1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M I
Lecture 7 A
Curves and Surfaces in Euclidean Space
p p p
CurvesinIR3 andIRd,Frenetframes SurfacesinIR3,Gaussframes Firstandsecondfundamentalform Curvatureofsurfaces
c 2003–2008 Martin Welk, 2015 Martin Schmidt, 2019 Marcelo Cárdenas
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M I
Curves inIR3
A
Reminder about Curves and Curvature in 2D
p In 2D, a regular curve is characterised up to Euclidean transformations by the curvatureκ(as function of the curve parameter)
p At each curve point, there are tangent and normal unit vectors~tand~n, such that in arc-length parametrisation
cs=~t , css=κ~n
c css
n
cs t = x
Curve with tangent and normal vectors and first two derivatives at a point, from Lecture 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M I
Curves inIR3
A
Curvature Parameters of a Curve in 3D
p Consider regular curve in 3D Euclidean space,c:I→IR3, in arc-length parametrisation
p At each curve pointc(s), there are
a a unit tangent vector ~t(s), cs =~t(s)
a a unit normal vector ~n(s), css =κ(s)~n(s)
a a unitbinormalvector~b(s), ~b(s) =~t(s)×~n(s) (unique ifcis2-regular, i.e.css6= 0)
p In contrast to the 2D case,κ(s)can always be chosen nonnegative
p ~t(s),~n(s),~b(s)form an orthonormal system, theFrenet frameofc
n b
t c s( )
c
CurvecinIR3with Frenet frame atc(s)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M I
Curves inIR3 (3)
A
Curvature Parameters of a Curve in 3D, cont.
p the derivative of~bis perpendicular to both~tand~b, i.e
~bs(s) =−τ(s)~n(s) with a functionτ(s), thetorsionofc
p Curvatureκ(s)and torsionτ(s)determine the curvec(s)up to rotations and translations
p Frenet-Serret equations(or Frenet equations):
d ds
~t
~n
~b
=
0 κ 0
−κ 0 τ
0 −τ 0
~t
~ n
~b
p The torsion can also be defined by
csss(s) =−κ(s)2~t(s) +κs(s)~n(s) +κ(s)τ(s)~b(s)
p The torsion vanishes identically if and only if the curve is contained in a plane
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M I
Curves inIRd
A
Frenet Frames in Higher Dimensions
p Consider a curvecinIRdin arc-length parametrisation
p For each curve pointc(s), there is an orthonormal basis(~e1, . . . , ~ed)such that cs(s) =~e1, css(s)∈Span (~e1, ~e2),
cs(k)(s)∈Span (~e1, . . . , ~ek), k≤d
p (~e1, . . . , ~ed)is theFrenet frameofc.
p Frenet equationsinddimensions:
d ds
~e1
~e2
...
~ed
=
0 κ1 0 . . . 0 0
−κ1 0 κ2 0 0
0 −κ2 0 0 0
... . .. ...
0 0 0 0 κd−1
0 0 0 . . . −κd−1 0
~e1
~e2
...
~ ed
p Curvature functionsκi(s),i= 1, . . . , d−1(nonnegative fori≤d−2) determinecup to rotations and translations
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M I
Surfaces in IRd
A
Surfaces
p Surface inIRd: Differentiable functionσ:D→IRd,D⊂IR2 connected domain
p Graph (image) of a surfaceσ: Set of points inIRdgiven by {σ(u, v)|(u, v)∈D}
Remark: Similarly as for curves, surfaces with identical graphs but different parametrisations are considered different.
Curves on a Surface
p σ:D→IR3 surface
p I⊂IRinterval, mappingI3p7→(u(p), v(p))∈D
p Byc:I→σ(D)⊂IR3, p7→σ(u(p), v(p)), a curve onσis given
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M I
Surfaces in IRd
A
Related Definitions
p Regular surface: Surfaceσ: (u, v)7→IRdis regular if the (Jacobi) matrix
Dσ:=
σu1 σ1v
... ... σud σdv
has rank2everywhere inD.
p k-regularity can be defined analogously using higher order derivatives. We will always assume that surfaces are sufficiently many times differentiable.
