• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Functional Analysis II – Problem sheet 11

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Functional Analysis II – Problem sheet 11"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Functional Analysis II – Problem sheet 11

Mathematisches Institut der LMU – SS2009 Prof. Dr. P. M¨uller, Dr. A. Michelangeli

Handout: 08.07.2009

Due: Tuesday 15.07.2009 by 1 p.m. in the “Funktionalanalysis II” box Questions and infos: Dr. A. Michelangeli, office B-334, michel@math.lmu.de Grader: Ms. S. Sonner – ¨Ubungen on Wednesdays, 4,30 - 6 p.m., room C-111

Exercise 29. Let T be a densely defined linear operator on a Hilbert space H. Denote by G(T) the graph of T and by G(T) its closure in H × H. Assume that T is closable, i.e., T admits a closed extension, and denote by T its closure. Prove that

G(T) = G(T).

Exercise 30. Let T be a densely defined linear operator on a Hilbert spaceH. Show that ρ(T)6=∅ T is closed.

(Hint: apply the Closed Graph Theorem to the resolvent (T−λ)−1.) Optional [freiwillig]: can you provide an example of anon-closed and densely defined T with empty resolvent?

Exercise 31. (This exercise proves Lemma 2.50 stated in the class.) Let d >1, integer, and s∈R, s>0. Prove that

H−s(Rd) = Hs(Rd).

1

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

This characterisation of the spectrum of A usually goes under the name of Weyl’s criterion: it says that the points of spec(A) are “almost eigenvalues”.. of A (i.e., Aϕ n ≈ λϕ n

(Hint: the natural way to proceed is to construct explicitly the approximating step function. To this aim, observe that the range of f can be covered by a finite and conveniently

Prove that, due to (∗∗), the limit operator defined in (∗) is unique (i.e., independent of the approximating sequence of simple functions one considers) and (∗∗) holds for

10.4) Prove that the operator-valued function R 3 t 7→ e tA is norm-continuous on R and Lipschitz norm-continuous on any bounded subset of R. Estimate such a constant.. 10.5) Prove

Compare this result to the general statement of the Weyl’s criterion (→ Exercise 3): actually that statement does not exclude that the whole Spec(A), not only Spec ess (A), might

1 This goes beyond the standard example of the Dirac measure, which is singular with respect to the Lebesgue measure, but not continuous (it is a pure point

(Hint: connect this problem with Exercise 19 above and use the thesis stated there. To be sure to have fixed all the details, check the role played in this construction by

Michelangeli, office B-334, michel@math.lmu.de