• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

The Chilean Labor Market: Job Creation, Quality, Inclusiveness, and Future Challenges

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "The Chilean Labor Market: Job Creation, Quality, Inclusiveness, and Future Challenges"

Copied!
34
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Munich Personal RePEc Archive

The Chilean Labor Market: Job

Creation, Quality, Inclusiveness, and Future Challenges

Parro, Francisco and Reyes, Loreto

Finance Ministry of Chile

May 2013

Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/50755/

MPRA Paper No. 50755, posted 19 Oct 2013 18:01 UTC

(2)

! !

"# $

Abstract

% % & ' %' ' (

) ' ' ) * "# #( !

* % + * , * ) )

) '% ' % % ' ) %

'% ' ( - ) ' ! ' )

% ! % ' ! ! +

* ( . ) ) % *

! % /% ! ! ' + %

( 0 ) ! ' + ' '%

! ! ( 1 + ! %

(

Keywords: Labor Markets, Inequality, Skills JEL Classification: J21; J31; J24

' ) % % ! ' % ! 23 4 ( - ) .

5 4 6 ! ! '' ( % 7

' !% 8 ( ( 9 ( : 8 ( ( 9 ( :(

(3)

"

( Overview of the Chilean labor market

1.1 Job creation

' ' % '% ' ) (

'% ' ! % ' )

;(<= "# " %% ) % 9<(>=: ! > ( ?

! ' @ A ! 5 % !

'% ' ;;#(

% ! ' ! ' ! * (

2 ' "($ ' ) * "### ! ) '

' ' (

#

"

>

<

B

#

"

>

%

Figure 1: Unemployment Rate (%), 199032012

5 A ! 5 ! ( A ' ;;# "##< ) A 3'% ' 5 93A3:

! ' "# # "# " ) A ) A 3'% ' 5 9A3A3: (

(4)

$

.% "# # A ! 5 % A 3'% ' 5

93A3: ) ! ;;< ) A ) A 3'% ' 5

9A3A3:( ) '' % % 23 4

2 & 9 2: ?(5( C ! 5 ' ! )

) ) ' ' % !

' '% ' '% ' ! @ ) !

) % '% ( . !

' ' A3A3@ % '

% % ! '% '% )

) traditional nontraditional '% (

' A3A3 '

/ ! ' ) ( 0 ) '

'% ' * ' ) !

(

3'% ' ? '% ' 5 ? !

' "##D( )

'% ' 5 ! ' #(B= ! + ! "# # E("=

! + ! "# "( ) ' % $"< < B

) * ) ( 5 ' ! ' A3A3 ) '% '

98,613 54,008

102,428 218,014

77,834 303,987

101,518

177,004192,693

348,966 537,996

356,523

138,675

7 E# ###

7E# ###

E# ###

E# ###

"E# ###

$E# ###

>E# ###

EE# ###

"### "## "##" "##$ "##> "##E "##< "##D "##B "##; "# # "# "# "

Figure 2: Job Creation, 200032012

5 A ! 5 ! 9"# #:( A ' "### "##B ) A 3'% ' 5 93A3:

! ' "# # "# " ) A ) A 3'% ' 5 9A3A3: (

(5)

>

! ' ;(>= <(>= ! ">< D$" ) * ' % (

' ! ' A3A3 ? !

@ ( $ > ) 7 ' ! ) '% '

'% ' ! ' ? ! @ ( -

' '

' ( ! ) *

) '% '

A3A3(

#

"

>

<

B

#

"

>

<

%

Figure 3: Unemployment Rate (%), 199032012

5 3'% ' ? '% ' 5 ? ! ( A ' ;;# ;;< ) %

'% ' ! 4 ' ( ' ;;D "# # ) % '% ' !

5 % ' 4 ' (

(6)

E

E '% * ' ) 23 4 ' (

! ) '% ' ! ! % ' ! 23 4

( ! !

