• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Co-benefits of Near-Term Climate Change Mitigation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Co-benefits of Near-Term Climate Change Mitigation"

Copied!
13
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Co-benefits of Near-Term Climate Change Mitigation

Zbigniew Klimont

Mitigation of Air Pollution & Greenhouse Gases (MAG)

IIASA 40th Anniversary Conference, Vienna-Laxenburg, 24-26th October 2012

(2)

Co-control of GHGs and air pollutants

Annex I parties of UNFCCC, 2020

Source: IIASA GAINS http://gains.iiasa.ac.at

(3)

Health Benefits of Pollution Control

(Loss of statistical life expectancy due to particulate matter (PM))

Source: Global Energy Assessment (GEA, 2012)

(4)

Air pollutants Greenhouse gases

Health impacts:

Particulate matter and ozone

+

Vegetation damage:

Ozone, acidification,

eutrophication

+

Climate impacts:

Long-term (+100 years) + -

+

Near-term

+ -

+

The RAINS model

(Regional Acidification Information and Simulation)

The GAINS multi-pollutant/multi-effect framework

(Greenhouse gas and Air pollution INteractions and Synergies)

Emissions occur largely from common sources

(5)

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

Maize Rice Soybean Wheat

Change in crop loss compared to 2005

Business-as-usual 2030 Climate scenario 2030

Co-benefits of GHG mitigation on crop losses due to ozone in China

Soybean:

Crop loss calculated for 2030 baseline Source: GAINS-Asia http://gains.iiasa.ac.at and 450ppm scenario (IEA, 2009)

(6)

Air pollutants Greenhouse gases

Health impacts:

Particulate matter and ozone

+

Vegetation damage:

Ozone, acidification,

eutrophication

+

Climate impacts:

Long-term (+100 years) + -

+

Near-term (<20 years)

+ -

+

The GAINS multi-pollutant/multi-effect framework

(Greenhouse gas and Air pollution INteractions and Synergies)

Emissions occur largely from common sources

e.g., Ozone, Black Carbon

e.g., Sulfur Dioxide

(7)

16 ‘Win-win’ air quality measures with co-benefits on climate change

1. Recovery of coal mine gas 2. Production of crude oil

and natural gas

3. Gas leakages at pipelines and distribution networks 4. Waste recycling

5. Wastewater treatment 6. Farm-scale anaerobic

digestion

7. Aeration of rice paddies

1. Modern coke ovens 2. Modern brick kilns 3. Diesel particle filters 4. Briquettes for coal

stoves

5. Improved biomass cookstoves

6. Pellet stoves and boilers

7. Elimination of high- emitting vehicles 8. Ban of cropland

burning

9. Elimination of

biomass cookstoves

CH4 measures Black Carbon measures

UNEP/WMO, 2011

(8)

Source: UNEP/WMO Black Carbon and Tropospheric Ozone Assessment (2011) Shindell et al., Science 335 183 (2012)

Reference scenario:

IEA World Energy Outlook 2009

CO2 measures from:

IEA 450 ppm scenario 2009

Control of long-lived GHGs is unlikely to reduce temperature increase in the near-term

Global temperature 1900-2070

(9)

Reference scenario:

IEA World Energy Outlook 2009

CO2 measures from:

IEA 450 ppm scenario 2009

Near-term measures:

IIASA set of 16 measures for CH4and black carbon

These measures could significantly reduce the rate of temperature increase in the next decades

Global temperature 1900-2070

Source: UNEP/WMO Black Carbon and Tropospheric Ozone Assessment (2011) Shindell et al., Science 335 183 (2012)

(10)

Reference scenario

IEA World Energy Outlook 2009

CO2 measures from:

IEA 450 ppm scenario 2009

Near-term measures IIASA set of 16 measures for CH4and black carbon CO2 + Near-term measures

Together with aggressive CO

2

strategies, they increase chances to stay below the 2º target

Global temperature 1900-2070

Source: UNEP/WMO Black Carbon and Tropospheric Ozone Assessment (2011) Shindell et al., Science 335 183 (2012)

(11)

1 to 4.5 million annually avoided premature deaths from full implementation of 16 measures in 2030 compared to the reference scenario

Highest health benefits

in developing countries

Source: Shindell et al., Science 335 183 (2012)

(12)

In the news

• ’A Quick (Partial) Fix for an Ailing Atmosphere’

News and Analysis, Science 335, 2012

• ‘Pollutants key to climate fix’

News in Focus, Nature 481, 2012

• ‘Climate change in black and white’

The Economist, 19 February 2011

• ‘A renegade climate idea that could work’

International Herald Tribune, 18 January 2012

• ‘Schneller Klimaschutz mit erheblichem Zusatznutzen’

der Standard, 12 January 2012

(13)

www.unep.org/ccac

• In February 2012, an international platform to implement these

16 measures to mitigate emissions of Short Lived Climate Pollutants was announced; currently supported by 18 countries, European Union and 14 non-state organizations, including World Bank

• CCAC recognize that action on Short Lived Climate Pollutants must complement and supplement, not replace, global action to reduce CO2, in particular efforts under the UNFCCC

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

obligations regarding communication and implementation of mitiga- tion efforts apply to reductions and removals (Section 4); (ii) principles and expectations regarding fairness

To answer these questions the International Global Atmospheric Chemistry Project (IGAC) has developed the Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report (TOAR): Global metrics for

The database contains surface ozone data sets with hourly time resolu- tion collected from all accessible data sources worldwide, including regional or national air quality

We propose a new and more inclusive categorization into five different classes: anthropogenic emissions reductions (AER), territorial or domestic removal of atmospheric CO 2 and

(2) Strategic Co-benefit Assessments should address specific interests and opportunities to drive effective climate policy and action To build coalitions across sectors for

Note, however, that the RCP scenarios do not sample the full range of uncertainty in future anthropogenic forcing, and that uncertainty in aerosol forcings in particular may be

Estimated changes in seasonal (6‑month) average 1‑hr daily maximum ozone concentration (ppb) in 2030 for successive implementation of methane measures, methane plus BC group

We concluded from our earlier studies that: (1) there is only a small dif- ference in the long-term cost implications of moderate and aggressive near- term