• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Tree phenology and carbon dioxide fluxes - use of digital photography for process-based interpretation at the ecosystem scale

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Tree phenology and carbon dioxide fluxes - use of digital photography for process-based interpretation at the ecosystem scale"

Copied!
14
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

source: https://doi.org/10.7892/boris.36390 | downloaded: 31.1.2022

(2)
(3)

(4)
(5)
(6)

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●●

●●●

●●

●●●

●●

● ●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

2006

2005 2007

15

10

5

0

0.42

0.38

0.34

30 20 10 0 –10

GP P ( µm o l m –2 s –1 ) Te m p er at u re (° C ) Green f rac tio n P re cip ita tio n ( m m )

20

60

40

(7)

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●●●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●●●●●●

●●●●

●●

●●●●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●

●●●●●●●

●●●●

●●●●

●●

●●

●●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●●●

●●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●

●●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

2006

2005 2007

20 15 10 5 0

0.50

0.42

0.34

20

60 40 30

20 10 0 –10

GPP ( µm o l m –2 s –1 ) Te m p er at ur e ( °C ) Gree n f rac tio n P re cip ita tio n ( m m )

(8)

110 130 150

Day of year Day of year

220 260 300 340

0.42

0.38

0.34

0.42

0.38

0.34

0.42

0.38

0.34

0.42

0.38

0.34 0.42

0.38

0.34

0.42

0.38

0.34

2005

2006

2007

2005

2006

2007

100 75 50 25 0

0 25 50 75 100

0 25 50 75 100

0 25 50 75 100 100

75 50 25 0

100 75 50 25 0

G reen f rac tio n G reen f rac tio n

Leaf d ev el o p m en t (% ) Le af se ne sc en e ( % )

(9)
(10)

● ●

LAE 2005

y = (− 11.3 ± 4.9) + (43.9 ± 12.3)* x R 2 = 0.48, p < 0.001

● ● ●

● ● ● ● ● ●

● ● ●

●●

● ● ● ●

● ● ● ●

● ●

●●

● ●

● ●

● ● ●

● ●

● ● ●

● ● ●

● ●

● ●●

●●

● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

● ●

● ●

0.36 0.44 0.52

12

8

4

0

12

8

4

0

12

8

4

0 12

8

4

0

12

8

4

0

GPP ( µm o l m –2 s –1 )

Green fraction

0.36 0.44 0.52

Green fraction

0.36 0.40 0.44

0.32

0.36 0.40 0.44

0.32

0.36 0.40 0.44

0.32

Green fraction

LAE 2006

y = (− 25.4 ± 4.1) + (83.2.9 ± 10.9)* x R 2 = 0.75, p < 0.001

HAI 2005

y = (− 8.5 ± 2.2) + (32.1 ± 5)* x R 2 = 0.57, p < 0.001

HAI 2006

y = (− 6.9 ± 1) + (26.3 ± 2.4)* x R 2 = 0.84, p < 0.001

LAE 2007

y = (− 16.7 ± 2.4) + (59.8 ± 6.2)* x R 2 = 0.83, p < 0.001

●●●

●●●

●●●

●●●●

●●●

●●●●

●●●●

●●●

●●●

Day of year

a

●●

b c

●●●

●●●

●●●

●●●●

●●●●●●

●●●●

●●●

●●●●●

●●●

●●●

●●●●●●

●●●

●●●

●●●●●

●●●●

●●●

15

10

5

0

15

10

5

0

15

10

5

0

0

25

50 30

20

10

0

–10

80 120 160 200 80 120 160 200 80 120 160 200

G PP ( µm o l m –2 s –1 ) Te m p er at ur e ( °C ) P re cip ita tio n ( m m )

(11)

● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

●●

●●

● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

● ●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ● ●

●●

● ●

● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

●● ● ● ●

● ●●

● ●

● ●

● ●

●●

●●

Day of year

a b c

15

10

5

0

15

10

5

0

15

10

5

0

0

25

50 30

20

10

0

–10

80 120 160 200 80 120 160 200 80 120 160 200

GP P ( µm o l m –2 s –1 ) Te m p er at ur e ( °C ) P rec ip itat io n (m m )

(12)
(13)

(14)

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Table 2 and Figure 2 illustrate that the potential societal benefits (in terms of selected ES) provided by bioproductive land of the case study is considerably higher in

Under the assumption that a continuous increase in atmo- spheric carbon dioxide beyond a critical value, caused by the combustion of fossil fuel, will lead to irreversible and large

Also two thirds of the situations with contrary eddy-covariance–chamber flux directions (filled circles in Figure 5a) and the higher sink fluxes of the chamber

Through two years of eld campaigns at two typical croplands on the Korea Peninsula and careful data analysis, this study provides a comprehensive insight into the

Figure 2.9: Event spring hydrograph after a recharge event (Kiraly 1998, in Kovács et al. Figure 2.10: Two conceptual models with different hydraulic parameter fields suitable

Interacting effects of temperature, soil moisture and plant biomass production on ecosystem respiration in a northern temperate grassland... Seasonal and

The general structure of GaFiR contains two modules (Fig. 1): the GaFiR-Evapotranspiration module, which is used for ecosystem evapotranspiration (ET) data, and the

‘Measurements of CO2 and energy fluxes over a mixed hardwood forest in the mid-western United States’. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, vol. 2015): ‘Tree species diversity