'% ' ! ( < )

! '% ' ! % % ) E "> ( .

) ! ! / ) '% '

( ' ) ! ' )

' % /% ' ! ' '

! '% ' ! % ' (

32,286

35,502 38,768 47,960

98,963 70,904

95,199

55,995

19,754

359,005 113,305

103,288 73,125

7B# ###

7<# ###

7># ###

7"# ###

#

"# ###

># ###

<# ###

B# ###

## ###

"# ###

># ### Figure 4: Job Creation, 200032012

5 3'% ' ? '% ' 5 ? ! ( A ' ;;# ;;< ) !

4 ' ! ' ;;D "# # ) ! 5 % ' 4 ' (

(7)

<

7E # E # E "#

1 3 5 4 '

5 %

0

? 5

A / / '

. 5) &

% F

%

Figure 5: Differential Unemployment Rate before the Crisis and Its Last Value (%), Q4 2007 3 Q4 2012

5 23 4Short Term Indicators Database9 7 !! .% D "# $:( A " "##D ! 5) & (

(8)

D

1.2 Job quality

A3A3 !! ! !

% '% ' ( ) & ' !

) + * ! % "# # "# "( . D ) ! ' !

+ ! "# # + ! "# " B#B ;$$ ) * ) ("- &

+ ! * !! ! + (

" ! + ! "# # + ! "# " 4 ' "# "

"# $(

7E # E # E "# "E $# $E >#

5%

5 A ) G

3 9 D :

3 % ? 9"D : 4 '

? 5

A A ) .

F 1 '

%

Figure 6: Differential Youth Unemployment Rate before the Crisis and Its Last Value (%), Q4 20073 Q4 2012

5 23 4Short Term Indicators Database9 7 !! .% D "# $:( A " "##D ! 5) & (

(9)

B

. ! ' ) ' ! ) * % %

* ( - ! % * ) ) ) '%

' % % ' ) % '% '

( C ) "# # "# " B"> <>$ ) % * ) (

!! ) ' ! ) * 9B#B ;$$: ' ! %

) * 9B"> <>$: % /% '%

* ' ! ! % * E D #

) "# # "# "( ' ' !

% * '% 9

B:(

6,925,551

7,734,484

< >## ###

< <## ###

< B## ###

D ### ###

D "## ###

D >## ###

D <## ###

D B## ###

Q1 2010 Q4 2012

Figure 7: Job Creation, Q1 2010 3 Q4 2012

808,933 <ew Jobs

5 A ) A 3'% ' 5 9A3A3:( A "# # > "# "

4 ' "# " "# $(

(10)

;

' % % ! ! '% ' ! '

% ( . ! ! A ! 5

% % ) % 7 ' * ) ) $# ! ) % )

) ) ) ' '' / E ( 2!

B#B ;$$ ) * <<B $D; ! 7 ' * B# ED; % 7 '

* 9 ) ) ) ) ' :( 2

% 7 ' * 9 '% ' : ># #"E * 9 ;:(

3,414,025 3,511,526

4,238,668

3,495,816

# E## ###

### ###

E## ###

" ### ###

" E## ###

$ ### ###

$ E## ###

> ### ###

> E## ###

) ) %

'% ' % '

'% ! %

Figure 8: Composition of the Protected Job Creation, Q1 2010 3 Q4 2012

"# # > "# "

5 A ) A 3'% ' 5 9A3A3:( A "# # > "# "

4 ' "# " "# $(

(11)

#

! '% ' 9* )

% ) '% % ) ! :

' ! ' A3A3 ' *

$>< #BD ) * (

/ '% ' ) *

) & ! '% ' ( &

' ) * 7 * %

! ! ' '% ' ( + ! "# " D<(E= !

) ) % '% '

! ( 7 ) ! D$(>= ) '

* ! ! ' ) !

