• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Correction to: Perceived and actual risks of drought: household and expert views from the lower Teesta River Basin of northern Bangladesh

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Correction to: Perceived and actual risks of drought: household and expert views from the lower Teesta River Basin of northern Bangladesh"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Vol.:(0123456789) Natural Hazards (2021) 108:2589

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04825-3

1 3

CORRECTION

Correction to: Perceived and actual risks of drought:

household and expert views from the lower Teesta River Basin of northern Bangladesh

Roquia Salam

1

 · Bonosri Ghose

1

 · Badhon Kumar Shill

1

 · Md. Aminul Islam

1

 · Abu Reza Md. Towfiqul Islam

1

 · Md. Abdus Sattar

2

 · G. M. Monirul Alam

3

 · Bayes Ahmed

4

Published online: 3 June 2021

© Springer Nature B.V. 2021

Correction to: Natural Hazards

https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11069- 021- 04789-4

Following publication of the original article, the corresponding author requested updates be allowed to the supplementary material. The update was granted with support from this erratum. The original article has been corrected.

Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original article can be found online at https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11069- 021- 04789-4.

* Bayes Ahmed bayes.ahmed@ucl.ac.uk

1 Department of Disaster Management, Begum Rokeya University, Rangpur 5400, Bangladesh

2 Department of Disaster Risk Management, Patuakhali Science and Technology University, Dumki, Patuakhali 8602, Bangladesh

3 Department of Agribusiness, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Dhaka 1706, Bangladesh

4 Institute for Risk and Disaster Reduction (IRDR), University College London (UCL), Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

b) Download the theory “RQSort.thy” – which stands for refined quicksort – in which you prove the correctness of the efficient quicksort. prove that the efficient version of

c) Optimize your proof by using the custom wphoare method, like done in the splitcorrect lemmas... d) The splitcorrect lemma does not prove that split does not change the content of

In a software project, the classes Person, AgePerson und AgeManager were implemented; their source is given in Figure 1... a) For testing purposes, the following code

In a software project, the classes Person, AgePerson und AgeManager were implemented; their source is given in Figure 1.. a) For testing purposes, the following code is

h) Write a function forall : (’a -> bool) -> ’a list -> bool, which calculates wether all ele- ments of a list satisfy the given predicate.. i) Write a function exists :

Prove the equivalence of this function to the

For mergesort you will of course need a different lemma capturing the basic idea of

Salis et al., (2014) applied large-scale wildfire exposure factors assessment to map burn probability and fire intensity based on the key factors including weather, fuel,