• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

WP3 – Analysis and Monitoring of NAP implementation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Aktie "WP3 – Analysis and Monitoring of NAP implementation"

Copied!
11
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

WP3 – Analysis and Monitoring of NAP implementation

Angela Wroblewski, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna

ERAC Workshop, Subgroup 2: Options for a simpler and coherent monitoring of ERA National Action Plans

Brussels, 5 December 2018

05 / 12 / 18

(2)

GENDERACTION

GENDERACTION is an innovative policy community

set to advance gender equality in R&I and the implementation of the gender priority in the

European Research Area at national, European and international levels until 2020 and beyond

foster policy coordination, best practice exchange and mutual learning

bringing together representatives appointed by national authorities in Member States and

Associated Countries

(3)

GENDERACTION AT A GLANCE

05 / 12 / 18 GENDer equality in the ERA Community To Innovate policy implementation

Horizon 2020 project funded in the SwafS-19-2016 call Project duration: 48 months , 01 / 04 / 2017 – 31 / 03 / 2021 Budget of 1,949,400 EUR

13 project partners (CZ, AT, CY, DE, EL, ES, LU, MT, SI, SK, BA, TR) and 5 Associate Partners (BE, IS, PO, RO, SE)

Project activities:

— Map and analyse Members States’ progress towards implementation of gender equality in R&I through national ERA action plans and strategies

— Deliver training events to build consistent and professional capacity in gender equality in R&I among responsible national representatives and Horizon 2020 National Contact Points

— Provide mutual learning opportunities to maximize existing experience among policy makers and other relevant stakeholders

— Prepare policy briefs on advancing gender equality in the ERA

— Build new collaborations to advance gender equality in international cooperation in science, technology and innovation

(4)

CONTRIBUTION OF WORK PACKAGE 3

Developing a methodology to measure progress in the implementation of priority 4 gender equality and gender mainstreaming

‒ Mapping, benchmarking and identification of best practices

‒ Methods and indicators to measure progress in priority 4

‒ Assessment of priority 4 implementation

Contribute to capacity building - consistent and professional capacity to implement priority 4 Support consistency between national gender equality strategies in R&I and Horizon 2020

Address the imbalance between the proactive and

relatively inactive countries in Europe

(5)

DATA SOURCES &

OUTCOMES

05 / 12 / 18

Data sources

‒ Documents (NAPs or equivalent strategies)

‒ Standardised survey regarding NAP implementation 27 countries participated; return rate of 82%

‒ Additional data collection regarding policies and measures

Outcomes

‒ First Report on NAP implementation and promising polices and measures

‒ Policy brief No 9 “Implementation of ERA priority 4. Gender Equality and Gender Mainstreaming in Research and

Innovation"

‒ Criteria for good practice NAPs and good practice policies

(6)

DIMENSIONS AND FOCUS OF ANALYSIS

Documents

‒ Gender concept used

‒ based on a context analysis

‒ 3 objectives addressed

‒ Concrete targets

‒ Concrete policies

Survey

‒ Reference of priority 4 to empirical evidence, national or EU legislation, R&I policies

‒ Additional information on concrete policies and targets

‒ Involvement of stakeholders in priority 4

‒ Links between priorities

(7)

RESULTS BASED ON DOCUMENTS

05 / 12 / 18

Gender concept

‒ 62% of NAPs do not contain a definition of gender/gender equality  Focus on women!

‒ 38% (8 NAPs) define gender equality through reference to EU/ERA 23 objectives or in an intersectional understanding

Context analysis

‒ 57% (12 NAPs) address all 3 objectives in context/gender analysis

‒ It is more likely that all 3 objectives are addressed when gender is defined

Interlinkages

‒ 10 NAPs contain interlinkages to other priorities

Objectives

‒ Most NAPs do not contain concrete objectives but a general

commitment to ERA strategy or a general objective

(8)

Stages of NAP implementation

22 21

14 14

13

0 5 10 15 20 25

NAP submitted Objectives Targets Measures Monitoring

(9)

Objectives and measures

Source: Survey on NAP implementation 05 / 12 / 18

19

11

13

19

8 8

15

6

3

10

1 1

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

objectives targets measures objectives targets measures objectives targets measures objectives targets measures

1. increasing share of women in R&I

2. structural change 3a. gender dimension in research content

3b. gender dimension in teaching

(10)

Differences between EU 15 and EU 13 countries

Different states of implementation

‒ Priority 4 first document on gender equality for 57% of EU13 countries and 25% of EU15 countries.

‒ Priority 4 is more often interlinked with other priorities in EU15 NAPs (39% vs 14%).

‒ EU15 NAPs more often contain concrete targets (53% vs 25%)

Different interpretation of gender equality

‒ Objective of structural change more present in EU15 countries.

Challenges regarding NAP development

‒ 50% of EU15 countries and 63% of EU13 countries faced

difficulties regarding the development of priority 4.

(11)

NEXT STEPS IN GENDERACTION

05 / 12 / 18

Assessment of NAPs and good practices based on criteria for good practice

Development of indicators measuring NAP implementation

‒ mirror stages of NAP implementation

‒ represent all 3 objectives

‒ focus on developments (e.g. switch between stages of implementation)

Implementation indicators should

‒ complement ERA progress indicators

‒ be useful in a comparative perspective and at national level

Discussion of a draft set of indicators in March 2019

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

The KOF indices of economic and social globalization (columns 3 and 4) are statistically significant at the 5% level and indicate that gender inequality as measured by the reversed

To this end, the program engages in a variety of research activities in subjects relevant to the field of cyberspace, including: development of a national defense concept

The main reason state officials give for virtually excluding CSOs from the implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of the NAP on 1325 in Serbia is the widespread opinion

The use of cyberspace as a primary warfare arena between enemies or hostile nations has always been fertile ground for fantasy and lurid scenes on the silver screen.

Ministry of Education and Science of Georgia developed the draft statute of bilingual education programmes for general education institutions. The schools are given an op- portunity

This policy brief draws out key areas of progress and other insights from 99 VNRs submitted between 2016 and 2018 (see Notes), particularly in relation to national governance

• Personal Assistant. The service includes permanent personnel care of 8 hours per day. Since 2010 the length has been reduced to 6 hours per day due to the financial restrictions

In the example of the Structural Funds these responses (or measures) are integration of gender perspective into programming documents, inclusion of relevant social partners into