! '% ) * ) % )

'% '% / 9 #:(

5,716,790

475,371 733,390

6,385,169

655,950 693,365

#

### ###

" ### ###

$ ### ###

> ### ###

E ### ###

< ### ###

D ### ###

7 ' ) 6 % 7 ' ) % 7 ' ) 9 7

'% ' :

Figure 9: Distribution of job creation according to full and part3time work, Q1 2010 3 Q4 2012

"# # > "# "

5 A ) A 3'% ' 5 9A3A3:( A "# # 7 7 > "# "

4 ' "# " 7 "# $(

(12)

2 >(>= ! ) ) * '% ) >("=

! 7 ) % 7 ' ) ) '%

% !! ) % 9 :(

694,916

3,401,768

213,333

1,230,788

# E## ###

### ###

E## ###

" ### ###

" E## ###

$ ### ###

$ E## ###

> ### ###

Outsourced jobs <on3outsourced jobs

Figure 10: Quality of Outsourced and <on3Outsourced Jobs, Q4 2012

- % '% ' % '

4 '% ! %

5 A ) A 3'% ' 5 9A3A3:( A "# # > "# "

4 ' "# " "# $(

(13)

"

"(

Inclusiveness of job creation

. '% ) * ( - & '

'% ' ! % ) % %

' ( % ) ) & ! % % ! ) '

% % ' % (

Women

" % ! ! ' ! % % !

23 4 9 / : ! ' ;;< "# ( - !

% % ! ) ' E <> 23 4 "##"(

' ' % (

3.5% 4.9%

4.4% 4.2%

92.1% 90.9%

#=

#=

"#=

$#=

>#=

E#=

<#=

D#=

B#=

;#=

##=

Outsourced jobs <on3outsourced jobs

Figure 11: Distribution of employment according to full and partial job, Q4 2012

6 % 7 ' ) % 7 ' ) 9 7 '% : 7 ' )

(836,223) (4,211,788)

(40,347) (31,679)

(194,478) (226,290)

5 A ) A 3'% ' 5 9A3A3:( A "# # > "# "

4 ' "# " "# $(

(14)

$

- ) & ! ' % % ! !! % ) '

' 23 4 ( % ! ) ' ) "E $;

% ) 23 4 * B % (

#

#

"#

$#

>#

E#

<#

D#

%

Figure 12: Female Labor Force Participation Rate (%), 199632011

Chile OECD excluding Chile

5 23 4 5 73/ ( A 5 "##" % % ! 23 4

/ (

(15)

>

(16)

E

4 % ! ! ' ! % %

23 4 ) ! ' 23 4 ' ( %

! ) ' ! (

% % % ' '% ' %

! ) ' @ ' ( .' % '

'% ' ) ! )

3/ ! ' / ' ! ) ) ' /

' % "> ) ! ' ' ! ! 7 ' % 7 ' ) (

5 ) ' @ ) ! ! ) ' )

"E E; ) ' $#= ! % % )

% % ' ( ' ! '

' ! ) % ' ! %

(

4 "# " "# $ ) %

' + "E ### ) E < % ) !

% ( . ' '

"# > ! ) > < ) ' <#= !

% % % 9 ) $ ' >

: # ### ) % % ! "# $ "# >(

5 4 %' ' ! ) ' 5 '

% ' ! ! %' ! )

) ' ) B EE % ' (

5 % ' ' % ' ! ' ! % %

! @ ' %' ) '

% % ' ( ! /% 7 '

) ' @ ! % % (

' ) ! ' %' %

' ! ' ' ! ( - ' % '%

* % '

) ( C ' ! % !

' % ' ) ' %' % '

%% ! ) ' ' (

. ) @ % !

( 0 ) %% ! ' ! ) ' '

' ' /% ( 2 ! !

' + ! ) ( ' ! ) '

(17)

<

( 7 7 !! ) + + ! !

' C ) 9 ;D$: ) ) ' ! '

' ) ' % % ' )

' ! ) ' (

. ! ! !! (

. ' !! !