p Tangent planeT(u,v)σtoσatσ(u, v): image of Dσ(u, v) : T(u,v)IR2→Tσ(u,v)IRd
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M I
Surfaces in IRd
A
Reparametrisation
p Transforms a surface into another one with the same graph
p σ:D→IRd surface
p D˜ ⊂IR2 connected domain
p ϕ: ˜D→Ddifferentiable mapping with rank Dϕ= 2everywhere
p σ˜:=σ◦ϕ: ˜D→IRdreparametrised surface
p orientation-preservingifdet Dϕ >0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M I
Gauss Frame for Surfaces in 3D
A
Gauss Frame for Surfaces in 3D
p Restrict now to surfacesσ:D→IR3 in 3D Euclidean space
p Gauss frame(analog of Frenet frame for surfaces) consists of the three unit vectors
~t1(u) := σu
kσuk , ~t2(u) := σv
kσvk, ~n:= σu×σv
kσu×σvk
p First two vectors~t1 and~t2 of the frame lie in tangential direction,~n perpendicular to the surface
p In general,~t1 and~t2 are not orthogonal
p ~t1 and~t2depend on parametrisation
p Normal vector~ndoes not change under orientation-preserving reparametrisation, is reverted by orientation-changing reparametrisation
t2 t1 n
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M I
First Fundamental Form for Surfaces in 3D
A
First Fundamental Form
p Consider regular surfaceσ:D→IR3
p Use boldface lettersu,v, . . .for points and vectors inIR2
p Symmetric bilinear form
Iu(v,w) :=hDσ(u)v,Dσ(u)wi, v,w∈TuD
p p
iscalledfirstfundamentalformofσatu RegularityimpliesIu(w,w)6=0, for nonzero w
Incoordinates,IuisdescribedbyamatrixwhichwewillalsodenotebyIu
(u= (u, v)):
Iu=I(u,v)= E F
F G
,
E=hσu, σui, F =hσu, σvi, G=hσv, σvi
p MapDσ(u) : TuIR2→Tuσ⊂Tσ(u)IR3allows to transferIu also into a bilinear form onTuσ
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M I
First Fundamental Form for Surfaces in 3D
A
Transformation Properties of the First Fundamental Form
p The first fundamental form isinvariant under Euclidean transformations (including reflections) ofIR3:
Forψ:x7→Ax+b,A∈O(3,IR),b∈IR3, and˜σ:=ψ◦σone has
˜Iu(v,w) =Iu(v,w)
where˜Iu is first fundamental form of˜σ
p The first fundamental formtransforms under reparametrisationsas follows:
Letσ˜:=σ◦ϕ,ϕ: ˜D→D; then
˜Iu(v,w) =Iϕ(u)(Dϕ(v),Dϕ(w)) where˜Iu is first fundamental form of˜σ
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M I
First Fundamental Form for Surfaces in 3D
A
MeasurementsUsingtheFirstFundamentalForm
p Considersurfaceσ:D → IR3 andacurvec:[0,P] → D)onσ.Then
I(u(p),v(p))(cp(p), cp(p)) =cTpI(u(p),v(p))cp=E u2p+ 2F upvp+G vp2 Lengthofc:
L[c] =
P
Z
0
kcp(p)kdp=
P
Z
0
q
E u2p+ 2F upvp+G vp2 dp
p Anglebetween vectors in a point (here forσu, σv) cos <) (σu, σv) = hσu, σvi
kσuk kσvk= F
√EG
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M I
First Fundamental Form for Surfaces in 3D
A
Measurements Using the First Fundamental Form, cont.
p Areaof surfaceσ(D):
A[σ] = Z Z
D
q
detI(u,v)dudv= Z Z
D
pEG−F2 dudv
p The bilinear form onT(u,v)σdefined by the first fundamental form is a Riemannian metric on the surface (graph). It is obtained by restricting the Euclidean metric ofIR3 to the surface.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
M I
Outlook and References
A
References
p G. Sapiro: Geometric Partial Differential Equations and Image Analysis.Cambridge University Press 2001
p W. Haack: Differential-Geometrie, Teil I.Wolfenbütteler Verlagsanstalt, Wolfenbüttel 1948 (in German)
14