributions

earlier and longer pensions

(10)

“Window of Demographic Opportunity”

cohort 1940 turned 60 in 2000

cohort 1964 60 in 2024

cohort 1945 turns 60 in 2005

(11)

Putting the Brakes on Early Retirement

• Pension reform: pensions before 65 with 3,6%

deduction per year

• unemployment benefit reform:

• maximum duration of contribution-based benefit for older workers 18 months (instead of 32)

• payments by former employer taken into account when means-testing for open-ended and flat-rate follow-on benefit

• short-time allowance: maximum duration 12 months (instead of 24)

• “gradual retirement” as an alternative to early

retirement via unemployment

(12)

The Impact of the Pension Reform

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

50-59 Jahre

60 Jahre

61 Jahre

62 Jahre

63 Jahre

64 Jahre

65 Jahre

(13)

Population 50 – 65 by Status:

1996

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 age completed

c u m u la te d p e rce n ta g e s

gainfully employed inactive, no pension or benefit receiving social assistance receiving pension

unemployed

(14)

Population 50 – 65 by Status:

2003

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 age completed

c u m u la te d p e rce n ta g e s

gainfully employed inactive, no pension or benefit receiving social assistance receiving pension

unemployed

(15)

Impact of Pension Reform plus Approach of Female Cohorts with Higher Participation towards Ends of their Careers

• inactivity without social transfers decreasing

• pensions decreasing 58 – 62

• employment increasing 50 – 64

unemployment increasing 58 – 63 (relative

to numerically weak cohorts)

(16)

Provisions of the Public Employment Service for the Accompaniment of Redundancies

• subsidies for job transfer measures (2,500 Euros maximum per worker)

• profiling

• outplacment training

• jobsearch coaching

• job placement

• allowance for working ‘short time’ (0 hrs.) in

a legally separate ‘transfer company’

(17)

Trilateral Job Transfer Schemes

employer ‘transfer

company’

employee

voluntary annulment of open-ended labour contract replaces imminent dismissal

no legal recourse possible

prolongation of employment beyond notice period

transfer services

possibly: supplement to short-time allowance

possibly: severance payment

obligation to actively participate in transfer activities

fixed-term labour contract on short-time basis

transfer services

exchange of

ressources and

services

framed in collective agreement between employer and works council

subsidised by PES as ‘short time working allowance’

≈≈ unemployment benefit not counting

against eligibility

period

(18)

The New Outplacement Pathway for Workers of all Ages

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

unemployment

notice period

month

profiling, outplacement training jobsearch coaching, job placement

new job no new job

fixed-term 'employment' for up to 12 months in 'transfer company', subsidized by short-time working compensation

vocational and outplacement training, jobsearch coaching, internships, job placement

no new job new job

(19)

Evaluation of Subisidies to ‘Transfer Measures’ 1998 – 2000

• enterprises <50 employees under-represented

• women under-represented (in relation to the national workforce, not the workforces concerned)

• services under-represented

• ‘not unemployed’ after participation:

73%

• in work (including 2% self-employment): 60%

⇒ no assessment of net effects

(20)

New Demands on Redundant Workers

• accept ‘real services’ as an equivalent

(totally or in part) for severance payments

• accept the ending of an employment

relationship many may have believed to be

‘for life’

• orient themselves towards new challenges and conditions

• often accept lower wages and poorer

conditions

(21)

New Demands on Employers

• envisage and commission employment-oriented measures (possibly in times of corporate crisis)

• pay at least 50% of costs of ‘transfer measures’

+ full wages for participation during working hours

• bear residual wage costs during short-time

⇒ social insurance contributions, full wages for bank holidays and annual leave

⇒ 35% of regular wage costs

• plus possibly negotiated supplements on top of short-time allowances

• bear these reduced costs for periods longer than employees’

individual notice periods (up to the legal maximum of 12 months short-time)

• pay 100% of employment assistance costs during short-time

(unless European Social Fund can be tapped)

(22)

New Demands on Works Councils

• defend existing jobs and simultaneously envisage transfer assistance to new jobs

⇒ at which point in the negotiating process do you openly switch strategy?

• give redundant workers confidence in opportunity for transfer

• ‘real services’ of employment assistance more sustainable than cash payments

• monitor quality and fairness of transfer services

(23)

New Demands on Trade Unions

• observe ‘critical’ corporate development in order to be prepared for pro-active responses

often: bring first information on the mechanisms of transfer and of public provision to the employer

• strategic coaching of works councils

• give employees confidence in transfer provisions accept irony of transfer to new industries:

⇒ loss of members for TU representing old industry

(24)

New Demands on the Public Employment Service

• explain and implement complicated provisions in a straightforward manner

• provide information on available provisions and providers for employers and works councils

win access to small enterprises in crisis where no workers’

representation exists

• win the confidence and commitment of employers and works councils who are ‘first time users’

• monitor the quality and outcome of third party provision

(25)

Demands on Outplacement Providers

• mediate between all the other actors

• survive and maintain professional quality in a highly cyclical business

• find jobs in the market during recession or stagnation

• infuse optimism and can-do attitudes in

seemingly hopeless situations

(26)

Summary

• remarkable structural change effected without much increase in labor market mobility

• early retirement important buffer but not sustainable under demographic change

• reforms of the retirement system show effects

• job transfer (assisted mobility) intended to replace early retirement

• difficult task in generally depressed labor market B turn-around of employment patterns and

retirement orientations indispensable before baby-

boomers arrive at the critical pre-retirement age in

about 10 years

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Тази разпокъсаност в нормативната материя на този основен правен институт, с практичес- ко приложение не само от юристи, но и в практиката на икономисти и други

Just under a quarter (24 per cent) lasted for at least two years; about seven per cent lasted for at least five years; and about five per cent lasted for at least nine years.

The government bodies controlling the integration process are the following: the Committee for European Integration; the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which is playing a major part

In particular, we examine whether the dampening effect of STW on the unemployment rate diminishes at higher STW take-up rates and whether STW schemes already established at the

Abstract: We present an optimal control based algorithm for the computation of robust domains of attraction for perturbed systems. We give a sufficient condition for the continuity

Model simulations indicate that 2.0 jobs were associated with BETR incentives in the average establishment, holding constant levels of assistance received from the other programs

Fifthly, an important related point which highlights the difference between rich and poor countries in their present urbanisation processes is that the population of large cities

These results are in a line with the theoretical result that students who are employed part-time can compensate the working hours with less leisure time whereas full-time