% ' ( / '% '

! ! ' ' ! ' ' ( ! !

) ' ! ' ) (

' ) (

. 1 ) 5 H 9"##E: ' %% !

! ! & ! ' ) ) ) ' % ' '

) ' ' (

! % /% ) ) '

' % ) ' ! ) ' '

% % ' ' ! '% ) '

(

! ! ) ' %' /% 7 '

) ' @ ! % % ( !

% ' I ) /% ! ! '

' ! ( '% ' ' %' !

% ! % ' '% ' !

) ' @ ! % % ! ' " $(

Young workers

C ! ;;; '% ' 9 E7"> : ) ' 23 4 (

> '% ' ;;;

) ! ' 23 4 ( ! '% '

) ' ' ' ) ) ;;B "###(

E ) ' ! ' ' ' ) ) ;;< "# "(

(18)

D

# E

# E

"#

"E

%

Figure 14: Youth Unemployment Rate (%), 199632011

23 4 /

5 23 4 5 73/ ( A 5 "##" '% ' ! 23 4

/ (

2.6 3.6

7.4 8.5

6.9

1.8 3.3

0.5 3.1

3.6

2.1 3.8

1.5 0.7

2.7 2.6 2.9

#

"

$

>

E

<

D B

;

%

Figure 15: Real Growth of Minimum Wage, 199632012

5 A ! 5 ! 9"# #:(

(19)

B

H '% ' ' "##$( ' "##$ "##D )

) ) ( % ' %

'% ' ) "##;( 5

' /% '% '

+ ! ' ) ( H '% ' )

! $ (

Vulnerable groups

. /% '% ' ' %

'% ' ! ' ( ? '% ' % !

% ' ( 0 ) ' "##;

'% ' ! % / "##<

) ;;<(

# E

# E

"#

"E

;;# ;;" ;;> ;;< ;;B "### "##$ "##< "##; "#

%

Figure 16: Unemployment Rate of the Most Vulnerable Groups, 199032011

" .

5 5 ' & 5 9 .53A:(

(20)

;

$( Social inclusion, poverty and education: Three faces of the same problem

3.1 Economic growth, demand for skills, and income inequality

3 ' ) ! !! ' (

! ) ) ) ! ) % %

' ' ( 5% ! ' ) ' !

' ) ( . ' ! ) ' %

! ( ! ' ) '

! !! % ) %

' + (

. % ) ' ! (

! ' ! ' ' ! ' ' ! ( 1

' ' ) 7 %

' ! ( % % % C F

9"# ": ' & ) % !

' % ' ! ' )

?(5( ' (

. '% '

7 ( '% ' % ! '

) ) ' ! % ! ) (

7 skill biased technological change ' F &

% 9 ;;":I C ' C 9 ;;>:I C * ' F & 9 ;;D:I . ' 9"##":( 1 9"# ": '

) ' ) (

. ! ) ' %' !!

' ! !! % ! ) & ( .

' 5 % 75 ' !! % %

% ) % & ) % '

) ) % ) % & +

) ( ' % ! ' ' ! )

% % (

0 ) % ! 5 % 7

5 ' !! ( ! capital skill complementarity ) ' %

' '% ' ' ) ( - ' '% !

% % ! ' ) +

' ! ) ( % ! % 7

'% ' %% '% ' ) ! F 2

7 6 9"###:( % % 9"# ":

'% ! ' / ! % 7 '% ' ' (

. % ! % ! ' )

' ! ) ( . ! % %

(21)

"#

! %% )I ! , % !

) % ' ' ' ( 0 ' +

) ' ' ) ( ' )

! ' ) '

% ! ! ! ' ' ) ( ) %

(

' + ' 9 :

' '

( % ) '% ' % )

)7 ' ! % %

! ! ' ) ( / '% ! % '

+ ;B# ;;# 91 "# ": ' + !

