• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

View of EPrints Funding Data and Workflow

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Aktie "View of EPrints Funding Data and Workflow"

Copied!
14
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

EPrints Funding Data and Workflow

William J Nixon and Lesley Drysdale University of Glasgow

Open Repositories 2010 8th July 2010, Madrid, Spain

(2)

The Enrich Project (April 2009 – March 2010)

• Establish Enlighten as a comprehensive University-wide repository and central publications database

• Create staff profiles using data from core

institutional systems including the repository and the Research System

• Ensure compliance with funders’ open

access grant and award policies using the Research System

• Improve publicity for research activity and outputs

(3)
(4)
(5)

State of Enlighten - July 2010

• 12,500 User records

• 25,000 Publication records

• 1,435 Records from 2009 onwards (227 FT)

(6)

Scaling up – Graph of Enlighten’s Growth

(7)

Adding Funder Data

• New Funding option in the deposit workflow

• Use project data from the Research System but only includes projects marked as

"publicity yes“ – Library staff will check.

• New Research Funder browse view

• Funder data can be added with a new autocomplete field

(8)
(9)
(10)

New Funder Compound Field

• Project Code / Award Number

• Project Name

• Principal Investigator (and co-investigators)

• Funder /Funder Code

• Department

(11)
(12)
(13)

Workflow Changes and Challenges

• Identifying the funder and the paper

(14)

Find out more

Project Web and Blogs

• http://www.gla.ac.uk/enrich • http://enlightenrepository.wordpress.com • http://researchoutcomes.wordpress.com Contact us • William Nixon w.j.nixon@lib.gla.ac.uk @williamjnixon • Lesley Drysdale l.drysdale@itservices.gla.ac.uk

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

(2009) “The Design and Realisation of the myExperiment Virtual Research Environment for Social Sharing of Workflows,” Future Generation Computer Systems 25, pp. (2009)

The need for easy deposit in the institutional repository at the University of Oxford has prompted the development of a registry and tools to support research information

Users (search) Blue Pages Internal External Users (re-use) ORA Registry Websites Other uses Content providers Dispersed Technical expertise Maintenance &

Many specialised Virtual Research Environments (VREs) (Fraser, July 2005) that integrate digital repositories with tools and services to work with the data in them have been

Context: scholars, data, research D4Science and gCube?.

Through a series of surveys conducted by the national repository support service, CAIRSS (the CAUL Australian Institutional Repository Support Service), this paper examines

– Publish My Data (people to machine) – Register My Data (machine to machine) – Identify My Data (persistent identifiers)?. •

We propose certain measurements to improve publishing of research data and other research output linked to the underlying grey literature resulting in a better visibility and