) ' ! % % ' 5 % 9"# :(

. 23 4 % $ ) ' ! % )

"(>= ) ' ! ("=(

. ! ' 5 ' 0 5 9 .53A: )

' ( - ) ' !

% ) 9

D:(

$23 4 9"# :(

30.3

28.1

30.9 33.0

35.4

31.6

34.4

31.3

46.2

35.6

26.9 25.1

27.7 28.7 29.0

27.6 27.3

23.9 25.9

22.6

# E

# E

"#

"E

$#

$E

>#

>E E#

Figure 17: Index 10/10, 199032011

/ #J # 9. ' ' : / #J # 9 ' :

5 5 ' 0 5 9 .53A:( A . ' ' ) ! '

!7 '% ' !7% ! % ) '

% ) )K ! % ! ( ' ' ' ! '

% ' (

(22)

"

B % ' ) ! % ! ' ;;# "#

.53A (> . ) % "##;7"# '

' E /% '% % % (

' % ' ' < ) % '%

/% "##$7"##< % ! ' %

;;#7 ;;"(

. ; % / "#J"# ! % % ' ( . !

) ) ' ! % +

" 9 / % % "###7"##E: )

' (

> '% ' ! !! ) /% '% ' ! !

! '% @ ' / ! A ' ! ( / '% ! ;;#7

;;" % ) /% ' ! ;;# ' ! ;;" 9=: )

! (

E ) ! ' !7 '% ' !7% ! %

) ' % ) )K ! % ! (

< ' ' ! '

% ' (

21.0

32.7

16.9

39.8

16.2

312.6

8.1

326.2

26.0 20.1

32.8

10.6

4.4

9.0

33.7

11.9

0.9

11.3

7$#

7"#

7 #

#

#

"#

$#

%

Figure 18: Income Growth Rate of the Poorest Households (1 Decile), 199032011

. ' ' 6 9=: ' 6 9=:

5 5 ' 0 5 9 .53A:( A . ' ' ) ! ' !7

'% ' !7% ! % ) ' %

) )K ! % ! ( ' ' ' ! '

% ' (

(23)

""

"# % ' ' ) ! !

"##< "# .53A ( . ! ) "##; "#

' ) ! ! /% ' ) '%

"##<7"##; % ( ' ) !

! ' ;(>= "##<7"##; 7$("= "##;7"# (

13.8 13.4

14.3

12.7

11.2

#

"

>

<

B

#

"

>

<

Figure 19: Per Capita Labor Income Index 20/20, 199032012

5 ' 5 ! 5 ? ! (

326.2

26.0

9.4

33.2

7$#

7"#

7 #

#

#

"#

$#

200632009 200932011

%

Figure 20: Autonomous Growth Rate for 1st and 10th decile, 200632011

4 # 4

5 5 ' & 5 9 .53A:(

(24)

"$

! ) ' +

( ' 7 ' % % ! '

) % ! '% ) % )

! ' % 9 ) % ! : '%

! ! + (

0 ) 7 ' ! ' %'

) % ! ' ' (

! % ( ! )

! ' % ! + % !

! ! ' % ( ) %

) % %

D7 ; ) ' 7 ' (

% / ! '

' ) ) ' % %

' ) ! ' ( 0 % '

' ' ) % ' '% '

! ' ' ) ' ) 7 '

% ( . ) ' * '% ' !

% (

! ' ' ) '

' '% %% ! ' % % '%

( ' )

' ( % '%

! + I ) ) ! %%

) ' !! ' ' ) % !

' ' ' (

% ! ) ' ! % ' ' )

' % % % ! (

. !

) ' ! ( 5 % ! % '

' ) ' (

3.2 Education: Policies and key trends

4 ' ' ! !!

@ ! ' )

' ( .' ' % % '

' ) ! )

'% ' % 7 "#

' 5 % 3 L 5 % &

(

(25)

">

! 5 % . 3 L

! % % ' '% )

!

' ' ( . 5 % ) %

' '% ) !

!! ) % ' ' (

% ' % % ! . '

+ + ! %% ( .

. ' ! ' ! ' % ! ' !

' % '% ! %

% ! ' (

'% ' % ! . ! "# $ !

3 ' ' & % !

) ! ' ) ! !

% '( . 9"# " : )

' ) !! ! ' )

@ ' ' ) %

' ! % ( 2 %

) /% )

' '% @ % ! ' '( 2

% ! / ! !

% ) % ( ! ! / ) '

) % !

) % ( /% )

( /

) + ' ! ) ) ) %

) ' / ' ! ' ' ! )

@ % ! ' '(

' ' ' ) ! ! )

% ! ' ) '(

' ! ! 5 5

"##B ' '

'% + ! % 7

7 ! 5

5 95 L 3 ! :(

'% ! % ! ' ' ' !

' '% ' ! '

% ! ' ( . ' %

) 7% ' ( . 9"# " : '

! 5 5 % ! !! &

'% ! !

' % ! ' ) ! ' (

4 "# " ' ' ! ' !

! 5 5 ( ' !

(26)

"E

! ! / ) + & ) !

% ! ( . !

! ' ) ! ) (

2 ! ' @ '

% % ! ) E <

' <#= ! % % ! ) '

/% "# >( "# " "# $

' ' "E ### % ( .

! $ ' > ' /%

' # ### % "# $ "# >( '

' ! ) ' )

) # " ( % & / )

' ) ) # " (

' ! % ! ! '

<#= ! % % "# " ! ! ' '

% % ' ' 7 )

) ! "B# ### ) ' !

) ! ! ' % "# ( . )

' ) !! + '

% ) ! '

9 5 L ? :(

! ' ' ! % 7 "# "

' ' ' ! % 7

' M . 3 ( .

% ' ) @ ' !

) ' / ' ' % ' % ! B# ' ( .

) ! ' <= "= ) '% %% / ' >#=

' % ' ' ! ! '

(

% ) )

) ' (

" 7 ) % ! % % ) $# $> )

% ' 23 4 /

( . ) % @ 23 4 % !

% ' ) % ) 23 4

' (

(27)

"<

" " ) % ! ) $# $> )

( . ! ) /

23 4 (

26.4

48.6

60.5

66.0 63.1

57.2 59.8 61.9

62.9 64.5 65.5 65.0 65.8 66.0 66.9 66.9

#

#

"#

$#

>#

E#

<#

D#

B#

%

Figure 21a: Percentage of 303 to 343Year3Olds with Completed Primary Education, 197532010

23 4 /

5 C 9! ' :(

7.9

20.9

34.4

41.2

44.7 42.6

47.6

51.9

31.6

39.1 41.8

48.0

51.7 54.4 57.4 58.8

#

#

"#

$#

>#

E#

<#

D#

%

Figure 21b: Percentage of 303 to 343Year3Olds with Completed Secondary Education, 197532010

23 4 /

5 C 9! ' :(

(28)

"D

' ' % )

' ) % ( -

1 !! ! ! % % ) "E $E

.53A ( . ) ! ' "" #

+ ! ( . ) %

' ! % ' %% '

+ % ' ) '

D7 ;(

3.1

5.1

8.6

11.0 11.2 10.9

14.5 13.8

8.3

10.7

11.9

13.2

14.7

16.6

19.7

18.4

# E

# E

"#

"E

%

Figure 21c: Percentage of 303 to 343Year3Olds with Completed Tertiary Education, 197532010

23 4 /

5 C 9! ' :(

#(##

#(#E

#( #

#( E

#("#

#("E

Figure 22: Gini Coefficient: Years of Schooling for 253 to 353Year3Olds, 199032011

5 5 ' & 5 .53A(

(29)

"B

3.3 The boom in the education of women

3 ' ) * ) ' ! ) ' !

!! ( - ) %% )

% ) ! ' % ( . "$ 7

) % $E ( )

'% % ' % ! ) ' ) $# $>

% ! ' ' ) !

% !

! ! ) ' ( ' ) ' ' '

'% $E ( ! % % ) ) '

! ) ' 9 C 0 % "# # "# ":(

'% ! % ' ' ) ' !

) ' ( ) ' +

' ' (

46.3 48.4

60.6

66.1

63.2

56.6

59.8

62.4

48.8 48.7

60.5

65.9

62.9

57.8

59.7 61.3

#

#

"#

$#

>#

E#

<#

D#

%

Figure 23a: Percentage of 303 to 343Year3Olds with Completed Primary Education by Gender, 197532010

'

5 C 9! ' :(

(30)

";

3.4 Summary

' ' ) ' ) '

% !! !! ! ' '% ' %% ( -

% ! % ) % / % %

% ! ! ' ' ) (

19.2 20.9

34.6

41.3

44.9

42.0

48.2

52.9

21.67 20.98

34.28

41.16

44.59 43.12

47.08

50.84

#

#

"#

$#

>#

E#

<#

%

Figure 23b: Percentage of 303 to 343Year3Olds with Completed Secondary Education by Gender, 197532010

'

5 C 9! ' :(

1.9

3.7

7.6

10.4 10.6

10.1

14.1 14.0

6.62 6.60

9.61

11.66 11.75 11.72

14.94

13.61

#

"

>

<

B

#

"

>

<

%

Figure 23c: Percentage of 303 to 343Year3Olds with Completed Tertiary Education by Gender, 197532010

'

5 C 9! ' :(

(31)

$#

2 % ' ' ) '

'

To have a more educated workforce '% %

' % ( . A & ) ' 0 '

' ' % ' !! (

% % ' ' ) ' + (

To facilitate the incorporation of women into the labor market

' ! ' %' %

! ) ' ! ( / '% ;E# $#= ! ) '

% % ! ( ' E#= ! ) ' (

- ! ) / % ) ' ' )

' ! ) ' ' ' )

% ( ! ' %' ' '% '

) % ! ) ' @ ' (

To make the labor market more flexible - ' ! ' ' !

%% ' ' 9 ( ( :(

'% ' % ' ' ' ! / (

/ '% ) ' ! ! ) ! ! '

) ) '% ( ! / )

) ! ) ' @ '

'% '% ' ' ' (

>( Unemployment benefits and employment protection

4 % ' % /% '

! ' ) ! * ! '% '

% ' ! ' (

! ' '% ' ! '% ' % (

"##" '% ' ) '% ' '

' % ! ' % 7! ! (

' ' ! ' !

! ' ) 9#(<= ! ) : '% 9"(>= ! ) (<=

) @ #(B=

! : 9 %% / ' ?5N E ' %

! :( '% ' ' !

' ' ! '% ) ) ! ) '% '

'% '% ' ( '

& % ) '% ' ' / ' ' ! ! '

) ) ) ' % ' ( . ! 4 ' "# " D(E '

) ) '(

(32)

$

. "# " 23 4 % ! ' ) ' ! ' '

'% ' ) + '% '

! 923 4 "# ":( ' ! ) ) ' /%

'% ' % 9! / '% ) ! / 7 ' )7)

: /% % ) % '

) ' ' ' ! ! '

' ( . '% 23 4 / )

% ' <# ' ( % 23 4 % ! !

) ! !! ) ' ( .

% 23 4 % ) ) '% '

% ' ( % % ! ' % ! ) )

'% ' %% / ' BE=

' ! ' ! !

!! ! ! !! * ( "#

! '% % ! ' '% '

% ! ( ' ) ! '

'% ' ' !

'% ) (

'% ' % '

! ! ) ( % '

'% >= '

! % ## ### ) "# E

! % . 1 ' (

' '' !

9 ' M : ! 5 ! 0 -

9 * % 5 5 * :

2 % 5 ! C 9 5 : (

' ! 2 A ( BD )

) ! ' ) ! % ' ! ! ) % ( . !

' ! ' E(> = "# # >(BB= "# "(

. ! % '% ' '

'' ! >= "# E(

. '% ' % '% ' ! !

'% ) % ) ' @ ( "# )

' ' ! ' !

! ' ) ! ) )

% (

(33)

$"

References

. ' 4 9"##":( O + (P Journal

of Economic Literature># D7D"(

C 7- 9! ' :( O. A ) 4 5 ! 3

. ' - ;E#7"# #(PJournal of Development Economics(

C 1 5( 0( 1 ) 9 ;D$:( O2 C )

! (PJournal of Political EconomyB 5"D;75"BB(

C 1 5( - ' 0( ( 0 F ( % 9"# #:( O3/%

- ) C ' 0 3 ! - ' (P - % "# #7#;(

C ' 3 C 5 % 9 ;;>:( O '% ! 5 7C

3 (P Quarterly Journal of Economics $

">E7B#(

C * 1 ( C( ' ) ( F & 9 ;;D:( O0 ) 4

'' .!! 2 ' QP Brookings Papers on Economic

Activity 7;#(

C ( % ( F 9"# ":( O ! 5 3 ' (P

American Economic Review #" 92 : "E>#7<;(

9"# ":( O % 5 '% '

4 % 4 QP ! ! - % (

9"# " :( O 3!! ! 6

. ' . ' 3 ! ' @ 6 '(P

! ! - % (

9"# " :( O5 !75 !

(P ! ! - % (

1 .( 9"# ":( O5 ' ' 5 5 ?%

5 (PWorld Development># 9$: E;>7<#;(

1 ) ' . 5 ' H 9"##E:( O3 !

(PReview of Economic StudiesD" 9 : #;7$$(

F & ) ( F ( % 9 ;;":( O - ;<$7

;BD 5 %% 4 ' (PQuarterly Journal of Economics #D 9 : $E7DB(

(34)

$$

F 3( 2 76 7 1 ( 6 9"###:(

O % 75 '% ' + . ' . (P

Econometrica<B 9E: #";7E$(

A ! 5 ! 9"# #:( (ew (ational Employment Survey, Methodological and Conceptual Manual: Sampling Design( A ! 5

.% (

23 4 9"# :( An Overview of Growing Income Inequalities in OECD Countries: Main Findings(

23 4 9"# ":(OECD Economic Surveys Chile( (

9"# ":( O 3 1 1 % 3

5 / 4 . && . ) (PJournal of Human Capital< 9": E#7BE(

5 % ( 9"# :( Chile: ¿Más equitativo? 5 3 ( ? L (

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

But it does imply that the focus of the surveying profession is changing from being very much related to doing measurements to now being increasingly related to management of

A more recent example was the convergence of genomics and information technology (IT), which resulted in the relatively quick sequencing of the complete human genome.

The current paralysis in the Doha Round is arguably hampering the ability of the multilateral trading system to respond and adapt to emerging global trade and sustainable

Note: GCL: Chinese government concessional loans, PCB: preferential buyer's credits, BC: buyer's credits, CDB: China Development Bank loans, HSBC: Hongkong and.. Shanghai

Furthermore, GAINS-Vietnam describes the atmospheric transport and chemical conversion of emissions across five regions, in order to assess the impacts of emission control

Integrating the approaches of the WorldQual model (and also other global models, see Figure 2) with our global multi-pollutant model will allow to have water quality information on

To address these challenges, blockchain technology is used because it offers immutable storage of records that improve data handling transparency and can host executable codes

My name is Dr Patricia Lewis, I am the research director here for international security, and it’s my great honour and privilege to introduce to you today Mr Franco Frattini who